He Fights!

T. Belman. I support Trump because I like what he fights for and because he gets results.  Who cares if he is undignified or uncouth.

I would even add that his manner is what Americans like the most.

TIERNEY’S REAL NEWS :  May 28

Conservative author Evan Sayet is the original author of this opinion piece called “He Fights” about President Trump. It was misattributed to a California Mayor and went viral. It’s likely been viewed by MILLIONS. With Trump facing down the mob in DC and New York who are trying to put him in prison – it’s worth reading again!

He Fights!

My Leftist friends (as well as many ardent Never-Trumpers) constantly ask me if I’m not bothered by Donald Trump’s lack of decorum. They ask if I don’t think his tweets are “beneath the dignity of the office.”

Here’s my answer:

We “right-thinking” people have tried dignity. There could not have been a man of more quiet dignity than George Bush, as he suffered the outrageous lies and politically motivated hatreds that undermined his presidency.

We tried statesmanship.

Could there be another human being on this earth who so desperately prized “collegiality” as John McCain?

We tried propriety – has there been a “nicer” human being ever than Mitt Romney?

And the results were always the same. This is because, while we were playing by the rules of dignity, collegiality and propriety, the Left has been, for the past 60 years, engaged in a knife fight where the only rules are those of Saul Alinsky and the Chicago mob.

I don’t find anything “dignified,” “collegial” or “proper” about Barack Obama’s lying about what went down on the streets of Ferguson in order to ramp up racial hatreds -because racial hatreds serve the Democrat Party.

I don’t see anything “dignified” in lying about the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi and imprisoning an innocent filmmaker to cover your tracks.

I don’t see anything “statesman-like” in weaponizing the IRS to be used to destroy your political opponents and any dissent.

Yes, Obama was “articulate” and “polished” but in no way was he in the least bit “dignified,” “collegial” or “proper.”

The Left has been engaged in a war against America since the rise of the Children of the ‘60s. To them, it has been an all-out war where nothing is held sacred and nothing is seen as beyond the pale. It has been a war they’ve fought with violence, the threat of violence, demagoguery and lies from day one – with the violent take-over of the universities.

The problem is that, through these years, the Left has been the only side fighting this war. While the Left has been taking a knife to anyone who stands in their way, the Right has continued to act with dignity, collegiality and propriety.

With Donald Trump, this all has come to an end. Donald Trump is America’s first wartime president in the Culture War.

During wartime, things like “dignity” and “collegiality” simply aren’t the most essential qualities one looks for in their warriors.

Ulysses Grant was a drunk whose behavior in peacetime might well have seen him drummed out of the Army for conduct unbecoming.

Had Abraham Lincoln applied the peacetime rules of propriety and booted Grant, the Democrats might well still be holding their slaves today. Lincoln rightly recognized that, “I cannot spare this man. He fights.”

General George Patton was vulgar-talking. In peacetime, this might have seen him stripped of rank. But, had Franklin Roosevelt applied the normal rules of decorum then, Hitler and the Socialists would barely be five decades into their thousand-year Reich.

Trump is fighting. And what’s particularly delicious is that, like Patton standing over the battlefield as his tanks obliterated Rommel’s, he’s shouting, “You magnificent bastard, I read your book!”

That is just the icing on the cake, but it’s wonderful to see that not only is Trump fighting, he’s defeating the Left using their own tactics. That book is Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals” – a book so essential to the Liberals’ war against America that it is and was the playbook for the entire Obama administration and the subject of Hillary Clinton’s senior thesis.

It is a book of such pure evil, that, just as the rest of us would dedicate our book to those we most love or those to whom we are most indebted, Alinsky dedicated his book to Lucifer.

Trump’s tweets may seem rash and unconsidered, but in reality, he is doing exactly what Alinsky suggested his followers do. First, instead of going after “the fake media” — and they are so fake that they have literally gotten every single significant story of the past 60 years not just wrong, but diametrically opposed to the truth, from the Tet Offensive to Benghazi, to what really happened on the streets of Ferguson, Missouri — Trump isolated CNN. He made it personal.

Then, just as Alinsky suggests, he employs ridicule, which Alinsky described as “the most powerful weapon of all.”… Most importantly, Trump’s tweets have put CNN in an untenable and unwinnable position. They need to respond.

This leaves them with only two choices. They can either “go high” (as Hillary would disingenuously declare of herself and the fake news would disingenuously report as the truth) and begin to honestly and accurately report the news or they can double-down on their usual tactics and hope to defeat Trump with twice their usual hysteria and demagoguery.

The problem for CNN (et al.) with the former is that, if they were to start honestly reporting the news, that would be the end of the Democratic Party they serve. It is nothing but the incessant use of fake news (read: propaganda) that keeps the Left alive.

Imagine, for example, if CNN had honestly and accurately reported then-candidate Barack Obama’s close ties to foreign terrorists (Rashid Khalidi), domestic terrorists (William Ayers & Bernardine Dohrn), the mafia (Tony Rezko) or the true evils of his spiritual mentor, Jeremiah Wright’s church.

Imagine if they had honestly and accurately conveyed the evils of the Obama administration’s weaponizing of the IRS to be used against their political opponents or his running of guns to the Mexican cartels or the truth about the murder of Ambassador Christopher Stevens and the Obama administration’s cover-up.

So, to my friends on the Left — and the Never-Trumpers as well — do I wish we lived in a time when our president could be “collegial” and “dignified” and “proper?” Of course I do.

These aren’t those times. This is war. And it’s a war that the Left has been fighting without opposition for the past 50 years.

So, say anything you want about Mr. Trump – I get it – he can be vulgar, he can be crude, he can be undignified at times. I don’t care. I can’t spare this man. He fights for America!

May 29, 2024 | 7 Comments »

Leave a Reply

7 Comments / 7 Comments

  1. Because of her support for Israel, Nikki Haley is being demonized as a warmonger by those degenerate nutjobs on the far left and far right. They have no argument other than to shout “warmonger” at those who dare to resist the axis of evil. Yet it is THEY who are the warmongers that support Iran, hamas and Russia’s genocidal wars. Haley has even been called a Mossad agent. LOL

  2. @Rafael & Laura I concur that Nikki Haley, Marco Rubio and Ron DeSantis all good capable political leaders and all also pro Israel were wrongly demonized by Trump and some the MAGA supporters. Scorched earth!!!! Rafael you are correct post Trump the GOP needs future leaders and this destruction while campaigning is to be understated not constructive.

    Not only do they try and destroy them, but the method and lies while doing so vicious without any moral fiber and relentless.

  3. You are right about this, and I would include Ron DeSantis as among those who MAGA foolishly demonized despite his being the most successful and most conservative governor in the country.

    Everyone on the Right needs to read this if they don’t already understand what is going on. Trump is our champion for this moment in history. I am troubled, however, that the Right seems to be putting all of its eggs in one basket. If Trump leaves the stage, for whatever reason, do we have someone of equivalent charisma and fervor to carry on the battle? That we don’t, is to some extent the fault of Trump himself. Trump brutally suppressed Nikki Haley and Marco Rubio, to name but two. The Donald doesn’t like competition, from any quarter.

  4. @Raphael

    Trump brutally suppressed Nikki Haley and Marco Rubio, to name but two.

    This is because they both acted in their own way to destroy his presidency, one while he was still in office (Rubio)and the ottember of the Gang of Eight, ie member of the SSIC, Rubio supported the report suggesting that based on full knowledge of all the intelligence related to the Russia Hoax, Trump was guilty of collusion, something which Muller couldn’t and didn’t ultimately claim. This shouldn’t surprise anyone as Rubio was the darling of George W, and Trump was responsible for displacing the Bush clan from leading the Rep party, and that included Trump bumping Rubio after he initially bumped Jeb. Honestly is this the type of leader which you believe Trump should promote instead of suppress?

    As to Haley, recall that it was Haley, speaking as a formerly close ally of Trump, who condemned Trump for January 6, and stating that ‘we should never have followed him’. Her attempts to delegitimize Trump backfired while it delegitimized her in the eyes of both Trump and a great many his followers.

    The willingness of these two to cooperate with the Dem messaging should give all of us pause, and should also earn our scorn at the idea that either of these chameleons might be entitled to follow Trump as leader of the MAGA movement, a role for which neither one should bother applying.

    Still, you are quite correct that Trump needs to lay the seeds of the future leadership of his movement, and much of that work will come with his choice for VP. But the reality is that no matter whom Trump picks as VP, that person will have to gain the confidence of the people, and once again, I would challenge the possibility that MAGA would faithfully support either Haley or Rubio in this role, even if Trump did pick them to follow after him, which of course, Trump is too smart to do. While it is undeniably possible that Trump will pick another chameleon to serve after him in their place, but I would argue that whoever Trump chooses, it will be someone who has yet to betray the movement to which Trump would be endorsing them to lead.

  5. Everyone on the Right needs to read this if they don’t already understand what is going on. Trump is our champion for this moment in history. I am troubled, however, that the Right seems to be putting all of its eggs in one basket. If Trump leaves the stage, for whatever reason, do we have someone of equivalent charisma and fervor to carry on the battle? That we don’t, is to some extent the fault of Trump himself. Trump brutally suppressed Nikki Haley and Marco Rubio, to name but two. The Donald doesn’t like competition, from any quarter. He needs to get over that. I saw a photo of him the other day, and the Left is undoubtedly wearing him down. He looked like a whipped puppy. I grew up in a city that had a museum with a significant amount of Abraham Lincoln memorabilia. I recall a dramatic series of photos of Lincoln, spanning the years from just before the war, until just before his assassination. The change in the President’s visage was shocking. The war had markedly worn him down. No one is immune to stress, and they are wearing Trump down, too, never mind that he’s almost 78 years old. All that to say, that the Right needs urgently to be looking to the future. Trump shouldn’t try, nor be expected, to fight the Left alone. I hope that after the election, he will read the writing on the wall and assume the role of the wise old man of the party and help to raise up the next generation of “fighters”.

  6. The majority of Americans support Trump, but the outcome of the election most probably will be the same. The procedure (duration, mail-in votes, drop boxes, Voting Machines, etc.) is not changing. GOP does not do anything to change it. Joseph Stalin – It’s Not Who Votes That Counts, It’s Who Counts The Votes. 

    .