Decoding Donald Trump’s efforts to draw a road map for Israel and Palestine

It is more about countering Iran than making peace

ECONOMIST

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP casts himself as a master negotiator. But when he talks of trying to achieve peace between Israel and the Palestinians, he often sounds less confident. It is a “complex subject”, the “toughest deal of all”, said Mr Trump in September. Still, he rates his chances of success as “very, very good”.

A peace plan from the administration, expected in September, is now due in January. Mr Trump’s son-in-law and adviser, Jared Kushner (pictured, centre), is leading the effort. He is being helped by Jason Greenblatt, the president’s envoy to the Middle East; David Friedman, the ambassador to Israel; and Dina Powell, a deputy national-security adviser. The first three are orthodox Jews who do not conceal their pro-Israel sympathies.

Initially dismissed as neophytes, the team has won over sceptics with its willingness to listen. Even the Palestinians admire their readiness to take soundings in refugee camps, not just from politicians. They find the team more genial than Barack Obama’s “pen-pushers”. Mr Greenblatt, the chief negotiator, has opposed unilateral moves by Israel and welcomed the Palestinian reconciliation deal between the nationalist Fatah group (which controls the West Bank) and Hamas, an Islamist group (which holds sway in Gaza).

The administration has been tight-lipped about the details of its plan, but those who have spoken to Mr Greenblatt describe it as more of a process—“a road map without a defined road”, says one Palestinian negotiator. The initial steps will probably be little more than confidence-building measures. The harder problems, such as drawing borders, returning refugees and resolving the status of Jerusalem, would be left until much later. It is not even certain that the endgame is two states, which most of the world has long demanded. Among the ideas being mooted is eventually to put Jewish settlements in the West Bank under Palestinian control. The lack of clarity is seen as a tactic aimed at keeping everyone on board.

Whatever the administration produces, Saudi Arabia is likely to support it. Mr Kushner has struck up a friendship with Muhammad bin Salman, the Saudi crown prince. Though the prince’s foreign-policy record is not widely admired, he seems to have convinced Mr Kushner that he can help reshape the Middle East in ways that suit America. At Mr Trump’s behest he summoned the octogenarian Palestinian leader, Mahmoud Abbas, to Riyadh earlier this month and urged him to embrace the American plan. Mr Abbas is seen by all sides (including his own) as plodding, time-serving and compromised.

For Prince Muhammad, it seems, Palestinian aspirations to statehood are less important than countering Iran, which has extended its influence in the region. He has sought a closer relationship with Israel, which shares his dark view. There are reports that the Jewish state has shared intelligence with Saudi Arabia to help it in its war against the Iranian-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen. Prince Muhammad may calculate that a viable peace process would give him political cover to make the alliance more overt.

Other Arab states also have an interest in restarting talks. Egypt under Abdel-Fattah al-Sisi has taken a more active role in the peace process and recently helped to end the feud between Hamas and Fatah. Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates support Mr Sisi’s aim of cutting Hamas off from Iran and Qatar. Under a deal, they would probably fund development in Palestinian areas and furnish Israel with security guarantees.

Binyamin Netanyahu, Israel’s prime minister, has long seemed reluctant to negotiate with the Palestinians. But he might prefer an open-ended process to one with clear milestones and deadlines that would pin him down. He also wants to show gratitude to Mr Trump for not pushing him as hard as Mr Obama did.

The Palestinians are also loth to alienate the Americans. But they fear being pushed into a deal that leaves Israel in military control of the West Bank. (The Israelis have already pushed for Hamas to be disarmed before the talks begin.) “Neither Netanyahu nor Abbas wants to insult the American plan, but neither has any real interest in it either,” says Jon Alterman of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a think-tank in Washington, DC.

In the region, officials rate the chances of success as very, very low. “They won’t find a way to make the circle square after so many others have tried,” says an Israeli diplomat. “Both sides are looking for ways to say no to Mr Trump,” says a Palestinian negotiator. On this, at least, they agree.

This article appeared in the Middle East and Africa section of the print edition under the headline “The art of a peace deal”
November 25, 2017 | 4 Comments »

Leave a Reply

4 Comments / 4 Comments

  1. @ JoeBillScott:
    This would only occur if one they believe the King is working with Islamic Militants and the Saudis and Egyptians concur. Currently all visible signs are that the King and Trump get along famously. Four or so visits joint friendly Press Conference. The wives socializing. So these secret implied rumors, that King is going down, coming out of some circles, are not credible in my view.

  2. Bear:
    I think David Friedman will prevail over the State Department and get the message to Trump that the only solution is for King Abdullah to be ousted. The new CIA director will see to it that this happens in early 2018 thus changing all calculations previously made by the plo and Hamas.

  3. Palestinians will not compromise one iota on any of their demands. They will reject anything Trumps team offers that is not 100% of what they demand.

    They will try and be a road block to normalization between Israel and the Gulf States if they are able.

    The attempted and failed hardball on closing the PLO office in D.C. by Tillerson was to try and get the Pals to negotiate with Israel (which they are refusing still). Also it was to try and get them off of their internationalization strategy of the conflict which includes getting the ICC to investigate and charge Israel with crimes. No evidence that the USA has gotten the Pals to change their behavior.

    The question is how long will it take before Trump says okay there is no chance at the “The Ultimate Deal”? Will he blame Israel or Abbas or both? Trump will need to blame someone because certainly it could never be Trump who overreached in ambition and thereby failed. Will he move the embassy to Jerusalem or will he be just like all other Presidents in making campaign promises on this but failing to follow through?

  4. This is all simply whistling past the Palestinian graveyard.
    Can we please just start up the old Davidkas? We’ll let them load their trucks and make a run for home in Jordan or Egypt. ? ???!