T. Belman. She is totally wrong in her description of historical fact. Particularly when she says that the world promised a two state solution 100 years ago; one for the Jews and one for the Palestinians. She has confused the two-state solution with the partition of Palestine into two future entities, Israel and Jordan. It is true that Britain proposed in the thirties contrary to law to further divide Israel into two states and that the UN, contrary to law, recommended Partition in 1947.
What was legally decided in the San Remo Conference in 1920 was that all of Palestine would be the Jewish National Home.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
@gascheatel
You are wrong. Read my preface carefully
I’m very disappointed with the anti-Israel stance of Gravitas, and their support not only for “Palestine” but even for Iran. For a long time, I thought that Gravitas was superior to its Indian rival TFG, because it had reporters “on the spot” in places that it reorted on, and identified its sources clearly when it cited secondary sources. TFG does not do either of these “professional” things, and its stories are usually either made up or pure speculation. Bu Gravitas’ anti_Israel bias means that I find it considerably worse than TTFG when it comes to reporting about Israel. Its reporting about Pakistan, China, Russia, and even Britain is pretty good. But its reporting about Israel and Iran sucks.
Whoa whoa, wait a minute. In the first minute she states accurately per international agreement Palestine was to be divided into two states one for the Jews and one for the Arabs. She goes on to say that hasn’t happened. Oh but yes it did. It is called Jordan! If not Arab what is it? She conveniently changed the map of Palestine to fit her sad narrative.