By Boris Shusteff
In an interview on Fox News on June 13th, Donald Trump said: “Look, we’re led by a man that either is not tough, not smart, or he’s got something else in mind. And the something else in mind – you know, people can’t believe it. People cannot, they cannot believe that President Obama is acting the way he acts and can’t even mention the words ‘radical Islamic terrorism’. There is something going on. It is inconceivable. There is something going on.”
Although Mr. Trump did not elaborate on what he meant by “something going on,” Jenna Johnson from The Washington Post, reporting on the interview apparently x-rayed his head. Figuring out what was in Trump’s mind, she came up with an article that was originally titled ‘Donald Trump suggests President Obama was involved with Orlando shootings’, and later re-titled, as ‘Donald Trump seems to connect Obama to Orlando shooting.’
Evidently in order to dispel Ms. Johnson’s concerns regarding his involvement in Orlando’s despicable crime or perhaps in order to mollify Trump, after his meeting with his National Security Council on June 14th Barak Obama delivered a speech, in which for the first time in his presidency, he connected the words ‘radical’ and ‘Islam’ together.
Indignantly stating that he and his administration are wrongly criticized for not using the phrase “radical Islam,” he continued: “That‘s the key, they tell us. We can’t beat ISIL unless we call them radical Islamists. What exactly would using this label accomplish? … Calling a threat by a different name does not make it go away.”
Obama is right; if one calls the threat by a different name it will not go away. But if it is called by its proper name, perhaps it can be at least properly opposed? Perhaps, it would be easier for people to understand where the threat is coming from and what it is?
ISIS did not “pervert Islam to justify terrorism,” and it does not have a “twisted interpretation of one of the world’s great religions” as the President tries to convince the American people. ISIS preaches radical Islam. Last year the Islamic State (ISIS) released a document called “These Are Our Creeds and Ways”. As reported by MEMRI* on June 2nd, Professor Ella Landau-Tasseron, former Chair of Islamic and Middle Eastern Studies at Hebrew University of Jerusalem, had recently reviewed the document. Below is her conclusion:
“The document ‘These are our Creeds and Ways’ is a self-profile of the Islamic State, reflecting its basic theology and political ideology. ISIS declares that it shuns extremism, and in fact it adds nothing new to traditional Islamic dogmas except for making the return of the caliphate a mandatory article of faith. The document deals with topics that have occupied Muslim minds for generations, yet it also reflects modern and local conditions and phenomena. It is firmly based on Islamic sources, which it cites often, and much of its content is identical to Islamic conservative Hanbali [one of the four major schools of Islamic law] and neo-Hanbali doctrines.”
By pooling the wool over the eyes of the American people, striving to hide the religious component of the threat Obama is doing a disservice to the adherents of Islam. Perhaps, Mr. Obama was so strong in his beliefs that he was not infected by the anti-American and anti-Semitic rhetoric of Jeremiah Wright while sitting in the pews of the Trinity church for more than twenty years. But how can he be sure that young American Muslims attracted by Islam would be able to withstand the insidious lures of radical Islam? Is he sure that they will be able to tell the difference between Sufism and Wahhabism, between Salafism and the traditional Sunni Islam if they are not firmly told and taught to be aware of the inherent dangers of the radical Islam? How will they know that they are attending a “virtuous” rather than an “evil” mosque?
In his speech Obama asked: “Are we going to start treating all Muslim Americans differently? Are we going to start subjecting them to special surveillance?” It might happen that the answer to these questions would not be politically correct if one looks into the results of a 2011 Study carried out by Professor Mordechai Kedar from Bar Ilan University’s Department of Arabic and Middle East Studies. A “random survey of 100 representative mosques in the U.S.” showed that “51% had texts on site rated as severely advocating violence; 30% had texts rated as moderately advocating violence; and 19% had no violent texts at all. In 84.5% of the mosques, the imam recommended studying violence-positive texts and 58% percent of the mosques invited guest imams known to promote violent jihad.”
Maybe it is time to start using common sense? We do not need “to start treating all Muslim Americans differently” but if according to the Clarion project, a non-profit group that describes itself as “dedicated to exposing the dangers of Islamic extremism” there is “more than 80 radical mosques in the US,” at least these mosques should be put under a strict surveillance or simply closed.
Perhaps if the term “radical Islam” is defined as dangerous to America it is time to look more carefully at the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) identified as Muslim Brotherhood front group in the 2004 Holy Land trail. Every time the terror strikes on the American soil, a representative of CAIR rushes to perform the damage control to the image of Islam. But should we really trust an organization whose founder is Omar M. Ahmad? The San Ramon Valley Herald wrote in an article on July 4th, 1998 about his speech “before a packed crowd at the Flamingo Palace banquet urging Muslims not to shirk their duty of sharing the Islamic faith with those ‘who are on the wrong side.’” Appealing to Muslims Ahmad declared: “Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant”. “The Koran, the Muslim book of scripture should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth,” he said.
Describing an interview he conducted with Obama Nicholas Kristof wrote on March 7, 2007 in the New York Times: “Mr. Obama recalled the opening lines of the Arabic call to prayer, reciting them with a first-rate accent. In a remark that seemed delightfully uncalculated … Mr. Obama described the call to prayer as “one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset.”
It is a pity that Mr. Kristof is not versed in Arabic and was not curious enough to ask Obama to translate the Arabic verses into English. To remedy this, we will appeal to one of the utmost authority in Islam, the 14th century sheikh Ahmad ibn Naqib al-Misri the author of the Reliance of the Traveller – A classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law. He writes on page 114: “The words of the call to prayer are well known: Allah is greatest. Allah is greatest. Allah is greatest. Allah is greatest. I testify there is no god but Allah. I testify there is no god but Allah. I testify that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah. I testify that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah. Come to the prayer. Come to the prayer. Come to success. Come to success. Prayer is better than sleep. Prayer is better than sleep. Allah is greatest. Allah is greatest. There is no god but Allah.”
Pausing for just a moment to digest these lines, let the reader consider that these are the words that President of the United States Barak Hussein Obama considers to be “one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset?” What is really going on?
* http://www.memri.org/pdf/MEMRI_IA_A_Self-Profile_of_the_Islamic_State-The_Creedal_Document2.pdf
June 16, 2016.
———————————————————————————————————–
Boris Shusteff is an engineer. He is also a research associate with the Freeman Center for Strategic Studies.
@ CuriousAmerican:
Ranbam wore 2 hats one as a rabbi Posek and one as a philosopher…. re: Jewish law christianity is pure paganism and Islam is not due to monotheism. christianity with it’s triune beliefs according to Jewish beliefs is paganism no doubt about that. Papa god- Jr. god- and Casper the friendly ghost. His more lenient view re: christianity and it’s potential is from his philosophical thinking and writings. In his epistle to the Jewish community in Yemen the context was a response to pleas of the rabbis there who were under pressure by the Muslims to convert or die and he told them to remain strong even convert rather than death, as Islam while crazy and he did call them nuts, was not idolatry. He would not have said the same re: christianity where Jews were required to die rather than convert.
Why are you opposed? Do you object to your own existence?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Nazi_Germany#Martin_Luther
@ honeybee:
@ CuriousAmerican:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Nazi_Germany#Martin_Luther
@ yamit82:
Nothing in spam.
Ted I have a comment or 2 Botted in your spam file pls retrieve and post a partial response to CA. Thanks
@ CuriousAmerican:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Nazi_Germany
CuriousAmerican Said:
I am the product of an intermarriage and for that reason I am opposed.
CuriousAmerican Said:
yamit82 couldn’t project bigotry on you . You have enough bigotries Don’t say us, you don’t speak for me.
Since it is you, Yamit – not us – who object to intermarriage, do not us accuse of bigotry.
But apparently the idiocy, among some, gets worse:
Well, if you, Yamit, think Islam is such a wonderful religion, how lucky you are. When you add in the Arabs of Gaza, and J&S, the Arabs are almost 1 to 1 with Jews in number.
The Christians, however, are only about 1-2%. You are so lucky, Yamit.
Must be scared away by those Christians who try to suicide bomb Jews every time an Israeli Jew tries to enter the Church of the Holy Scepulchre while those calm, demure, better-behaved Muslims welcome you with open arms into the Al-Aqsa.
You are so lucky, Yamit. You are surrounded by 1 billion wonderful monotheists; and they are not “idol worshippers.”
They, the Muslims, venerate an Ishmaelite, Mohammed, who slaughered Jewish men and raped their wives and daughters after the battle of Khybar.
However, the RMBM liked these better Ishmaelites.
But horror of horror:
We, the Christians, venerate a Jew … YESHUA, with an -A, may His Name live forever. But this Jew, YESHUA, was not rabbinically approved … so better you should go to a mosque. Right, Yamit?!
Trust your sages! You are better with the Muslims.
If you bring up the Holocaust – as you will – I will remind you that Nazi Germany was a re-paganized Germany where pre-Christian Nordicism made a resurgence. Turns out that Hitler, like Maimonides, also liked Islam
The USA, Britain, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand were solidly Christian and they fought Hitler. Doesn’t matter. The RMBM, of blessed memory, thought Muslims were better.
Hitler was a monotheist.
The RMBM, your sages, and A. Hitler are of one mind on this: Islam is preferable. Who are you to argue?!
Hitler was a wannabe Muslim, yet you blame Christianity. Such a wise person you are.
Do not accuse us of your own, Yamit’s, bigotry.
You problem is not with me. It is with YESHUA, with an -A, His Name will live forever.
Don’t project your bigotries on us, Yamit.
CA was in moderation. Any one who address his comments goes there too. I will now remove him from moderation.
Difficult to respond to Curious as each response is either moderated or botted
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0UnEtHbOWvo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TptkFd6HXhE
Ted my comment to Curious was Botted pls retrieve and post
So why do they continue to do so?
Projection on your part. Yeah, we do want you to assimilate. We want you, like everybody else, to marry into and become indistinguishable from us. It is you, who wants separation, you, Yamit, who assumes we are as much against assimilation as you are.
We are not against assimilation. You are, Yamit.
I have relatives who are intermarried with Jews. A horror to you, maybe; not to us.
Wrong! Again, you assume that we Gentiles detest what you detest.
Initially, the Germans were not upset that Jews were intermarrying but rather that so many prominent and influential Jews were pushing social agendas contrary to the wishes of the German people in general.
For ex: A) Kurt Eisner in Munich – 1918
B) Rosa Luxemborg – Berlin 1919
What upset the Germans was that the Jews, a prominent and influential minority, were often pushing values contrary to what most German people believed.
This is no way excuses Hitler; but assimilation is not the reason people hate Jews.
That fact that so many Jews were intermarried prior to Hitler showed that Germans were not as anti-semitic originally.
But Hitler mixed anger at the different social values of Jews, and blended it with Darwinistic racial theories, and occultic nonsense.
Hitler was a pig, but it was not assimilation that ticked the Germans off originally.
Again, pushing your agenda. No one cares. What bothers people is when some influential Jews push agendas that are contrary to accepted social norms.
For ex: In 1971, there was a very popular TV show: Bridget Loves Bernie, about a Jewish taxi driver who marries a rich Irish Catholic girl.
No one minded that. Both the man and the women were white. The show was very popular in the USA. At that time, only racial distinctions were controversial – maybe they should not have been controversial, but they were. Religious distinctions were socially acceptable at that time, and the show was a hit.
It was a runaway TV hit.
But among the Jewish establishment, it was a horror.
The network executives: heavily Jewish, were pummelled with complaints. Get that show off the air. Do not encourage Jews to marry Goyische blonde girls.
Who made those complaints? Not the Gentiles – we loved the show – but rather influential Jewish religious leaders.
So the show – though it was popular, had many Jewish actors on it, and had high ratings – was pulled off the air to appease the rabbis.
But it got much worse:
Weren’t Jews at the forefront of the civil rights movement?
Encouraging blacks and whites to mix? But when it came to their own?!
Ah, that was a different story.
A few years later, the same network, with Jewish executives, had no problem portraying interracial black white intermarriage with the next door neighbor on the Jeffersons.
Tell whites it is okay to marry blacks, but heaven forfend a Jewish guy marry a Christian girl?!
THIS IS WHAT UPSETS CHRISTIANS. A DOUBLE STANDARD.
It is not even that you are for or against race-mixing. It was that network TV praised interracial marriage, while it condemned Jewish-Christian marriage, by cancelling Bridget Loves Bernie.
This is what ticks Gentiles off. No one cares if you intermarry our daughters or vice-versa.
BTW: I know personally knew one Jewish guy whose brother was disowned for marrying a Gentile. Another one who was threatened with disinheritance if he ever married a Gentile, and a third Jewish guy, who abandoned his Gentile wife, to get a divorce, because he knew his Jewish mother would never accept her. I know these people personally.
Yet, you claim we Gentiles are discriminating against you.
You call Jesus, “yeshu,” an insult, instead of his right name: YESHUA – and you do it to tick people off.
Israeli TV shows this horror (Click Here), but were it done to Jews on American TV, there were be congressional investigations.
American Jews rightly want respect, but Arutz Sheva ran this praise fest about Gopstein and Lehava for interrupting a baptism by violent methods.
Can you imagine if that was done to Jews? You would howl, but it is okay to do it to Christians.
Saving the souls. Do you think we sell the souls on Ebay?
Is this lady insane?
She cannot even write Christianity. She says Xtianity, like you write “yeshu” instead of YESHUA.
And do not say it is an abbreviation. I know better.
I can write Moses. I can write Maimonides – I can write the names of Jewish sages like Rashi who rejected Christianity, but you cannot even write Jesus or Yeshua.
Look at this idiocy below:
It was Lehava and Gopstein who were getting violent (like terrorists) not the Christians.
It is this double standard which is infuriating; not your assimilation.
Again, there are Jews among my relatives; but they do not act like you, Yamit.
===================
I especially love it in the Mideast. I read articles by pro-Palestinians saying Jews discriminate against them by forbidding intermarriage to Jewish girls. But Muslims are just as bad. If an non-Muslim tries to marry a Muslim girl … he could get killed.
The thing is: Both Muslims and Jews both pull this nonsense, and then call us Christians the bigots.
My nieces are Christian. If they wanted to marry a Jew I would not mind. I would recommend the kids be raised in both beliefs, but it would be their decision.
I am not the bigot here. You are Yamit.
@ bernard ross:
Jewish liberals influence antisemitism in several ways. They arouse the discontent of conservative Americans (not to be confused with amorphous political conservatives) by bringing down traditional values: religion in school, the heterosexual family, and non-discriminatory racial distinctions. They arouse hatred and fear by spearheading Jewish assimilation: gentiles don’t want us to assimilate and become untraceable among them. The Holocaust was largely a response to Jewish assimilatory movements: Germans, like anyone else, don’t want Jews to intermingle with them.
Antisemitism, like other variations of hateful behavior, is the province of relatively few; the majority doesn’t care. By their tirades and actions against hate speech liberals enhance the majority’s tendency not to oppose evil. Their rhetoric does not affect hardcore haters, but makes the majority incredibly soft, unwilling to employ violence even to oppose evil. They refuse even to criticize evil; try speaking to them about Muslim terrorists or Palestinian enemies.
The liberals fully accept the fact that their goals are detrimental to Jews. Jewish liberals marched against apartheid in South Africa, the only state in the world genuinely friendly to Israel; they brought up a predictably antisemitic black establishment in Africa’s most influential country. In 1967 and 1973, liberals screamed against Israeli preemption in the face of imminent attack. In 1944, 1948, and 1973 they did not march to the White House to demand support for fellow Jews threatened with annihilation; they expend much more effort on some exotic endangered species of cockroaches.
The liberals go against any sensible definition of Jewish interest—indeed, against the very goal of Jewish survival—by pushing for the peace process.
bernard ross Said:
Bush let them escape just like he did after the Boston Bombing when he let a connected perp get out before he was really connected to the Saudis and the bombing in Boston.
Re: Oil fields bombing while the Saudis hold the West at ransom Israel holds the matches that can burn them all in Hell. a couple of tactical nukes in their main oil fields and the subsequent ecological fallout literally could in of itself produce a nuclear winter. I suggest that thousands of inextinguishable burning oil wells and millions of tons of sand in the atmosphere could make a real nuclear winter plausible….. I don’t think any of the scientific models included such a scenario.
CuriousAmerican Said:
Jews have no recognizable and or accepted collective leadership and never have. A people with the proportionately largest number of Nobel Laureates cannot be so stupid unless a much proportionally larger number are imbeciles. Knowing American and Israeli Jews as I do I opt for the latter. You cannot blame incomprehensible even suicidal behavior on non existent leadership.
Judge perino get a gun clip@ bernard ross:
GET A GUN
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATGdlxh2PIg
You do not know what my views are. My own view is that most Jews are innocent and readily assimilable; but that their leadership in America is insane.
The US coverup of the saudi role is so obvious that one has to take seriously the idea of a saudi US collaboration.
What is interesting to me is that since 911 the muslim influence on our gov is 100 times greater with president husseing at the helm, hillaryMBhuma at state and running for pres, john brennan rumored to have ocnverted to islam when staitoned in saudi, Johnson and lynch pushing the pro muslim line that islamaphobia is more important than muslim slaughtered americans..
One has to seriously wonder what is really going on here.
Did they all get in so deep that then cant get out now… the sauds have too much on them?
I wonder what would happen if one day Israel bombed all their oil fields and put them out of business?
@ CuriousAmerican:
@ yamit82:
This is a truer song of Brotherhood !!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frAEmhqdLFs
@ yamit82:
You have corrupted me, now even sweet Honeybee is in moderation. This never happened with keli-a.
CuriousAmerican Said:
yes, but nothing like you envision… I warn the jews who beleive that the goyim have changed and that they can now function like any other citizen who agrees or disagrees without worrying about the consequences. I warn the jews about the others. Especially american jews who beleive they are equal and can express themselves like any one else without being called out as a jew.
when the goyim hates the jew it is because he is a jew and anything the jew does is because he is a jew. that is what I warn the naaive stolkholm syndrome, battered wife syndrome jews about…. the goyim have not changed, they have simply freaked themselves out for a bit on discovering their insanity and have retreated from doing the dirty work and instead open holocaust museums while stalking the Jews back to Israel and payingmuslim proxies to do their dirty work. However, they are feeling refreshed by the presence of their muslim brothers openly without shame attacking jews and are themselves about to join in.
Those that have convinced themselves that funding muslims to slaughter jews is merely a political position are destined to be slaughtered by those they employ….. and this destiny will be blamed on the Jews they are trying to slaughter. This is the natural pre disposition of the euro based goyim and Jews must not operate on the basis of their presumed equality
CuriousAmerican Said:
😛 😛 😛 thats what you all say, thanks for re injecting reality back into the picture, a good laugh.
CuriousAmerican Said:
thats because you also knew that your view of jewish responsibility is basically that the Jews deserve what they get whereas mine is the Jews are in stockholm syndrome, naive and hopeful to see good in people… and that is a dangerous MO. The jews elevate “principles” above safety and loyalty… which is the mistake. Supporting the jew killing creed of honor killers on the basis of irrelevant principles is an error of confusion of ethics and principles…. not an evil inclination as you always infer.
CuriousAmerican Said:
Don’t think too many remember Madoff and most have recoverd their investments or at least a good proportion of their losses…. That said the backlash will be if any is the right conservative yahooos blaming Jews for being up front and too aligned with liberal and progressive causes of the left. Then from the right or left …They all can find some reason to hate the Jews it’s in your DNA….
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6RbfaoX5Hw
CuriousAmerican Said:
Madoff was small time and he mostly bilked other Jews. Try Soros , he even looks the part.
@ CuriousAmerican:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rv5qfyr18cg
CuriousAmerican Said:
Don’t think too many remember Madoff and most have recoverd their investments or at least a good proportion of their losses…. That said the backlash will be if any is the right conservative yahooos blaming Jews for being up front and too aligned with liberal and progressive causes of the left. Then from the right or left …They all can find some reason to hate the Jews it’s in your DNA….
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rv5qfyr18cg
CuriousAmerican Said:
Juxtaposition of antisemitism and Zionism. Same goals different motivations.
CuriousAmerican Said:
And he is Darlin. does he make you feel inadequate ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jMvnTUlWog
Negative interest rates have already hit Scandinavia, Japan, and Germany. Soon to come to the USA.
I see a total world-wide economic collapse very soon. And thanks to Bernie Madoff, I see the Jewish community en masse being blamed for it. Some will be guilty, as Jews are heavily represented in High Finance – chiefly because High Finance requires a high IQ and a good education to comprehend and manipulate derivatives.
But even then, most Jews are not in high finance.
The Rothschilds may have survived the Great Depression. Groucho Marx went bankrupt like everyone else.
Just because Jews are disproportionally represented in high finance does not mean that most Jews are in high finance, or that those Jews who are in high finance would be any more guilty than their Gentile colleagues.
But most people do not comprehend statistics or such distinctions – or they would be in high finance themselves – which requires a knowledge of higher math – and so all Jews will be blamed.
You may see a soon increase in Aliyah.
England is almost as bad as the USA is regarding debt.
Believe it or not, Japan is the worst.
Scotland is Britain.
Scotland + England + Wales = Britain.
Scotland is not independent yet.
And here you were telling us that Yamit was all man.
Are you hinting that Jews contribute to their own plight by their actions?
You are, you are hinting at it.
Yes, they were; and disproportionally leftist as well.
Wow! Such a confession.
Ez 36:22 I will show how holy my great name is–the name on which you brought shame among the nations
I use Scripture so I cannot be charged with a bigotry I do not have, but apparently, the Goyim-Jewish dialectic is not as black and white and you would have it.
I finally agree with something you have said. But that will probably not stop you from slamming me.
bernard ross Said:
keli-a , yamit82’s feminine side.
yamit82 Said:
how long before your backside is kicked off again.
@ yamit82:
good, the other name was a girls name and threw me off
honeybee Said:
Hi I’m back 😉
@ lsatenstein:
in the new CVE obama has directed that words like sharia and jihad be ommitted from discussion of terror events.
As my beleif is that IS was a reincarcation collaboration with the US and the GCC and I notice that this gay slaughter immediately served to push gun control which is a goal of the white house and dems… the same folks who gave us IS.
lsatenstein Said:
NO, just one more deceitful decision designed to fool americans with obfuscation, smoke and mirrors. Muslims are the source of the problem, Trump is the only one who makes that important accurate observation… I do not agree with the cutesy adjective of radical, etc. the problem comes from muslims, until we can figure out what is their problem(which of course is Islam) we should ban their immigration to err on the side of safety and security for americans… we have no obligations to muslims.
taking logic a step further: those already here should be getting profiled and the mosques getting increased surveillance but Obama has instructed his appointees to keep anything muslim off the radar. Hence, we have our president, DOJ and DHS conspiring to focus americans intentionally on wrong targets thus insuring more heinous slaughters of americans by muslims.
Israel should take a similar approach… the basis of anti semitic abuse in Israel and of terrorism begins with Islam and the mosque… pretending this is not so just costs more lives… the lives of citizens swindled by their con artist leaders.
yamit82 Said:
A ha back in moderation, didn’t take long keli-A , the good twin, was never in moderation.
Give Obama credit for not saying Islamic”!. A wise decision. If you say affiliate the word “Islamic” with radical or with terrorism, you are promoting ISIL/ISIS, who will jump on that label to promote fear to non-muslims and promote “join us” by Muslim youth.
yamit82 Said:
in the face of the muslim flood, they cannot control their borders, the huns are dictating to them.
I see a great deal of a rise in anti semitism in europe and the USA arising out of the public face of many jews supporting all the things that the mass of people resent and oppose. The jews will once more be seen as a fifth column, aligned with forces seeking to damage the nation, a disloyal group…. many americans and euros are suffering because of the immigration policies and loss of jobs and the greatest face of jewry is supporting those travesties. I am told by folks who were there that in pre shoah germany the Jews were all over the media. Every minute I read about a jew standing up for muslims, for obama, for illegal immigration, for shipping out jobs, for firing american workers.
In my view jews should beware.
every so often the Jews are slapped down…….
Who does the slapping says:
“Jews, I just remembered why we hated you so much last time….
Jews, remember who you are…………..
and remember who we are.”
I see a returning hatred fueled by Jews themselves… I see the hatred that they forgot now returning.
Why do jews stand up for muslims when muslims would never stand up for jews…. muslims are enemies of the jews.. why would jews support muslims over the natives of their host nations.
this is a dangerous MO.
@ bernard ross:
Yeah probably but heavy obsessive regulations by unelected bureaucrats in Brussels,loss of a lot of national autonomy. England wisely opted out of Maastricht Treaty leaving them a large degree on independence….. That’s what has mostly saved the Brits till now. They can still print their own currency and control value to a degree.
I see currency wars, trade wars and finally real hot wars coming down the pike.
@ yamit82:
it appears to me that the main motivation currently for brexit is the flood of muslim immigrants.
Ted pls take ME out of moderation mode Thanks
Ted comment in moderation
@ bernard ross:
Really a lot to do about little… Brexit means nothing immediatly will happen as all English companies have 2 years to renegotiate with the EU for new or better terms. Britain is 25% of EU trade and I can’t see the EU trying to punish Britain it would really be shooting itself in the foot. In the short term if England leaves the UNION nothing much will happen or change immediately. Britain sees itself aligned more closely with the Commonwealth countries and America than to Europe and there is a consensus in Europe that the EU is all but dead anyway…. Politicians and some big financial concerns need Europe but not good in mid to long term for Britain. Scotland will follow the lead of Britain I think. we shall see next week.
but exactly the opposite is what should happen, as the EU policies are causing dissension they should be voted on as quickly as possible.
It appears convenient for those who want to keep UK in the EU when the polls say brexit will win. There are some suspicious inconsistencies… the contradiction between those who knew the alleged killer as apolitical with no political view on brexit, the denials of witnesses of the shouts of “britain first”, the convenient arrival of the far away southern law center who had correspondence from the brit; the witnesses said that the MP interrupted an argument between two people and was then shot.
Govs are know for dirty tricks… they could have set up mair, already having his correspondence… their agent could have contacted Mair for a meeting and when he arrived, knowing the MP was attending the scheduled weekly meeting could have started the fight, shot the MP and left.. what happened to that person? Look how quickly they used this to stop the referendum… they have done similar things before.