When Harry Cheated on Sally

By Linda Goudsmit, PUNDICITY

When Harry cheated on Sally he accused Sally of cheating. What? It is called projection. Psychological projection is a “psychological defense mechanism in which the human ego defends itself against unconscious impulses or qualities by denying their existence in themselves and attributing them to others.” Projection is a method of blame shifting – Harry blamed Sally for what Harry did.

When Harry accuses Sally it is incumbent upon Sally to defend herself from the bogus charges. This cunning maneuver shifts the focus from Harry to Sally which is the underlying strategic objective of the false allegations. So, while Sally is busy defending herself Harry’s guilt goes unchallenged and he can continue to cheat. The best defense is an offense.

Political projection operates in the same way. A politician or political group accuses the opposition of doing precisely what they are doing themselves. The coordinated attack on President Trump and the well-orchestrated, well-funded effort to destabilize and delegitimize his presidency is a prime example of political projection.

So, who is the opposition and what are the charges?

In my 12.23.18 article, “The Betrayal of America: Who Do You Trust” I define globalism as synonymous with one world government and state unequivocally that:

“Globalists are the existential enemy of American sovereignty, independence, and they are desperately trying to destroy America first President Donald Trump and every one of his America first initiatives. Globalism is at war with Americanism…Globalist politicians are enemies of the state and serve their own agenda on both sides of the aisle. Their loyalties are to the global enterprise (one world government) and not to the United States of America.”

So, how do the globalist elite control the corrupt globalist politicians in the Washington swamp? They finance their preferred candidates of course!

Hillary Clinton was the globalist darling of 2016 – OOPS – that did not go as planned. So, the deep state had to switch to alternative Plan Y – their insurance policy that would destroy President Trump by any means necessary. The litany of allegations and accusations leveled against POTUS are staggering and the commitment to investigate them shown by the deep state operatives is stunningly hypocritical.

Let’s examine the behavior of some of America’s most dangerous globalists and their political projections.

Washington swampster Robert Mueller leads the “investigation” into accusations against President Trump of Russian collusion to influence the 2016 election.

In Daniel Greenfield’s brilliant 12.27.18 article, “Hillary’s Russia Doomsday Scenario” he explains the purpose of the accusations of Russian collusion concocted by the Clinton campaign:

“They needed a potential election defeat to be illegitimate even before it happened. . . . The Russia theme enabled abuses like the FISA warrant. Any scandal short of foreign espionage would not have allowed the Obama administration and its Clinton allies to pull off their own Watergate. Being able to eavesdrop on Trump allies was crucial to the conspiracy. But false accusations are also revealing. The accusers tend to slander their targets by accusing them of their own crimes to cover them up. What Trump and his allies have been accused of, is what Clintonworld most feared being accused of.”

Uh-oh! The Clinton allies did what Harry did – they accused President Trump of what they were doing themselves.

The true Russian collaborator was crooked Hillary Clinton herself and the infamous Uranium One deal she orchestrated while secretary of state that sold 20% of our American uranium to Russia! And who do you suppose was hand picked to deliver the secret enriched uranium sample to Russia? None other than the equally corrupt Robert Mueller himself.

Remember, when Harry cheated on Sally he accused Sally of the cheating to deflect the focus away from himself. The entire Mueller investigation is based on the same operating principle and for the same reason. The guilty accuser protects himself with falsified accusations that hide his own guilt – the best defense is an offense.

The maliciousness and magnitude of the effort to bring down President Trump is directly proportional to the threat that POTUS poses to the existence of the deep state. An investigation by the Trump administration into the staggering malfeasance of Hillary Clinton would not only lock HER up, it would also implicate Barack Obama and the shocking involvement of a corrupted Department of Justice. It would expose the entire deep state apparatus and its meddling in the 2016 presidential election.

What is fascinating is the similarities between the ongoing attacks on President Trump and the attacks made on former Presidents Kennedy, Nixon, and Reagan. These former presidents are not from the same party – but they shared a patriotic commitment to America-first policies that threatened the influence of the globalist deep state. So, if the globalist elites finance their preferred candidates why would they finance America-first presidents?

Because they also chose globalist vice presidents as their political insurance policies – they hedged their bets. The three former vice-presidents were all seasoned politicians from the Washington establishment aka part of the globalist infrastructure. What happened?

When Kennedy threatened to shatter the CIA (deep state institution) and refused to escalate US involvement in the Vietnam War – deep state operative Lee Harvey Oswald assassinated him and globalist Vice President Lyndon Johnson ascended to the presidency. When Richard Nixon opened trade with China that threatened the globalist worldwide financial interests Nixon was driven from office – good old boy Vice President Gerald Ford replaced him.

Ronald Reagan was a radical patriot who brought the country “Reagonomics” – supply-side economic policies of tax reduction, deregulation, and reduction in government spending. Reagan was as threatening to the establishment then as President Donald Trump is now. Reagan was also an outlier who was disparaged relentlessly and only months into his first term some “mysterious mental case” tried to assassinate him. Sound familiar? Had the assassination attempt on Reagan succeeded, globalist Vice President George H.W. Bush would have replaced him.

The deep state waited and did not risk supporting another outlier for president. After Ronald Reagan they supported former CIA director globalist swampster extraordinaire George H.W. Bush who became the 41st president of the United States. George H.W. Bush was an ardent globalist who signed the pro-globalist North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). His economic policies weakened America and were designed to restore the status quo and primacy of the globalist world order that Reagonomics had disrupted.

It was very instructive to witness the Washington swampsters lionize George H.W. Bush at his recent funeral. For four days they honored him, a man like themselves, who put his own self-interest before America’s interests like any good globalist would do.

The Mueller affair will wrap up with a report and be followed by a full court press. In his 12.28.18 article, 2019: Impeachment and Worse-Unless Americans Act Now Freedom Watch attorney Larry Klayman warns, “Pelosi’s Democrat-run House will waste no time using the smears and innuendo in Mueller’s report to introduce articles of impeachment to start the process of removing the president from office.”

The deep state and the Washington swamp who do its bidding are desperate. They know it is highly unlikely that there will be a Senate conviction for high crimes and misdemeanors but the charges were always meant to deflect attention away from the guilty parties and keep President Trump on the defensive. Remember, when Harry cheated on Sally he accused Sally of the cheating to coverup his own infidelity. Keeping Sally on the defensive was the strategy that allowed Harry to continue to cheat.

Impeachment proceedings are the political projections of the soft coup against President Trump designed to make it impossible for him to run again in 2020.

It is time for Americans to realize that Harry cheated on Sally and then accused Sally of cheating to win the presidential election in 2020.

December 30, 2018 | 39 Comments »

Leave a Reply

39 Comments / 39 Comments

  1. ADAM– An addendum to above. The Rotunda Lying in Hospital was famous all over the civilised world. Those studying and taking higher degrees in gynecology used to come from everywhere, to study in Dublin, and be able to visit the Rotunda Hospital.

    It was the only hospital known where could be encountered women who’d had large, multiple births, maybe 15-17 children born…

  2. @ adamdalgliesh:
    Adam…Sorry about the disjointed shape. I put down things as they occurred to me. Far too many for a smooth, “cultured post”…. So here goes….. “post comment”….!

    ***************** ********************* *******************

    De Valeria could not help but “provide useful assistance” to the Allies…. Ireland still at that time, and for many years after, had all it’s currency marked guaranteed by the Bank of England. It depended COMPLETELY on England for everything. It was basically a single hair on the tail of the dog. The Irish “politically” hated the British because they had been occupied and dispossessed by England and the English for 7-800 years ..and their well aired hatred died very slowly…. very like the Arabs in THAT way. But it stopped at talk

    {{except for that IRA outbreak years ago in the Nth. of Ireland..We had a factory 10 miles from Belfast which I returned from Canada to run, and I would go down to Dublin on weekends. Belfast was barricaded and concreted between the Catholic and Protestant districts and taxicabs had to pay “tolls” to be able to operate in both of them. It was a dangerous time, and our bank was in the middle of the worst spot. The Shankill Rd area. Great times… I had to duck below the window level more than a few times.
    There were at least 2 serious attempts to murder me, one of which I escaped by a matter of a few seconds. }}

    I believe that over 100,000 Irishmen were fighting in the British forces, and always had. (Wellington’s armies were MUCH more than half Irish. Some of his greatest generals and those of England were originally Irish). There were also many more than that working in the English war factories. . In fact there was never anywhere else to go for work… In those days and for long after, unemployment in Ireland was about 18-20%.. AT LEAST….I used to see these figures published now and then. {The working-class women commonly went out as charladies, earning a pittance in shillings, and their good-for-nothing (except to have 10-12 kids) husbands would wait to grab the money, and rush to the pub. They would line up outside before 10 o’clock opening time every day}….!!

    As for the return of downed Americans I would believe that, because it was easy to do… just send them over the Border to Belfast or over to England. As I posted, I used -even as an early teen- to travel very often to England in the overnight boat to Liverpool to my dear brother. There was NO WAY they could ever send Germans back to Germany, the geography forbade it and I sincerely believe that even though they hated Britain generationally, they were mortally afraid of Hitler.

    Cosgrave’s “Blueshirts” was just an idea that William Cosgrave had ..like Moseley..He was a bitter and threatening political enemy of Dev. with his Fine Gael Party, and maybe he thought he could get more support with his identifying Mussolini-like cohorts. I think Eoin O’Duffy, a former Irish Civil War general, was the leader. It was great (and safe) to join, salute and march, but that’s all they ever did. As far as I can recall, I think Dev banned only their threatened “march on Dublin”… they petered out a couple of years later…Dev banned anything that threatened him . He was advsed all the time by the Catholic Church…. believe me.

    He just happened to have been the only “patriot” not executed by the British after the stupid, miserable 1916 “uprising”… and was damned lucky, because his father (I think) was an American citizen, which caused the British to waver. They were depending on the US to come into the War (WW1) as an Ally, apart from getting massive supplies from the US…..

    I never heard anything about the supposed 9 “helpers” executed.. I would be fairly sure that this never happened nor would happen. Dev would have been torn to ribbons in the street after such an event.

    I believe that all German internees were held in a camp at the Curragh, described by the Irish Examiner newspaper as a luxury hotel, and were treated as guests, not prisoners. Several got married whilst “interned”…. The outlawed IRA ( a threat to Dev) were also at the Curragh but in a different camp.. surrounded by barbed wire and guards etc.

    The Curragh otherwse was where the Irish Army (about 7-10,000) with it’s antiquated WW1 rqupment traned and was housed. Of course there were a few other solders’ Barracs around..one only a 5 mn. wal from my home. But all THEY dd was marh around sometmes aon Sundays.

    Maybe, (typifying the Irish Army of the time, best) I posted the joke I once saw in that wonderful magazine “The Dublin Opinion” (like Punch, but 50 times better) about the old woman in the shawl, standing in a crowd watching soldiers march by…. saying.

    .”There goes my lad Seamus..god bless’m, the only wan in shtep…”. !!

  3. @ Edgar G.: Edgar, I read that the during World War II the Republic government allowed the U.S. Air Force to use air bases inside the Republic, although it prohibited British planes from using them. That it returned Allied airmen who bailed out over Irish territory to their bases, but interned German airmen who did the same thing. That it allowed 40,000 residents of the Republic to serve in either the British or American armies, but executed for treason nine residents who tried to help a German submarine that attempted to land on the Irish coast. That de Valera banned an overtly fascist group that called itself the Blue Shirts in the 1939s. But on the othe rhand there is the fact that the German embassy was allowed to remain open throughout the war, and de Valera’s bizarre visit to the German embassy after Hitler’s death, in which he offered his condolences and signed the guest book. Weird! Do you have any explanation for the government’s, and de Valera’s seemingly schizophrenic behavior? Providing extremely useful assistance to the Allies on the one hand, and playing footsie with the German’s on the other? Please share your insights with us.

  4. @ Edgar G.: Deeply moving, and also fascinating for us pampered, ignorant Americans. Please share more of your memories of your intense and moving life with us, Edgar. And you should write it into a memoir. Maybe also write a script for the BBC or Irish broadcastic netwok to produce as a docudrama. This history should be preserved.

  5. @ Edgar G.:
    A very touching story, Edgar. I wouldn’t trade places with my parents, nor with my any of that generation. Very hard times for some; but I never heard them complain — not about those days. Of course, after the war, when things were much better, they sometimes complained.

  6. @ adamdalgliesh:

    There were at least two documented bombings and I believe a couple more somewhere in the countryside which did no damage. They were believed to have been bombers which ether had gone off course, or been driven away from England, and seeing lights below, they dropped their load. At that time, it was dangerous to land with a full bomb load as accidents could happen.

    But….it’s more than co-incidental that the very first bombing was right in the middle of the Jewish area, and it’s a miracle, as I said, that no Jew was even slightly injured. There was another not too long after, which dropped on a tenement in the North Strand, and there were about 70 dead. It was a disaster.

    Yes Ireland was officially neutral, but every scrap of food raised in the country went over to England. And the Irish were put on very stringent rations. (1/2 oz of tea a week ..(In wartime England it was 2 ozs.) Almost no eggs at all, butter, sugar, the bread was half sawdust. 5 cigarettes a week…if you were lucky. No cooking gas except for a few meal times per day. They had inspectors going around to make sure no unauthorised usage was happening. He was called the “glimmer man” because the gas jets at their best were only a feeble copy of normal.

    There were ration books for some of the above items, and if not sold out before you got there in the queue..you’d get about enough to put in your eye and not notice it.

    They cut the gas altogether at last, except for meal times. No petrol, therefore almost no cars. There were all sorts of steam, turf (peat) and wood furnace contraptions to propel vehicles, some with huge balloons on top etc. -ghastly…

    Yes the German Embassy was alive and kicking…. a hotbed and headquarters for German spies of whom there were many. When Hitler killed himself De Valera actually had the enormous gall to go personally to the Embassy and bring his condolences.

    We had a very precarious time then for the whole 5 years, and not about the rations…..I’m sure you’ll find some of it on the internet.

    And they wouldn’t let any refugee Jews into the country…. saying that they’d like to “get ” of those they had..(about 3-3500) A few -maybe 10- were smuggled in.

    As the same time, my family has a more personal problem which I described here some time ago, which necessitated us taking weekly trips over by boat to Llanbedyr in Nth Wales, where my dear brother was in a TB sanitorium. We had to travel down the Irish countryside, no matter the cost transport faclity or effort, to try to find black market eggs, butter, cream, etc. and smuggle them over. In those days there was no cure for TB, the greatest killer, except exposure to the elements in a 3 sided open ended hut, and load up wth calcium rich foods, to try to encyst the lung perforation.

    We (and !) did this right throughout the war. Mr late uncle, about whom I have also written here, being a Dr. had extra petrol, and would meet us at the Liverpool Docks, and drive us down to our dear brother.

    And there’s more….. but I’m written out about it. A very traumatic prolonged time.

  7. @ Edgar G.: Edgar–I never knew that the Germans bombed Dublin, or why. I thought that the Republic of Ireland was officialy neutral in the war. The Germans were even allowed to maintain their embassy in Dublin during the war, or so I have read.

    Did the Germans conduct other bombings of Dublin or other towns in the Republic? Or was th is a unique event? Please fill us in with more background about Ireland’s involvement in World War II. Thanks, Adam

  8. @ Michael S:

    Goodbye, Michael S. I made it clear my objections were political. If you want to resort to crude insults because you can’t tolerate someone disagreeing with you, I’ll refrain from reading your posts in future. May I suggest Twitter as a better platform for your vulgarity?

  9. @ ketzel:
    Ketzel,

    I’ve held off, responding to your post. Frankly, I don’t know how to read it, except to say that you simply don’t like Chinese people. Maybe you have a good reason. Maybe one of them mugged you or something; I don’t know the history. Until I do, there’s not much I can say.

  10. @ Edgar G.:

    When I was looking for dirt on Nixon, I found an article that claims he deliberately sabotaged the Paris peace talks so LBJ wouldn’t get the credit for ending the war and help Democrats win the election. You can google that, I don’t have the link handy, nor am I an authority on this subject.

    I don’t think anyone can state “you are wrong” about something like this, because there is much we haven’t been allowed to know. I’m not a partisan of either party, BTW, I’ve been a registered Republican and have voted mostly Republican since 9/11. I even voted for George W Bush, excuse me while I vomit.

    Didn’t we used to think he was the good guy? This is why it’s okay to take another look at Nixon. Look at the results. We’re losing to China, and who helped them get rich? That article I referred to compared Nixon’s trip to China with Obama’s support of the Iran deal. Same motives, same result, very apt. In fact, I’m going to see if I can find that thing again, it’s so good. Even though he doesn’t like Trump and I do.

    edit: here’s another article on the same subject, it will do:
    https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/31/opinion/sunday/nixons-vietnam-treachery.html?_r=0&module=inline

  11. @ yamit82:

    I positively agree with you as regards the culpability of Churchill. He was-so to speak-a neighbour of mine, before, during, and after the War, as I lived in Dublin. Every night we would listen feverishly to the BBC News at 9.p.m. Often hearing Churchill and others. We prayed for him then. He was a British Nationalist through and through and a consummate opportunist.

    I was in a danger spot then as a German Bomber dropped a 500 lb er about 6 doors down the street from us. Right into the soft under front window flower beds of our local shochet and the second reader in the Greenville Hall shool directly opposite. His large family was dug out from under the rubble, miraculously unharmed. One non-Jew a block away, had his eye blinded by glass splinters.

    The cemented-over scars on the shool (now an offce building) facade can still be seen. Our house was badly damaged, roof destroyed, no windows and more. I ended up with my bed thrown from an inner wall to under the window and filled with glass shards. I never think about it. It was Fate.

    t was I who wrote to Felix about Mudar being the best proposition etc. He was merely repeating it wth view to comment.

  12. Edgar G. Said:

    And, although Balfour didn’t “give” Palestine to the Jews, his letter was the central impetus which drove the San Remo, Sevres, British Mandate, Anglo-American, and etc. So, I suppose, taking it very broadly he DID give us Palestine. His famous letter is repeated word-for-word in every one of the above Declarations and Agreements…………

    Real Zionism!

  13. Felix Quigley Said:

    “Mudar is by far the best proposition for peace and security with them ….for however long he’ll last”

    About one and a half seconds I would say

    I agree with you for a change haaaa but besides Belman who really supports the con-artist? Hamas and MB will take power in a vacuum.

    As far as the Jews are concerned I equate Churchill to Hitler…. He maintained the White Paper dooming hundreds of thousands if not millions to their doom under Hitler. I would have advocated killing all Brits in Palestine especially during the war. Begin was wrong and he deserves partial credit for the deaths of Jews in the Holocaust just as Ben Gurion.

    As far as Israel is concerned Syria is a declared enemy of Israel in word and deed and their support for Hezbollah gives Israel all legal justification in dealing with Syria in any way she deems necessary in our own defense. Even without legal backing, I would have vaporized Syria long ago. They are a vile people!!! The Turks are worse !!! Attaturk has lost and will soon be a forgotten figure in history besides possibly a footnote.

    Note: Not Balfour the League of Nations or the UN created the State of Israel.

    Israel’s juridical birth certificate is the pre-Holocaust League of Nations Mandate for Palestine of 1922 (provisionally operative from 1920) — not the post-Holocaust United Nations Palestine Partition Plan of 1947. Moreover, the Mandate was itself explicitly based upon the preexisting “historical connexion of the Jewish people with Palestine and to the grounds for reconstituting their national home in that country” (Mandate for Palestine, Preamble, Paragraph 3).

    International law was merely a formal acknowledgment of the 4,000-year-old aboriginal Jewish right to the Land. The absence of the State of Israel did create the Holocaust. For, had the Jewish State already existed when Nazi Germany arose from the ashes of World War I, virtually all of those who perished in the Holocaust would, instead, have been forcibly expelled by Nazi Germany to a welcoming Israel; and, consequently, there would have been no Holocaust.

    While the United Nations certainly endorsed the establishment of modern Israel (at least within the tiny Partition Plan lines), that feckless endorsement (which was so violently rejected by the entire Arab, and larger Muslim, world) had no operative effect on the creation of the Jewish State precisely because that endorsement was stillborn.

    I contend that Great Braiten shares co-responsibility in the Jewish Holocaust. They and Europe are now paying the price of their collective perfidy against the Jews and have only received their first course. The main course has yet to come but it surely will.

  14. Edgar read again what yamit wrote. She would create a diversion a the drop of a hat. A specialist you might say.

    “Mudar is by far the best proposition for peace and security with them ….for however long he’ll last”

    About one and a half seconds I would say

    I want to make this a Trotskyist position. After the terrible travails that hit our movement I am seeking to create an identity for us.

    But it is real for me and not manipulative…I do not accept what Churchill the “great” (read Gilbert) Churchill we are told, did.

    I will never accept that. It is the ultimate disgrace.

    Also it leads into the present where the likes of bear think it is OK to waltz into Syria and do whatever they feel like doing.

    It is easy to defend the nation of a lovely person…It is a real test when they are not lovely, like Assad…But he is better than ISIS. At least the Christians and Yazedis think so and now it seems even the Kurds

    Your points are well made and worth making

  15. @ Felix Quigley:

    Felix, I do NOT understand your reference to Jordan being Palestine (an artificial Roman dubbed name and used by habit) and belongs to the Jews. That was the way it was a hundred years ago before Churchill double-crossed us, and gave the Eastern Province of Palestine, called Trans-Jordan, to Lawrence’s pet Arabs. They are ensconced there, rooted like oak trees. and the Jews have accepted that our portion is that part between the Jordan River and the Sea, the original Canaan/Eretz Yisrael. There s NO way that we could ever take that over. There are 9 million Arabs there and not a single Jew, and neither has there been since well over 2000 years ago.

    They are antagonstic to us, and would do us the greatest harm if they thought they could get away with it. They hate us. Mudar is by far the best proposition for peace and security with them ….for however long he’ll last. But I believe he would, with the backing of the US and Israel. . At this point, without the known support of the US and Israel, Jordan would have collapsed to the terrorists years ago.

    And, although Balfour didn’t “give” Palestine to the Jews, his letter was the central impetus which drove the San Remo, Sevres, British Mandate, Anglo-American, and etc. So, I suppose, taking it very broadly he DID give us Palestine. His famous letter is repeated word-for-word in every one of the above Declarations and Agreements………….

  16. @ ketzel:

    By then living in Canada, I was following everything political in the USA in those days. I recall when the Kennedy cabal -and Mayor Daley- stole the election from Nixon in the most barefaced, easily detectable manner, and because of Nixon’s respect for the Office, he didn’t demand an investigation and recount. He let it go, knowing he’d been cheated. Very few if any, would have done that, as we have since seen…. with Bush-Gore etc. My recollection -hazy though it is- is that in those days, China was looming more and more as a world threat; that the had not so long before got the bomb, and were throwng their weight around. The general fear was that they would combine with the Soviet Union to wipe out the US and dominate Europe. (they already had half of Europe and healthy Communist groups and spy rings everywhere. People had been digging “survival” shelters in their backyards for some years already.Although McCarthy had been brought down, the realities of the time were still very much to be feared.

    So Nixon did a really BIG and smart thing with China. He gave them recognition and respectability and brought them PEACEFULLY into the real world, before they could go crazy enough to destroy it.

    You are completely wrong about Nixon. In future years he will go down as one of the better Presidents….. the Watergate craperoo was a piddling little nothing, which his sanctimonious enemies made the most of, to destroy him. Which they did. But he rehabilitated himself, by tirelessly working for other candidates and in effect becoming the guru of the Reps.

    The goods that they sell to us were the brainchildren of those US magnates who were saving money.

  17. For example I am not involved above in a discussion about Moses or whatever…I was talking about the Balfour Declaration and about Winston Churchill…Heard abou them?

  18. Felix Quigley Said:

    The fact is that Balfour granted Palestine to the Jewish people as their national homeland

    Balfour never granted Palestine to the Jewish People.

    Jews have never abandoned the Greater Israel concept…History of the Jews is a continuum where a 100 or 200 years are a blip…. Jewish history has a way of eventually evening out in the end. We just don’t see the future paths but they will inevitably exist. Jewish prophecy is not stupid commie projections & predictions that always fail to materialize. Look at the Jews today and compare them with Jews only a hundred years ago… Look at you Commies today and compare to Commies 100 years ago. Huge difference Huh?

    The MOST Important Video About Israel You’ll Ever See!

    On February 8, 2015, Eve was privileged to interview the late Charles Krauthammer, and is now re-airing their conversation. The passing a few days ago of this great columnist and political commentator has left a void, in our world of partisan and even fake news, of honesty, decency and brilliance. A man who valued true liberalism and democracy, loved America and was an ardent Zionist, Krauthammer, a rare and precious voice and by all accounts, a true gentleman and mensch, will be sorely missed.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sSHVKoI_u4

  19. The West’s Big-Ticket Power Grabs
    Why Should People Respect the Social Contract when Politicians Do Not?
    The assertiveness of supra-national organisations with a focus on global policy-making is a direct threat to the sovereignty of the nation state, and a dilution of the power of the individuals within it.

    Most alarmingly, as MEP Marcel de Graaff neatly surmised from the UN Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration: “Criticism of migration will become a criminal offense.” At what point have we left all pretext of democracy and moved into the sphere of dictatorship, manifest at a supranational level?

    “It’s very simple: the globalist political elite doesn’t respect nation-states, nor does it give a damn about the views of ordinary people. Indeed, it despises them so much that it would much rather make their views illegal than listen to what they have to say.” — James Delingpole, Breitbart, December 9, 2018.

  20. This issue of nation is why I as a Trotskyist working on modern Trotskyist principles, which takes up from where Trotsky was exploring in the years leading up to the war, separate from the impressionist “thinkers” like Ted Belman.

    I do not see and never have seen any reason to oblige the treachery of Winston Churchill.

    The fact is that Balfour granted Palestine to the Jewish people as their national homeland.

    I am Irish and why deep in my Celtic bones I would not support that no matter what antisemites down the years might do.

    The Jews have a right to adopt the name of Israel and I support them in that. But they had no right to abandon the concept of “Palestine”. And in the Mandate they called themselves “Palestinian Jews”.

    So back to the present I oppose this guy Mudar. He has no right to take over Jordan,

    Jordan is Palestine and Palestine belongs to the Jewish people.

    This IS trotskyism in the modern era and I will have this written into our new website due out in the near future.

  21. In Vietnam there was the message to the masses of America by the commie hating elites, and there was the truth.

    I suspect that Ho was never a Marxist. OK he did attend one of the early Congresses in Moscow. But he was a nationalist first and foremost. Many nationalists who played with Marxism and he was one for sure. He became a Stalinist and put down the Trotskysits…lethal person…but was a bourgeois nationalist

    That nationalism ran into the globalists of big dirty old Sam of US imperialist infamy.

    The rest is history. You bums lost to an impoverished people who believed in their nation. That is why Michael you can never be with the Jews…the very definition of nation. It is just not in your American genes. Get over it bum. You lost big in Vietnam.

  22. @ Michael S:

    Oh, I should go read the statistics? My town turned into Chinatown, but I must be wrong, it’s as all-American as it used to be. If whole areas of China became majority white, wouldn’t that be called imperialism?

    Assimilation happens when a minority becomes more like the majority. But if the minority becomes the majority, is that assimilation? More like genocide. Ask the Native Americans how they feel about all these assimilated immigrants. And we have assimilated, white hipsters go to sweat lodges and all that. So no problem.

    Having a wonderful son in law doesn’t mean you should be blind to what our enemies are doing, which is taking over the world with our money.

  23. @ ketzel:
    Hi, Ketzel

    The Chinese who leased the Port of Haifa are not emigrants: they are agents of a company in which the State is the majority shareholder. I can’t help but look at this as a security risk on the part of the Israeli government.

    Concerning Chinese and Jewish assimilation into the American mainstream, these things take time. The year of peak Jewish immigration was 1907, 112 years ago; and at present, the vast majority of US Jews have assimilated as Leftist Democrat crazy Americans. Considering that they tend to live in Leftist Democrat crazy places like New York City and Miami Beach, it’s understandable that they have chosen to transform into this particular mold — regrettable, but understandable.

    The peak in Chinese immigration hasn’t come yet; it increases every year. There was a mini-peak in the mid 1800s, however, mainly in California. They have largely assimilated. Immigration data, etc. can be found at

    https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/chinese-immigrants-united-states

    My grandchildren are all trilingual in Mandarin Chinese, English and their father’s local Chinese dialect. My 5-year-old grandson composes music in English; and I must admit, it is not perfected yet; but I think they will do well if they move here.

    I am not opposed to immigration. I oppose illegal immigration, just as President Trump does. I’m not a racist, and neither is he.

  24. @ Michael S:

    My comments don’t come from crude bigotry. The Chinese are gifted people who will do well anywhere, like the Jews. However, just as we know we are Jews, they know they’re Chinese. It’s a bad idea to import a huge tribe to another country and expect them to identify with the majority. In fact, Chinese people will find it even harder to give up their tribal identity than Jews do, because they don’t pass as people with European ancestry, as many Jews do.

    This is nothing against Chinese or Jews. Just as when European colonized various new lands, they didn’t become Native American, Zulu, Indian Indian…The British didn’t become Chinese, they were Brits who lived in Hong Kong. Is John Derbyshire Chinese?

    This is all so naive. I think white people and Jews (not mutually exclusive, IMO) are the only people on the planet who are silly and arrogant enough to think the other groups they live with will magically transform into some ideal “American.”

    Let’s take another look at Nixon. He ended the Vietnam war. Who, exactly, were we fighting in Vietnam? Was that not a proxy war with the Chinese & Russians? So all of a sudden, the people we were at war with are now making our blenders, and they’re all moving here, taking over whole states like California, and I hear Vancouver Canada is like that.

    I insist, I’m no crude bigot, I like my Chinese neighbors and admire their accomplishments, but they shouldn’t all be moving here, buying up everything, and crowding out everyone else. This is our fault (I mean Nixon’s fault), not theirs. If someone gives me money and stuff, I take it. The Chinese simply took what a fool and traitor offered them. I have no objection to having Chinese marry into my family, the personal stuff works fine, but politically, it’s a tragedy.

    Also, not just America. In Cambodia, the coastal resorts are Chinese owned, the Chinese are developing the Bulgarian Black Sea Coast, they just bought a port in Israel…Where did they get the money? Oh, it’s our money, we buy blenders from them, when we used to make our stuff here.

    I’m not a journalist, but someone needs to look into who Nixon was. I think he did more damage than Obama.

  25. @ ketzel:
    Ketzel,

    you will have a hard time agreeing with me about China. My daughter moved to Red China in 2000, to teach English in a business college. That was after a “career” of selling tacos in the US (Califoernia, actually). She married a Chinese-born busineessman, and they have given us four grandchildren (all joint US-Chinese citizens). They are all athletic, artistic and intelligent, as well as being beautiful. Some time soon, I hope my son-in-law can wrap up his business dealings in China, and they can all move here — hopefully, before I die.

    It’s a strange world, isn’t it?

  26. @ Michael S:

    What I mean about Nixon being Pandora is that the China thing wasn’t inevitable, he started it. Without that, Russia never would have had the resources to develop China like we did. We raised a cute puppy that’s now eating us alive, Thanks, Nixon. I’m glad he ended the war and all, he wasn’t all bad, but you know, handing our jobs to a potential enemy so everyone could have cheap blenders wasn’t so great.

    Have you been to California lately? It cracks me up that so many people think Mexican immigration is a problem (so do I), but no one says anything about Chinese immigration. California is Chinese. There are some rich white people left, some poor white hipsters, but California is Chinese. I saw it happen, I’ve lived in the SF Bay Area for 30 years. Regular Americans have no jobs and no future, all the new businesses are Chinese, subsidized with American grants. You think Chinese will rent to you or hire you? Thanks to Nixon and no one else. What a great man, one day the Chinese will put up a giant statue of him in DC.

  27. @ ketzel:
    Hi, Ketzel

    Let me take your last point first:

    ” I always thought Watergate was trivial, so I agree with the article that it was really about something else, but obviously Nixon was the Pandora who undermined the USA like no one else in history.”

    It was once said of Richard Nixon, that his support was “a mile wide, and an inch deep”. He had the support of the vast majority of Americans, the “silent majority”, who felt he cared for their interests. The Democrats had gotten us involved in a long, bitter war that seemed to have no end. He promised to get us out of it, and did so. I was in the US Army in those years, and frankly, I did not like him; but I give him credit for doing what he said he would do.

    You seem to have a different opinion, but I do not believe Nixon undermined the US. Try as he may, he got us out of Vietnam ungracefully, and just about everyone seemed to hate him for it. The fact is that the American people, on the whole, were tired of fighting a war on the other side of the earth that didn’t see, to benefit them. I had access to information that told me the Communists would never give up, even if we tried to exterminate them; but those who supported us were led by self-seeking people who were willing to leave them in the lurch. Every day the war continued, was an exercise in futility.

    Besides the war, Nixon had to tackle a monetary system that was on the verge of collapse. The Bretton Woods Agreement had been responsible for a high rate of inflation that was depleting our economy. Nixon tried to stop the bleeding with a wage-price freeze, and with taking us off the gold standard. LIke the war, this was a problem he had inherited.

    Now, the first point:

    “Can someone explain to me how Nixon opening trade with China threatened globalist interests?”

    I don’t know how or if it did. That one’s too deep for me.

  28. Can someone explain to me how Nixon opening trade with China threatened globalist interests? I always thought Watergate was trivial, so I agree with the article that it was really about something else, but obviously Nixon was the Pandora who undermined the USA like no one else in history.

  29. HOT OFF THE PRESS: THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE “LEFT” AND THE “RIGHT!”

    Note: Macron is left, Hitler is right.

  30. @ leonkushner:
    Hi, Leon

    I have just finished two years of rapture, at having an American President, and more importantly a US electoral majority, who still have a semblance of sanity. Since the election of a Democrat-majority House, however, I am reminded of the eight “Yeas of Gloom” under Obama. I was not gloomy about Obama himself, but about the numbskull majority that knowingly and willfully elected him.

    I have no doubt, that the Soroses and Kochs of this world have engineered weak American minds to think and act as they do. However, that does not excuse the people who have surrendered their free will and ability to think, in expectation of some handout. The most optimistic thing I can say, is,

    “We are doomed.”

  31. Articles like that need to saturate the MSM until every person who reads any political article has read them many times over. Whenever someone mentions Trump and his ‘Russian connection’ I immediately ask them how they feel about Obama’s and Hillary’s real Russian connection. Most respond in surprise, as if they don’t have a clue what I’m talking about. I’m sure some have heard about it put pretend to have never heard about it but I do believe that most have never heard about it. Why would they? It’s never been reported on CNN or most other MSM. That’s why we need to repeat it like a mantra. I really believe that the only way to stop the political projection is for Trump to get the balls rolling on charges of treason on Obama, the Clintons and the rest of the swamp.