Last night’s debate was a demonstration that nominating two absolutely unfit candidates for president may not have been a wise decision for America. There were rock ‘em, sock ‘em moments; there were attack angles from both candidates. But neither candidate was able to provide a comprehensive vision of America’s future, neither had a basic grasp of policy issues, both ignored looming crises like entitlements collapsing, and both demonstrated their penchant for lies and corruption.
Here are some takeaways.
1. Hillary Clinton Is Insanely Corrupt. Hillary breaks out the Nightmare Clown Grin™ every time she has no answer – and she broke it out an insane amount last night. She had no answers for why she took money from regimes that harm gays and women. She had no answers on her emails. She had no answers on why she told a Brazilian firm that she wanted open borders. She had no answers on the material in her Wikileaks. She had no answers on the Clinton Foundation corruption with the State Department. Hillary has no answers on her corruption because she’s ridiculously corrupt.
2. Trump Doesn’t Know How To Promote Conservatism. Trump nibbled around the edges of some conservative thoughts last night, but his defenses of conservatism were weak at best. He had the greatest opportunity to promote conservatism in presidential history – a moderator, Chris Wallace, who asked great questions, and an opponent, Hillary Clinton, who can’t defend her policies to save her life – and instead, he spoke in broad generalities and embraced a solid number of leftist policies. In his much-ballyhooed defense of the pro-life position, for example, he allowed Hillary to get away with the lie that women having partial birth abortion are simply making the difficult decision to kill nine-month-old babies to save their lives. He repeated that partial birth abortion is “tak[ing a] baby and rip the baby out of the womb of the mother just prior to the birth of the baby…it’s not okay with me.” But this fails to explain why that is wrong – what the baby is, what the baby looks like, any details that would help explain just how evil partial birth abortion is. That was his best moment. And it was weak. Trump spent much of his time last night railing against NAFTA and NATO. That has nothing to do with conservatism. Again, liberty was never mentioned at any point during this debate.
3. Trump Doesn’t Know How To Attack. Trump was touted during the primaries as the fellow who could attack. But last night, he launched a hundred attacks and failed to sustain any of them. The essence of attack in debate is forcing your opponent to answer the charges. Trump let Hillary swivel out of those charges by constantly shifting his own focus to defending himself. That allowed Hillary to redirect away from lines of attack she didn’t like, even though Trump hit her hard repeatedly. His penchant for speaking political shorthand – culled from reading only the headlines on news stories – doesn’t allow him to delve deeply into any single attack, leaving a scattershot overall impression of corruption but not latching it to anything substantial.
4. Hillary Lies Incessantly. Hillary Clinton can’t stop lying. She said that her “open borders” comments were only about energy. False. She said that the Heller decision was about toddlers. It wasn’t. She said that she wouldn’t put troops in Iraq, but would put Special Forces…which are troops. She said she wouldn’t let anybody into the country unvetted. False. She said partial birth abortion is about saving the life of the mother. False. She said the Clinton Foundation did everything right in Haiti. False. Hillary can’t stop lying because the moment she tells the truth, she has to resign in disgrace.
5. Trump Loves Vladimir Putin. Trump imploded when Hillary Clinton redirected from open borders to Vladimir Putin. “I don’t know Putin,” Trump said. “He said nice things about me. If we got along well, that would be good…She has no idea whether it is Russia, China or anybody else.” Clinton rightly pointed out that Trump would rather take Vladimir Putin’s word on Wikileaks than that of American intelligence agencies. Which led Trump to state, “Putin has outsmarted her every step of the way.” This is the Republican nominee. Ugh.
6. Hillary’s Values Are Disgusting. Hillary said that the Supreme Court existed to act as a sort of super-legislature of brilliant leftist godkings and godqueens, explaining to America what’s best for all of us. She said judges should “stand up to the powerful,” which is absolutely not the job of justices. She said her economic plans relied on redistribution “because we are going to go where the money is.” She defended partial birth abortion as just a “difficult decision,” ignoring the humanity of the child. She’s a far leftist, and her radicalism is actually evil.
7. Neither Has Serious Plans. Asked about her economic plans, Hillary Clinton doubled down on Barack Obama’s; asked about entitlements, Donald Trump simply said that we’d grow our way out of debt, which is eminently untrue. Asked about foreign policy, Hillary threw goo against the wall; asked about foreign policy, Trump railed in ridiculous fashion about Aleppo having fallen and Russia taking leadership. Neither Hillary nor Trump has any material plans – Hillary just has her radical leftism, and Trump his ad hoc approach to problem-solving.
8. Trump Is Utterly Self-Destructive. Trump fought Hillary to a standstill, and perhaps had her on the defensive. But he dropped two bombs that were utterly disastrous. First, he denied all allegations of sexual assault and harassment and accused the women of publicity-seeking, allowing Hillary her Movie Moment™, nearly complete with swelling music, to talk about victimized women – and let her get away with it without mentioning her intimidation of an alleged rape victim, even though Chris Wallace hung a softball for him to hit. Then, he said that he might not accept the results of the election, and failed to qualify the statement in any real way, just adding that he wanted to keep Americans in suspense – an act of utter insanity given his political need to project stability rather than chaos.
In the end, the debate won’t change any minds. Hillary Clinton is awful and evil. Donald Trump is a blue dog Democratic clod. Thanks, America – this one’s for you.
ltrail Said:
perhaps it made sense to the person to whom my reply was addressed. Perhaps you could be more specific as to what you do not understand? I dont like whiskey.
@ bernard ross:
Your rant doesn’t make sense. Are you drinking some whiskey-based drink right now?
@ mar55:
I wasnt interested in discussing this article, it ended for me here:
Trump is not out to defend “conservatism” or any ideology. His agenda was pragmatic… although I think he has “conservatized” some of his agenda to rope in some ideologues… like now he says “free trade but fair trade” whereas before he said “fair trade not free trade” I also am not interested in ideologues, I have found such folk to be limited thinkers who stay in the box. I scanned the rest of his 8 points and they seemed silly… so I passed it by.
An Open Letter to Attorney General Loretta Lynch
Dear Madam Attorney General:
Just as Zika Virus has entered the Continental USA, so has corruption seeped into, what used to be, an above reproach Federal Agency, the Department of Justice. AG Lynch. You and FBI Dir. Comey, both Appointees of President Obama, have apparently become the President’s pawns to protect a guilty felon, Hillary Rodman Clinton. It’s time to take remedial action, admit that you are under President Obama’s thumb, and indict Ms. Clinton on all charges.
Neither Dir. Comey, nor yourself, are willing to indict Ms. Clinton, and yet Dir. Comey admits to The House of Representatives that Ms. Clinton is guilty of theft, perjury, treason, and other felony charges. The Statutes do not rely on “intent” for authority to prosecute.
You have chosen to allow corruption of the Rule of Law, by allowing Ms. Clinton to be above the Rule of Law; a two-tier system, if you will. Dir. Comey even stated that if anyone did the same crimes, they would be sent to prison (my paraphrasing). This is tantamount to Obstruction of Justice. You, Madam AG, did not recuse yourself so that you could remain in total control. Had you recused yourself, the Asst. Attorney General would be in control, and the outcome might have been different.
Is it possible that “Pay to Play” is happening in your own House? I’m not speaking of a monetary exchange (although that’s still to be determined), but rather, a new career advancement. From my perspective, that appears plausible. If Ms. Clinton is not indicted, she remains a possible candidate for POTUS. If she becomes the POTUS, there is a distinct possibility that you, Loretta Lynch, would be appointed by Ms. Clinton, to a Seat on the Supreme Court. If Ms. Clinton is indicted, the Supreme Court offering goes away.
Now. What about James Comey, your Subordinate? How does he benefit? For starters, he gets to keep his career, under Ms. Clinton’s POTUS watch if she’s elected. Beyond that benefit, your guess is as good as mine. But we do know that Dir. Comey is a Director of a large bank, HSBC Holdings, that has donated to the Clinton Foundation. Hmmmm. And then???? We learn that Bleachbit was used to wipe clean Hillary’s private servers. Isn’t that the “Intent” that you, for some reason, couldn’t find to indict her? You now need to indict her, or you and James B. Comey, are as corrupt as she is, and must resign.
Sincerely,
PLEASE SHARE THIS OPEN LETTER FAR AND WIDE. I SENT IT DIRECTLY TO COMEY’S AND LYNCH’S WEBSITE COMMENTS.
@ Prof Asher J Matathias:
You sound like a saaaad siiick backside licker….. And palatable as it must be for you, you should try it with mustard…. aLOT of mustard, and then it might turn into Mustard Gas which you should inhale deeply, and the depart from this place with our blessings. Since you already feel blessed, perhaps because the most crooked jailworthy criminal politician threw you her patented china teeth smile, you may feel blessed….but it’s not the real thing, be assured. Our Blessings are real, but only if and when you depart from this place….you know what I mean…….huh….eh….?
@ Cindy L Solis:
Most emphatically, do not consider Bibi in the same league as Ben Gurion, Rabin, Peres, Sharon, the list is considerable; nor would I take his word if, as he erroneously tried to do, it’s posed opposite our President. The choice is not even close, for I side with President Obama! An Obamacan, Republican for Obama
Asher J. Matathias feeling blessed.
4 hrs ·
E-MAILiT Social Sharing
·
One does not have to travel far in our crazy Five Towns than to cull the writings of the inane Larry Gordon, and Jeff Dunetz, among others, of the toxic and grossly misnamed 5T (un)Jewish Times, and The Jewish Star(less), respectively. Assured that they write for shamefaced acolytes, in an echo chamber that brooks no diversified opinion; and absent local rabbinic leadership to chastise them for their willful exploitation of intra-communal divisions, they have regularly injected our American political bloodstream with poisonous nonsense — for eight years against our distinguished President, now poised to do the same with the first woman Chief Executive!
Gordon has a head start in this mission, projecting eight psychotic ruminations on the third Presidential debate.
To him, our next Commander-in-Chief is branded insanely corrupt; has Larry seen himself in the mirror, debasing legitimate journalism that his late father labored to raise to respectability?
Trump is accused of not being able to promote conservatism; which one? Is it the one that Ayn Rand would find acceptable? No safety nets, no Social Security, Medicare, or Affordable Care Act, where laissez faire, and unfettered naked capitalism will reign? Gordon says that Trump doesn’t know how to attack. Really, what else has this nasty misanthrope has been doing for more than a year?
Gordon attributes to Hillary an incessant string of lies, not realizing how he has patented the genre, along with his hero: lying about our President’s origin, his ardent support of Israel and Jews, any reader knows the pathetic drill of misinformation Larry’s poor entry to the newspaper profession represents. A brief semblance of realism creeps in this creepy columnist’s assessment when he, too, questions the mutual admiration that has emerged between Putin and Trump!
Then, this sad excuse of a professional declares Hillary’s values “disgusting.” Does he have a record of caring for children, poor, students, workers, medically-challenged Americans without insurance coverage, hard-hitting international negotiations? Knew that a dispassionate reader won’t think so; an imperfect Hillary is superior to the fatally-flowed Trump, or Gordon! The outrageous statement includes Gordon’s regret that neither candidate “has serious plans.”
We are incredulous with this patent stupidity: Hillary comes replete with a comprehensive program behooving a lifetime wonk — climate control, minimum wage, robust military and foreign policy, student college debt, improving the ACA, equal gender pay, and not only; Trump, as is his custom, is programmatically vacuous, ignorant of basic civics, and civility, totally unfit for the Oval Office, or any job!
Finally, this screed’s deficient publisher-editor, perennially embarrassing and shameful to our Jewish community, and beyond (for I herald its limitations in my speeches and published articles), concludes that “Trump is self-destructive.” Dah! Where has he been, while Trump(ism) was taking over my nominal Party; insulting and assaulting our collective sense of sanity and decency (not his, of course)?
This ignoble chapter in our glorious nation’s history yearns to end, and will surely conclude on November 8; the next day, we will come together Americans all (legal and aspiring), to bind our self-inflicted wounds we allowed a child-man, devoid of education and morality, but ample bigotry, to visit upon us. We shall begin to expiate our considerable pain by performing our patriotic duty to put our nation above Party: foremost to vote, rejecting paranoia, xenophobia, misogyny, and racism — all conspicuously present in my Republican Party — and then, rebuild it along the inclusive, progressive, moderate, even liberal tradition reflected in Abe’s, TR’s, and Ike’s vision. E Pluribus Unum. ????
I am personally very proud of all those who gave Ben Shapiro the smack down. This article/opinion of his is most likely a global elitist point of view. I would love to see who he wants to be President. But then we probably know that answer. Are you also against Bibi?
Trump is pro Israel. Clinton is anti Israel. Trump is pro Police and Military. Clinton is anti Police and military. Trump is pro Capitalism. Clinton is anti Capitalism. Trump is pro Energy. Clinton is anti Energy. Ben Shapiro, Bret Stephens, Bill Kristol all sophisticated intellectual Jewish Conservatives are lost at sea and cannot see these simple truths. My mom called people like them intellectual snobs. Pitiful. My wife Marsha has these never Trump,Clinton enablers figured out.
@ Austin:
The most important point is that 1/2 the population considers abortion to be personal choice. 1/2 of the population considers birth, rather than conception to be the beginning of the person’s life.
To criminalize something that 1/2 of the population considers a matter of personal discretion is the most unwise the most divisive politics possible. It divides and weakens the country.
By contrast, substantially less than 1% of the population would approve of killing a born baby.
To me the beginning of person’s life is a matter of religious view, rather than “science”.
It possible to find scriptural support for both views within the Bible, too. For example God created Adam, but Adam was lifeless until God breathed the breath of life into his nostrils. This can be interpreted that until Adam took his first breath he was not yet alive.
Interestingly linguistically soul is associated with breath. “Spirit”, “spiritual”, all come from the root meaning breath. Likewise in 4 other languages that I happened to know.
Personally, and I am not trying to impose my views on you or anyone else, just sharing: to me my life in my mother’s womb was not “my” life. I was not separate from my mother. I did not know myself as separate being. I did not have any individual awareness. My mothers feelings were my feelings, etc. I did acquire individual existence and individual “soul” when I was born. Soul is related to “solo”, alone, one, individual. I was not individual until I separated from my mother.
In any case, I am just sharing my spiritual views, I am not trying to persuade others to change their’s. However I am speaking for respecting the views of others and not imposing our spiritual beliefs on others.
This is the way to have a healthy, free, and humane society.
There are 1000s of things that we can agree and work together, why obsessively focus on one that makes it impossible.
And the practical result of criminalizing abortion will lead to illegal abortions.
Now the lowest most underprivileged, the least educated, and the least intelligent classes, will indeed have more unwanted children. Not necessarily to the benefit of the society…
@ veet vivarto:
I think a bit differently to you on this. If a woman has the sort of sex which makes her pregnant, it is her own doing, and a process has been put in place that will definitely produce a brand new human being, of her blood. Unless of course, and this should go without saying, that she has a spontaneous abortion, or her ife would be in danger of the development process was continued. These are medical matters, and should not be left up to the woman, who committed the act in the first place. It make it “abortions on demand” or “baby murder on demand” . A woman must have a sense of her DUTY to be careful if she doesn’t want to become pregnant.
No I do not agree. A woman knows a lot more about the gynecological aspects of sex than a man and knows how to avoid pregnancy if she wishes.
@ mar55:
The comment from No.14 was from the site below:
http://truepundit.com/pentagon-hillary-clinton-should-be-arrested-for-leaking-top-secret-nuclear-intelligence-on-national-tv/
Ted, where is Bernard Ross? Has he taken a vacation from this place? always count on him to watch and comment on the details sometimes missed by other people.
Bernard, please come back!
@ Austin:
http://www.sharefortrump.com/node/1549?a=12188
Hillary Reveals Nuclear Secrets At Debate
Hillary Clinton divulged Top Secret nuclear security intelligence to tens of millions of worldwide television audience viewers Wednesday night during the third presidential debate, according to high-ranking Department of Defense personnel.
Clinton, responding to opponent Donald Trump and a question posed by debate moderator Chris Wallace, boasted specific and “damaging” details about the United States’ nuclear response time to retaliate during a nuclear attack. Clinton said:
“But here’s the deal. The bottom line on nuclear weapons is that when the president gives the order, it must be followed. There’s about four minutes between the order being given and the people responsible for launching nuclear weapons to do so.” –Hillary Clinton, National TV Appearance
Ben Shapiro. You are dead wrong when you wrote, “But neither candidate was able to provide a comprehensive vision of America’s future, neither had a basic grasp of policy issues, both ignored looming crises like entitlements collapsing, and both demonstrated their penchant for lies and corruption.” Trump provided a succinct list of accomplishments that he plans to do. You and those who read this, your article, better review the entire 90 minute debate, once again.
Ben Shapiro will get what he deserves and so will the rest of the “Never Trumpers” if they screw us and this nation.
They gave us McCain and Romney…HAVEN’T YOU HAD ENOUGH, BEN AND BRET?
Ben Shapiro, I hope you enjoy a nuked Israel by the Ayatollahs, more ISIS terrorism, supreme court justices who legislate from the bench and curtail our freedoms, and screw the 2nd Amendment.
I once thought you were a pretty smart guy and a courageous kid who fought freedom’s enemies at UCLA. Now you’re just a pathetic schmuck who in his rush to elect Hillary so the same “conservatives” he does support will do nothing as they have these past 6 years.
Face reality, boychik, your heroes Ryan, McConnell, Cruz and Corker did jack shit to stop Obama – heck they couldn’t even prevent the Iran deal. THEY’RE SURE NOT GOING TO STOP THE MONGREL.
No, the name isn’t Ben Shapiro. Ir is Ben Schmuck.
Abortion issue is divisive.
Many people hesitate to vote for Trump just because of his pretended opposition to abortion.
On the other hand if he stopped pretending that he cares about abortion one way or the other, then the social conservatives would not vote for him. So it is a delicate mater.
The important thing to understand that whether abortion is legal or not, it will be still happening. The only difference will be that illegal abortions will be more dangerous to women.
However that, too, may be a thing of the past. At least the early pregnancies today can easily be interrupted with just a pill. The whole discussion is just damaging to American politics.
Personally I don’t see any wisdom in interfering with my next door’s neighbor’s decisions regarding her womb…
Ben Shapiro is a ” never Trumper”. Apparently, the fact that Trump wants to see an undivided Jewish State where Jews can live in peace and not be constantly criticized by the U.S. Government is not that important to him. I am so disappointed in Shapiro, Goldberg, Kristol, Bret Stephens and all the rest of them. Trump was not my first choice either, but once he became
The Republican nominee I learned to appreciate the positive things he is for.
Hillary will finish the job Obama started, and we must stop her. If that means supporting an imperfect Republican candidate, that’s where we should be.
Trump is more conservative than most of republicans who criticize him. It is more than enough to vote for him.
Hillary Clinton is evil, corrupt and criminal.
It is only one choice-Trump.
Well blast it to hell. My long, measured, point by point comment was jammed and never was able to be printed. There is definitely a short limit to what the computer controlled “moderator” on this site can handle. I doubt if I could repeat so concisely my earlier lost missive. And on fact, I no longer have the inclination.
I am disappointed, because there were many points I made well worth noticing, not the least, that Clinton must have had at least 30-40-50% more speaking time than Trump. The moderator most often began with her, and allowed her a rebuttal of Trump, which she used to make a political speech each time, repeating the same platitude over and over, in a different way each time, as if in a football game “running out the clock”. Wallace was a completely ineffective, other than being allowed to ask the questions (composed by others)
He never reined in Clinton, although his very soft interjection could be heard when her time was up, with her ploughing through it. In fact he usually could be heard about every 30 secs past the “time-up” 3-4-5 times, with no effect until she would at last run down. I though he was to be supplied with a referee whistle.
Trump, by comparison, rarely got the opportunity to reply to her lies, and when he did, his voice was low, his mic soft, and he wasn’t clearly heard like Clinton, who’s mic was loud, her voice louder.
Trump should have spent at least 2 hours a day with a voice teacher learning inflection, tone, volume control and when to rise to intensity.(such as in the partial Birth Abortion question)
He missed a HUGE opportunity where he should have described “late birth abortion” in graphic, movie quality terms….”as long as a single foot has not emerged, the complete, whole, living human being, a defenceless baby, has a spike or instrument driven through his/her head, destroying the brain, and killing a new human being.”
He missed his opportunity on the 33,000 destroyed emails and the accusation that he encouraged Putin to “commit espionage” to hack them. What he actually had quipped was that if he did hack them, and published, then we, the American People would at last learn what was in them.
He could have pained a graphic picture of her acolytes, behind closed/ doors, probably at nighttime, destroying with hammers, the 13 different instruments she used for the illegal emails..AFTER the subpoena was received…… and Much Much More……. he made, by ommission, the most egregious errors in wasting his time with inanities.
I’m badly disappointed.
He should have known that his whimsical last obviously spur of the moment remark, directed to the moderator Wallace, was just his humour, but would be jumped on immediately as addressing the American People.. I actually heard the Dem boffins say that he REFUSED to support Clinton if she won. Ah me, Oh MY, Oy Veh…. (here an exaggerating wringing of the hands)
Anyway, I had a hell of a lot more to say, and in far better order than this now, but it’s lost in the bowels of this devilish instrument that Ted uses. I don’t know if this will be printed..even.
Disappointing.
Trump won the debate hands down and Hillary was helpless most if the time. Trump could have driven the late term abortion point with more detail I agree. He could have also mentioned that Khan is a friend of the Clintons is a radical Islamist who makes his money by assisting Muslim immigrants into the US.
What peeves me is the lying CNN who consistently present skewed poll results and are driving the Democratic narrative by having post-debate panels dominated by Clinton supporters masquerading as impartial who criticize Trump at every turn and are soft as cotton-wool on the obvious Clinton lies. Donald should have destroyed her on the obvious lies she told. CNN also have documentary filmmaker Karl Burns accusing Trump of having roots in the Nazi’s, comparing Syrian refugees with the Jews in the 2nd World war who were escaping from the Nazi’s. He misses the point that the Jews do not have an ideology that seeks to destroy democracy and force everyone into Islam on fear of death as a number of the so-called refugees have amongst them. CNN makes me feel sick with their bias. Clinton should be arrested, not elected as President. Her unsubstantiated accusations against Putin were disgraceful and certainly extremely poor diplomacy, but it seems that Obama is also doing his level best to destroy the US relationship with Russia, certainly some evil agenda behind that, do they (the Democrats) want a war?
In almost a parody of political correctness, her lawyer “filed a complaint on her behalf with the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal, for discrimination on the basis of sex and family status.” http://www.jewishpress.com/news/breaking-news/jewish-hospital-sued-for-refusing-to-abort-healthy-twin/2016/08/05/
This reminds me of the notorious though, as it turns out, apocryphal, Lizzie Borden Defense:
“I’ve killed my parents. Have mercy on me. I’m an orphan.”
http://www.chicagotribune.com/ct-pensions-lizzie-borden-perspec-zorn-0313-20150312-column.html
Also, he could have mentioned this.: http://www.jewishpress.com/news/breaking-news/jewish-hospital-sued-for-refusing-to-abort-healthy-twin/2016/08/05/
She had an Iranian lawyer, yet. I remember being pretty shocked by this. Still am.
Yes, “
” Well, said. That’s what she creeps me out with every time she smiles. Agree with the articles observations about Hillary but I feel it is too harsh on Donald. I thought he did well. And I find his economic prescription credible.
My only two criticisms of his performance is, first, failing to mention that Khan is a notorious Sharia-Supremacist and Clinton Slush fund collaborator. Being the father of someone who died in battle is not a defense; Benedict Arnold would have died a national hero and a founding father, if he had died before his betrayal, and besides people only should get credit for their own actions, anyway. What is this a monarchy?
And, second, What ABout Israel?, HUh?
This is what I sent out to my email list, last night:
“While I agree with Trump on Most Issues, This is the only reason that actually determines how I vote. I would vote for any politician who took this position and meant it. It’s about Ending U.S. pressure on Israel and Putting it on the U.N. where it belongs. It’s about preventing the next Holocaust.
Republican Platform 2016
https://prod-static-ngop-pbl.s3.amazonaws.com/media/documents/DRAFT_12_FINAL%5B1%5D-ben_1468872234.pdf
(written by Trump and Cruz’s advisors. I voted for Cruz in the Republican primary because he was the strongest pro-Israel advocate. I switched from Independent to Republican last year so I could vote for Huckabee who was the only candidate who called openly for Greater Israel.)
and then in a subsequent email:
And I switched from Democrat to Independent in 2008 Because
Obama insulted (we’ve been hearing that Muslim-inspired word a lot lately, anybody remember defending the speech you hate?) Bibi and Israel. I won’t be in the same party with anti-semitic scum.
Seriously??? You think that America is being bled by the rest of the world is a joke? You think that the military should be rebuild is a chuckle?
Your one of these pseudo intellecctuals that cant think his way out of a paper bag.
Trump has come up with a honest straight forward agenda that has not been approved by Harvard, Yale or Princton (Thank God). Donald Trump won the debate.