By Ted Belman
David Bedein writes
Israeli Reporter Challenges McCain To Polygraph Test
Jerusalem – This week, Senator John McCain took heat because of an interview that he granted two years ago to Amir Oren, a credible journalist from the Israeli newspaper HaAretz, on May 1, 2006, in which Mr. McCain declared that his administration “would send “the smartest guy I know” to the Middle East …. “Brent Scowcroft, or Jim Baker though I know that you in Israel don’t like Baker.”
Mr. McCain added “I would expect concessions and sacrifices by both sides.”
When Mr. Oren asked Mr. McCain if that meant a “movement toward the June 4, 1967 armistice lines, with minor modifications? McCain nodded in the affirmative.” CONTINUE
Apparently McCain is trying to distance himself from such remarks and even denying he said them in that way.
Many of us have moved to the right since that interview and McCain is entitled to also. Would he still back Baker, the person responsible for the Iraq Study Group’s recommendations, and would he still back the Saudi Plan?
Soren: Did you vote for George W. Bush the first time? The second? If not was it because you weren’t old enough to vote? Did you believe everything he said then?
Teshuvah, just because there still are such folks as Hegelians, doesn’t mean that any candidate for office is a Hegelian, much less Huckabee, who is not a Hegelian, not a globalist, not an isolationist, but something altogether outside that paradigm. I watched your videos from links 18 & 19 (thank you), so why not watch the one I linked to in #8 above, where Huckabee with no ambiguity at all makes this forcefully clear, then do the honorable thing and admit the false accusation. Here’s the YouTube video link again:
Soren: I See Brain Dead People
Try this one: What is the Hegelian Dialectic?
Then this one: Hegelian Dialectic & the New World Order
The Preview function is missing so I can’t test links before submitting a post.
Thanks Teshuvah (#15), but the link didn’t work for me–anyway, there’s a reason my nic is “soren”! Soren Kierkegaard, my favorite thinker and author, who had some great parodies of Hegelian dialectics, heh, even the titles of Kierkegaard’s books poke fun at Hegel; SK, too, had a dialectical scheme, a better one! I also saw your message in #13, and though we disagree on the scriptures you cited, I applaud your appreciation of scripture and your concern for fellow man by sharing what you perceive to be true. Thank you again.
Teshuvah,
McCain suports the KLA Islamic-Fascist Jihadists in Kosovo.
I have done a search on Israpundit’s archives and I have found that McCain vigorously supported the Islamo-Nazi KLA terrorist group by not only calling for the bombing of Serbia in 1999 in support of these Jihadist fascists, but actively pushing Bill Clinton to arm the KLA.
This admission from an Albanian website:
Disgraced Congressman Joe DioGaurdi’s Albanian American Civic League [AACL]is the Albanian Jihadist-Fascist KLA’s front-group in the United States.
Here’s a photo of
McCain at a pro-KLA rally with DioGaurdi
Just who are the KLA?
See here:
The roots of Kosovo fascism
And this from Israpundit’s archives:
And this:
Soren: Read this about how they do it. What is the Hegelian Dialectic?
It is distressing to see so many people deceived because a candidate says he is a Christian. Yeshua said, Joh 5:43 I am come in my Father’s name, and ye receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive. Bush came in his own name and said he was a Christian and look what you got! Peggy Noonan said, “Bush destroyed the Republican Party, by which I mean he sundered it, broke its constituent pieces apart and set them against each other. He did this on spending, the size of government, war, the ability to prosecute war, immigration and other issues.” And he lied. Inspect the fruit of the tree!
Alan Stang wrote: The Republican Party, Red From the Start
Soren: Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; 2Th 2:3.
I am just a researcher and don’t have a pony in this race and obviously don’t vote there. Nevertheless the election is of interest to see which set of globalists the Power Elite will install to continue their plan towards New World Order totalitarianism which effects the whole world negatively. This too is of G-d. It is His judgment on a sinful nation and world.
Yamit: The people are being conned…with consensus by the globalists who will only allow one of their own puppets to even run for election. They only empower corruptible men. Da 4:17 This matter is by the decree of the watchers, and the demand by the word of the holy ones: to the intent that the living may know that the most High ruleth in the kingdom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever he will, and setteth up over it the basest of men. Note that is “basest” not “best” of men.
Teshuvah, I’ve seen you didn’t address my 100% rebuttal of your Huckabee’s a globalist false accusation and instead raised a new objection–that he spoke to memebers of Kenneth Copeland’s church and accepted donations from them, though in a legal way. Well, Huckabee and Kenneth Copeland (who I do not support in general) are not “closely associated,” but they have some common interests, as does Huckabee and John Hagee (who I do not support in general) who is also controversial and at whose church Huckabee also spoke–and what they have in common is support for Israel! Both Hagee and Copeland are affiliated with CUFI (Christians United for Israel), which is an umbrella group of Christian Zionists that do not by any means share the same general theology, much less agree with the ethics of the various people associated with the group, but are like the name says, united for Israel. Candidates speak at all sorts of forums and no one assumes the candidates who show up agree with everything about the sponsors, but when Huckabee speaks to a church group it’s assumed he agrees with that pastor? Makes no sense. Like Giuliani’s endorsement by Pat Robertson meant Giuliani’s “closely associated” with Robertson? Ridiculous–they just shared a common issue, fighting terrorism. You can continue to throw your negatives at Huckabee, but this is the best you can do–guilt by very incidental association with someone who has issues totally unrelated to Huckabee, but with whom they share some commonalities re:politics–support for Israel. Huckabee’s the best to stand up under scrutiny, you clearly just don’t like him.
It seems odd that a country as diverse and with so much human talent in so many fields, can’t come up with a few good qualified political leaders out of a population of 300 million ; is there no better choices than the ones being presented to us today, yesterday and most probably in the future? Unless these characters actually reflect what America is today. If This is the case ,the World is in deep shit!
I hadn’t realized the case against McCain was so strong.
An Arkansas voter said, “Huckabee lies more than Bill Clinton!”
Fresh story today: Huckabee’s Link To TV Preacher Questionedl GOP Hopeful Has Close Bond With Televangelist [Kenneth Copeland] Targeted By Senate Investigation
Senator Grassley is investigating Kenneth Copeland and asking for financial disclosures. Copeland is also associated with the Richard Roberts/Oral Roberts University scandal. More here.
Teshuvah, you have Huckabee exactly backwards when it comes to the globalist accusations–the info’s out there, all sorts of videos where you can hear Huckabee in his own words decrying yielding any sovereignty, such as re: the Law of the Sea Treaty, which he’s decried publicly, or the US courts citing international law in deciding domestic cases, concerns about NAFTA, etc. That said, he’s not an isolationist, but has balance that is in the US interest. Huckabee, like I’ve said before, listens to all–he is a populist, and respectfully–but he beholden to none.
Grrr, let me find a video for you…o.k., here one is, from YouTube: Huckabee (NOT a globalist!). Teshuvah, you’re getting real bad information. Try going to Huckabee’s official website, which includes issues statements, a blog, and one page called the Huckabee Truth Squad that exists specifically to rebut or clarify accusations, misrepresentations, etc.
Ted, I am interested as to which part of those links shocked you? Lynn Stuter’s is a pretty basic summary of the current situation. I had just read the one about McCain and that was new to me though. It is all a dog and pony show to make voters think their votes count, when they don’t count. I suspect the globalists plan to install Hillary (and therefore Bill) as Pres with the Obamination as VP, and run McCain as Rep candidate and Huckabee as VP. All are members or have the kiss and blessing of the globalist satanic CFR. Therefore it is a done deal as far as they are concerned and the “election” is irrelevant. The only one exhibiting any morality and support for the Constitution is Ron Paul and I suspect the globalists have set him up by sending antisemitic and neo-Nazi supporters to blur the picture. From what I have read, he is not personally antisemitic.
Chuck Baldwin ~ Huckabee is Bush on Steroids–a Man Globalists Can Trust:
Chuck Baldwin ~ More Reasons To Beware Of Mike Huckabee
Huckabee’s Elite Backers:
A google search for the three words CFR member Huckabee will get you many more.
Soren I am convinced but he won’t get the nomination so we are back to the tree stooges again!
McCain is CFR (Huckabee is not.) McCain went along with the trust-Bush/AIPAC Roadmap folly despite such obvious ridiculous peril to national security that would cause, as is evident by looking on a simple map. Huckabee only supports a 2-state solution if the Palestinian state is not carved out of Israel, but located elsewhere, such as in part of the enormous geographical area now under Arab League control. McCain has promised a key role to his good friend and Annapolis monitor Gen. James Jones. Huckabee has shown he can’t be bought, can’t be bound to lobby groups, yet he is not against hearing what anyone has to say, including members of the CFR and AIPAC, it’s just that he uses his own judgment. McCain offers the same-old-same-old approach–Arab League states are also our friends, it’s just the Al-Qaeda’s and fringe that are the threat, whereas Huckabee sees the underlying ideology as the threat, both within and without the US. Neither seem to be Islamic experts by any means, but I trust Huckabee’s judgment in hiring Islamic experts, whereas I suspect McCain would stick with the standard State Dept and Defense Dept gotta-be-a-Muslim-to-understand-Islam approach of hiring those sympathetic with outreach to the very type of Muslims that are responsible for spreading the dangerous ideology–Muslim Brotherhood front groups, Hashem Islam types, etc. I would still vote for McCain over Hillary/Obama, but Huckabee’s my first choice and I’m sticking to it–anyway, Huckabee will debate better against Hillary/Obama and has already proven ability to beat the Clinton machine in Arkansas.
Teshuva
Thanks for those links. After reading them I am in shock.
Look at what the CFR stands for – what their goals are: the destruction of national sovereignty and Global government at the expense of the independence of sovereign nation-states.
In order to be a “long standing member of the CFR” one has to agree with and follow what they stand for.
McCain is CFR Globalism all the way. Period.
He would be a disaster for the sovereign Republic of the United States and like any other Globalist CFR member, a disaster for the sovereign nation-state of Israel.
McCain is a hawk and a mad man. Read this:
Chuck Baldwin — McCain Madness
Then this:
Lynn Stuter — The People’s State of the Union