Israeli soldiers have been blood libeled by the Palestinians and the world press for allegedly shooting a Palestinian female Al Jazeera journalist, Shireen Abu Akleh, during protests in Jenin on May 11, 2022.
The Israelis have no record of any shots being fired at the journalist and have asked that the bullet that killed Shireen to be turned over to a joint Israeli-Palestinian forensic group for examination.
The Palestinians have refused to turn over the bullet to the joint forensic group for obvious reasons: They know that the bullet did not come from the gun of an Israeli soldier.
The attached video shows the actions of the Palestinians on the day that they shot and killed Shireen. The Arabic has been translated into Hebrew subtitles which in turn have been translated into English subtitles below
The attached video shows the actions of the Palestinians on the day that they shot and killed Shireen. The Arabic has been translated into Hebrew subtitles which in turn have been translated into English subtitles below
1. Scene: Wild, indiscriminate gun firing by an Arab in an alley: “This is the moment that the Palestinian shoots the female journalist who is located on the other side of the same alley at the side of the road.”
2. Scene: The side of the road where the journalist, Shireen Abu Akleh, has been shot and killed: “A Palestinian by the other side of the road comprehends what has occurred and shouts and warns the other female journalists.”
3. Scene: Shireen’s body on the ground: “Now a female friend of the journalist bitterly cries over the wounded journalist.”
4. Scene: The second female journalist next to Shireen’s body: “Here we see the second female journalist shouting to the Arabs on the other side of the road, “You have killed her. She is not a soldier!”
5. Scene: Shireen’s body in the alley: “Now they are listening to an Arab in the background who explains to the shooters on the other side of the road, “What did they do? Now the journalist is dead from them.”
Does anybody know who made the video? That’s a good start. Examination of bullet wounds. Was done. A map of the area and full transcript of words. All in video interviewed at length. In other words all that is known.
I am far away but I can’t see what the problem is. Follow what I said above and there is amazing clarity. Surely the IDF is already doing that. Ted where are your best contacts? Peloni and Sebastien have you any contacts? Is Richard Landes not on the ball already? (http://www.theaugeanstables.com/)
Time is passing.
@Felix
Until an investigation is done, all that can be said is that no investigation was done, and it begs the question why one was not conducted with participation by all parties, as I have noted before it would be a simple task, just as it would have been easily done to resolve the truth about this young reporter. Ballistics don’t lie and they can not be manufactured. The only conceivable purpose in opposing a full impartial investigation would be that those who oppose such investigations recognize they are lying and prefer to support their war propaganda over the truth. This was true in the Bucha massacre and it is true with the Akleh murder. These were both crimes, and in both cases the criminals are blocking any fair consideration of the evidence.
These are the words uttered
“You have killed her. She is not a soldier!”
And
““What did they do? Now the journalist is dead from them.”
These words are very incriminating.
They show journalist was not shot by Israel.
(Need all to be translated and posted a simple task)
The Scene 1 shows firing by Arabs somewhere was indiscriminate
No more.
That needs questioning AND that assertion proven
The rest deals directly with scene and vital is the vocals and also questioning of all on video
Vital material for sure
The link to Bucha lies made by Russia haters is also central. THAT LINK MUST BE MADE.
Who made video?
A terribly important piece of evidence which will be ignored with the same ignorance as motivated the Arabs refusal to allow a joint sponsored investigation of the young woman’s death. Some will say her friends killed her, but the truth is that she would be happy to have lived long enough to join them in manipulating her death to benefit a narrative that I fully accept she knew to be false. Such betrayals of the truth is how these blood libels began. There is no inspection of the truth because the truth is irrelevant to the object being pursued, which is the narrative of the evil Jew who stole the Arab lands, shoots Arab children, and targets innocent reporters rendering the calls to Jihad against the infidel a legitimate goal.
Abusing the facts around her death defames the loss of one so young, despite the honest truth she would likely have strongly supported its use as such. Just one more blood-libel patch sewn into the patch-quilt tale that has come to fashion the tyranny of narratives that she strongly supported in life. Quite a sad tale now definitively proven false, but then again, it was always quite obviously a ruse.