Bibi is, for one, but what he is afraid of is, not what we are, but may become if we acquire more Arab citizens. Arens wants better integration and more aliya because we are already a bi-national state. We are a bi-national state because two nations live here where each nation’s language is an official language and each nation can set up their own schools. But both nations are not equal in how the state views them. Israel has Jewish symbols only and a Jewish national anthem. Only Jews have a right of return. There are many other issues when the Jewish nationalists want preferences. Can Israel be equally Jewish and democratic or must being a Jewish state trump being a democratic state in order for Israel to be a Jewish state. Arens doesn’t deal with these issues. Ted Belman
Israel is already a bi-national state – a state in which two nationalities reside, Jews and Arabs. The government’s best bet is to encourage aliyah from the Diaspora and to better integrate Arab citizens into Israeli society.
Fear of the emergence of a bi-national state in the Land of Israel seems to be the driving force, on the right and on the left of the political spectrum, behind the many proposals for abandoning the hills of Samaria and Judea, the biblical Land of Israel, to powers as yet unknown and unpredictable. But the fact of the matter is that the State of Israel is already a bi-national state – a state in which two nationalities reside, Jews and Arabs. The advocates of the establishment of a Palestinian state in Judea and Samaria simply oppose the addition of any more Arabs to the existing Arab population of the State of Israel. Lurking behind their pious slogan “two states for two peoples” is their real, politically incorrect slogan: “Not one more Arab!”
Since Theodore Herzl, all Zionists have known that the Jewish state, when established, would include a significant number of Arab citizens. Ze’ev Jabotinsky’s requirement for the establishment of the Jewish state was a Jewish majority. But how big a majority? How big a minority of Arab citizens can be included within the borders of the state without significantly affecting the Jewish nature of the state? There is no quantitative answer to this question. Is the present 17% Arab minority among Israel’s citizens the limit? Or 20%, which would result if the entire Arab population of East Jerusalem were to opt for Israeli citizenship? Would 30% be stretching the limit? How do we expect the ratio to change as time goes by? What will be the rate of natural increase of Jews and Arabs in future years? How big an aliyah is to be expected in the coming years? How certain are we of the accuracy of the demographic projections?
Considering all this uncertainty, what risk are we willing to take? Leave forever large swaths of Judea and Samaria and uproot tens of thousands of Israelis from their homes? Or plan on incorporating into Israel parts of Judea and Samaria and accept the Arab population there as citizens of Israel? How much time do we have to accumulate more data in order to decrease the uncertainties clouding our vision of the future, before we have to make so fateful a decision? Is time working for us or against us?
In the meantime there are things to be done which will improve the situation regardless of the final outcome. We should advance toward the integration of Arab citizens into Israeli society, and promote aliyah to Israel from the countries of the Diaspora.
The degree of integration of Israel’s Arab minority into the fabric of Israeli society bears directly on the question of how large a minority population can live at peace in the State of Israel. A minority that is alienated from the state and hostile to it represents a problem. A minority that is well integrated and feels at home can be an asset.
Despite the opposition of radical elements like the Islamic Movement, in recent years there are visible signs of a gradual process of integration of many of Arab citizens into Israeli society. It is spontaneous, receiving very little help from the government. Much greater progress could be achieved if the government were to adopt it as a high priority goal. In time it may well turn out that the demographic issue is not all it is cracked up to be.
The other face of the demographic issue is aliyah. Most of the aliyah in the past originated from countries where Jewish communities were in distress. In future years, potential immigrants will be drawn to Israel based on what Israel has to offer, rather than by a desire to seek refuge. The great economic progress of the Israeli economy in the past decade has turned Israel into a land of opportunity with a standard of living as high, or even higher, than some of the countries with sizable Jewish populations. Can the present rate of aliyah of about 20,000 per year be doubled? Is it possible that half a million Jews might arrive in Israel during the next 10 years? It may be possible if the government adopts an active policy of promoting aliyah.
Maybe time is on our side after all.
This is a bait and switch argument. The debate is about a one-state binational state, NOT about pre-1967 Israel.
The only safe policy
His answer to what is happening in the territories is to improve what is inside 1967 Israel. That is bait and switch.
Avoids the issue of the Arabs in Judea and Samaria.
Dishonest double speak.
Tell us what he is going to do with the Arabs in the territories.
He is faced with the Arabs wanted a binational state, and he refuses to address the issue. Yes, No, Maybe so!
Dishonest!
The question is not whether they should be encourage to leave; but how do you encourage other Arab states to take them?
Much of their condition is out of the Palestinians hands.
1949
Israel: They are yours, take them.
Arab Word: They are yours, take them back.
—-
1967
Israel: They are yours, take them.
Arab Word: They are yours, take them back.
—-
1973
Israel: They are yours, take them.
Arab Word: They are yours, take them back.
—-
2013
Israel: They are yours, take them.
Arab Word: They are yours, take them back.
—-
This marvellously static conversation is called THE PEACE PROCESS.
What Moshe Arens does not mention is the need to remove Arabs from Israel through the right policies. The question that should not be asked is whether Jews should be uprooted from their homeland but whether the Arabs should be encouraged to return to their Arab homelands.
The chimera of Israel being a binational state has been used as a distraction from the real issue: how to solve the Arab problem. Without addressing Israel’s Fifth Column, the Jewish State will always be vulnerable through terrorism, sabotage and subversion from within.
Israel should have done to the Arabs in the first place what the Czechs did to the Nazi Sudeten Germans. Had Israel removed the Arabs in the first place, Israel wouldn’t have been saddled with the destructive legacy of Oslo and the need to create a hostile Arab state overlooking its populated coastal plain today.
Political correctness prevents Israel from honestly addressing the question ever since the late Meir Kahane was denounced as a racist for advocating resettlement of the Arabs as a solution to Israel’s demographic and security threats.
And if we can’t have a honest discussion about what to do about the Arabs, Israel will be stampeded into giving up Judea and Samaria out of expediency and out of a sense of defeat about Israel’s future.
Integration of the Arab into the Jewish state is a non-starter. Be they Muslim or Christian, if Israel is and is to remain the Jewish state, there is no possibility of integration. It’s anathema to the Muslim and incompatible to the Christian. As the “democratic” state, it might be possible. Israel has to decide if it is to be a state like all other (western) states or, as the Torah enjoins, a “nation that dwells apart”. If the latter, and I suggest that is the only alternative and the only justification for its existence, the Arabs, at least of J&S need to be recognized for what they are and were, Jordanian citizens, resident only, in our biblical heartland that needs to be annexed once and for all. All of it! Those Arabs that are not prepared to remain as peaceful residents should be deported to Jordan or Gaza (two Arab states already existing on lands promised to the Jews by the post-WWI world community). The Arab Israeli citizens should be forced to swear an oath of allegiance to the “Jewish” state or else forfeit their citizenship for legal residency.
The legal justification is of course that only Jews were accorded legal settlement and sovereign rights in J&S, while the Arab was only guaranteed civil rights which makes the suggested policy entirely legal notwithstanding the constant but grossly erroneous and inverted refrain of “illegal occupation of Palestinian territory” – sheer bunk and entirely without any foundation. In fact a mere expression of antisemitism.