Trump will be sworn in on Mar 4/21 as the 19th President of the United States of America.

Posted Jan 18/21 and now updated.

January 20, 2021 | 33 Comments »

Leave a Reply

33 Comments / 33 Comments

  1. Sebastien Zorn Said:

    Hardly the same. There is so little hard contemporary evidence of the events of the New Testament

    There ia actually, literally none. For instance, Philo of Alexandria, the best known actual contemporary of the supposed time period, who knew, and wrote everything about everything, never mentioned a group, or events, which as described in the New Testament would certainly have been known and mentioned by him. Don’t forget, the early “Christians”, were known even in Christian history to have been Jews, in fact the first non-Jewish “Pope” didn’t arrive until after Bar Kocheba’s War was over. in 135.

  2. Michael S Said:

    for having a certain opinion about the Act of 1871. This comes from a man who doesn’t even acknowledge the historicity of the New Testament

    Hardly the same. There is so little hard contemporary evidence of the events of the New Testament that people have been fighting, literally, over interpretation for 2,000 years. It’s mostly a matter of faith. Differences among American historians are about which facts to emphasize but they don’t make things up. This is not a grey area.

  4. @ CHUGIBUGI@YAHOO.COM:

    You sound like a disgusting being who detracts from the benign aspects of simple humanity.. “Witches” were firmly done away with after Salem, at the end of the 17th century, but you sound far to ignorant to know this. I resent you coming on this site with your vile outbursts. Your name…”CHUGI-BUGI” indicates your own demented mind. The poor girl may indeed by affected, but is lucid and not given to psychotic outbursts like you apparently are. And has done no discernable criminal acts.

    You are a living insult . Control yourself….-or just quietly bugger off.

  5. @ Edgar G.:
    Hi, Edgar. You said,

    “What DOES surprise me, if that Trump was not able to handle it with his usual flair for the unexpected…”

    Actually, the CIC has been very much on top of things, for four years. Stay tuned. God bless and keep you 🙂

  6. who is this criminally insane demented witch ? ,a rabies infected sewer rat has more sense in his behind than this insane humanoid

  7. @ naes1984:

    I just looked at the whole video again, for the second time, and unfortunately I seem to have poor sight, because I didn’t see her “giggling” anywhere in her readin; at about what “time” is it in the video..??

  9. @ Michael S:
    I do have an inkling, much more than an inkling of what Jewish patriotic nationalists suffered, as I have closely read historical, factual data many times, as it even keeps emerging to this day. The Bar Kocheba days are very revealing, as are the accounts of Yehuda the Gallilean and his son Menachem. I have NO inkling of what Jesus suffered because I don’t believe there ever was such a person..

    As for my “selective” choice of the Pauline Letters, I wasn’t being selective, just giving an example, which I took from a whole New Testament of examples.

    I’m deeply concerned about the obvious outcome of the US elections. If there was going to be an “October Surprise” as late as January, it would have happened LONG before now. The evidence for such an event has been overwhelming ever since a few days after the election, and kept growing more so..

    What DOES surprise me, if that Trump was not able to handle it with his usual flair for the unexpected… He was too constrained by legalisms and his dubious “inner circle” His family as advisors were good, but they had no executive power. .

  12. @ Michael S:
    PS Edgar, disregard the link I gave. It was a general link to the video host, and its content keeps changing. The link I intended was some sort of farewell address by the President.

  14. @ Edgar G.:
    Thank you for writing, Edgar. These are difficult times, and I am not sure what to write.

    If you have the time, check out the latest “Q” video:

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/CoMANuO4uac8/

    I did not produce it; and it does not represent my views. It is an optimistic, typically “Trumpian” message of unyielding hope; a message of hope against all hope — very much like the speeches of Sir Winston Churchill or of President Franklin Roosevelt. When you watch it, recall that those now great and remembered leaders had no more of an inkling of how the Great Depression and the second Great War would turn out than any of us have today; but they were vindicated in their hope, as was George Washington before them; and through that hope they and we prevailed.

    You are skeptical about “the Pauline Letters”. Just them? I thought you were altogether skeptical about the Bible in general. You seem to pick and choose what you believe and what you don’t believe — I don’t know where to draw the line, a line which, if you look at it honestly, seems to keep moving.

    I could start to be “clever” here and argue the scriptures with you, as Christian evangelists would, or as your own eternally arguing Jewish scholars would. On this matter, I will only say that the answers are indeed in the scriptures; yet Jews and Christians alike have had these writings for some 3,000 years, and an oral & written tradition for another 3,000 years or so before that; but their understanding in these matters have not given them peace, either within themselves or between them; but faith in our Creator, like that of Washington, Lincoln, Churchill and others, HAS kept them and us in peace in the midst of repeated calamities.

    People like Simon have kept many of us trusting in a good outcome, during times that look ever more impossible every day; and we are running out of days. If you have been caught up in this trusting, if even briefly, you have some inkling of what Jesus endured — to you, perhaps a fantasy, though to me someone near and dear to me. He spoke the truth every day, and was undaunted by the “facts”. He saw incurable diseases and, trusting in God’s eternal promises, spoke healing. Even so, it’s written,

    “And he could there do no mighty work, save that he laid his hands upon a few sick folk, and healed them.” (Mark 6:5).

    Even so, Jesus, an ordinary man except for his trust in God’s word, trusted that God to the end. As Paul said,

    “For consider him that endured such contradiction of sinners against himself, lest ye be wearied and faint in your minds. Ye have not yet resisted unto blood, striving against sin.” (Hebrews 12:3,4).

    He continued to trust unto death, counting his very life of no value in comparison to the Truth in which he trusted; and God rewarded him with eternal life. We are close to such a point ourselves — I with my country, and all humanity with us.

    This, I believe, is the heart of the matter. The rest, to quote the Preacher, “is vanity”.

  15. @ Michael S:
    I don’t want to accuse you of telling barefaced lies, but really…really, you are doing a good job of “interpolation” here. A good part of the Western World, if directly asked to be honest, and complied, would say that they didn’t believe a word of the New Testament.

    And especially, …I’m glad i wasn’t eating anything when I read, in amazement that “I never insulted you”… for my belief in their utter falsity. I’d certainly have choked, perhaps to a quick end, which would not have pleased me at all……

    By the way, you are “interpolating” again…I DID write, that I didn’t hear a single word of what that nut case said, there being NO sound with the video I saw, and was basing my remarks on what the other posters-who HAD heard her, were saying about it.

    Even though you and she are obviously as much alike as brother and sister, can you not just STOP “interpolating” (verbally) even for a minute…??? **

    After all, some scholars now say say that all the Pauline letters are forgeries. Until recently, and for many years, it was reliably believed by experts that 5 were “probably” genuine.

    And as for “Sun Gods” they were a dime a dozen in ancient times. Every “religion” had one., Except one-of which I am an adherent. .

  16. @ Michael S:

    Your skewering comment puts me in mind of the fact that in the 1920s, it was a sought after description, you know,… the guys in plus fours and caps, It was all the rage, they called themselves “Knuts.”. Sometimes with open cars and goggles…but always that fashionable cap.

  17. @ Edgar G.:
    Edgar, just take a look at what you said about Ms. Tittler — WITHOUT EVEN LISTENING TO WHAT SHE HAD TO SAY. You called her “off her rocker”, for having a certain opinion about the Act of 1871. This comes from a man who doesn’t even acknowledge the historicity of the New Testament — a treatise that has been accepted by the vast majority of the Western world for some 2000 years.

    You are welcome to your personal opinions, and I have never insulted you for holding them; yet this woman has simply stated her belief about a point of law (which you are not an expert at), and you emptied both barrels on her.

    Let’s try to be civil, bro.

  20. @ Sebastien Zorn:

    I’ve seen that quote before a few times, when a youth, but don’t recall the person whu uttered it.

    That talk about the 1871 Act was brought up about a week ago and I made two posts on it saying just about the same as you did. I looked it up of course to make sure. It didn’t refer to the whole country as was being implied, abolishing the Constitution and substituting the Act..

    As for my comment to Joe, I meant every word of it. To see that woman looking out at me, and appearing like a normal person, whilst talking the kind of drivel I saw posted, is disturbing. .

  25. @ nachmank:
    “support like this will only harm Trump, his agenda, and his followers”

    Nachman, I had to research the Act of 1871 myself, after hearing Charlie Ward reference it. I also looked up another favorite term of his, “NASARA”.

    You know Simon Parkes, Robert Steele and Charlie Ward have hung together closely with their collective ideas, viz

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/fIdnR0Z8bCRk/

    Even Robert Steele is not thoroughly convinced of the “Corporation of America” business, but he has always given Charlie the benefit of the doubt in this matter. Now I see that Michelle Tittler gives it much credence.

    These people believe what they do. Maybe they are right, and maybe they are wrong; but either way, I don’t see how they “will only harm Trump, his agenda, and his followers” It is obvious that the 2020 Election was hopelessy fraudulent, on a scale never known in this country; and I sincerely believe that the consortium of villains who engineered the fraud are an international, elitist bunch who make the “Illuminati” look like a friendly social club. It is THESE people, not Tittler or Trump, who “will only harm the whole world;” and Ward, Tittler et al have so far presented the best solution to the problem: be calm, pray, and I will add, drink tea.

    https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi.ebayimg.com%2Fimages%2Fi%2F320982003892-0-1%2Fs-l1000.jpg&f=1&nofb=1

  27. @ Joe S:
    I’m glad thatthis video happens to have NO sound, but I gather enough from the other posters. She is off her rocker, such nonsense will only backfire on anyone who goes along with it.

    It’s only in America that a woman with such mental problems would be able to valk in the streets without an evaluation by 3 psychiatrists. Surely her bizarre behaviour has been noticed by others…???

    Maybe not because she spends all her tiem in a “nut club”……….!!

  28. “if it’s not true we will get our country back — it should be”
    “ask not what your country can do for you —ask what you can do for your country”
    Get Away From Your Lap Top & Do Something!!!

  29. Nonsense. This is what she must be referring to:

    The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 is an Act of Congress that repealed the individual charters of the cities of Washington and Georgetown and established a new territorial government for the whole District of Columbia. Though Congress repealed the territorial government in 1874, the legislation was the first to create a single municipal government for the federal district.[1]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_Organic_Act_of_1871

  30. Ted. What are you doing? Why are you ruining you fine news letter with such garbage? I too know that the election was stolen and I am a Trump supporter, but support like this will only harm Trump, his agenda, and his followers.

  31. Listening to Michele Anne Tittler is like listening to an act from “Who can tell the biggest whopper.”
    According to Ms. Tittler, the USA ceased being a nation in 1871 when it became a corporation belonging to the City of London. She doesn’t explain if it was London, England or London, Ontario. Only presidents who served prior to 1871 are legitimate. There were 18 of them. The US is about to revive its nationhood and on March 4, Trump will be sworn in as its president, the 19th president.
    Ms. Tittler definitely wins first prize for the biggest whopper.