DONALD TRUMP Continues Lead in Florida Early Voting

GATEWAY PUNDIT

In fact, his lead in early voting there is a first for Republicans.
Back in September Trump led Hillary Clinton in early voting.

BREAKING: the FIRST Republican EVER to win early votes in FL!

Trump still leads Hillary Clinton in Florida early voting.

In 2012 the early voting breakdown was this:
43% Democrats
40% Republicans
17% Other-Independent

This year the early voting breakdown is:
40% Democrat
42% Republican
18% Other-Independent

Trump still leads in Florida two weeks before election day.
This is big news!
Don’t expect the corrupt media to report on this.

October 24, 2016 | 10 Comments »

Leave a Reply

10 Comments / 10 Comments

  1. The power of humor:

    From various parts of the year (I don’t buy that enormous parts of the electorate are constantly changing their mind):

    Here’s link to a Leftist article packed with lots of disinformation alleging Trump’s anti-semitism of all things and that recycles the blood libel of Israel being Apartheid, but, in which, he annoyedly slams Sephardic Jews for being more sympathetic to Trump, citing anecdotal evidence. If he slammed Muslims as primitive savages in the condescending borderline racist way he talks about contemporary Sephardim, he would be lynched by his own crowd. But, it is instructive to learn what the enemy admits that it is not in his interest to acknowledge (unless of course, you are talking about self-hating Jews who will always acknowledge any blood libel and apologize, even if they’ve never heard of it before. Western Liberals are like that too. Idiots. “Useless idiots”: http://downwithtyranny.blogspot.com/2016/08/is-there-trumpist-split-between.html

    Here is a Jerusalem Post Article saying Hillary is in trouble because while she still has a majority among Jewish voters, it’s less than what Obama had and Jews in Florida make up 5 percent of the vote, and the candidates are dead even.
    http://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/Private-poll-finds-trouble-for-Clinton-with-Florida-Jewish-voters-467336

    From March = Haaretz:
    Home   >   Jewish World   >   Jewish World News
    Trump’s anti-Muslim Alarmism Wins Over Jewish Retirees in Florida
    Over coffee and bagels, older, wealthier Floridians debate whether the candidate’s comments are truth or racist rhetoric.
    read more: http://www.haaretz.com/jewish/news/.premium-1.708955

    From August: Why do Florida’s Orthodox Jews support Trump? Because they fear Clinton http://www.jta.org/2016/08/30/election-2016/why-do-floridas-orthodox-jews-support-trump-because-they-fear-clinton

    And to think, I found all this because I wanted to ask “ok, so we’ve learned about the statistical patterns of Ashkenazim and Sephardim (I guess Oriental Jews like Syrian Jews get lumped in with Sephardim here in the US unlike in Israel where they have their own category(ies?) — is that Proportional representation at work– ) Orthodox vs. non, Observant vs. non, Retirees vs. still working, left-handed vs. right-handed Jews.”

    But, this is Florida. Why is nobody asking:

    “What about the Orange Jews?”

    “There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics.” Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli quoted by Mark Twain.

  2. @ Ted Belman:
    Thank you indeed. I certainly hope that the trend is correct, it will be wonderful for Israel, considering the alternative. But the problem with Florida is that there are nearly a million Jews living there (I think) and they are so determined to vote Democrat that I recall a report during the Bush-Gore election that there were more than a few who were so elderly-impaired that they had to be wheeled to the polling booths, and on occasion carried on stretchers. I thought at the time…..Jews.. such bloody imbeciles.

    Of course I didn’t like Gore at all, and had no particular leaning towards Bush, but in the past, I’d read all about Tammany Hall, and how it was run by the retired Mafia Luciano Family Don, Frank Costello who was so much in charge there that he could and did, chose the rosters of Democratic Candidates at will. They nicknamed him “The Prime Minister (of the Underworld-which stretched to Tammany Hall) and I’d read all about the Democrat ward heelers and how they got out the vote, how their stooges, were instructed months before, to grow full beards, brought to vote, and then later taken around the polling booths again with a full moustache-no beard, then later again clean shaven. A minimum of 3 votes per man.

    The enormity of the crookedness of US Elections struck me very forcibly. I’ve been interested in them ever since.

  3. @ Ted Belman:
    I always press the “read more” for an article I’m interested in…..But….alas….this article never had a “read more” in it. I’ve just again closely inspected it twice, and will do it again before sending this… So I went by what was on the page, which I still say is either ambiguous or of no validity to read a month later.

  4. @ Austin:

    Just realised that this Heading about “Trump CONTINUES to lead in Florida” is ambiguous. The text says he led “back” in September, as if the reporter is referring to both NOW and THEN, but it seems to me his headline means NOW.

    I assumed above that he was leading NOW and that the actual date on the report saying 23rd Sept was a typo.

    SO…as I say, it’s ambiguous…is he leading NOW or not. If his “leading” is a FIRST, then it must be referring to September, not NOW, a month later…so what’s the point of this report…..?? If he’s leading NOW that would be a SECOND, but he doesn’t mention this…

    Nobody is interested to hear NOW that he momentarily led in Florida a month ago…unless he still retains that lead, but the report doesn’t say so.

    Confusing. To me anyway. Am I breaking down under the strain……??? Seeing things that are not there, and hearing voices from outer space……? Oy Veh.

    Does anyone understand what I’m saying….not sure I understand it myself at this point……. Oy Vey’s Mir. I’m clear about what I’m saying, but reading it back it seems confusing…….A Klug Af Mir….

  5. TED…. The date given for the early poll results giving Trump 43% and Clinton 37% is dated 23rd SEPT. not 23rd OCT…..Is this a typo……if not it’s a poll taken a month ago. And if it was known a month ago, then you’d have had it on here. So..??