Peloni: In the first half of Glick’s most recent monologue, she reports the fall of the Iranian host in Syria, and explains that the mischief which was begun under the Sykes-Picot arrangement at the beginning of the 20th Century has finally come to an end. In its place she suggests that these artificial nations should be broken down into cantons based on ethnic cohesion. It is a worrying position to adopt seeing that Israel is host to its own minority regions, including both that of both the Pals and the Druze. Indeed, how should Israel be seen thru this new world order based on etho-religious compatibilities?
Copy the following URL and paste it in your browser’s Address Bar:
https://tinyurl.com/4x2sb6hr
The disgusting part of her monologue is the issue of the unbelievable lack of interest of the upper command structure in the events in neighboring countries. While this is theoretically possible, this blindness is more on our, the public’s part, than on theirs. To give them the credit they deserve, they are fully aware of what is going on but they have a different agenda that seems to be dictated by the US deep state or by their insistence on getting rid of Bibi, whichever is more dominant.
To fortify the above statement, they knew which border crossings to destroy on the Lebanese border, they knew which “dangerous” weapons to destroy near Damascus, they knew which border crossings were in use to replenish Hezbollah on the Iraqi border and most interestingly, which sites to bomb in Iran. Also, we should not ignore the importance of the Huthi sites bombed in Yemen which are also far away. In short, even considering a “lack of interest” is off the mark.
For some reason, they don’t know where the hostages are hidden.