T. Belman. This so-called aid is not aid at all. It is what US agrees to pay in exchange for a multitude of benefits that Israel gives the US in exchange. How can a joint research programe of any kind where the US is entitled to the make use of the end result be called aid. Israel spends a fortune on human intelligence which is shared with the US. Of course the US must share the expense. The US can’t achieve the same human intelligence if they did it on their own even at double the expense.. The US defense budget includes billions to keep troops in South Korea and Germany among other places year after year. It is spared this expense in the Middle East because Israel is there. Without Israel there, the US would have to station one aircraft carrier there, at a minimum, to achieve half the benefit. The list of benefits the US purchases with this paltry sum vastly exceeds the cost.
It is time that this “aid” be included in the US Defense Budget where it rightly belongs.
Amb. Yoram Ettinger makes the same point, but in a more detailed analysis, in US investment in – not foreign aid to – Israel
On top of $700 million more annually, Jerusalem said to seek separate funding for surface-to-air programs
TOI STAFF (May 4/16)
Negotiations over a new US security aid package to Israel have hit a snag, and the two sides are in disagreement not only over the size of the annual increase but also over a request from the Jewish state that a separate sub-package for missile defense be enshrined in the deal, Reuters reported Tuesday.
US and Israeli officials have been trying to hammer out a memorandum of understanding that would increase US military aid to Israel for the next 10 years, due to be renewed before 2018.
The current aid package stands at $3 billion annually, and Israel has demanded that the amount for the next 10-year deal be raised to $3.7 billion.
In addition to the extra $700 million per year, Israel, according to the report, is also asking that the memorandum include a separate deal for missile defense spending, which could raise the total amount to more than $4 billion annually.
It would be the first time missile defense was addressed in a separate subsection of the memorandum. The US Congress in the past has provided the Jewish state with extra missile defense spending on a provisional basis of up to $600 million in recent years.
US officials were quoted in the report as saying the new package could include $3.5 to $3.7 billion annually, but it seemed the area of dispute between the two sides was whether that sum included the extra missile defense allocation.
After four conflicts in the past 10 years that saw the Lebanon-based Hezbollah and the Gaza-based Hamas terror groups fire thousands of missiles and rockets into Israeli cities, Israel’s missile defense has remained a bulwark of joint US-Israeli military cooperation.
Furthermore, Israel and the US have jointly developed the costly David’s Sling missile defense system, which Israel sees as increasingly important in the face of Iran’s military growth following the 2015 nuclear accord.
Another area of dispute, the report said, is the US’s intention to ensure all the aid funds are spent on its military products, while in the current memorandum, Israel can spend 26.3 percent of the package within domestic defense companies.
The report also said the US wants to remove a clause in the memorandum that allows Israel to spend $400 million a year in “military fuels.”
More than 80 of the 100 sitting US senators have signed a letter calling on President Barack Obama to increase foreign aid to Israel and immediately sign an agreement on a new package.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has hinted he may wait to negotiate with Obama’s successor to try and secure a better deal.
During a visit to Israel last month, US Vice President Joe Biden reportedly warned Netanyahu that the aid package will be less than what Jerusalem seeks, but offered reassurances the amount would reflect the security needs of the country.
During Biden’s meeting with Netanyahu, described by an Israeli official as “friendly, cordial and warm,” the vice president urged the prime minister to accept the offer, assuring him the agreement could always be amended at a later date.
“In the past we’ve known how to make adjustments to agreements after they’ve been signed,” he said, according to Channel 10, which cited senior Israeli officials.
In November, Israel was said to have completed its “shopping list” of desired American military materiel, which reportedly included a request for V-22 Ospreys, planes believed capable of reaching Iran.
Israel also reportedly sought the V-22s from the US in 2012 when contemplating a strike on Iran’s Fordo enrichment facility, but later decided not to purchase due to budgetary restraints.
The US has either jointly developed or financed all three tiers in Israel’s missile defense program — Iron Dome (short-range missile interceptor), David’s Sling (medium range) and Arrow (long range).
israels purchase of the f35 white elephant is the cover up and fig leaf for the waste of billions in corporate welfare. when Israel buys the public and congress will not know of all its failures… it will be covered up by “aid”. I suspect that the additional aid is to make up for this massive cover up, assuming that what the detractors assert is true. How many other nations will be given aid to purchase it?