TIERNEY NEWS
President Trump said Jon Karl’s story in the Atlantic about Bill Barr is fake news:
TRUMP:
“I lost confidence in Bill Barr long before the 2020 Presidential Election Scam. It was when he dismissed and didn’t act on the very powerful Horowitz Report, and instead gave everything over to John Durham, who has seemingly disappeared from the planet.”
“AG Barr wouldn’t go against his friends in Washington, D.C. Barr was a “swamp creature” who was devastated when the Radical Left wanted to impeach him. RINOs always fold. It takes a very strong and special person to go against the “mob”. Bill Barr was not that person. Despite evidence of tremendous Election Fraud, he just didn’t want to go there. He was afraid, weak, and pathetic.”
Then Trump went after Barr’s RINO buddy, Mitch McConnell:
“Had Mitch McConnell fought for the Presidency like he should have, there would right now be Presidential Vetoes on all of the phased Legislation that he has proven to be incapable of stopping. Not to mention, he lost two Senatorial seats in Georgia, making the Republicans the Minority in the Senate. He never fought for the White House and blew it for the Country. Too bad I backed him in Kentucky, he would have been primaried and lost! Based on press reports, he convinced his buddy, Bill Barr, to get the corrupt (based on massive amounts of evidence that the Fake News refuses to mention!) election done, over with, and sealed for Biden, ASAP!”
People say that President Trump made bad hiring choices. Well, if he hadn’t hired the swamp and exposed them they’d still be out there doing bad things. Think about that. Think about all the people we NOW know are not on America’s side – thanks to Trump!
For those of you who are still confused about Hillary, Mueller & Russia Russia Russia – here’s a quick few paragraphs to sum it up:
“In July of 2016 Hillary Clinton okayed a plan to smear the Trump campaign with a fake Russian scandal to distract from her own email server scandal, and by August Glenn Simpson and Christopher Steele of Fusion GPS are simultaneously selling the fake dossier to the FBI and the news media – using McCain as front man.
While making no effort to validate the dossier claims, the FBI used them to justify spy warrants on the Trump campaign while the news media launched a fake Russia scandal targeting the Trump campaign, which only intensified when Trump shocked everyone by winning the 2016 election.
That led to the creation of the Mueller Special counsel, which entered into a criminal conspiracy with the FBI to go after General Flynn and others based on evidence they knew was 100% fake. After that failed, they went with Stormy Daniels, Ukraine Gate and Impeachment followed by numerous false flags & fake scandals. When that failed they went with COVID to push lockdowns and cheat-by-mail to rig the election.
Then they sickened 19 Republicans in the White House and sent Trump to the hospital one month before the election. Was it COVID or something worse. I’m guessing something worse.
They they threatened judges to not review fraud cases and orchestrated a fake “insurrection” on January 6th to bypass the State Legislatures and a 2nd impeachment to try to make sure Trump could never hold office again. Got it? Now they’re going after the Trump Organization’s CFO who is expected to be indicted on Thursday for getting bonuses for doing a good job. Meanwhile, Biden got a free pass for taking MILLIONS from Communist China.
BTW, where’s Durham?
(3 of 3)
Hence, it is very important to distinguish if Barr is a White-Hat or a Black-Hat, so can we do more than guess at this point? I think so.
Many very important members of the DOJ were retired in the past few years.
The Flynn case was completely shut down due to exposures made by Barr’s intervention, an intervention he did not leave the courts to easily ignore.Prior to the 2020 election, Barr soundly spoke out against the fraud being perpetrated, and he easily articulated a much more sound explanation of the harms associated with massive use of mail-in-ballots than Trump and others were capable of expressing.
The most important tell, however, is that if Barr was truly part of the cabal to undo Trump, all he needed to do to stop any investigation into the obvious fraud, which was clearly going to be exposed unless some Black-Hat authority moved to obstruct the natural course of things, was to federalize it and hand it over to his newly appointed Special Council and park it at the 12th of Never-to-Reveal. Once the investigation was being investigated by the Feds, no one would have access to the data, or the ballots, or the machines.
Perhaps there was another reason Barr purposely moved against pressure to become involved in the Election theft, but I am unconvinced of anything that strikes a sound reasoning. Perhaps too, Barr and Durham will serve to ultimately disappoint, but if this were the case, they could have made the stolen election unapproachable for many years or ever with such a ruse. The States could have fought this move, but this would send things before SCOTUS….tick, tock, tick, tock…
So why the back and forth with Trump and Barr, as they are very convincing of their antagonism to one another, but perhaps, too much so. A reasonable explanation would be to secure the image that Trump is not fighting to keep his power, but to take the power from the elites who stole it. If Barr is seen as a member of the Cabal against the nation, it severs any relationship between Trump and Durham. It puts Trump at arms length from anything that Durham might release, should he ever release something.
And some are postulating the fact that congress members are very unsettled by the revelation that a grand jury was looking at phone records of certain Democratic members as far back as early 2017, as evidence that Durham might be ready to move on something. If nothing else it should further support the idea of Barr and Durham as White-Hat actors if Durham actually formed a Grand Jury and actually investigated Congressional phone records – means he wasn’t exactly parking investigations back then, anyway.
Just some thoughts.
/3
This seems an impotent move for a man with the full authority of the DOJ and the FBI at his disposal. But recall, he didn’t have control of these powerful institutions. The way to gain control of them would be to create a new organization picking certain members from the old and then collapsing what remains – Barr could have chosen this path but instead pursued the conservative path of reform from internal reviews, quietly retiring bad actors as their bad actions were exposed in these reviews – again the wisdom of this is a different topic.
So, Barr did not have the ability to move heaven and earth to expose what everyone knows was a stolen election conducted by foreign interests on behalf of the Globalists alliance with the China-Class. Even if he did, such a move would be tantamount to Trump using ‘his AG’ to carry out what would be described as extreme measures that would only result in Trump deciding Trump won – again not the image Trump decided to pursue. To put this in a better reflection, the Legislature and the VP had certified the election and only Trump and his Executive authority and Executive actors would be seen as exposing the fraud.
The SCOTUS could also step in and alter their role of acquiescence and stipulate that the Executive could not override the State Legislatures, the Congress and the VP – and, of course, who could argue with this possible ruling should they have found the motive to do so. It would be game over.
The consequence of all this is very important. If Barr is a Black-Hat, then Durham’s investigation, which has recently been seen to go back to the very early months of the Trump presidency, is a fake investigation in which to park Federal inquiries that seem to sail out to sea but never come to port. If Barr is a White-Hat, Durham has investigations under his control stemming from the Trump transition thru the Mueller Russia debacle onto the Impeachment hoax and ending with who knows what else (Covid, Election Fraud, Insurrections, False Flags…). Depending on which of these 2 scenarios (White-Hat vs Black-Hat) is accurate, many things can be revealed or left hidden.
(1 of3)
There is an alternate scenario to this Black-Hat drama being over-played with some force by both Barr and Trump currently. The alternate reasoning that he is a White-Hat goes something like this:
After Pence betrayed the nation by refusing to send the Electoral Votes back to the States for the State Legislatures to validate, it left Trump in a quandary. Trump could not get the election fraud exposed without some serious Anti-Federalist measures such as using Federal authority to intervene upon State Rights to conduct elections. Regardless of what was found, it would carry a distinct appearance that Trump was using his Federal authority to override the states when many Americans did not support this.
When the fraud was not sent back to the states, Trump had a choice to make – he could play the heavy autocratic dictator that he had been painted over the past 5yrs or he could leave, not surrender and wait for the fraud to be exposed by other means. It is postulated the second choice was chosen for reasons including fears of a civil war should he take steps beyond what the Anti-Trump elements of the public would accept in preference of gaining their support with time – recall Lindell’s remarks that everyone will recognize the fraud.
What role would Barr play in this Barr is White-Hat scenario ?
Barr, as AG, had authority over an organization historically dominated by Leftists. This situation was rendered markedly more so by Obama’s 8 years when Leftists alone were chosen and promoted within the DOJ. Regardless of whether you believe the DOJ could have been reformed in the 2 1/2yrs Barr was AG, it wasn’t – though many important players were shown the door in that time. So when the fraud occurred in Nov, there was no likelihood the DOJ would be the solution for this matter to be resolved. The investigators and US Attorneys could each play a role in creating significant delays of years, forget that there was only a little over 2 months between the election and Jan. 20. Hence, he made the announcement about the Durham Special Council appointment, and he next referred the parties to pursue the matter as best they could with their own resources, pitifully powerless as that was, by challenging the fraud by civil means.
/1