Livni and Liberman were also against referendum. Too bad. I don’t trust the politicians to decide. It is imperative that the people have the last say. Ted Belman
Op-ed: For some reason, Lapid prefers that a pile of politicians decide where Israel’s permanent borders should be set
Yair Lapid now knows that he can’t please all of the people all of the time. That’s what happens when decision-making replaces storytelling. That’s what happens when an unaccountable columnist becomes a scrutinized finance minister that needs to submit a prioritized budget. In a budget that called for cuts, Lapid had the choice of confronting corrupt union leaders or humiliating unemployed housewives and hard working middle class. He chose the latter, leaving the brunt of the new budget to be borne by ‘Riki Cohen’ and people of her social standing.
However, beyond the merits of Lapid’s budget, his most puzzling decision this week had nothing to do with budget or finance. It concerned national unity and Lapid’s bogus decision to refuse the backing of a referendum bill – a referendum intended to ratify Israel’s final borders once such demarcation is made possible.
Lapid’s opposition to the referendum is anti-democratic. Throughout his election campaign, Lapid presented a variety of positions on a number of different key public issues. Defining Israel’s national borders was not one of them. In fact, out of the 35 political parties that peddled for votes a few months ago, not one dared link the ill-conceived Oslo Accords or suggested borders to their political platform.
It is peculiar that Lapid and his party prefer that a pile of politicians decide where Israel’s permanent borders should be set, rather than bring such a paramount and almost irreversible matter to a referendum. Letting the public decide is simply the most democratic and right thing to do. There are not many standalone issues that need be brought to the public for referendum. Irreversible decisions concerning the demarcation of secure and just borders for Israel are such an issue. Other matters, such as the cost of cottage cheese or the middle class tax margin, can be addressed in periodically held elections.
Israel’s final national borders should be set after an in-depth national discussion. Political parties, NGOs and individuals should suggest the demarcation lines, based on security, social, economic, demographic, historical, national and international considerations. Following extensive deliberations and public discourse a transparent and democratic vote should be held by means of referendum. This process is not perfect, but it’s preferable to general elections that address a wide range of issues.
The recipe for referendum proposed by the Supreme Court of Canada when reconsidering the separation of Quebec from Canada, should serve Israel well. In a paramount decision taken after two very volatile referendums, the Supreme Court of Canada held that such a vital and almost irreversible decision should require “a clear majority votes on a clear question” (Judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada – Reference re Secession of Quebec, 1998 – 2 S.C.R. 217). In other words, the question presented to the people must be unambiguous so that voters know exactly what they are voting for – and the majority should be substantial – say two thirds of the voters – so that the results will be unquestionable.
Almost all internationally recognized borders came to be as a direct result of war. Israel does not need another war, certainly not a civil war. When choosing between war and referendum, the latter clearly prevails. Israel needs to form a national consensus concerning its final borders, and after six and a half decades of independence to finally set the nation’s borders.
The referendum result will set a consensus backed border for Israel. Red lines, from which no government will be entitled to withdraw from and for which the lion’s share of Israelis are willing to fight for.
Canadian Otter Said:
WOW!!!!!
@ yamit82:
This is so true, the Bolsheviks don’t want the people to have any say so. That’s why they banned Rabbi Meir Kahane and had him murdered because he called for a national referendum on numerous issues. Abba Eban even had the arrogance to say that direct elections for prime minister are “anti democratic”. This is also why they come up with lame excuses for why representative government where each district would have its own directly elected Knesset Member supposedly won’t work in Israel because the country is too small. They don’t want accountability and want the power for themselves.
Lapid decision surprising at best, shocking at worst! It means that he, as a citizen, would not want to be consulted for what might be the single most important decision ever for the state of IL!! This would then imply that a consensus already exists for IL regardless of which party is in charge of the country. That does not seem to be the case!
Another impressive picture: photographer captured the moon, planet Venus, a flock of birds, and a storm cloud, all in one beautiful snapshot. http://io9.com/as-the-storm-breaks-the-moon-and-venus-converge-504792076 – I couldn’t resist, I had to share this with you.
@ yamit82:
OOPS! Thank you Yamit for letting me know. So here it goes, with my apologies to all of you. Northern Lights – http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2323331/Photographer-braves-37C-temperatures-months-capture-star-trails-Rocky-Mountains.html
And a bonus: Canada’s ice tsunami a couple of days ago – http://io9.com/freak-ice-tsunami-crunches-homes-in-canada-504411441
All politicians are afraid of the people. That’s why they never speak the truth. If they told the truth to the people they would never be elected in the first place.
Politicians in democracies always cater to the lowest common denominator and these days the denominator is very low. People vote and support for what they want to hear and back those parties and politicians who offer them the most.
@ Canadian Otter:
Cute otter but you doubled up on the otter link. I want to see the lights. 😀
BEAUTIFUL PICTURES – Northern lights – photographer waited for months to capture these perfect moments – http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2270471/Im-ready-close-Shutter-shy-otter-finally-warms-camera-intense-primping-session.html
And one of my relatives, a shy Washington state otter – http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2270471/Im-ready-close-Shutter-shy-otter-finally-warms-camera-intense-primping-session.html
So wrong, even the column’s subtitle is wrong! It says “Lapid prefers…” It should say “Israelis allow their politicians to decide…” ~~~ Your politicians are allowed to decide what to do with YOUR heritage. So it’s not their fault, really. They are like out-of-control 12-year old kids with a key to your very expensive car and no supervision. They’ll take it and smash it, and you can’t really blame them. ~~~ Israelis are the irresponsible parents who will have to live with the consequences. ~~~ They did not even learn from past experiences with politicians making overgenerous offers with your land, including Jerusalem, while they slept. ~~~ For the time being, not willing to wait for that exciting moment when they will partition the country, your public servants have busy giving away huge expanses of your Negev to the Bedoouin.
Israel’s elites have a Soviet mentality. They don’t believe they have to consult the people and they routinely trample on the country’s laws. Democracy is only given lip service.
Whether or not they decide to hold a referendum at some point, they will not be bound by the outcome. Ophir Falk is naive if he expects any different.