We must confront the reality that so much that is taken for granted in American society could actually disappear.
By Douglas Albatef, INN
It has become deeply dubious, even suspicious, to try to look at Western civilization through a half full glass. Nevertheless, it must be asserted with full throated enthusiasm, that liberal Western society has been mankind’s greatest achievement in the attempt to provide dignity of life to as many as possible.
Part of the West’s achievement has been an openness to remediation, improvement, atonement and change.
The idea of defending to the death your right to say things I disagree with has become the anachronistic redoubt of dead white males.
The price of this great experiment, this magnificent edifice, has been forbearance. Like tolerance, forbearance demands that we recognize that there are those among us who we disagree with, even unto the point of hating. Yet, we willingly channel that dislike into socially acceptable vehicles such as voting, demonstrating, letter writing, and working to support organizations that take different positions from those we despise.
The result has been an exquisite, yet delicate social fabric, one reflecting complexity and contradiction while remaining intact.
The great challenge for any liberal society is to withstand its own de-legitimization from within. Great societies have been historically far more vulnerable to internal decay and dissolution than they have been to conquest. Internal decay first creeps and seeps and then ultimately, floods.
Sad to say, much of the West is facing these internal challenges of dissolution. It is mindboggling for many, particularly older people schooled and steeped in the values of their society, to see speakers booed off the stage at universities, to see those who with unconforming views harassed – verbally and physically.
The idea of defending to the death your right to say things I completely disagree with has become the anachronistic redoubt of dead white males.
A society predicated, however very imperfectly, on equal opportunity for all, has now embraced equal outcomes for all, and better outcomes for those who had not previously shared fully.
The great anchor of our grand experiment, individual freedoms: of speech, of association, of religion, are all under attack. Most destructive of all is the frontal assault on free speech, for without it, all other freedoms fall as well.
Nowhere is free speech more at risk than at the very institutions which best represent free speech’s triumph, and which therefore would seem to be its natural and logical defenders: the university, and the media.
The number of bannings of conservative speakers on US campuses has grown to the point of requiring a scorecard, and the US main stream media has long jettisoned objectivity for opinion. Beyond embracing opinion though, has been the unwillingness to tolerate any opinions out of one’s ideological silo.
The recent palace revolt of younger staff at the New York Times in response to the effrontery of printing an op-ed by a US Senator, will, I fear, mark in hindsight, a very painful and enduring milestone in the dissolution of the fabric of American society.
That the publisher and senior editors could be cowed and bullied by a walk out of young staffers says worlds both about the personal courage of the paper’s leadership, as well as the world view and mindset of the future leaders of the paper.
Those who take conservative views, and most certainly those who proudly and unapologetically tout those views, have been marked with the kind of vilification that has the distinct smell of physical threat.
There are those who are oblivious to the threat that they pose to the edifice of America’s liberal Western civilization. They just want to drive Donald Trump from office. Then there are those who want to use the readily popular cause of driving Trump out for the purpose of making profound structural changes in American society.
There are the not so closeted communists or socialists, and there are the not terribly subtle identity politics authoritarians. Both groups have a more pervasive agenda than electoral change; both groups are happy to use the electorally focused as their “useful idiots” to provide cover for a far more insidious goal.
Those of us deeply worried about the direction of things in America know that this is about far more than who will be the next President. For many on the Left, it is possible that they do not even care about driving Trump from office, because they believe they can advance their anti-Liberal Western agendas with a visible rallying figure in office.
In this mindset, Trump himself serves as the Reichstag Fire of contemporary America: that event (in his case, that person) which provides the excuse and the rationale for committing horrendous acts.
What happens if Biden becomes President? There will not be peace and love, but there may or may not be a clearer path to civilizational disruption. Many anti-Trumpers will assume that the cause has been won, but of course this is far from the case for the ideologically committed.
What is clear is that all Americans, spanning the entire spectrum of political affiliation, need a jarring wake up call. They need the kind of lesson given to young children who are brought to a jail house to see the real world implications of shop lifting and minor crimes.
In other words, all must confront the reality that so much that is taken for granted in American society could actually disappear. Freedoms, discretions, choices not exercised or made in the politically acceptable format will be rejected. And he or she who acted so egregiously, will be deemed a threat and an enemy.
Perhaps the summer of love that we are now beginning to experience will show itself to be the shape of totalitarian things to come, and will serve as an inoculation against going down a very dangerous path. If not, however, the prospects for the center holding are increasingly remote.
I fear for America, as America’s loss of vision, commitment and sense of what made it America, will be a disaster for the entire Western world.
Understanding that frightening possibility might be the only thing that allows us to back away from the cliff.
Douglas Altabef is the Chairman of the Board of Im Tirtzu (a grassroots non-profit organization working to strengthen the values of Zionism in Israel as a Jewish and democratic state).and a Director of the Israel Independence Fund. He can be reached at dougaltabef@gmail.com.
https://knowbdsinisrael.com This is a new site established by Im Tirzu that identifies and exposes Israel’s anti-Israel, anti-Zionist professors.
@ Michael S:
I just saw the headline,
“Sweden: 18,000 Asylum Seekers from 2015 Now Given EU Citizenship:
and now, for the first time, I realize that the talk about “asylum seekers” probably refers to the “Woke” people trying to get committed to mental institutions. That comes as no surprise: The want a super “Nanny” state which, of course, an insane asylum exemplifies.
@ Adam Dalgliesh:
I just read this:
“New York City’s American Museum of Natural History announced Sunday that it will remove a statue of former president Theodore Roosevelt from outside its entrance.”
–https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/06/21/teddy-roosevelt-statue-to-be-removed-from-museum-of-natural-history/
That makes 4 out of 4 Mount Rushmore figures all slated for destruction. This is not a result of mass ignorance: the American Museum of Natural History ought to represent the most learned scholarship. Rather, this is mass psychosis and self-hatred. What’s worse, is that this sickness is spread thoughout the white Western Christian world, W. Europe and the Americas — the same areas, curiously, that have been judged by God the most severely with the COVID plague.
This is a spiritual attack, for anyone with understanding. Jesus said, “You cannot see the wind, but you can see the trees swaying. That’s how it is with the spirit”. People are fleeing when no man pursues (the COVID plague), and brother is turning his hand against brother. This stuff is straight out of the scriptures: Nobody could have made this up, or imagined that such things would be happening in our “modern” times. It is, literally, madness.
In recent days, mobs in the u>S. have desecrated and toppled the statues of Wahington, Jefferson, Ulysses Grant, Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, John Kennedy, and many other of our most distinguished national heroes. The assault is on America’s history itself, which is in effect an attack on America itself. The entire U.S. past is being described as evil, and all European-Americans from the first to the present are being declared to be evil. This is exactly what happened in Russia when the tsars were replaced by the communists in 1917-1920. It is what happened in France during the revolution of 1789-94. It is very similar Henry VIII’s destruction of all England’s and Ireland’s monasteries in 1537-38, the puritans destruction of all remaining statues and stained glass in English churches during 1642-57, The Chinese Communists’ destruction of all Tibetan monasteries and the destruction of their paintings and sculptures in 1966-69, the Taliban’s destruction of all Buddhist statues–hundreds of them–since1991, the Albanians, destruction of innumerable Serb churches and the artwork in them since 1999. The destruction of statues always precedes or is part of the destruction of a people, nation, political order, or religion. That is what is happening to America now.
Excellently article that summurize very well ! so…
First thing to do : defuse the moral argument used to obligate evrybody to submit, give mind weapons :
1. I am « against racism » i am not anti-racist which is a new form of racism.
2. Evrybody that believe that he is a victim have a « cold heart » . He thinks he is entiteled to be violent.
3. Tolerance is accepting to live with people we disagree with
America has already accepted black racism and separatism, the stigmatizing of people of European ancestry as inherently sinful, the idea that people of European descent today are to blame for the discrimination against non-whites in previous generations, the allegation that policemen are inherently racist and that police forces are instruments of “structural racism” that should be withdrawn from black neighborhoods, the sanctification of black petty criminals as martyrs, that white people should be denied freedom of movement, the right to pray in churches, attend bars and restaurants, send their children to school, etc., while these rules are not binding on “people of color.” A nation that has accepted these “principles” clearly has no future. Its disintregation into poverty, crime and lawlessness are inevitable. This belief system is a terminal illness for any country.