Because it Won’t Be!
MG Paul E Vallely
Morning Intelligence Report
by George Mcclellan | Oct 28, 2024
October 28, 2024
Guest Editorial:
The result of the 2024 election, soon to be upon us, should signal the end of the Democrat Party, reassert an attempt to return to common sense Americanism based upon the Constitutional rule of law, and restore confidence in our government. Regardless, America will be left politically shattered and irrevocably divided. The Democrat Party, in its death throes, will become violent; it will lash out at its MAGA enemies, Trump, Christians, and middle-class citizens alike, leaving the smoldering ruins of a once united America taking decades to cool down. By then, it will be too late! China, Russia, and Islamic Jihadists are promoting all this.
The Democrat Party’s demise will be no loss because today’s Party is a version of an older, similar exercise in top-down political, economic, and social control exercised by the National Socialist German (Deutsch) Workers Party (NSDAP) in the 1930s. It died quickly but violently. Today, instead of “Workers,” our Democrat Party embraces “Victims,” and they can’t have victims without having an evil force to struggle against, so they have targeted White Christian middle-class conservatives as anti-Democratic, domestic terrorists and enemies of the State, exactly what they claim Trump will do if he wins.
They have already sicced Federal Law Enforcement elements against innocent Americans by armed arrests in the dark of night, censorship of conservative speech, threats of IRS investigations, enacting rules to legitimize spying on Americans through social media sources and asserting control over American citizens through trivial bureaucratic rules and regulations that fail to meet the requirements of law. National Socialists (Democrats) tell us they are doing what they consider is best for Americans. However, they weren’t asked and are steadfastly intolerant of people, except the stupid ones, who won’t flock to their banner. National Socialists need a strong, charismatic leader to exert popular control over the economy and social and military issues, bringing prosperity to citizens by his/her will alone. But alas, the Democrats don’t have one, But Republicans do, so the Democrat party’s brilliant thinkers on national and foreign policy issues bend to the loudest noise so long as that noise doesn’t disturb their more significant agenda.
Hillary Clinton, in her failed attempt to unite voters under her socialist banner, described conservative Americans as “a basket of deplorable’s,” and Kamala Harris, even this close to the election, taunts Christians, saying they don’t belong in the Democrat Party and screams to near empty halls that Donald Trump is a Hitler “fascist” who will send the US Military against his enemies (them presumably) eviscerating the constitution. He won’t because it’s unconstitutional, and the American people won’t stand for it, and, hopefully, US Soldiers will not fire upon American citizens because a politician says so. But don’t bet on it. History provides us with exceptions of a failure to obey the law, the most serious when Ohio National Guard soldiers fired upon rioting students at Kent State in 1970. It was an aberration to be sure, but it happened. The lesson here is that cooler heads didn’t prevail as the Kent State protest, precipitated by America’s invasion of Cambodia as the Vietnam war was growing in unpopularity, split the growing rift between Americans of all political persuasions wide open. “E Pluribus Unum” was in trouble, and that division, exacerbated by the Kent State incident, shadows us today.
Democrats’ leadership is trying to define their mistake of promoting Kamala. Well, they didn’t encourage her; Joe Biden did after Pelosi, Schumer, and Obama told him to abdicate or go out as a 25th Amendment nut case. But they can’t make her look good. Every time she opens her mouth, she ruins any thought of competency. Kamala is damaged goods ranting about abortion on demand (infanticide, aka: murder), swinging in support of America’s enemies, radical Islam, spending billions of taxpayer dollars on projects redundant to America’s needs, leaving the border open to millions of invaders, and most definitely unchristian, and expects Americans to see and accept the value in her version of fulfilling the hopes and dreams only her government can provide. While she doesn’t realize it, having only worked at McDonalds for a short time, the only thing standing between a young person and their hopes and dreams, apart from government interference, is their appearance, lack of talent, and general personality.
This election will not be unique in the sense we expect because we expect what will happen and must be prepared. When Trump wins, the Radical Left, the Democrat Party’s BLM brown shirts, Antifa, black-shirted stormtroopers, and irate pro-Hamas college students egged on by Hamas infiltrators will attempt a coup against Trump’s presidency, exporting violence everywhere they can on American streets. Trump’s response will satisfy Harris’s claim of his fascist tendencies, and we will be locked in an unpleasantness, person against person, to an end. This must not happen, but we must be prepared for it anyway. In the meantime, China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea will be licking their chops, ready to move in.
As an afterthought, do not discount the thousands of illegal infiltrators, including thirty thousand or so single Chinese males of military age and other nationalities, suddenly appearing on our streets uniformed, organized, armed, and ready to put down resistance. That’s why we must be prepared!
Remember, freedom is the goal; the Constitution is the way. Now, go get involved.
Help save America
@pdale
I rescued your interesting comments below. Based on many comments being made, it does appear that the Dems will pull every lever to maintain power and the SCOTUS will be required to do again in 2024 what they refused to do in 2020, namely to hear the evidence. It will be important to note which topics they choose to provide rulings, and which they will once again only punt.
I think that there will be riots in the major cities if Trump wins. This disagreeable result will not be the only difficulty Trump will face.
We must not forget that the corrupt New York judge has yet to hand down his decision. I suspect that he will impose a prison sentence on Trump.
This action could prompt several states to refuse to certify Trump as the winner. They would do this by arguing that he would be a convicted felon and also that he was ineligible under the provisions of the fourteenth amendment.
The Supreme Court would have to move quickly. I suspect that a majority of the court would vacate the order of the New York judge and direct the recalcitrant states to certify Trump as winner.
Meanwhile, hostile foreign actors could, and I think would, take advantage of this instability to move to take what they could get; namely, Ukraine taken by Putin and Taiwan by the Chinese. Perhaps not taken, but aggressively attacked.
I certainly agree that, should Trump win, there will be violent riots in the major US cities.
Beyond this conclusion in the editorial, the author does not venture and I think he should because it is necessary to anticipate all the moves that could or will be taken to deny Trump his victory.
What, then, could we expect besides the riots?
We should expect the corrupt New York judge to sentence Trump to prison following the corrupt trial and jury verdict.
That judgement could provide the rationale for several, or many, states to refuse to certify the decision of the presidential electors in each of those states on the grounds of Trump’s conviction and the provisions of the fourteenth amendment to the US constitution.
The Supreme Court would have to intervene at once. And, given its ideological composition, I would expect it to vacate the New York judgement and it to order the states to certify Trump’s electors.
Remember as well that the final certification of the state electors’ decision must be done by the Vice-President who is …. one K. Harris.
Whether the states would obey the Supreme Court or not is an open question. Ditto for K. Harris.