By James T. Moodey, AM THINKER
What will happen to our children when we mass vaccinate them? Since the vaccine side effect of myocarditis is more prevalent in children, will the low dose be enough to mitigate, or will they die at a higher rate? What else can go wrong? Here is one idea.
Europe’s version of our VAERS system for doctors to report drug-induced maladies is EudraVigilance.
On Nov. 13, EudraVigilance reported 30,551 mRNA-vaccine deaths, after reporting 24,526 on Sept. 11. That is 6,025 deaths in little over a month.nce the booster shots began.
Some immunologists estimated that the overwhelming number of spike-protein pathogens produced by the shot would create an aggressively mutated covid virus (since named the D variant) that will evolve to survive the shot. For instance, Dr. Geert Vanden Boosche said, “… the ongoing mass vaccination experiment drives a rapid evolutionary response of SARS-CoV-2… [And] will inevitably lead to vaccine resistance or circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants.”
Apparently, this has proven to be true, hence the rapid increase in vaccine deaths. Recently, Israelis reported that the fully vaccinated were 13 times more likely to contract the D variant than people with natural immunity.
It may be that the death rate of the D variant is not much different; however, the extreme acceleration of deaths in Europe seems to confirm that the D variant has thrived among the fully vaccinated.
The oft-quoted CDC statistic that the COVID survival rate for people under age fifty was 99.9 percent (before the vaccines were introduced). This indicates that no vaccine was necessary for young people.
EudraVigilance records 72,203 cardiac disorders, most of which are cases of myocarditis. We have been told that myocarditis afflicts the young at a higher rate.
The new medical apparat blames unvaccinated children for the surge in D variant cases. I don’t know about you, but this seems to be a heinous dissimulation, given the likelihood it is their vaccine that has driven the surging D variant mutation.
If what these doctors have said is true, we laymen might consider this: When fully vaccinated, do we really want our children to become incubators of the D variant?
@Felix
One additional point regarding the use of the pharmaco-vigilence tools is the cutoff trigger. In any study, there is a stated trigger which will cause the study to be halted regardless of the consequences or effects upon the study or the data collection. These triggers are determined prior to the beginning of the study and are stated in the study guidelines. The strict adherence of this trigger is critical to the safety of the experimental patients involved in the study, ie the people being experimented upon. In vaccine/drug rollout to the public, the pharmaco-vigilance tools are used to assess the and stimulate the trigger.
As of November 12, 2021 these are the case reports reported thus far in VAERS
18,853 Deaths
94,537 Hospitalizations
99,470 Urgent Care
8,082 Anaphylaxis
11,229 Bells Palsy
2,996 Miscarriages
9332 Heart Attacks
13,237 Myocarditis/Pericarditis
30,010 Permanent Disabilities
4,387 Thrombolytic
21,089 Life Threatening disease
33,660 Severe Allergic Reactions
10,455 Shingles
There is no cutoff trigger.
Furthermore, there is no Data and Safety Monitoring Board, no Human Ethics Committees and no Endpoint Adjudication Committees overseeing this current world wide vaccine trial. Hence, not only is there is no trigger in this world experiment, there is also no one overseeing that the trigger is properly enforced executed or that the public safety is being properly evaluated and protected.
@Felix
You do not understand the purpose or use of these pharmaco-vigilence tools. This is likely true with many people and many medical staff as this is an administrative tool which is used to assess drug safety and assure the public’s interest in the use of new drugs/vaccines. These tools are employed to establish safety signals missed during the rigorous drug trials which were largely skipped and some of which used data from other compounds to demonstrate required criteria for the Covid vaccines. For instance, it is used to demonstrate the presence of a large number of cases of a given medical concern, eg myocarditis or blood clots, that could be attributed to the vaccines using standard methodology. If the safety concern is significantly debilitating or causing severe illness or death, they are described as a severe adverse event, and their presence in any material number should stimulate the halted use of the vaccines while the specific cause of the severe adverse event, eg myocarditis or blood clots, is identified in the vaccine formulation and altered to eliminate the harms being produced.
There is a methodology in science and pharmaco-vigilence(drug safety) which is used to determine causality. It requires certain criteria be met to demonstrate causality. They are called the Bradford-Hill criteria. As Dr. McCullough(https://www.israpundit.org/covid-vaccines-are-epic-failure-does-not-protect-kills-more/#more-63675156) has recently discussed these criteria as having been satisfied by the evidence in VAERS alone. Dr. Rose, who has been examining the data in VAERS since the beginning of the vaccine rollout has stated this as well. Among the criteria, the most important is the temporal association, two things occurring in close time sequence and being reproduced repeatedly to demonstrate the signal. 80% of all injuries occur within one week of the injection. 50% of all vaccine injuries occur within the day of the vaccine or the next day. 25% occur within 24hrs of the injection. These facts alone are pretty damning.
Regarding your attempt to describe these tools as “no more than a database” ignores the use of the database to display concerning medical signals. The presence of 10,000 cases of a rare symptom over the course 5 months displays a non-rare occurrence of this rare symptom. Dr. Rose and Dr. McCullough demonstrated that the rise in myocarditis was actually increased by 19X following vaccination. 70-80% of the time these people were hospitalized which demonstrates that these cases are not mild. They also described the reality that though it is easier to identify the cases of myocarditis in the young, it is present in every age group.
Additionally, the reports in VAERS requires ~30min to complete. So a doctor/nurse/pharmacist/shop employee who discovers only 10 of these in the course of a day, would require 5hrs or more to complete the reporting, and they are neither paid nor allotted time to do so. Deborah Conrad’s testimony on this is quite telling(https://originalrebel.net/2021/09/21/whistleblower-deborah-conrad-senior-pa-c-describes-the-pushback-from-her-hospital-on-reporting-covid19-vaccines-side-effect-to-vaers/). VAERS reporting is completed by medical staff 84% of the time and carries with it a felony charge and disqualification from practicing in medicine for any false reports.
These reports are each reviewed by the CDC and they are present in such high numbers that the CDC are unable to process and validate the claims since the early months of the vaccine rollout, ie their is lag in the processing, and the lag is enormous. This means that the 800,000 cases in VAERS is actually much larger even as the reports are under-reported. There are enormous safety signals, severe adverse events, that are screaming to be pursued and remedied from the data in these pharmaco-vigilant tools and can be classified into three major categories: immunological, neurological and cardiovascular. Similar injuries are found wherever proper use of pharmoco-vigilence is conducted. These severe adverse events have been publicly known for many months, even as the medical tyrants have pushed their product with heightened intensity and greater acts of coercion and outright requirements around the world.
No not saying that. EudraVigilance is no more than a database you could call it. Just s reporting of all medical incidents. It is .not saying these people were killed by COVID vaccines. You are.
@kbfcst
Well stated. In truth, if we are to describe these pharmaco-vigilance(drug safety) tools as disinformation, we would only do so because of the massive under-reporting would lead people to believe that their reported number is the limit to any possible injuries, which would be dis-informing the public of the truth. Using the FDA’s own model in determining the under-reporting factor in VAERS, you will find that the factor is 41. There have been 8 different methods employed to determine the under-reporting factor for VAERS and they all range from 31X to 100X, the lowest of these values being based on the dubious data of the Pfizer EUA study, which has been recently reported to have supported data manipulation, dubious data collection and fraud.
Even without the under-reporting factor, as you well describe, the numbers are astronomically out of any rational range of acceptance. Prior to 2020, the yearly average was 153 injuries per year. There are now more than 894K in only 11months, as of Nov. 12(last weeks update was skipped due to the Thanksgiving holiday). The exact numbers do not matter in drawing the conclusion that the vaccines are not safe, though the exact numbers would likely matter to the casualties that lie among them. Pharmaco-vigilance tools were created to collect and report any consequence following vaccination so that any safety issue not detected in the normal 10yr worth of careful and methodical studies might be detected by an increased occurrence during the public rollout. There are unfortunately numerous safety signals registering in the data in VAERS currently and the safety concerns are all associated with the Covid vaccines currently being administered, even though these safety concerns are belittled, and dismissed, ignored.
It was hoped that Israel would actually detect the safety issues for the mRNA vaccines as they were labeled as the lab experiment of the world. It is curious that Israel’s data collection was not sensitive enough to detect the enormous signal of myocarditis, but rather a member of the US DOD actually detected the signal in reviewing the US data, not in VAERS(I think it was either in CMS or the Veterans database) and this was then supported by Israel, but only after it was leaked to the public. The concerning fact that Israel did not detect this safety signal was further characterized by the revelation that reports made to their pharmaco-vigilance tool did not collect personal contact info which would allow confirmation of the vaccine injury. It also did not allow any description of the injury beyond a handful of predetermined, specific injuries which I have read were mild and non-specific(I can’t vouch for this, but I would appreciate if someone with such knowledge would respond). Pharmaco-vigilance should be mandatory for any vaccine, especially a vaccine rushed to market with minimal testing that is being injected into anyone drawing breath. Trust but verify actually requires the verification to support the trust. Dismissing safety signals will result in generalized distrust of public safety efforts and may result in massive health consequences both short and long term.
FelixQuigley: So you’re saying EudraVigilance is misinformation. Take a look at the U.S. version: openvaers.com
Death following vaccination is flat from its inception in 1990 until late 2020 when the experimental synthetic gene therapy injections (called “vaccines”) were introduced. It’s startling to see the steep increase from then until now.
Looks like misinformation
Many of these claims come from Health Impact News, a website that describes itself as publishing stories “the mainstream media seldom covers”. It regularly posts pieces that criticise COVID-19 vaccines, along with claims that figures provided by the EudraVigilance database are confirmed adverse reactions to the shots