Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Menu There is no diplomatic solutionIsrael should declare three nos;
no to nuclear Iran, no to two-state solution, no to bi-national state
no to nuclear Iran, no to two-state solution, no to bi-national state
@stevenl
He absolutely can and should. To be honest, he should have already been actively pursing the case against Maricopa County as they have failed to respond several times to demands from the Senate without any reasonable explanation and Brnovich has clearly shown us that he is resistant to acting against Maricopa. However, in the past few weeks he has stood up to the White House and appears currently to be talking about doing what is needed going forward. He wants to be the next AZ US Senator and he knows he needs Trump’s support to do this. So, hopefully he will act, but I have to admit, I don’t trust him much. A lot of dirty deals went down in AZ and I find it hard to believe that he was not knowledgeable, or more likely complicit, in them – he was the AG of the state when a Presidential election was rigged at every level and more than a dozen laws were broken while, as AG, he just watched…yeah, I think more likely complicit. So it the fun is just beginning with him. Just my thoughts.
Can and will the AG do something about all this?
More Breaking News From Patrick Byrne:
The link below is a discussion with Byrn and Pulitzer who was part of the audit team.
The paper used in the AZ election was suppose to be a special type of paper called “Vote Secured Paper”. This paper has several special distinctions that serve as security parameters for the election. Among these was one that was secret and Byrne exposed at ~1hr marker in the video at the bottom. The Vote Secure Paper had a low level radioactive isotope that the Dominion machines could detect and alert if the ballot was on any other paper than this Vote Secure Paper. Of the 2.1 million votes in Maricopa County, there were zero votes cast with Vote Secure Paper and the machines did not alert anyone. This is because there is an override switch in the software, but this override switch is only known to Dominion. There were 2Dominion employees tasked with AZ and they reported directly to Eric Cumer, yes the same Cumer who is suing Sydney Powell and stated that Trump would definitely loose the election.
In addition to this, Byrne and Pulitzer, and Joe Flynn(he left after the first half hour), revealed other issues as well, such as that the adjudication rate, where a supervisor chose the meaning of your vote, ran as high as 67% in some voting districts. Also, there are 14 reports from Pulitzer to be submitted to the Senate and only 3 have been submitted. The three submitted do not include the most significant of his findings and it also does include the most shocking of his findings have been released yet.
They also go over the audit findings. Very worth while discussion.
Here is the link:
https://rumble.com/vmydr7-forensic-audit-aftermath-top-12-lies-and-truths.html
This is the draft executive summary of the CyberNinja report, as downloaded by Gateway Pundit’s Jim Hoft.
8 pages
ExecutiveSummary VersionFinal 092421 Draft
Uploaded byJim Hoft
Description:draft of AZ reportFull description
Save
Save ExecutiveSummary VersionFinal 092421 Draft
Download now
Jump to Page
You are on page 2of 8
Search inside document
9/24/2021 Maricopa County Forensic Audit Volume I: Executive Summary & Recommendations Work Performed For: Arizona State Senate 1700 W Washington St Phoenix, AZ 85007
© 2021 Cyber Ninjas FOR ARIZONA SENATE USE ONLY Page 1 of 7 1 D OCUMENT OVERVIEW This document includes the Executive Summary of the Maricopa County Forensic Audit, a listing of findings within the Findings Summary, as well as Recommendations based on our work in the audit. For more details about the Methodology & Operations of the au dit, please see “Maricopa County Forensic Audit – Volume II – Methodology and Operations ” . For more details about the Findings of the report, or to review the results from the hand-tallying of the 2.1 million ballots, please see “Maricopa County Forensic Audit – Volume III – Result Details”. 2 E XECUTIVE S UMMARY The preamble to our Constitution reminds us that our nation is always pursuing greater perfection, seeking to establish “… a more perfect Union” so that we can “…secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”. Nothing is more essential in establishing liberty than free and fair elections. To that end, Cyber Ninjas was engaged by the Arizona Senate to audit the 2020 General Election and determine the outcome of the election and in what areas legislative reform is required to ensure that our elections are indeed free and fair in the future. This audit has been the most comprehensive and complex election audit ever conducted. It involved the hand counting of 2.1 million ballots, a forensic paper inspection of them, a forensic review of the voting machines, and most important, an in-depth analysis of the voter rolls and the 2020 General Election final files. Many of the issues in the election can be traced back to two primary causative factors: mail-in voting and improper voter registration management. More than 80% of the ballots cast in Maricopa were via mail. The guarantee of the secret ballot is not only a right that applies to the voter themself, but it is also a right guaranteed to the rest of those voting in the election that that person’s ballot is secret and therefore cannot have come under any undue influence. Mail-in voting eliminates secrecy in voting as it is impossible to control or know who a voter shares their ballot with and what is done with it prior to it being mailed-in or dropped off. 57,734 ballots with serious issues were identified in the audit. These issues include improper voter registration, improper votes, and discrepancies in the registration. This is a conservative estimate, as there were other identified problems that were not quantified nor included in that total, likely resulting in a much larger number of flawed ballots. Additional issues identified: backdated registrations, multiple voter registrations linked to the same voter affidavit, voters without records in a commercial database, and printing defects rendering thousands of ballots as suspicious. In the 2020 presidential election, the margin of victory was only 10,457 votes, a small fraction of the 57,734 ballots with known issues. Again, this is almost 6 times the margin of victory in the Presidential race and is multiples of the margin of victory in other races. Based on these factual findings, the election should not be certified, and the reported results are not reliable. Major issues identified: • There were more than 10,000 double votes across county lines • Tens of thousands of ballots cast from individuals who had moved prior to the election and could not have physically received their ballots, legally.
© 2021 Cyber Ninjas FOR ARIZONA SENATE USE ONLY Page 2 of 7 • None of the systems related to elections integrity had numbers that would balance and agree with each other. • The voter rolls and the registration management process itself have many data integrity issues. For instance, over 200 individuals were easily identifiable as likely being the same person but having two different Voter IDs and voting twice in the election. o Without access to the County’s detailed records including personally identifiable information and registration systems it is more likely there were many tens of thousands of improper votes in the election from double voters, deceased voters, voters for which we can find no trace in the public records nor association to their voting address, moved voters, etc. • Proper voter registration law and procedures were not followed. o There were unexplained large purges of registered voters, right after the election, of people who had voted in the election. o There was back dating of registrations, adjustments made to historical voting and voter records, unexplained linking of voter registration affidavits to multiple voters and more. • Files were missing from the Election Management System (EMS) Server. • Ballot images on the EMS were corrupt or missing. • Logs appeared to be intentionally rolled over, and all the data in the database related to the 2020 General Election had been fully cleared. • On the ballot side, batches were not always clearly delineated, duplicated ballots were missing the required serial numbers, originals were duplicated more than once, and the Auditors were never provided Chain-of-Custody documentation for the ballots for the time- period prior to the ballot’s movement into the Auditors’ care. This all increased the complexity and difficulty in properly auditing the results. • There were substantial statistically significant anomalies identified in the ratio of hand-folded ballots, on-demand printed ballots, as well as a statistically significant increase in provisional ballot rejections for a mail-in ballot already being cast, suggestive of mail-in ballots being cast for voters without their knowledge. The 2005 Report on Federal Election Reform, which was an effort led by democrats, stated the following regarding mail-in voting: “While vote by mail appears to increase turnout for local elections there is no evidence that it significantly expands participation in federal elections. Moreover it raises concerns about privacy as citizens voting at home may come under pressure to vote for certain candidates and it increases the risk of fraud.” Managing an election conducted almost entirely by mail is a difficult endeavor and raises numerous issues which would be much less likely to occur if most voting was in-person. Had Maricopa County chosen to cooperate with the audit, many of the obstacles faced in the audit could have been overcome. By the County withholding subpoena items, their unwillingness to answer questions as is normal between auditor and auditee, and in some cases actively interfering with audit research, the County prevented a complete audit. This did not stop the primary goal of offering recommendations for legislative reform to the Arizona Senate, but it did leave many questions open as to the way and manner that the 2020 General Election was conducted. 3 F INDING S UMMARY The following is a list of findings covered within the report. Details on all these findings as well as the results of the hand-tallying can be found in the document “Maricopa County Forensic Audit – Volume III – Results Details”.
© 2021 Cyber Ninjas FOR ARIZONA SENATE USE ONLY Page 3 of 7 NOTE: Ballots Impacted is intended to give a gauge on the potential impact for the finding. While it is based on the number of ballots impacted by the finding, it is not generally expected that any single finding would completely favor a candidate. In many cases there could be legitimate and legal votes within the Ballots Impact amount. For more details, please see the write-up for the finding within Volume III.
© 2021 Cyber Ninjas FOR ARIZONA SENATE USE ONLY Page 4 of 7 Finding Name Phase Ballots Impacted Severity Mail-in Ballots Voted from Prior Address Voter History 23,344 Critical Potential Voters that Voted in Multiple Counties Voter History 10,342 Critical More Ballots Returned by Voter Than Received Certified Results 9,041 High Election Management System Database Purged Voting Machine N/A High Election Files Deleted Voting Machine N/A High Corrupt Ballot Images Voting Machine N/A High Official Results Does Not Match Who Voted Certified Results 3,432 Medium More Duplicates Than Original Ballots Ballot 2,592 Medium In-Person Voters Who Had Moved out of Maricopa County Certified Results 2,382 Medium Voters Moved Out-of-State During 29-Day Period Proceeding Election Voter History 2,081 Medium Missing Ballot Images Voting Machine N/A Medium Failure to Follow Basic Cyber Security Practices Voting Machine N/A Medium Subpoenaed Equipment Not Provided Voting Machine N/A Medium Anonymous Logins Voting Machine N/A Medium Dual Boot System Discovered Voting Machine N/A Medium EMS Operating System Logs Not Preserved Voting Machine N/A Medium Votes Counted in Excess of Voters Who Voted Certified results 836 Low Voters not part of the Official Precinct Register Voter History 618 Low Ballots Returned Not in the Final Voted File Certified Results 527 Low Duplicated Ballots Incorrect & Missing Serial Numbers Ballot 500 Low Mail-In Ballot Received without Record of Being Sent Certified Results 397 Low Voters With Incomplete Names Voter History 393 Low Deceased Voters Voter History 282 Low Audit UOCAVA Count Does Not Match the EAC Count Ballots 226 Low Late Registered Voters with Counted Votes Voter History 198 Low Date of Registration Changes to Earlier Date Voter History 194 Low Duplicate Voter IDs Voter History 186 Low Multiple Voters Linked by AFFSEQ Voter History 101 Low Double Scanned & Counted Ballots Ballot 50 Low UOCAVA Electronic Ballots Double Counted Ballot 6 Low Duplicate Ballots Reuse Serial Numbers Ballot 6 Low EMS Operating System Logs Not Preserved Voter History N/A Low Election Data Found from Other States Voter History N/A Low Audit Interference Ballot N/A Informational Batch Discrepancies Ballot N/A Informational Commingled Damaged and Original Ballots Ballot N/A Informational Early Votes Not Accounted for In EV33 Certified Results N/A Informational High Bleed-Through Rates on Ballots Ballot N/A Informational Improper Paper Utilized Ballot N/A Informational Inaccurate Identification of UOCAVA Ballots Ballot N/A Informational
© 2021 Cyber Ninjas FOR ARIZONA SENATE USE ONLY Page 5 of 7 Missing Subpoena Items Ballot N/A Informational No Record of Voters in Commercial Database Voter History N/A Informational Out of Calibration Ballot Printers Ballot N/A Informational Real-Time Provisional Ballots Voter History N/A Informational Voter Registration System Audit Access Voter History N/A Informational Questionable Ballots Ballot N/A Informational 4 R ECOMMENDATIONS The following sections outline the key recommendations that were determined over the course of this audit. 4.1 Elimination of Universal Mail in Voting Universal Mail-in Voting statutes should be repealed, and absentee ballots only allowed in the strictest of circumstances for military personnel stationed outside of Arizona as well as doctor verified individuals who are not physically able to make it to a polling location. 4.2 Result Reconciliation Legislation should be considered that does not allow an election to be certified until the Official Canvas and the Final Voted File is fully reconciled. Furthermore, full records for every ballot sent, ballot received, ballot rejected, and ballot voided should have to be fully reconciled within a defined period after the election. 4.3 Voter Registration Legislation should be enacted that centralizes voter registration at the state level tied into the State’s motor vehicle and identification system ensuring that voters are registered under their full legal name and that they have only a single residential address with the state and one mailing address if applicable. 4.4 Voter Rolls Legislation should be enacted that links voter roll registration to changes in driver’s licenses or other state identification, as well as requiring the current voter rolls be validated against the United States Postal Service (USPS) National Change of Address (NCOA) at a predefined period prior to every election. Any voter roll software should validate that there is only one entry in the state database per identification number, such as a driver’s licens e number. Laws already exist for interstate reporting of changes in residence, addresses, and driver’s licenses. Tying voter roll registration to these forms of identification would greatly increase the likelihood that voter registration details would be kept up to date. Individuals are much more likely to remember their license needs to be updated immediately than voter registration, and since most states now offer the ability to register to vote when getting a license, license updates could also update voter rolls. It is recommended that the voter rolls be validated against the NCOA both 30 days or more prior to the election, in addition to a week before absentee ballots are sent out, along with requiring absentee voters to register prior to every election. This check would not be utilized to purge the rolls, but to validate that an absentee ballot should be sent prior to that ballot going out..
© 2021 Cyber Ninjas FOR ARIZONA SENATE USE ONLY Page 6 of 7 In addition, legislation should be considered to require the voter rolls to periodically be compared against ERIC, the Social Security’s Master Death List, or other commercially available tools that gives access to this information. Failure to do this at least once a year should come with financial penalties. 4.5 Election Software Legislation should be considered that would require applications developed and utilized for voter rolls or voting to be developed to rigorous standards that ensure the confidentiality and integrity of the systems. Specifically, its recommended that the Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) Application Security Verification Standard (ASVS) Level 3 be applied to all applications associated with voter rolls or voting and that it be required that this be fully validation no less than once every two years. Part of this testing should be explicitly testing a programming interface access to validate that no external party has the capability to manipulate the voter rolls. Furthermore, it should be required that whoever builds the software be required to rotate vendors doing the OWASP ASVS Level 3 assessment a minimum of once every four years, with a rotation of no less than three vendors before returning back to a vendor utilized in the past. The vendor who performs this work must be willing to attest that their assessment fully covered the ASVS Level 3 requirements that there are no critical or high vulnerabilities detected, and that there is a remediation plan for any moderate risk vulnerabilities. 4.6 Voting Machines Legislation should be considered that would prohibit connecting tabulators, or the Election Management System Servers or similar equipment from being connected to the internet or any other mechanism that could allow remote access to these systems. Furthermore, County employees should have access to all administrative functions of all election equipment and have sufficient access to independently validate any configuration items on the device without requiring the involvement of any 3 rd party vendor. In addition, electronic voting machines must always have a paper backup of all ballots which can be used to confirm that votes were cast as intended; and these machines must be regularly maintained according to the vendors recommended maintenance schedule. Failing to do so should have a financial impact on the County. Legislation should be considered that would require that paper stocks utilized on election day should conform to manufacturer recommendations to ensure that the paper that has been tested in the device is what is actually utilized to cast votes. 4.7 Election Audits Legislation should be considered that creates an election audit department in charge of regularly conducting audits on a rotating basis across all counties in Arizona after elections. This department should validate that the County follows all processes and procedures outlined in the Elections Procedure Manual (EPM) and have the ability to financially impact the County for repetitive EPM failures, or other failures that make auditing more difficult. Legislation should be considered that requires batches of ballots to be clearly labeled, separated from each other in a manner where they cannot easily mix together, and easily connected to the batches run through the tabulation
© 2021 Cyber Ninjas FOR ARIZONA SENATE USE ONLY Page 7 of 7 equipment for easy auditing of the system. Failure to follow these practices should have financial implications for the County. Legislation should be considered with have financial and criminal penalties for purposely inhibiting a legislative investigation, or an officially sanction audit of an election. 4.8 Ballots Legislation should be considered that will make ballot images and the Cast Vote Record artifacts from an election that is publicly published within a few days of the results being certified for increased transparency and accountability in the election process. Legislation should further be considered that would require all ballots to be cast on paper by hand utilizing paper with security features such as watermarks or similar technology; with a detailed accounting of what paper(s) and the quantities utilized for any given election cycle. Absentee voting should incorporate an objective standard of verification for early voter identification, similar to the ID requirements required for in person voting.
Share this document
Share or Embed Document
Sharing Options
Share on Facebook, opens a new windowShare on Twitter, opens a new windowShare on LinkedIn, opens a new windowShare with Email, opens mail clientCopy Text
Related titles
Carousel Next
Maricopa County Canvassing Result
Maricopa County Canvassing Resultopens in a new window
AZ Audit Report Dr Shiva
AZ Audit Report Dr Shivaopens in a new window
VoterGA Files Suit to Ban Illegal Dominion Voting System
VoterGA Files Suit to Ban Illegal Dominion Voting Systemopens in a new window
Maricopa County Forensic Election Audit Volume I
Maricopa County Forensic Election Audit Volume I: Executive Summary & Recommendationsopens in a new window
Final Election 2020 Grassroots Canvass Report
Final Election 2020 Grassroots Canvass Reportopens in a new window
Immunization RA Request Interview Questionnaire1
Immunization RA Request Interview Questionnaire1opens in a new window
Dominion Invoice 3 31 21 w PO
Dominion Invoice 3 31 21 w POopens in a new window
Dominion Invoice 1 31 21 2
Dominion Invoice 1 31 21 2opens in a new window
2021.07.13-complaint-4814-7096-7793-1
2021.07.13-complaint-4814-7096-7793-1opens in a new window
2021.08.02 Complaint Judge Napalatono
2021.08.02 Complaint Judge Napalatonoopens in a new window
Dominion Invoice 1 31 21
Dominion Invoice 1 31 21opens in a new window
Fulton Internal Audit 2021
Fulton Internal Audit 2021opens in a new window
Click to expand Related Titles
From Gateway Pundit:
Exclusive: Pattern Identified in Arizona Audit Mirrors Michigan Scandal on Fraudulent Votes and Provisional Ballots
According to the initial Cyber Ninja Report released to the media on Friday, the day before the Arizona Senate report was made public, there was real concern about provisional ballots.
On page 2 of the early Cyber Ninja report:
There were substantial statistically significant anomalies identified in the ratio of hand-folded ballots, on- demand printed ballots, as well as a statistically significant increase in provisional ballot rejections for a mail-in ballot already being cast, suggestive of mail-in ballots being cast for voters without their knowledge.
Then on Friday the Cyber Ninja Report revealed that 58,550 voters appeared on election day to vote who had reportedly already received a mail-in ballot , page 59:
5.7.1 Real-Time Provisional Ballots
TRENDING: Arizona Audit Final Report Was Watered Down: Reports from Cyber Ninjas Were Edited, Most Damning Statements Removed – What Else Was Removed?
The Arizona Secretary of State Elections Procedures Manual identifies circumstances that require the issuance of a Provisional Ballot. If a voter appears in the e-pollbook or signature roster as having received an early ballot by mail, but the voter wants to vote in person on Election Day, that voter must be issued a Provisional Ballot. However, Maricopa County reported 58,550 voters who had received mail ballots but were issued standard ballots on Election Day. The County identifies these as “real-time Provisional Ballots.” There is no mention of real-time provisional in the AZ Elections Procedures Manual. In fact, the EPM specifically addresses this circumstance and is clear that such voters must be issued a Provisional ballot.
These 58,550 voters turned up on election day and were told they already voted by mail-in ballot without their knowledge. The language was watered down in the final report.
Arizona was not the only state in 2020 that illicit acts with provisional ballots.
In Michigan, leftist operatives taught poll workers how to cheat with provisional ballots.
Damning audio was released by Detroit Leaks before the election that outlined poll worker training wherein workers were trained in how to lie, trained on how to handle ballot challenges from Trump supporters, told to call 911 on any challengers and to use COVID as an excuse to deny poll challengers access to view the ballots as they were being counted and tabulated.
The series of leaks also revealed that even challenged or provisional ballots would be processed as regular ballots.
This was a tactic used by the left and TAUGHT to poll workers before the election. They were taught how to cheat with provisional ballots.
In fact, the poll workers in Detroit were taught tactics on how to cheat with provisional ballots.
** Jim and Joe Hoft reported on this illegal practice at the regent University Election Integrity Conference back in March.
The reporter who initially published this video was later threatened by far left Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel demanding he take down this damning audio or face charges.
The Democrats did not want this audio made public!
The FBI and Bill Barr completely ignored this evidence.
It now appears this was a tactic used in several states — Not just Arizona.