Maryland Court says parents can’t opt kids out of LGBTQ+ curriculum: ‘Not a fundamental right’

Parents argued the inclusion of LGBTQ+ books indoctrinated their kids

By Chris Pandolfo Fox News

A federal court in Maryland decided Thursday that parents can’t opt their kids out of reading books with LGBTQ+ content in Montgomery County Schools.

In Tamer Mahmoud v. Monica B. McKnight, parents sought to reinstate a MCPS policy that would allow them to opt their children out of reading and discussing books with LGBTQ+ characters in elementary schools. The parents argued the content in these books was a form of indoctrination that violated their families’ religious beliefs.

The court disagreed. Judge Deborah L. Boardman, a Biden appointee, concluded that the parents’ “asserted due process right to direct their children’s upbringing by opting out of a public-school curriculum that conflicts with their religious views is not a fundamental right.”

placeholderThe judge denied the parents’ request for a preliminary injunction that would allow them to opt-out their kids when school begins on August 28.<

MAN FORCIBLY REMOVED FROM SCHOOL BOARD MEETING BY SECURITY WHILE READING FROM LGBTQ BOOK: ‘UNCONSTITUTIONAL’

“Because the plaintiffs have not established any of their claims is likely to succeed on the merits, the Court need not address the remaining preliminary injunction factors. Nonetheless, because a constitutional violation is not likely or imminent, it follows that the plaintiffs are not likely to suffer imminent irreparable harm, and the balance of the equities and the public interest favor denying an injunction to avoid undermining the School Board’s legitimate interests in the no-opt-out policy,” the judge determined.

“The plaintiffs seek the same relief pending appeal as in their preliminary injunction motion: an injunction that requires the Board to provide advance notice and opt-outs from instruction involving the storybooks and family life and human sexuality. For the reasons stated in this opinion, the Court cannot conclude the plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits of an appeal. The plaintiffs’ request for a preliminary injunction pending appeal is denied.”

A group of Montgomery County parents gather outside MCPS Board of Education to protest a policy that doesnât allow students to opt-out of lessons on gender and LGBTQ+ issues during the school board meeting in Maryland, United States on July 20, 2023. (Celal Gunes/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)

The controversy arose last year when Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS) introduced more than 22 new books featuring LGBTQ+ characters into classrooms as part of a diversity initiative. Initially, the school district notified parents when these materials would be used in class and permitted them to opt their kids out from instruction involving these books, as they can with other portions of the curriculum.

But in March, the district changed its policy and announced that parents would no longer have that right. A group of religious families of diverse faiths sued, claiming the policy violated their First Amendment right to guide the religious instruction of their children.

But Boardman said otherwise: “The no-opt-out policy does not pressure the parents to refrain from teaching their faiths, to engage in conduct that would violate their religious beliefs, or to change their religious beliefs. The policy may pressure them to discuss the topics raised by the storybooks with their children, but those discussions are anticipated, not prohibited, by the parents’ faiths. The parents are not pressured into violating their religious beliefs in order to obtain the benefits of a public education.”

Eric Baxter, VP and Senior Counsel at Becket – the law firm representing the families – said the ruling “flies in the face of parental freedom, childhood innocence, and basic human decency.”

“The court’s decision is an assault on children’s right to be guided by their parents on complex and sensitive issues regarding human sexuality. The School Board should let kids be kids and let parents decide how and when to best educate their own children consistent with their religious beliefs,” Baxter said.

The LGBTQ+ books added to the district’s curriculum are included in pre-K through eighth-grade classrooms and feature references to gay pride parades, gender transition and pronoun preference.

MCPS has come under fire in recent years for a series of sexual abuse controversies. Since 2009, the public school system has disbursed more than $1 million to settle civil lawsuits involving students who were sexually assaulted by teachers or staff, ABC7 reported in 2018.

In 2021, a track coach at Northwood High School in Silver Spring was arrested on felony child sexual assault and molestation charges.

Chris Pandolfo is a writer for Fox News Digital. Send tips to chris.pandolfo@fox.com and follow him on Twitter @ChrisCPandolfo.

August 25, 2023 | 2 Comments »

Leave a Reply

2 Comments / 2 Comments

  1. Joey’s land!
    What do you expect!
    Will parents fight for their parents’ rights?
    Will abortions including the “4th trimester” supersede parents’ rights? Nov 2024!

  2. If I lived in America or Canada and had school-age children I would home-school them myself rather than expose them to the teaching of LG BT+ attitudes and practices. Christians, Orthodox Jews and Muslims all object to the forcible indoctrination of children with what were, until very recently, considered perversions – and still are by those of us from the above religions. It is surely immoral, and certainly should be illegal, that parents are forced to allow their children to take part in these classes, since they are based on atheistic attitudes that don’t consider the human body as a gift of G-d and therefore subject to His laws. When we had Christian assemblies at my old grammar school, 50 years ago, children from other religious backgrounds were allowed to opt out of them and sit in the school library to do their homework instead. Why isn’t the same reasoning applied to these classes, which are based on a belief system that millions of us oppose?