If these were any other vaccines, they would already be off the market.
In fact, they would have been pulled a long time ago. Usually, a new drug is withdrawn after 50 deaths, which isn’t typical because the FDA has a strict approval process. The COVID-19 vaccines have been exempted from it, instead being temporarily “authorized” for emergency use.
These vaccines have coincided with 3,544 American deaths and 12,619 serious injuries as of April 23, according to the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reports System database (VAERS, republished “as is” in user-friendly format here). The flu vaccines by comparison are linked to 20–30 death reports a year, according to Dr. Peter McCullough, and those 20–30 death reports come with considerably more vaccines administered.
This is precisely the kind of thing FDA approval is supposed to prevent.
Bye?bye Broadway: A grim prognosis for NewYork’s theaters
Dr. McCullough estimated the flu shot at 195 million people annually, while 153 million have currently received COVID vaccinations. The disparity between these two vaccine groups is staggering.
Instead of treating this data seriously, institutions like the NIH are pushing to fast-track FDA approval and give the vaccines to younger and younger children. Regulators lowered the minimum age for the Pfizer vaccine from 16 to 12 on Monday, and shots for that age group could begin as soon as Thursday. Pfizer is currently experimenting on 144 young children in three age brackets: 5 to 11 years, 2 to 4 years, and six months to 2 years. The results will be available in September. The vaccine is already mandatory at many colleges (and only for students), and you can bet they’ll make it a precondition for your little ones to continue attending school.
How long until it isn’t optional, for you or your children?
Thirty-five hundred reports is 70 times the normal threshold for pulling a drug from the market. Although this is raw data, previous VAERS studies have shown that only 1–10% of vaccine-related deaths are reported to VAERS — or less. This would put the likely real death count in the U.S. at tens to hundreds of thousands.
Inexplicably, Dr. Fauci was able to look at those data and say, “obviously the safety looks really, really good in well over 140 million people having been vaccinated.” How can he look at the VAERS data in good faith and say the safety looks good?
The updated number of published death reports as of April 30 is 3,837. That’s 300 reports in a week, and those are just the reports: per the studies that show that VAERS underreports deaths, we’re on pace for an estimated half a million COVID vaccine deaths by the end of the month. It’s remarkable that the press isn’t covering this.
They are indeed doing the opposite, insisting that VAERS data are meaningless. They say VAERS reports are unverified, which is always true with raw data, and anyone can make them, so we don’t know that 3,544 deaths have happened.
What they leave out is the correlation between death reports and deaths has already been studied, and one report on VAERS correlates with 10–100 deaths. They also leave out the sheer volume of reports. What they don’t leave out is their customary appeal to authority: listen to the doctors.
Dr. McCullough is vice chief of medicine at Baylor University Medical Center and the most cited American medical doctor on COVID-19 at the National Library of Medicine. He dedicated his career to COVID when the pandemic began, focusing on outpatient treatment, on which he testified to Congress early in the pandemic. He says the death reports come from medical professionals, and the CDC’s investigation into them could only have been falsified.
Having “chaired and participated in dozens of safety monitoring boards and sat on those committees,” Dr. McCullough refutes the CDC’s March announcement that there were no vaccine-related deaths: “It is impossible for unnamed regulatory doctors without any experience with COVID-19 to opine that none of the deaths were related to the vaccine” in so short a period of time. It would take “many months” to complete an investigation.
Meanwhile, more people would die. This may be why a drug is taken off the market after excessive death reports, before investigating or proving causation.
The CDC has collected VAERS data for 31 years, and while anyone can make a VAERS report, the database is intended to compile data from health care workers, who in turn are required by law to file reports for a long list of vaccines — COVID vaccines not included.
There’s absolutely no history of massive VAERS fraud, and if the media want to suggest that, they should say it directly and provide evidence. Anyone filing a false VAERS report is committing a federal crime.
Their point that VAERS reports are meant to generate further studies to contextualize them is true. In the CDC’s words, “VAERS is designed to rapidly detect unusual or unexpected patterns of adverse events[.] … If a safety signal is found, further studies can be done.”
The COVID vaccines are adding a year’s worth of VAERS reports every week. In four months, they’ve had more adverse reports than any single vaccine has had cumulatively over the past 31 years. This is clearly a safety signal, further studies are not being done, and it appears they’re being forged.
Tucker Carlson covered some of Dr. McCullough’s findings recently, and, not surprisingly, he was ridiculed for it. He responded:
That very same [VAERS] system has been used for a long time. What was interesting is what the numbers showed consistently across decades, as a relative measure, one vaccine comparing to another. More deaths have been connected to the new COVID vaccines over the past four months than to all previous vaccines combined over a period of more than 15 years.
Mystifyingly, the Washington Post accused Carlson of “using reports submitted to VAERS to suggest that something worrisome is happening,” as if large death and serious illness counts are not worrisome.
Dr. McCullough notes that the Post is part of the “Trusted News Initiative,” an agreement between Silicon Valley and news outlets to censor any news or data critical of COVID vaccines since that could make people hesitate to get vaccinated. Early on, they set the public curriculum to isolate, mask, and wait for the vaccine, and treatment meanwhile has been discouraged and stigmatized. Stigmatizing treatment and burying safety data are so counter-intuitive and pervasive at this point that the motives must be questioned. Are they getting us sick on purpose to sell vaccines?
It appears either that the bureaucracy is trying to hammer through FDA approval or that the arrangements have been made and they’re conditioning the public to accept it. There’s a reason that it normally takes ten years for a vaccine to hit the market: long-term testing.
Skipping the Phase III trials, getting these results and not just ignoring them, but testing the product on children and infants, in my view, shows criminal intent.
These reports must be studied and the vaccines taken off the market until completion. Instead, we are seeing the product of a system that, as Dr. McCullough says, has gone off the rails.
Hat tip: Leo Hohmann.
Image: torstensimon via Pixabay, Pixabay License.
(2 of 2)
This is where the use of NAC comes in. NAC has its effect intracellularly(inside the cell), as opposed to intercellularly(outside the cell) such as acetylcholine does. NAC contains a precursor for glutathione and it is proposed that oral supplementation will support the relative deficiency of glutathione present in the many diseases for which it is commonly used. Now just because an oral supplement contains such precursors, it doesn’t guarantee that these precursors won’t be rendered useless in digestion or that it is capable of gaining access to the relevant cellular cites where it is required. This is where the use of studies and research proposals come in. The research of the past decade or more clearly shows a great deal of very exciting(to those who are really interested in this, it really is exciting) results in the use of NAC to treat a whole host of diseases. Now the jury is still out for its use in the treatment of Covid. This is largely due to the fact that little to no research has been generated in the past year towards treatments of this terrible disease while literally billions upon billions were used to sponsor alternate treatments known as experimental vaccines that are both non-effective and non-safe. But for the use of NAC to be restricted now in the middle of this Chinese bio-attack after having been used over 60 years as a safe over-the-counter supplement is clearly(in my mind at least) another move by those malevolent vaccine-shareholders in the FDA to prevent access to early treatment of any kind as was there moves against hydroxychloroquine and as, I believe, was similarly attempted in Australia against Ivermectine. I, for one, judge such deliberate moves to be both unconscionable and evil. Perhaps, such loathsome tactics have always been utilized towards political ends. But I do not believe this to be the case and at some point something must be done to curtail such diabolical schemes which result in too many lethal consequences to contemplate.
/2
(1 of 2)
@ Michael S:
Michael, you cited info on wikipedia for acetylcholine which is a neurotransmitter completely unrelated to N-acetylcysteine(NAC). NAC’s wikipedia page can be found at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acetylcysteine
Sidenote on Wiki – I know many use and love Wikipedia for its ease of access and the extensive subjects it covers, but I generally don’t use Wikipedia for much outside of considering the sources they often cite, with varying levels of misinterpretation or incompetence(oftentimes I believe this is done with full knowledge and intent upon their part). No offense intended here to the millions of people who love Wiki, but my strong dislike for this free site does recall the adage about getting what you pay for. Also there is a reason that Wiki citations are linked by every web-search on anything, it is part of the tech oligarch’s attempts to disseminate disinformation while managing and manipulating knowledge and conversations. But it is free, and easily accessed and everyone but me seems to both love it and use it, so sorry for the rant.
Wikipedia aside, NAC is a very safe neutriceutal – I suspect if you inquire, you will find more people die from aspirin overdose or NSAID(ibuprofen class drugs) toxicities than succumb to NAC. The more serious consequences of administration of NAC are associated with IV and breathable formulations (both of which are obviously not over the counter). The benefits of using NAC in disease processes that result in the development of inflammatory compounds in the body called Reactive Oxygen Species(ROS) is significant. ROS are referred in common literature as free radicals and they are very damaging to the body and can result in many secondary disease states of varying significance including causing cancer. ROS’s are produced in non-disease state but the body has a mesmerizing cascade of sometimes redundant processes that were designed to account for the possible production of ROS’s and keep such small sparks from burning down the forest(body) so to speak. Among the chemical reactions helping to keep these sparks under control, is the oxidation and reduction of glutathione. The amazingly important use of this compound may reflect that it is to be found in biological systems(not just human) with greater frequency than any other compound containing a sulfurhydrol group(this is the active part of glutathione that actually is used to put out the sparks(ROS’s). But in a disease state the ROS’s are rampant and frequently get out of control causing their own series of disease consequences. This is because of the glutathione’s inability to be recycled fast enough and the body has a resulting relative deficiency.
/1
@ peloni1986:
Thanks, Peloni.
“Acetylcholine is the neurotransmitter used at the neuromuscular junction—in other words, it is the chemical that motor neurons of the nervous system release in order to activate muscles. This property means that drugs that affect cholinergic systems can have very dangerous effects ranging from paralysis to convulsions….”
— https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acetylcholine
So, there are some issues of side-effects with NAC. As for Ivermectin,
https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/antiviral-therapy/ivermectin/
“Ivermectin is generally well tolerated. Adverse effects may include dizziness, pruritis, nausea, or diarrhea…. and,
“The FDA issued a warning in April 2020 that ivermectin intended for use in animals should not be used to treat COVID-19 in humans.”
The main reason the pathologically lying FDA gives for its warning, it that sufficient testing has not been performed.
As for me, I decided to get hold of some, to have on hand, when I began having a sore throat after having been in public. Since death at the hands of a hopelessly politicized medical establishment is an alternative, this would constitute a “right to try” if my symptoms suddenly worsened. This is what has become of a once-trusted American medical and pharmaceutical community: We are now a third-world banana republic, thanks to mad Dr. Fauci and his gang.
Fortunately, my sore throat improved after a few days of bed rest and nutritional supplements.
My wife and I watched the interview with Dr. Tenpenny, about the thousands of deaths clearly attributed to the vaccines. There is also an article out, about the 1,000 lawyers and 10,000 doctors who are suing various parties for Nuremburg crimes violations caused by forced masking and experimantal vaxing.
— https://sorendreier.com/1000-lawyers-and-10000-doctors-have-filed-a-lawsuit-for-violations-of-the-nuremberg-code/
We are certainly living in interesting times.
The FDA has apparently seen fit in the past week or so to reclassify N-acetylcysteine(NAC) as a prescription medication only. It has been available as an over-the-counter supplement for nearly 60 years, but it is now prescription based use only. The compound is the most used antioxidant on the market and has a host of benefits and treatment applications for a large variety of disease processes. Among the diseases treated by NAC include diabetes, high blood pressure, COPD, alzheimers disease, heart disease, among many others. The compound is very useful in removing free radical agents in the body associated with these diseases. It is also used with some support showing benefits with coagulopathies, i.e. diseases associated with blood clotting issues. There are no serious consequences associated with the use of NAC beyond occasional stomachaches, nausea, and diarrhea. Over the past 10 years, research has been very supportive of the benefits of using NAC in the treatment of influenza. Research has shown that using NAC reduced the clinical presentation of influenza – so you could still contract the disease but it reduced the disease symptoms in nearly 50% of the cases. Furthermore, it showed that in influenza cases that presented to the ICU there was a statistically significant shortening in the time spent in the ICU with NAC. NAC is also shown to inhibit viral replication when taken as a daily supplement. And there seems that there may be a benefit towards the prevention of the formation of blood clots. This nutraceutical has been used by thousands of people including healthcare professionals on a daily basis as part of a variety of antioxidant supplements to help reduce the presence of free radicals and inflammatory compounds in the body. With the onset of Covid, NAC had been hypothesized, given its uses in fighting influenza and its possible use on blood clots, to be a proposed beneficial supplement in preparing the body for a possible viral infection with Covid. NAC is not banned in the US, but the FDA has deemed it necessary that US citizens will need a physician’s prescription for its use going forward. I can not imagine a reason why this was done. Or, I should say, I can not imagine a rational or beneficial reason this was done.
@ Michael S:
Sorry, Michael, I just saw your comment here. Yes, the benefits of Ivermectin has been known, since last May(a year ago) at least, to be very efficacious in the treatment of covid when applied in at least a 3-drug strategy. I just saw some data on Ivermectin and its use from India. India is one of the largest, most densely populated nations in the world. They hold most of the world’s manufacturing plants for hydroxychloroquine and had been using it with significantly greater success than was found in the US where they chose to send everyone home with no treatment while the disease led to hospitalization and death/compromised health as an outcome. In recent months India’s cases were reported to have “skyrocketed” but of course that was Fake News. Their cases did rise and it was alarming for what they had been dealing with but nothing remotely similar to, say, the US. Well the new data in India shows the use of Ivermectin having remarkable effects in New Delhi with both the deaths and cases.
Here is a graph displaying the findings:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E1_74FtWQAQduz9?format=jpg&name=900×900
@ Michael S:
Sorry, Michael, I just saw your comment here. Yes, the benefits of Ivermectin has been known, since last May(a year ago) at least, to be very efficacious in the treatment of covid when applied in at least a 3-drug strategy. I just saw some data on Ivermectin and its use from India. India is one of the largest, most densely populated nations in the world. They hold most of the world’s manufacturing plants for hydroxychloroquine and had been using it with significantly greater success than was found in the US where they chose to send everyone home with no treatment while the disease led to hospitalization and death/compromised health as an outcome. In recent months India’s cases were reported to have “skyrocketed” but of course that was Fake News. Their cases did rise and it was alarming for what they had been dealing with but nothing remotely similar to, say, the US. Well the new data in India shows the use of Ivermectin having remarkable effects in New Delhi with both the deaths and cases.
Here is a graph displaying the findings:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E1_74FtWQAQduz9?format=jpg&name=900×900https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E1_74FtWQAQduz9?format=jpg&name=900×900
@ peloni1986:
one can get Ivermectin from the feed store. In a pinch, I guesstimate that about 1/5 the dose used for horses should do. On the “downside”, one might die from this proven therapeutic instead of the experimental vaccine-like test drug, and not live long enough to witness the Zech. 2 War.
I just listened to an interview with Dr. Peter Pry on Frankspeech.com. Dr. Pry, who is the Executive Director of Task Force on National and Homeland Security has excellent credentials as a scientist and military analyst, notes that WWIII (aka Armageddon) could be over in less than an hour. According to Zechariah, it would be a free-for-all nuclear exchange. China, Russia and North Korea already have the capability to destroy the US, and Iran already probably has nuclear weapons mounted on its missiles.
This makes COVID, and the current war in Israel, by the way, small potatoes. Dr. Pry’s website is
https://www.worldviewweekend.com/profile/dr-peter-pry
@ Reader:
I have a friend who would state the idea of having 2, 3, or 4 generations to deal with this situation is an optimistic view, but he is a pessimist.
But there are more issues than just the spike proteins that have deservedly garnered much of the attention of late. The solution carrying the mRNA has itself very concerning issues. There is a emulsion mixture in the Moderna vaccine that includes a component that is noted to be not for human or veterinary use, as it is intended for research only.
Also in the past few weeks there is a German research group who have uncovered a proposed mechanism by which the coagulation (blood-clots) cascade is triggered. They believe it is related to the use of EDTA in the AstraZeneca and J&J vaccines. It is a bit techy, but the end result is basically the adenovirus(a common cold virus) from a chimpanzee is used as the vaccine carrier to immunize against the spike protein. This chimp virus is injected into the patient’s body and the proteins from this chimp virus is attacked by the body’s platelets. The normal plan is for this platelet covered virus to make its way to the blood where an effective immune response will generate immunity. But, if too many platelets respond to this chimp virus, it could stimulate an generalized(body-wide) immune response where antibodies are produced in large numbers against the body’s own platelets. The consequence of this is the formation of blood clots. This is noted to occur in patients who have recently been treated with heparin(a blood thinner). Another additive in these two vaccines is EDTA(another blood thinner). This compound helps the vaccine proteins from the injected chimp virus make its way from the injection site into the bloodstream. If too much of the EDTA is present, the body’s vessel walls can become too leaky and a massive immune response can result.
There are many more concerning issues about all of these compounds. The fact that they are all listed as experimental vaccines should NOT be taken lightly. Unfortunately, I believe most people do not consider the consequences of being a live lab rat with enough gravity, largely due to the poor emphasis being placed on real informed consent as I have noted previously.
@ peloni1986:
Since genetic material (mRNA (messenger RNA) introduced from the OUTSIDE into the cells and NOT produced naturally by the body’s OWN cells) which creates foreign proteins (the COVID “spike” protein) in the body is involved here in all these vaccines, we might not know how the end game will play out until several generation after this one.
I mean, THIS IS THE PERFECT CRIME!
2, 3, 4 generations later, even if someone connects the dots, all the perpetrators will be long dead and, anyway, there will be no way to come up with the data to prove ANYTHING!
@ Reader:
Clearly this is so. There are many who are being motivated by $$ such as many in the FDA(which should be an acronym for stake-holder-in-the-pharmaceutical-companies), but there is a power game at hand in all of this. I have heard some very disturbing theories proposed by friends and associates in the medical field and I have imagined a few others myself. But Peter McCullough , the physician cited in this article, made a comment recently that is related to this point. When he was questioned about the possible motives for all the duplicity and obstructions he had encountered. He said, bluntly, that he is a physician not a investigative reporter. Sadly, the investigative reporters are an extinct race – they died some time ago. Their untimely expiration is one of the factors that allowed much that has occurred over the past year go without any scrutiny or scrutiny being applied when it was not indicated to act as a diversion. So, unfortunately, we might have to wait for the end game to play out(this is worrisome) or at least until their hand is possibly more exposed than it is so far.
@ Reader:
Correction: “as smart AS you and I”
@ peloni1986:
I agree with you completely but don’t you think that people who are pushing this are probably as smart and you and I and are much closer to all the sources of information and YET THEY STILL KEEP FORCING IT ON (ideally for them) the 100% OF THE POPULATION OF THE PLANET!
To me it means that they KNOW the effects of these “vaccines” (which, strictly speaking these preparations are NOT), and they KNOW THE PURPOSE for which these “vaccines” are administered.
They KNOW that turning people into lab rats against their will is A WAR CRIME but it doesn’t stop them.
To my mind, their goal must be something a lot more important to them than simply dollars.
(2 of 2)
It is now known that with early treatment, 90% of all hospitalizations are avoided with aggressive at home early treatment protocols. Not just deaths, but all serious disease. I am being told that there are more cases of people presenting to the emergency clinics for these adverse reactions to the vaccines than to the disease itself. And, yet, the focus remains to administer as many of these vaccines as possible. And now they are focusing on children. There have been no research studies done on children. They are using extrapolated data from research on adults to authorize the administration of shots to children. Contrary to the assumed basis of this extrapolation, children are NOT little adults. The usage of a stratification of age classifications is significant. And not one study was done on children. What is known about children is that the disease does not affect them. But such extrapolations can also be done on the consequences of the vaccine towards children. This is an unacceptably dangerous policy.
/2
(1 of 2)
@ Reader:
Yes, Reader, you are correct that this is the reason they pulled the vaccine. The word safer should not have appeared anywhere in that post. Not all reports are equivalent in consideration of vaccine adverse reactions. The reports of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis(CVST) was suggestive of a known lethal vaccine reaction – and it was pulled after only 6 such reports were collected and only 1 death, not 298. But the conclusion should not be to take the J&J shot because it kills fewer people. This is ludicrous and was not my meaning. No one should be taking these vaccines. Thousands are dead. It is dubious that all of these deaths are connected to the vaccines, but also it is beyond reasonable comprehension that none of them are. This is the very basis that VAERS was created. The vaccines are not safe. J&J is being re-released with the notation that it can cause blood clots. This is obscene. None of the vaccines should be allowed, even if you want them. This is not a restaurant where the operator of the establishment bears no responsibility on what your diet is when they serve you. It is a vaccine. These are all vaccines. They are suppose to provide immunity and not death. The very basis of all medical protocols is to do no harm. No reasonably minded individual could claim this about these vaccines. Lethal coagulopathies(disease processes including aberrations in the clotting mechanisms) are associated with all of these vaccines. No less lethal or disturbing are the inflammatory diseases that they appear to be associated with as well. And the deaths are only the lives that are lost. It does not include the severe reactions that people are now having to live with for the rest of their lives with no opportunity to gain financial compensation for the harm. There are several fold more cases of lives being destroyed than those who have died. The presence of this disease has driven our medical community mad. The vaccine is being administered as a triage measure to counter this very serious disease rather than focusing on early treatment protocols.
/1
@ peloni1986:
The number of reactions should correlate with how many people got the vaccine:
https://www.healthline.com/health-news/why-some-people-still-prefer-the-johnson-johnson-covid-19-vaccine
Assuming that the number of deaths from all three vaccines would rise in direct proportion to the number of vaccinations (which is not necessarily true), J&J would perform better than Moderna (about 461 deaths fewer with the same number of vaccinations as Moderna) and almost the same (17 deaths fewer) as Pfizer.
I think the reason that the J&J vaccine was withdrawn was because of the nature of the reactions – severe thrombosis of blood vessels causing death or disability.
Stew Peters is reporting that MN state Dems are planning on stripping parents of their rights to prohibit their children from receiving vaccine!
Here is the link
https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2021/05/insane-democrat-lawmakers-pushing-bill-that-would-eliminate-parental-objection-to-child-vaccination/
Currently, as of May 7, there were 4,057 deaths coincident with these vaccines. Of these, Moderna is associated with 1921 deaths and Pfizer is associated with 1805 deaths. The J&J vaccine, which appears to be much safer by several orders of magnitude, is associated with only 298 deaths, and yet this was the vaccine that was temporarily halted. Over 1200 of these 4057 reported deaths were noted on the day of injection or the day after the injection – that is 30 percent of the coincident deaths are occurring within approx. 36 hrs of the vaccine.
The VAERS system was intended as a method to sense if a problem was occurring with a vaccine or drug that had been authorized and was being currently distributed to the public. Medical personel are the individuals who are usually intended to enter the info, but any can do so. But in reality such reporting is almost never completed. Many clinicians are unaware of the system, others are uncertain of how or what specifics to cite in the reports and still other clinicians view the reporting methods as redundant, onerous and not included in their very busy routines. The public are mostly ignorant of the VAERS system, and since the patient in question is dead, it is left to a grieving loved one to report the death which means they would need to have access to the personal records and patient details to do so. The end result is that as the author noted less than 1% of such coincident deaths are reported. It seems ridiculous to ask, but how are these lethal vaccines still being allowed to be administered. So nearly half a million possible deaths? And now children are being “authorized” to enjoy the lack of protection afforded by these lethal concoctions when they face no threat from the disease itself.
This is the biggest story around as it’s not just a siren call to stop 30-40 times already the deaths seen in war with Gaza before they potentially grow much larger. But just like the war, it shows a microcosm of the disdain and dysfunction and death wish in that war conflict between all the players including the media, likewise this Covid shot situation.