What have Fauci’s friends been up to in Ukraine?

by David Mark, ISRAEL UNWIRED       February 27, 2022

https://www.israelunwired.com/faucis-friends-bioweapons-ukraine/
With Russia rolling through Ukraine, making clear gains in both Kharkiv in the east and the capital in Kiev, the US military has scrambled to vacate multiple bio weapons labs that it runs in Ukraine.


Beyond the Pentagon’s speedy retreat from various laboratories across Ukraine, the US government erased all online documents in PDF form related to America’s connection to the laboratories.

<

America’s Biological Threat Reduction Program (BTRP) established Ukraine as its major partner:<
“The U.S. Department of Defense’s Biological Threat Reduction Program collaborates with partner countries to counter the threat of outbreaks (deliberate, accidental, or natural) of the world’s most dangerous infectious diseases.? The program accomplishes its bio-threat reduction mission through development of a bio-risk management culture; international research partnerships; and partner capacity for enhanced bio-security, bio-safety, and bio-surveillance measures. The Biological Threat Reduction Program’s priorities in Ukraine are to consolidate and secure pathogens and toxins of security concern and to continue to ensure Ukraine can detect and report outbreaks caused by dangerous pathogens before they pose security or stability threats.”

Back in April 2021 Newsweek Reported on “Vladimir Putin’s Adviser Says U.S. Is Developing Biological Weapons Near Russia” 

Interestingly, the BTRP has a direct connection the EcoHealth Alliance.

That’s the same EcoHealth Alliance connected to Dr. Anthony Fauci.

It doesn’t take much to add all of this up. Ukraine is at the forefront of the US Department of Defense’s Biological Threat Reduction Program that essentially is another form of a Wuhan lab, which means the US DoD is researching bioweapons right across the border from Russia. Putin may be brutal, but given what came out of Wuhan, these bioweapon research facilities in the Ukraine appear to be an existential danger to Russia. Why would he want to take a chance with an increasingly brazen NATO on his doorsteps and the threat of bioweapons?

None of the above justifies the Russian army’s brutality in its attacks on Ukraine, but the US DoD’s games in far off places having been causing more problems than they solve and if the game here was to get a one up on Russia, then it is America’s willingness to play with fire that is the real trigger for this war.

NATO has done a good job over the years painting itself as the “defender of freedom” against an autocratic Russia. However, given the brutality showed across the world connected to COVID-19 restrictions, coupled with the fact that it was the USA’s own government (albeit only a clandestine part of it) that had a direct hand in developing the COVID-19 pathogen, it is increasingly getting harder to tell the difference between the two sides.

Click here for the full deep dive analysis of reporter Dilyana Gaytandzhieva

March 1, 2022 | 13 Comments »

Leave a Reply

13 Comments / 13 Comments

  3. Reader…I’m still concerned at your attitude to Zelensky? I am unable to read every article on Israpundit just too.much for me so I’m here

  4. “Interestingly, the BTRP has a direct connection the EcoHealth Alliance.”

    Is this proven here or have I missed it?

  8. From Dr. Malone:

    Please help us to crowdsource review of these Pfizer documents! As you read the various documents, please comment and include reference to the document in question.

    This is one of the most productive things that you could do to help at this point.

    On behalf of myself and many others, thank you in advance.

    https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/

  9. Nine pages listing 1,291 different Pfizer vaccine adverse events:

    CHD Says Pfizer and FDA Dropped Data Bombshell on COVID Vaccine Consumers
    Children’s Health Defense
    Thu, March 3, 2022, 3:54 PM·4 min read

    Clinical trial data contradicts ‘safe and effective’ government/industry mantra

    Washington, DC, March 03, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — In a 55,000-page set of documents released on Tuesday, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) is for the first time allowing the public to access data Pfizer submitted to FDA from its clinical trials in support of a COVID-19 vaccine license. This follows U.S. District Judge Mark T. Pittman’s decision on January 6 to deny the request from the FDA to suppress the data for the next 75 years which the agency claimed was necessary, in part, because of its “limited resources.”

    A 38-page report included in the documents features an Appendix, “LIST OF ADVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST,” that lists 1,291 different adverse events following vaccination. The list includes acute kidney injury, acute flaccid myelitis, anti-sperm antibody positive, brain stem embolism, brain stem thrombosis, cardiac arrest, cardiac failure, cardiac ventricular thrombosis, cardiogenic shock, central nervous system vasculitis, death neonatal, deep vein thrombosis, encephalitis brain stem, encephalitis hemorrhagic, frontal lobe epilepsy, foaming at mouth, epileptic psychosis, facial paralysis, fetal distress syndrome, gastrointestinal amyloidosis, generalized tonic-clonic seizure, Hashimoto’s encephalopathy, hepatic vascular thrombosis, herpes zoster reactivation, immune-mediated hepatitis, interstitial lung disease, jugular vein embolism, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, liver injury, low birth weight, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, myocarditis, neonatal seizure, pancreatitis, pneumonia, stillbirth, tachycardia, temporal lobe epilepsy, testicular autoimmunity, thrombotic cerebral infarction, Type 1 diabetes mellitus, venous thrombosis neonatal, and vertebral artery thrombosis among 1,246 other medical conditions following vaccination.

    “This is a bombshell,” said Children’s Health Defense (CHD) president and general counsel Mary Holland. “At least now we know why the FDA and Pfizer wanted to keep this data under wraps for 75 years. These findings should put an immediate end to the Pfizer COVID vaccines. The potential for serious harm is very clear, and those injured by the vaccines are prohibited from suing Pfizer for damages.”

    The U.S. government has already purchased 50 million doses of the Pfizer vaccine intended for children under five years of age to be delivered by April 30, 2022 although the FDA has yet to grant an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for this age group. The risk of serious injury or death from COVID to healthy children is practically nil and so far, the vaccine is not effective when used in young children….

    https://finance.yahoo.com/news/chd-says-pfizer-fda-dropped-205400826.html

  10. US Senate Passes Bill to End COVID-19 National Emergency
    Zachary Stieber
    3-4 minutes

    The U.S. Senate on March 3 approved a measure that would end the national emergency over COVID-19.

    The resolution passed 48–47 on a party-line vote.

    All Republicans voted for S.J.Res. 38, which would end the national emergency declared by President Donald Trump on March 13, 2020. All Democrats voted against the declaration, which has been extended twice by President Joe Biden.

    Five senators missed the vote, including three Democrats.

    “After nearly two years of living under this state of emergency, the American people are worn out and yearning to breathe free; they long for their God-given freedoms, and for leaders to take their side. There is no doubt, it’s time for our nation to learn to live with COVID,” Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.), who introduced the measure, said in a statement after the vote.

    “I am proud my colleagues came together to repeal this emergency declaration and delivered a symbolic victory to our citizens that normalcy is around the corner and that limited government and our constitutional rights still reign supreme. It’s high time to stop talking about restrictions and the unknown. We must chart a new course to victory today that respects the virus and our freedoms.”

    Before voting began, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) urged senators to vote no. He argued that it isn’t the right time to end the emergency declaration, which enables the president to take certain actions, because new variants of the virus that causes COVID-19 may emerge.

    The proposal “would precisely handicap the Biden administration’s ability to fight the pandemic and heighten the danger that all our progress is suddenly unraveled in the future,” he said, claiming the declaration “has been one of the most powerful and best tools for mobilizing the federal government to combat the pandemic.”

    Sen. Mike Braun (R-Ind.) disagreed, telling the body that the number of people who have been vaccinated combined with those who enjoy natural immunity means “a large majority of the nation are already protected” and that the virus has become endemic.

    “When this emergency was first declared two years ago this week, it was needed,” he said, but “it’s past time for the president and governors across the country to give up the extra powers granted to them under the COVID emergency declarations.

    “If we’re going to live with this virus and move forward as a country, we must end the national emergency authorization and then other governors across the country should follow suit.”

    The measure now heads to the House of Representatives, which is controlled by Democrats, who have generally been more in favor of restrictions during the pandemic than the GOP. Even if the House were to approve the measure, the White House said on March 3 that Biden would veto it.

    A spokeswoman for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) didn’t respond by press time to a request by The Epoch Times for comment.

  11. The favorite testing sites for new drugs and vaccines have always been (for many decades) India and the USSR/Russia.

    Until now, when they went worldwide.

  12. Bombshell report on Ukrainian labs from 3 months ago. Here is an excerpt:

    …
    The Ukrainian-American program for the study of dangerous biological objects is controlled by one of the Pentagon structures, the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA). Over 16 years, US military biologists managed to achieve significant success. According to project’s Acting Deputy, Joseph Pennington, Ukraine received more than $ 200 million from the Pentagon to create a network of biological laboratories. The money went to the opening of 15 bio labs across the country to work on the study and enhancement of pathogens and the most dangerous diseases.

    For example, in Kharkiv, as well as Kiev, Odessa and Lviv biolabs, studies were conducted on seroprevalence to hantaviruses among healthy servicemen of the Armed Forces of Ukraine (a project under the code UP-8). The US titled the task for their Ukrainian sub-contractors as “The spread of the Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus (GLCC virus) and hantaviruses in Ukraine and the potential need for differential diagnosis in patients with suspected leptospirosis.”

    As part of this study, biologists conducted experiments on Ukrainian servicemen, receiving blood samples of more than 4 thousand soldiers of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. During the experiments, some subjects died and others ended up with severe health consequences. This medical information was transferred to military scientists in the United States.

    The scientific component of the project was led by Professor Colleen Jonsson, Director of the Center for Biomedical Sciences at the University of Tennessee. On the US side, Gregory Glass from the Institute of Emergent Pathogens at the University of Florida, Gregory Mertz from the Center for Global Health at the University of New Mexico, Scott Howard from the Center for Biomedical Sciences at the University of Tennessee also participated in this program. The general management of the program was carried out by representatives of DTRA (AUU) Gavin Braunstein and Brandt Siegel.

    As in other cases, after the start of the work of American military biotechnologists, the region was overwhelmed by a wave of infectious diseases. For instance, in the fall of 2017, there was an outbreak of hepatitis A in Kharkiv. Earlier in the same year – similar foci of infection were noted in Zaporozhye, Nikolaev and Odessa. At the end of 2019, a large spikes of infectious diseases occurred in the Kharkiv region, this time – meningitis.

    In the first three weeks of September alone, 29 cases had already been identified. More than half of them – children. At the same time, 44 people have been infected with meningitis in the region since the beginning of the year. In just 10 months of 2019, 233 cases of viral hepatitis A were registered in Kharkiv and the region, and 328 cases in total in the region. These are very unusual numbers that happen to coincide with these biolabs and testing projects.

    …

    It is said that other biolabs conduct their work in the Kharkiv region even more covertly. Information about their activities gets into the press mainly due to leaks from former employees

    According to one such whistleblower that contacted DC Weekly, these biolabs are funded through a grant system through the International Renaissance Foundation, controlled by George Soros. Curators of the project are Secretary of the Atlantic Council for Ukraine, Melinda Hering, and her assistant Paul Neeland, who is also the director of the firm “Lifeline Ukraine”.

    One of these secret biological laboratories, located in the areas of Pesochin and Podvorki, collected biomaterials from residents of Kharkiv region in 2019 who used new, experimental medicines. These experimental drugs were given out free of charge in state medical institutions, children’s camps and educational institutions under various pretexts. Tests were collected from the test subjects, the results of which were sent to the United States.

    This same bio lab conducted research of the ability of insects to be carriers of pathogens dangerous to humans. Experiments were carried out with ticks as carriers of Zika viruses, West Nile fever, Dengue fever, etc. Another area of “dual-use” research conducted up to 2019 is the development of a so-called “universal, smart” vaccine that can adapt to mutations of the influenza virus.

    …

    Here is the full article:
    https://dcweekly.org/2021/12/11/united-states-not-so-secret-bio-weapons-program-in-ukraine-increases-tensions-with-russia/

  13. From 2005:

    Threat Reduction Program Extends Reach to Ukrainian Biological Facilities

    Arms Control Today

    William Huntington

    U.S. cooperation with Ukraine under the Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) program was expanded Aug. 29 with an agreement to use U.S. CTR funds to improve security for pathogens stored at biological research and health facilities in the former Soviet republic.

    Under the agreement, CTR funds will for the first time flow directly to projects aimed at securing pathogen strains and sensitive biological knowledge within Ukraine. The United States also will work to improve Ukrainian capabilities to detect, diagnose, and treat outbreaks of infectious diseases, as well as determine whether outbreaks are natural or the result of bioterrorism.

    The agreement was signed during the visit to Kiev of a high-level U.S. delegation led by Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Richard Lugar (R-Ind.) and Senator Barack Obama (D-Ill.).

    Among the facilities in Ukraine intended to receive security upgrades are those once linked to the Soviet-era anti-plague network, which continue to store libraries of naturally occuring pathogens for the purposes of research and public health. Andy Fisher, spokesperson for Lugar, told Arms Control Today on Sept. 15 the anti-plague facilities “were threats and they are threats,” given the risk that poor security could allow terrorists access to pathogens. Fisher also cited the possibility that outdated operating procedures and equipment could result in the unintentional leakage of pathogens from these facilities, endangering the public health of the region.

    Cooperation under the new agreement will not be limited to physical security over pathogens. Funds also will be available for the peaceful employment of scientists whose skills and financial insecurity could render them potential targets for states or independent groups looking to acquire bioweapons capabilities. In addition, the agreement includes provisions for cooperation between U.S. and Ukrainian epidemiological laboratories in diagnosing disease outbreaks. Toward that end, pathogens from Ukrainian health and research facilities will be shared with U.S. partner laboratories. Under a CTR agreement with Azerbaijan, the United States last month also received a transfer of pathogens from similar facilities in that former Soviet republic.

    As a first step toward implementation of the agreement, the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) will conduct an assessment of biological facilities in Ukraine to determine what sites will receive assistance. Funds within the current DTRA budget will cover the assessment phase; additional implementation funds could be appropriated in fiscal year 2007 and beyond. As the Aug. 29 agreement falls under the established CTR framework, neither Congress nor the Ukrainian Rada will need to provide further authorization before implementation begins.

    Negotiations on the Aug. 29 agreement spanned more than a year. One administration official who requested anonymity told Arms Control Today that inter-Ukrainian political and bureaucratic hurdles were surmounted by a combination of strong U.S.-Ukrainian relations and the presence of the high-level U.S. delegation. A press release from Lugar’s office specifically credited then-Prime Minister Yuliya Tymoshenko with breaking a “log jam within Ukrainian government bureaucracy.”