Wendy Sherman, Under Secretary for Political Affairs
Written Statement before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Washington, DC
May 15, 2013
Iran’s nuclear activity – in violation of its international obligations and in defiance of the international community – is one of the greatest global concerns we face. A nuclear-armed Iran would pose a threat to the region, to the world, and to the future of the global nuclear proliferation regime. It would risk an arms race in a region already rife with violence and conflict. A nuclear weapon would embolden a regime that already spreads instability through its proxies and threatens chokepoints in the global economy. It would put the world’s most dangerous weapons into the hands of leaders who speak openly about wiping one of our closest allies, the state of Israel, off the map. In confronting this challenge, our policy has been clear: we are determined to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon. Our preference is to resolve this through diplomacy. However, as President Obama has stated unequivocally, we will not allow Iran to obtain a nuclear weapon, and there should be no doubt that the United States will use all elements of American power to achieve that objective.
Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei has asked why it is that the international community does not believe that Iran’s nuclear program is for peaceful purposes only. The answer is simple: Iran has consistently concealed its nuclear activities and continues to do so, denying required access and information to the International Atomic Energy Agency. As a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, Iran has responsibilities to the international community, and it is that blatant disregard for those responsibilities that has made Iran the subject of four UN Security Council resolutions imposing mandatory sanctions.
From his very first months in office, President Obama put forward a clear choice to the Iranian government: Meet your international responsibilities on your nuclear program and reap the benefits of being a full member of the international community, or face the prospect of further pressure and isolation.
Six months later the P5+1 and Iran reached an Interim Nuclear Agreement in which Tehran was to limit its nuclear energy program in exchange for initial relief from international trade and financial sanctions.
The preamble to the agreement began with:
“The goal for these negotiations is to reach a mutually-agreed long-term comprehensive solution that would ensure Iran’s nuclear programme will be exclusively peaceful. Iran reaffirms that under no circumstances will Iran ever seek or develop any nuclear weapons. “
If only.
The US has chosen to ignore its concerns as expressed by Wendy Sherman, above, and give Iran everything it wanted.
Obama has repeatedly expressed his view that America lacks exceptionalism and is merely one country amongst many. This deal embodies his philosophy that the United States must stop being “arrogant” and accept its diminished role as just another member of the United Nations.
Obama is now an international community organizer, doing on a global scale what he did in Chicago. And what he did was seek to redistribute wealth and power, which is exactly what this agreement accomplishes. Those who say he was “fleeced” are misjudging him. Obama achieved his desired result, deplorable though it is.
You make a darned good point.
Why not? All treason based governments do that.
Netanyahu is the master at that. There is no Jewish subject or principle or national interest which has been betrayed by the disgrace.