WSJ: Pfizer Trial Found Vaxxed Toddlers ‘Were More Likely to Get Severely Ill With Covid’

Chris Menahan, InformationLiberation 
Jul. 05, 2022


The Wall Street Journal reported Monday that toddlers vaccinated during Pfizer’s trial were “more likely to get severely ill with Covid than those who received a placebo” and “most kids who developed multiple infections during the trial were vaccinated.”

From WSJ, “Why the Rush for Toddler Vaccines?”:

“This is a very historic milestone, a monumental step forward,” President Biden declared last week after the Food and Drug Administration authorized Pfizer and Moderna vaccines for toddlers. “The United States is now the first country in the world to offer safe and effective Covid-19 vaccines for children as young as 6 months old.”

In fact, we don’t know if the vaccines are safe and effective. The rushed FDA action was based on extremely weak evidence. […]

More troubling, vaccinated toddlers in Pfizer’s trial were more likely to get severely ill with Covid than those who received a placebo. Pfizer claimed most severe cases weren’t “clinically significant,” whatever that means, but this was all the more reason that the FDA should have required a longer follow-up before authorizing the vaccine.

Also worrisome: Most kids who developed multiple infections during the trial were vaccinated. This warranted more investigation, since experimental vaccines for other diseases sometimes increase susceptibility to infection.

Scientists are also discovering that triple-vaccinated adults who were previously infected with the Wuhan variant have a weaker immune response to Omicron, leaving them more susceptible to reinfection. This phenomenon, called “immunological imprinting,” could explain why children who received three Pfizer shots were more likely to get reinfected.

The FDA brushed aside the risk that inoculating infants against a variant no longer circulating could blunt their immune responses to Omicron and its offshoots. There’s a reason vaccine trials usually take a decade. Some steps can be accelerated, but an extended follow-up is often necessary to ensure potential side effects aren’t overlooked.

The FDA standard for approving vaccines in otherwise healthy people, especially children, is supposed to be higher than for drugs that treat the sick. But the FDA conspicuously lowered its standards to approve Covid vaccines for toddlers. Why?

An NIH study of adults who took part in Moderna’s trial (which ran through March 2021) found those with shots had fewer N antibodies after COVID infection when compared with the unvaccinated, suggesting they’re more likely to get reinfected with the virus.

This was known shortly after the covid vaccine rollout began but our public health authorities didn’t bother to tell the public. Instead, they did everything in their power to mandate everyone take these experimental shots in order to work or go to school and ordered social media companies to censor all dissenters.

July 6, 2022 | 3 Comments »

Leave a Reply

3 Comments / 3 Comments

  1. Update: Judge orders “immediate suspension of vaccination agaisnt Covid to children (under 13yrs) under penalty of contempt”.

    The suspension will remain until the following conditions are met:
    -All contracts must be made public without redaction
    -All documents associated with the contracts must also be published, particularly noting the documents that cite the contents of the injections
    -A prepared document is provided that includes
    —The compositon of the injections
    —The benefits of the injections
    —The risks involved in the injections, detailing the nature, probability and magnitude of the risks, as well as the time reference of the risk if known.
    —Clearly note that the injections are being provided with only an experimental authorization, explaining in clear and easily understood language all the various distinctions that exist between experimental authorization and an appproved biological injection.
    —Detailing the adverse effects that have been experienced by people already.

    The case has only three days to be appealed.
    https://www.elobservador.com.uy/nota/justicia-dio-lugar-al-amparo-y-suspendio-la-vacunacion-en-ninos-menores-de-13-anos-20227712847

  2. Pfizer must prove efficacy and safety of its Covid vaccine within 48 hours in Uruguay court
    July 6, 2022|Corruption, Inquiry, Law, Politics, Research, World

    The judge made the order as part of a complaint to suspend childhood vaccinations in Uruguay. The extent to which the authorities and Pfizer can provide the required evidence (and whether their failure to do so will have consequences) will become clear on Wednesday.

    RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL – Uruguay media report that a Montevideo judge has ordered disclosure of a range of information about Covid vaccines – within 48 hours. Administrative Judge Alejandro Recarey’s order is directed at the government, the Ministry of Health, the state health agency, and pharmaceutical giant Pfizer.

    Among other things, detailed information on the vaccine composition and evidence of its safety is required.

    Representatives of all agencies, as well as pharmaceutical giant Pfizer, are due to appear at the hearing at 9 a.m. Wednesday, where the requested information must be presented.

    The judge made the order as part of a complaint to suspend childhood vaccinations in Uruguay.

    According to the decree, the following information is requested:

    -The vaccine purchase contracts between the Uruguayan government and Pfizer, as well as information on whether clauses for civil compensation or immunity from punishment for suppliers in the event of possible side effects, are included
    -Information on the distribution of the vaccine batches, as well as quality control measures
    -Detailed information on the biochemical composition of the vaccine – including whether graphene oxide and nanotechnology components are included
    -Information on the mRNA used and evidence that it is harmless
    -A statement whether the vaccine or parts of its ingredients are experimental
    -Detailed data demonstrating the efficacy and safety of the vaccination, i.e., “the negative or positive impact of the so-called vaccination on the number of infections and deaths diagnosed with Covid from the beginning of the campaign to the present”
    -Detailed information on the average age of those who died with Covid-19 diagnosis and information on how many of those deaths were caused solely by the disease
    -Information on whether studies are being conducted on the increase in deaths in Uruguay since the vaccination campaign began in March 2021
    -Scientific evidence that unvaccinated people pose a risk
    -Information on those responsible for and involved in the vaccination campaign and their links to NGOs or (pharmaceutical) companies
    -Information on the extent to which alternative therapies against covid-19 have been investigated

    The extent to which the authorities and Pfizer can provide the required evidence (and whether their failure to do so will have consequences) will become clear on Wednesday.

    https://worldfreedomalliance.org/au/news/pfizer-must-prove-efficacy-and-safety-of-its-covid-vaccine-within-48-hours-in-uruguay-court/

  3. None of this is rational. As unthinkable as it might be, there is no explanation that could be put forward to explain the use of a vaccine that induces more disease than it prevents, and yet this is what has occurred with the full support of those individuals who have been entrusted with the oversight of the greater well being of not just the children and babies, but every age group.