CPB Board of Directors
Name Title Appointed by (year of confirmation) Party Term expires
Bruce Ramer Chair George W. Bush (2008), Barack Obama (2013), Donald Trump (2019) Republican January 31, 2024
Laura G. Ross Vice Chair Donald Trump (2018), Joe Biden (2022) Democratic January 31, 2028
Elizabeth Sembler Member George W. Bush (2008), Barack Obama (2014), Joe Biden (2022) Republican January 31, 2026
Miriam Hellreich Member Donald Trump (2019) Republican January 31, 2024
Tom Rothman Member Joe Biden (2022) Democratic January 31, 2026
Vacant Member — January 31, 2024
Vacant Member — January 31, 2026
Vacant Member — January 31, 2028
Vacant Member — January 31, 2028
Political concerns
Edit
In 2004 and 2005, people from PBS and NPR complained that the CPB was starting to push a conservative agenda.[14][15] Board members replied that they were merely seeking balance.
The charge of a conservative agenda came to a head in 2005. Kenneth Tomlinson, chair of the CPB board from September 2003 until September 2005, angered PBS and NPR supporters by unilaterally commissioning a conservative colleague to conduct a study of alleged bias in the PBS show NOW with Bill Moyers, and by appointing two conservatives as CPB Ombudsmen.[16] On November 3, 2005, Tomlinson resigned from the board, prompted by a report of his tenure by the CPB Inspector General, Kenneth Konz, requested by Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives. The report was made public on November 15. It states:
We found evidence that the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) former Chairman violated statutory provisions and the Director’s Code of Ethics by dealing directly with one of the creators of a new public affairs program during negotiations with the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) and the CPB over creating the show. Our review also found evidence that suggests “political tests” were a major criteria [sic] used by the former Chairman in recruiting a President/Chief Executive Officer (CEO) for CPB, which violated statutory prohibitions against such practices.[17]
Objectivity and balance requirements
Edit
The Public Broadcasting Act of 1967 requires the CPB to operate with a “strict adherence to objectivity and balance in all programs or series of programs of a controversial nature”.[13] It also requires it to regularly review national programming for objectivity and balance, and to report on “its efforts to address concerns about objectivity and balance”.
Political concerns
Edit
In 2004 and 2005, people from PBS and NPR complained that the CPB was starting to push a conservative agenda.[14][15] Board members replied that they were merely seeking balance.
The charge of a conservative agenda came to a head in 2005. Kenneth Tomlinson, chair of the CPB board from September 2003 until September 2005, angered PBS and NPR supporters by unilaterally commissioning a conservative colleague to conduct a study of alleged bias in the PBS show NOW with Bill Moyers, and by appointing two conservatives as CPB Ombudsmen.[16] On November 3, 2005, Tomlinson resigned from the board, prompted by a report of his tenure by the CPB Inspector General, Kenneth Konz, requested by Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives. The report was made public on November 15. It states:
We found evidence that the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) former Chairman violated statutory provisions and the Director’s Code of Ethics by dealing directly with one of the creators of a new public affairs program during negotiations with the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) and the CPB over creating the show. Our review also found evidence that suggests “political tests” were a major criteria [sic] used by the former Chairman in recruiting a President/Chief Executive Officer (CEO) for CPB, which violated statutory prohibitions against such practices.[17]
Objectivity and balance requirements
Edit
The Public Broadcasting Act of 1967 requires the CPB to operate with a “strict adherence to objectivity and balance in all programs or series of programs of a controversial nature”.[13] It also requires it to regularly review national programming for objectivity and balance, and to report on “its efforts to address concerns about objectivity and balance”.
”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporation_for_Public_Broadcasting