WEF partners with Big Tech and governments to police Internet, encourage ‘coordinated action’ against unauthorized voices deemed ‘harmful’ to collective psyche
by Leo Hohmann July 1, 2021
The World Economic Forum announced June 29 it will initiate a new “public-private partnership” with Big Tech and governments around the world to identify and uproot all opinions from the Internet that it considers “harmful.”
The WEF is one of those elitist organizations that wields enormous influence over the elected leaders of Western nations but which almost nobody in the general population has heard of.
Its members are internationalist corporate honchos and technocrats who meet once a year in Davos with the stated goal of working to “shape global, regional and industry agendas.”
It made a big splash last year with its highly touted “Great Reset,” which promises to use the pandemic as an “opportunity” to crash the world’s dollar-based, capitalist economic system and “build back better” under a more socialist and globally integrated system that mirrors the United Nations Agenda 2030 goals for Sustainable Development.
Any politician you hear using the term “build back better” [Biden-Harris-Trudeau-Johnson repeat this mantra daily] you know has drunk the poisonous Kool-Aid of the World Economic Forum and its founder, Klaus Schwab [pictured below].
<
>
Schwab’s latest venture is the so-called “Global Coalition for Digital Safety” that consists of execs from Big Tech and government officials with the goal of creating a “global framework” for regulating speech on the Internet, wiping it of so-called “harmful content.”
[I could not help but think of the Committee of Public Safety that conducted the reign of terror during the French Revolution.]
And who gets to define what’s “harmful”? Why, the global coalition set up by the elitist WEF of course!
The “harmful” content targeted by this Global Coalition for Digital Safety you can bet will be tailor made to entrap those who stand for limited government, traditional values and individual freedom. Those of us who still believe in such things will not be included in the WEF’s definition “inclusive,” “equality” or “diversity.”
“The Global Coalition for Digital Safety is a public private platform for global, multi stakeholder cooperation to develop innovations and advance collaborations that tackle harmful content and conduct online,” states the WEF on its website.
Microsoft immediately announced it was on board with the WEF’s plan to squelch free speech on the Internet.
Chief digital safety officer for Microsoft Courtney Gregoire stated:
“Technology offers tools to learn, play, connect, and contribute to solving some of the world’s greatest challenges. But digital safety harms remain a threat to these possibilities. As the World Economic Forum is uniquely positioned to accelerate the public-private collaboration needed to advance digital safety globally, Microsoft is eager to participate and help build whole-of-society solutions to this whole-of-society problem.”<
>
Facebook also seems excited to get started on finding new ways to groom users to start thinking about turning in their friends for wrongthink. The social media giant has begun sending cryptic messages to some users that read as follows:
“Are you concerned that someone you know is becoming an extremist?”
See screenshot below that one user received from Facebook today, July 1, and sent to this reporter.
This program fits perfectly with the rhetoric coming out of Washington since Biden claimed the presidency.
Biden and his attorney general, Merrick Garland, take every opportunity to talk about “extremists” on the right being the “biggest threat to our democracy.” This is a classic propaganda technique used to turn public sentiment against a targeted demographic. The Nazis perfected this, using the media to blame all of Germany’s problems on Jews before they actually started rounding them up and making them disappear.
The next phase in this evil plan is to encourage Americans to turn each other in to the online thought police. What happens next, after one has been reported to Facebook, Google or Microsoft? Will the tech giants turn those accused of thought crimes by their online “friends” and “followers” over to Biden’s politicized FBI? This is exactly how it works in China.
Readers of this blog know that China is the model being touted by those who believe in the Great Reset. Now their plans are right out in the open on the World Economic Forum website with this announcement of their Global Coalition for Digital Safety.
The WEF states:
“With the growing challenge to counter health misinformation, violent extremist and terrorist content, and the exploitation of children online, there is an urgent need for more deliberate global coordination to improve digital safety.
“The Global Coalition for Digital Safety aims to accelerate public-private cooperation to tackle harmful content online and will serve to exchange best practices for new online safety regulation, take coordinated action to reduce the risk of online harms, and drive forward collaboration on programs to enhance digital media literacy.”<
>
In the above quote, notice how sneakily the WEF lumps spreaders of “health misinformation” – that would be anyone who expresses reticence about experimental mass vaccination programs, COVID lockdowns, mandatory mask wearing, etc. – in with violent extremists, terrorists and child traffickers. How clever.
The WEF has the audacity to claim its coalition will be “impartial” in policing the Internet. This is the same organization run by Schwab, who openly states that the pandemic should be exploited as a “unique window of opportunity” to fundamentally change the way the people live, work, do business and fit into society.
“The Forum is uniquely positioned to leverage its impartial platform and convening power to drive public-private cooperation amongst key stakeholders focused on improving safety online,” the WEF states in its release about the new coalition.
The WEF sets itself up as the global arbiter that defines terms like “harmful content” and “misinformation.” It also laments the fact that encrypted social media channels like Telegram and Signal are able to allow users to communicate free of censorship and spying.
Here are its recommendations for “key focus areas that now require coordinated action” by governments and their Big Tech allies:
1. Share Best Practices on Safety Standards: Exchange knowledge on policies and practices for improving online safety, considering content policies, remedies, transparency reports, use of data, and new technologies
2. Address Balance of Privacy and Safety: Share best practices on addressing the growing tension between privacy and safety as harmful content on encrypted channels risks evading detection
3. Market Competition: Drive better alignment between regulations focused on safety and competition to foster market innovation and enable consumer choice
4. Cross-Jurisdictional Content Cooperation: Enable action on content that spans jurisdictions and requires greater coordination amongst countries (e.g. content created in one county but causing harm in another)
5. Definitional Alignment: Support work on consistent definitions for content categories, such as self-harm and cyber-bullying to enable standardized enforcement, reporting, and measurement across regions.
If COVID taught us anything, it’s that Big Tech social-media platforms, in league with global power elites, defined for us what is allowed and not allowed to be said on the Internet.
Posts that challenge the official narrative about the virus and the best way to respond to it were immediately censored, either tagged with warnings meant to discredit the posts or removed all together.
The most typical reason for such censorship was that these posts “violated community standards,” which consist of mysterious, vaguely worded legalese that nobody reads.
Big Tech corporations are also increasingly working in concert with governments around the world, including in the U.S. and the ruling Chinese Communist Party in China, to regulate what people are allowed to see on the Internet.
But all of this control over the free flow of information is not enough for some of the global power elites.
Now they are ready to take their Gestapo tactics to the next level.
They want to turn us against each other.
Don’t let them do it.
Now is the time for all freedom-loving patriots in nations across the world to wake up, rise up, recognize these tactics as divisive and anti-human, and unite against this pernicious group of global predators.
(2 of 2)
In that contract, the legitimacy and composition of gov’t is established as a consequence of elections and those legal statutes have recently been recklessly violated with a willful intent by foreign actors which belies any legitimate or accidental explanation for the impeachable toleration for the recent election thefts by every gov’t entity. The plan is not subtle and the plot is barely obscured. A global regime intends to extend its designs on the American nation and her sister democracies across the world.
Recognizing this, it comes to a choice that the American nation will, by whatever means necessary, choose their future as free men characterized by sovereign rights, and as dictated by the founding charters, or they will choose to go forth as chattled slaves, owned and co-opted by the state, as dictated by foreign interests.
This choice will not be decided by any election process but rather by human tolerance of any imposed global tyranny as described above. Men will acquiesce or resist to such an imposed burden and the outcome of this contest will, as was true with the American Founders, determine a combined fate of all.
If this current aberration is left unrestored to the founders’ will, the philosophic underpinnings of their great resolutions will wilt from a considered fact into a tissue of myths, unmade by the acknowledgement that tyranny will be the natural successor to this fallen republic.
As these past two centuries turned, America served as the spark which burned the image of liberty from one end of the globe to the next, with increasing acceptance by each generation, of the founding truths of the American nation by emergent democracies.
No convenience can be so great, nor any penalty be so severe, nor any public be so craven as to abandon the recognition and defense of these inalienable rights for both current and coming generations. Such globalist designs, as described by Hoffman in the above article, upon the American nation, and her sister democracies across the globe, must be opposed by all means and by all peoples.
Failing this, the tolerance of the Great Reset will serve to reset the limits of tyranny over free men who will be free no more until either they or their descendants recoil from being willing actors in the service of these global tyrants, and recall that “it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security” and once again throw off the yoke of tyranny as was first envisioned in 1776.
/2
(1 of 2)
The American Republic was the consequence of a philosophical debate regarding the just origin of gov’t authority, following a series of events which the Founders saw as “repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States”.
The era of the 1770’s displayed a wide collection of oppressive tyrants, some more complete than others, all of whom accepted their authority from a divine anointment which they utilized to rule their subjects who were little more than property to be dealt with much as if they were a piece of furniture or an acre of land.
Opposed to this view, the Founders of the US Republic drew from the strength of their Judeo-Christian beliefs that men held a right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and that these rights were an extension of the intimate relationship between men and G_d rather then emanating from any tool of oppression such as a King or Parliament. . Accordingly, the American rebels broke with the accepted top-down model of authority and embarked upon a great experiment which enshrined a bottom-up model in its place.
They declared that securing these rights of men should be the very purpose of gov’t and that to this end men granted the authority of gov’t over them “by the consent of the governed” – but only to this end. Further than this, they proposed that “certain unalienable rights” existed among all men and that these rights were actually “endowed by their Creator”. They established an agreement upon the gov’t’s limit of authority in a document named the Constitution.
Hence, the Constitution was but a great contract between this newly adopted experimental gov’t and the people who formed it upon these stated principles. It enumerated the limits of authority that would be ceded by the American public to their gov’t and thereby, intentionally limit the breadth of its authority upon the public.
/1
@Ted Belman
Thanks.
This is the end of free speech as we know it. Without free speech there are no other freedoms. The globalist reset effort is a return to the binary socio–political system of rulers and ruled. It is a catastrophic regressive political system that eliminates private property, the middle class, and the individual freedoms guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. The Great Reset is the greatest humanitarian hoax perpetrated on the world community in human history. The political corruption and tyranny of the Biden/Obama/Harris regime is unparalleled in American history.
I looked for the missing comments in Trash and in Spam and found over 15 of them.. I restored them all.
I do not know why all of a sudden your comments should go into these folders.
In future, just alert me by email and I will restore it.
@Reader
Sorry to hear you are having issues as your comments are always revealing in one way or another. I noticed that the editing function is working for me and thought I should suggest that you might try logging out and back in, as this technique seems to help anytime I find the site acting out of the norm. Actually, it is a good rule for many sites that I frequent where bizarre things occur and it seems to be a good solution to such odd happenings, for me at least. Just a thought. Hope it helps.
My comment has disappeared after my not being able to edit it.
Is there a problem with the system or is it censorship of some sort?
I think people should use the word “dictatorship” or “tyranny”, and “dictatorial” instead of “socialism” and “socialist”, and the words “freedom” and “free” instead of “capitalism” and “capitalist”.
The words “dictatorship”, “tyranny” and “freedom” cover more territory than the terms for the theoretical economic systems some of which have never existed.
Just to be more honest and precise in their thinking instead of following the old divide-and-rule paradigm.
Also, the members of the WEF are hardly the “proletarians that unite”, they are the world’s economic elite, i.e., capitalists (the folks who possess the capital).
After all, fascism has always been sponsored by the rich corporations, which means that the word “capitalism” is not a synonym of the word “freedom”.
The question is: HOW TO DO THIS? To set up new parallel free means of communication? Will it not be infiltrated and swamped by these new international fascists? Perhaps the way is 1) no anonymity: the only way to join is to fully expose your identity 2) anyone who has an account with these new international fascists must stop using it – and how can this be determined?