T. Belman. Do not confuse the ACLJ with ACLU
ACLJ Obtains New Memo in State Department Lawsuit Unveiling
The Boston Globe put it this way: “Kerry is quietly seeking to salvage Iran deal he helped craft.”
The ACLJ put it a bit more bluntly: “John Kerry tried to undermine President Trump in order to support Iran, putting our national security at risk.”
Remember the stories that former Obama Secretary of State John Kerry – no longer in office as of January 20, 2017 – engaged in shadow diplomacy with Iran promoting foreign policy contrary to that of America’s sitting President, Donald Trump? As the story continued to unfold, and more information about the Left’s counter-diplomacy was revealed even just last year, the ACLJ went to work.
We launched a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the State Department, seeking records of State Department awareness of or involvement with Obama-era U.S. officials – aka, the Deep State – employing undercover backchannels in an effort to undercut President Trump’s cornerstone foreign policy of withdrawing the United States from the disastrous Obama/Biden Iran Deal.
In the FOIA lawsuit against the State Department that ensued, the ACLJ just obtained a never-before-seen “unclassified” October 2018 memo entitled, “Notes From ‘Iran and the US: An Off-the-Record Conversation with Foreign Minister Mohamad Javad Zarif.’”
According to this memo, the previously unreported “off-the-record meeting” took place at the “Iranian Ambassador’s Residence, NYC,” on October 4, 2018 – just days after major media coverage of Kerry’s admission of the secret efforts. The memo we unearthed contains notes on the former U.S. diplomats’ conversation with Zarif and his responses “to questions posed by a group of US former ambassadors and policy analysts.”
The key here is “former” – and the date, October 2018, right in the middle of the Trump Administration.
The newly obtained memo, regarding the secret meeting between Zarif and these former U.S. officials, included discussions of nuclear weapons, potential prisoner swaps, Afghanistan withdrawal and negotiations with the Taliban, Houthi rebels, Syria, Suleimani’s popularity in Iran, and the “region in turmoil.”
Former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo – now ACLJ Senior Counsel for Global Affairs – reviewed this memo and reacted by calling this discovery “a big deal for sure.” He continued: “This is exactly what we were fighting. . . . The arrogance. The indecency. The hatred of Israel.”
This is precisely why we sent this FOIA request: to uncover actions of then-former U.S. diplomats – those who worked for the Obama-Biden Administration but who then went to work undermining President Trump and the core policies he campaigned on and succeeded. Kerry himself admitted his part in this scheme. And here we obtained a memo showing just that: an off-the-record meeting between Zarif and “former” U.S. diplomats right in the middle of the Trump Administration and during the time President Trump was working through the aftermath of withdrawing the United States from the farce known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) – the Iran nuclear deal.
Further, this record was only responsive to our FOIA request if it involved former high level Obama officials John Kerry, Robert Malley (key Iran Deal negotiator and currently President Biden’s U.S. Special Representative to Iran), or Ernest Moniz (Obama’s Secretary of Energy) in some way. This in and of itself is a key piece of this shadow diplomacy puzzle.
In the ACLJ’s FOIA request sent to the State Department last year, we sought records of these former high level Obama officials engaged in secret, “off the record” diplomacy with Iran, and particularly, with Mohammad Javad Zarif. To be specific, we sought:
All records, communications or briefings created, generated, forwarded, transmitted, sent, shared, saved, received, or reviewed by any DOS official or employee that regard in any way John Kerry, Robert Malley, or Ernest Moniz, and Mohammad Javad Zarif or U.S. relations with Iran.
When the State Department ignored our requests, failing to comply with the law, we took it to federal court in Washington, D.C., as we’ve done so many times before.
There are many more documents to be produced in this case; and once the production is complete, we’ll have to litigate against the State Department to force it to reveal what it has redacted and withheld along the way.
One question we will pursue: In whose custody was this memo? Another one is, what conversations did Obama-era holdovers still at the State Department have with the “former” U.S. diplomats who went to this meeting?
The memo we uncovered shines a light, not just on the secret meeting itself, but also on Zarif’s rhetoric and unbelievable assertions as he attempts to persuade his listeners. For instance, he claims “Iran will never seek atomic weapons.” Well, I guess there’s no cause for concern here. And, “It is almost impossible to turn fuel rods into nuclear weapons.” Almost impossible. He goes on and on, spouting off his distorted pro-Iran view as if it’s fact.
Interestingly, record productions we’ve received in this case also include a series of sensitive but unclassified (SBU) emails revealing that Kerry had State Department staff working to send correspondence to Zarif, described as a farewell letter, two weeks after Kerry had left office on January 20, 2017. It is clear from the emails that the State Department staff were struggling with how to send the letter, we presume because the United States had no official diplomatic relations with Iran.
As of now, the State Department has withheld the contents of Kerry’s secret February 2017 letter to Zarif, so we will continue to litigate to gain access.
We will keep you up to date as this case progresses.
Jordan Sekulow is the Executive Director of the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ).
Kerry boasted about his interaction with the Mullahs during Trump presidency.
That is how the elitocracy behaves.
Raphael:
The elitocracy controls ALL the institutions!!!!
@Raphael
They have placed themselves into an extra-judicial position when they siezed control of the two branches of the govt, as these radical moves made their threats against the Judiciary carry a weight of certain coercion over the courts, for those justices not already compromised and in their control. In fact, they have broken so many laws for so many years, it is impossible that nothing has been done to draw them to account, even as they made the further impossible move to steal the presidential election. Their control of the Deep State and the Rep cooperation to aid them in their schemes have made them somewhat bullet proof. Of course, there is the potential of Durham coming thru, the election investigations, and the possibility of the people taking back control from the entrenched elites from an ever expanding local level across the nation.
Beyond these points of redress, barring some crazy boldness by the SCOTUS, it would seem these Deep State operatives are quite beyond any possibility of prosecution for any crime, as the potential defendants control both the prosecutors as well as the judges. That being said, the potential present in Durhams prosecutions has had an effect of causing a certain chaos in the ranks of the key players, with some very far reaching points of evidence being revealed recently. Also, the election investigations, with the 2000 Mules revelations, have the potential of being prosecuted at the local county level, all across the country. Lastly, and most importantly, I believe people are awakening to the reality that freedom is not secured without a level of local participation, and I believe that many people are being motivated towards doing just that (it was a very great point of motivation that the children were so openly targeted with the designs of self-hating CRT and sexualization, not to speak of the harms of masking – these woke many people to the importance of personal interactions in the local politics). So, whereas these Deep State operatives are well placed to secure their victory, they have extended their tyranny too far, too aggressively and with too little care of the optics of their intent.
Hence, it will be an interesting six months til the next election, or perhaps a bit longer, to see how these factors develop, and to what extent the entrenched oligarchs are determined to further resist the consent of the governed.
Why aren’t Kerry and the other “Obama-era officials” being prosecuted under the Logan Act? What they did is strictly illegal.