TRUMP IS THE KRAKEN. LET THE CONSPIRATORS BEWARE.

T. Belman.  Trump means business.  He has allowed the conspirators to hang themselves.  His plan of action was to draw attention to all the various ways they cheated and conspired.  And he has made certain to educate the people regarding the fraud and the coup and the Reset.  In spite of the MSM blackout and the Social Media censorship  The people are now informed and really mad.  Thus they will support all his drastic, but necessary methods to clean the swap.  That will take place in January.

TIERNEY NEWS

Here’s how I think President Trump launched a counter-attack against the global GREAT RESET.

1) Let the Communists rig the election & try to overthrow the free world. Document every step and pinpoint every enemy combatant. Let them think they are winning. Show every free nation what it’s like to live under Communism, censorship & lock downs.

2) Write an EO that bypasses the FBI/DOJ & local law enforcement and uses the power of military tribunals & treasury sanctions to punish ANYONE participating in foreign election interference. That includes members of Congress, FBI, CIA & DOJ.

3) Purge Communist traitors from the DoD & DHS and replace them with Patriots. Remove the corrupt CIA from ALL military operations.

4) Educate the world on the dangers of voting machines, voter fraud & Communist China.

5) Expose all those collaborating with Communist China including world leaders, politicians, Big Tech & Big media.

6) Tie Facebook & Google to foreign election interference while simultaneously launching massive anti-trust lawsuits against them and restructuring the FCC to reform Section 230 so they can be broken up & sued by the American people. Tie Big Media to foreign election interference, remove their affiliate licenses & sue them into oblivion.

7) Encourage red states to join in the fight to get rid of cheat-by-mail FOREVER, even in states like WA, OR & CO where it is currently legal, by calling out the traitors in blue states who sold out to the Communists. This is how you conduct a civil war by lawsuit before SCOTUS!

8) Save ALL your most inflammatory & important evidence for the FINAL lawsuit before SCOTUS so the Communists have NO time to counter.

9) The people are enraged and INFORMED! Trump wins back the White House & the states are now forced to abide by the Constitution and remove voting machines, install voter ID, use paper ballots & hand counts. All states will be forced to ensure that ONLY citizens vote and that ONLY citizens count toward Congressional apportionment & the Electoral College.

10) Tie this to the new Census 2020 data which now delineates every citizen & non-citizen in America and will be used to redistribute Congressional apportionment going forward.

11) Force a 50-state forensic audit to prove the GOP already won the House, the Senate & the White House. This is the ONLY way to install confidence in our system.

12) Once America does this, the world will follow. This is bigger than Trump. This is God’s plan. Pray for his wisdom & guidance! 

Nothing I’ve outlined has NOT been done before. People don’t know history. President Lincoln called for the arrest & imprisonment of the fake news and the seizure of their printing facilities for spreading falsehoods & giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Think President Trump won’t do the same? Think again. 

President Trump still has two major paths to victory. Path 1: Civil path with a big SCOTUS win Path 2: Military path using his 2018 EO. I hope he uses both! 

Zuckerberg’s money literally paid the salaries of election officials and judges, and the money came with significant strings attached, such as mandating the number of ballot drop boxes and polling places and the processes for handling the ballots! In other words, counties handed over control of the election to private parties – against the law!

Local election officials in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and other states ignored ballot security laws such as signature and residency requirements in exchange for cash! 

Trump administration has blacklisted 35 Chinese companies over their ties to the Communist Chinese military and they will be removed from equity benchmarks beginning December 21. Americans will be outlawed from investing in them.

A Taiwanese journalist is reporting that the Chinese Communist Party believes President Trump will be successful in his re-election efforts & has called for its military to prepare for war.

December 11, 2020 | 3 Comments »

Leave a Reply

3 Comments / 3 Comments

  2. More very bad news. Reminds me of David’s lament over Saul and Jonathan in the Bible (Tanach) when they were killed in a climactic battle with the Philistines: “Tell it not on the streets of Gath, lest the Philistines rejoice . . .”

    Supreme Court rejects Texas’ effort to overturn election in fatal blow to Trump legal blitz to stop Biden

    “The Supreme Court has decisively and speedily rejected the latest of Donald Trump and his allies’ attacks on the democratic process,” said Biden campaign spokesman Mike Gwin.

    Pete Williams is an NBC News correspondent who covers the Justice Department and the Supreme Court, based in Washington.Dartunorro Clark is a political reporter for NBC News.
    Dec. 11, 2020, 6:40 PM EST / Updated Dec. 11, 2020, 7:56 PM EST
    Image: US-POLITICS-TRUMP-HEALTH-VIRUS
    By Pete Williams and Dartunorro Clark

    WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday brushed aside the lawsuit filed by Texas that sought to overturn Joe Biden’s election victory in four battleground states.

    President Donald Trump called the case “the big one,” and 126 of the 196 Republicans in the House urged the court to take it. But the justices acted quickly to turn it down.

    “Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another state conducts its elections,” the court said in a brief unsigned opinion.

    Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito said the court had no authority to refuse a case filed on its original docket, where one state files to sue another. But they said they would not have granted Texas any other relief and expressed no view on any of the issues raised in the lawsuit.

    So the ruling was essentially a unanimous rejection of the Texas claims.

    Supporters of the Trump campaign saw the Texas suit as their best hope for derailing a victory for Joe Biden before the actual presidential vote is cast by the Electoral College on Monday.

    President-elect Joe Biden’s team welcomed the news, calling it an end to the president’s baseless legal battle.

    “The Supreme Court has decisively and speedily rejected the latest of Donald Trump and his allies’ attacks on the democratic process,” said campaign spokesman Mike Gwin in a statement.

    “This is no surprise — dozens of judges, election officials from both parties, and Trump’s own Attorney General have dismissed his baseless attempts to deny that he lost the election,” he said. “President-elect Biden’s clear and commanding victory will be ratified by the Electoral College on Monday, and he will be sworn in on January 20th.”

    Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel, a Democrat, said in a statement following the ruling that “it’s time to move forward.”

    “Today’s Supreme Court decision is an important reminder that we are a nation of laws, and though some may bend to the desire of a single individual, the courts will not,” she said. “Now it’s time to move forward — not as separate states, red or blue — but as united states in the continuing pursuit of a more perfect union.”

    Republican Sen. Ben Sasse, who has clashed with Trump, said in a statement the Supreme Court has finally “closed the book on the nonsense.”

    “Since Election Night, a lot of people have been confusing voters by spinning Kenyan Birther-type, ‘Chavez rigged the election from the grave’ conspiracy theories, but every American who cares about the rule of law should take comfort that the Supreme Court — including all three of President Trump’s picks — closed the book on the nonsense,” he said.

    Never before had any state asked the court to do what Texas proposed, to nullify election results from other states. The lawsuit sought to delay the vote of presidential electors in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, arguing that voting procedures in those states violated their own state laws.

    Allowing them to cast their electoral votes, Texas said, would “cement a potentially illegitimate election result.”

    In response to the ruling, Texas GOP chairman Allen West issued a statement that continued to suggest widespread voter fraud in the election, for which he offered no evidence, but criticized the court and suggested that Texas and other states secede.

    “Perhaps law-abiding states should bond together and form a Union of states that will abide by the constitution,” West said.

    Both conservative and liberal legal experts alike said the lawsuit had a fatal flaw, because Texas had no authority to claim that it was injured or that its own voters were affected in any way by election procedures in another state.

    Pennsylvania made that point in urging the court to dismiss the case.

    “Texas has not suffered harm simply because it dislikes the result of the election, and nothing in the text, history, or structure of the Constitution supports Texas’s view that it can dictate the manner in which four other states run their elections,” Pennsylvania said.

    The other battleground states said allowing the lawsuit to proceed would invite lawsuits over virtually any future federal election.

    “Texas proposes an extraordinary intrusion into Wisconsin’s and the other defendant states’ elections, a task that the Constitution leaves to each state,” the state said in its response to the suit. “Wisconsin has conducted its election and its voters have chosen a winning candidate for their state. Texas’s bid to nullify that choice is devoid of a legal foundation or a factual basis.”

    The lawsuit was filed Monday by Ken Paxton, the Texas attorney general. Among its claims was that the chances of a Biden victory were “less than one in a quadrillion.” That statement was widely ridiculed, because it was based on a statistician’s assumption that voters showed exactly the same party preferences as they did in 2016.

    “Wow!” wrote David Post of the libertarian Cato Institute on a conservative legal blog. “If mail-in voters had the same preferences as in-person voters, Trump must have won!! And if my aunt had four wheels, she’d be a motorcar!!”

    The four battleground states, joined by friend-of-court briefs from Democratic attorneys general from 20 states and the District of Columbia, said Texas also waited too long to bring its claim to court.

    Many of the new voting procedures, such as a move by the Pennsylvania legislature to allow no-excuse voting by mail, were adopted months ago. They were also unsuccessfully challenged in the courts of the four states, another point against the Texas suit.

    The Texas lawsuit attracted support from attorneys general of 16 other red states. One notable exception was Ohio’s Republican attorney general, Dave Yost. He said that federal courts “lack authority to change the legislatively chosen method for appointing presidential electors.”

    Mark Gordon, the Republican governor of Wyoming, where Trump won 70 percent of the vote, said he and his attorney general declined to sign on to the red state brief.

    “We believe that the case could have unintended consequences relating to a constitutional principle that the state of Wyoming holds dear, that states are sovereign, free to govern themselves,” he said.

    Trump and Republicans in seven states have so far filed nearly 60 lawsuits to challenge election procedures, but not a single outcome was changed.

    John Foriter, an election law expert at the Bipartisan Policy Center in Washington, said once the electors cast their votes Monday, lawsuits face even greater odds against undoing a Biden victory.

    “I think the answer is that the court challenges are pretty well done.”

  3. This is obviously an ultra-biased report from the ultr-biased Huff Post. But it is unlikely that the bare facts of the report, as distinguished from its purple rhetoric, ihas been made up. Apparently the Supreme Court has rejected the Texas attorney-general’s appeal, even though the attorneys- general of at least 17 other states supported it. Shocking and extremely depressing.

    “The truth is that we are losing the battle. Trump is outnumbered and outgunned. The people who should be supporting him, his fellow Republicans, have jumped ship. Even Newt Gingrich is very pessimistic about Trump’s chances for a second term.

    May God help us. And I mean that literally.

    “Supreme Court Rejects Trump’s Authoritarian Bid To Hijack The Presidency

    December 11, 2020, 6:37 PM
    The U.S. Supreme Court has rejected a bid by outgoing President Donald Trump to usurp a second term in office, an anti-democratic legal campaign that sought to disenfranchise millions of voters across four states he lost in the presidential election that would have sent the union spiraling into chaos.

    Trump had asked the Supreme Court on Wednesday to intervene in a lawsuit brought by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton that sought to invalidate votes cast in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin.

    The Supreme Court rejected the case wholesale. Two conservative justices — Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas — said they believed the Supreme Court was technically required to allow Texas to file a bill of complaint, but indicated that they would “not grant other relief,” meaning they would not agree to throw the country into chaos.

    More than half of Republicans in the House of Representatives as well as 17 Republican state attorneys general joined in the desperate and unprecedented request to overthrow the will of the American people and give Trump another four years.

    Millions of Americans will continue to believe conspiracy theories about mass voter fraud and refuse to believe the demonstrable fact that President-elect Joe Biden beat Trump, who has continued to push misinformation about nonexistent mass voter fraud to the American public.

    Paxton’s now-rejected complaint alleged that entities other than the state legislatures, like the courts, in the four states in question changed election laws prior to the election. The complaint made the controversial argument that only state legislatures may change election laws (a position with no holding precedent) and therefore the elections in these states should not count. The lawsuit made no mention of the fact that Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican, and not the state legislature altered election rules unilaterally as well.

    Furthermore, the complaint was riddled with falsehoods and unproven conspiracy theories of voter fraud that centered around a bogus statistical analysis that claimed there was only a “1 in 1,000,000,000,000,000” chance of Biden winning the four states.

    The lawsuit sought to nullify the election results in these four states and allow the Republican-controlled state legislatures to choose the winner. Trump lost these four states from a low of 0.24% in Georgia to a high of 2.8% in Michigan.

    After losing more than 50 post-election lawsuits, Trump called Paxton’s complaint “the big one,” and filed a motion to join the suit. But it died like the rest.

    This case, just like Trump’s other lawsuits, wasn’t really meant to succeed. There is no evidence of widespread voter fraud in the four states fingered in Paxton’s complaint, nor is there any evidence in any other state. Just as Trump’s lawyers denied in court that they were alleging voter fraud, Paxton’s complaint contained no specific allegations of voter fraud. The specific, and false, allegations were reserved for arenas where lawyers could not be sanctioned for lying.

    The futility of Paxton’s challenge made it more like a political protest rather than an actual legal challenge. This led Republican Party partisans to pile onto the complaint with briefs that read like press releases in order to show their support for Trump, and the party base that loves him, by rejecting the results of a democratic election.

    In addition to the 17 Republican attorneys general who filed to support the complaint, 126 Republican House members, or 64% of the party caucus, including Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (Calif.), joined in. As did more than three dozen Republican state elected officials in a brief alleging “cabal and oligarchy.” Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) agreed to argue the case if the court took it up. Conservative activist groups joined with briefs as well. As did right-wing cranks seeking attention, including disgraced Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore and the imaginary states of New California and New Nevada.

    The states targeted for the nullification of their elections forcefully rejected such allegations in their own briefs. They all noted that prior lawsuits filed by Trump and his allies litigated these matters and state and federal judges found no evidence for the allegations of fraud.

    “Texas’s effort to get this Court to pick the next President has no basis in law or fact. The Court should not abide this seditious abuse of the judicial process, and should send a clear and unmistakable signal that such abuse must never be replicated,” Pennsylvania’s brief stated.

    Related…

    Once Again, Georgia Certifies Election Results Confirming Biden’s Win

    Trump Looks Past Supreme Court Loss To New Election Lawsuit From Texas

    Republicans Back Trump’s Election Lies To Please Their Base

    Love HuffPost? Become a founding member of HuffPost Plus today.

    This article originally appeared on HuffPost and has been updated.”