T. Belman. As I understand it, this ship was boxed in by the Russians to the north of it and the US to the south of it. Using electronic means they caused the ship to run aground so that the containers could be examined. This month will see many things come to light that I have been reading about for a long time.
BEFORE ITS NEWS Thursday, April 1, 2021 22:09
Over a thousand trafficked children and dead bodies have been rescued out of shipping containers in the Suez Canal by US Navy Seals. Sources say that as of this writing, children were still being rescued and bodies discovered in Evergreen’s 18,000+ containers. The containers were on an Evergreen Corporation ship that blocked the Canal from Tues. 23 March to Mon 29 March, causing billions in lost revenue to shipping companies internationally.
The Seals also found Weapons of Mass Destruction on the six story high vessel – which were believed destined to start a war in the Middle East.
Finally by Tues. the Evergreen cargo ship was loosened and taken to Bitter Lake in Egypt. By order of the Egyptian President, the containers were taken off the ship and searched by US Navy Seals.
The Japanese-owned, Taiwanese-operated ship of Evergreen Corporation was actually co-owned by Walmart and the Clinton Foundation – known for it’s international child trafficking ring. The children were said ordered out of magazines like Wayfair by pedophiles who paid big bucks for certain abused children.
Wayfair and Child Trafficking? The Rabbit Hole Goes Deep. – The Vigilant Citizen
Think this was just a conspiracy theory? Here was the testimony of a brave Trafficked Survivor who claimed that as a child, she was strapped inside one of those Evergreen human trafficking containers:
Human Trafficking Survivor Exposes Secrets Of Evergreen Shipping Containers, CPS & More!
Evergreen was believed to not only be carrying trafficked children, but Weapons of Mass Destruction. Many other ships that were blocked in the Suez Canal last week were also discovered to be carrying weapons – believed to be used to start a war in the Middle-East. Why? The weapons were going to be given to the Muslims by the Israel Mossad.
Human traffickers were being arrested and cartels busted – losing critical income for their owners worldwide. The Deep State Operation was said to have lost 400 million $ an hour while the ships were stuck for a week – that would pale in comparison to what those children were undergoing.
Evergreen vessels were having problems in ports all over the world. Why? Why were Special Ops US Navy Seals magically on the scene to rescue the children? Was the ship purposely run aground? It was rumored that holes in Microsoft software allowed someone, or ones, to hack into the Evergreen ship software, take over the steering and run it into the bank.
We may never be given the whole story. So far the Evergreen ship’s Capitan in the Suez Canal has refused to cooperate. Now why on earth would a Ship’s Captain not cooperate, unless there were major reasons? Won’t hand over the black box?
Why would a vessel of that size from Taiwan list it’s first destination as the Netherlands? Why would the below news article NOT mention Amsterdam? (Only Dutch) Lots of significant signals and clues were being released. Egypt could seek $1 billion from ship Ever Given: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2021/04/01/suez-canal-blockage-egypt-could-seek-1-billion-ship-ever-given/4833205001/
Guido Fawkes Telegram on Thurs. 1 April: “Ever Given has been boarded by the US Navy Seals and they have opened several cargo containers with live and dead inside. The vessel is in Bitter Lake and the Navy is performing unloading procedures. No images will be leaked, but I have been sent one.”
@ Ted Belman:
You are the publsher and choose the articles. If you think they might be of interest to the readers, displaye us enough to show what they are saying.. Of course, with the suggested warning. Never without that, including fact checkers opinions..
The reader can arrive at his own calculated onclusionc.
All the fact checkers out there say the article is false. Does that mean we should trust them or associate them with the MSM.
I have posted a couple of articles like this. Should I refrain from doing so or do so with a warning. What do you think?
@ tessa:
Go to Bitchute and do a search for “sex trafficking”. Many videos come up. Watch what you want.
I am not suggesting that they are truthful. Only that there may be some truth in what they disclose. So should we totally ignore the issue and dismiss them all as conspiracy theorists or do we keep an open mind to the possibility that this is a huge scandal and coverup..
@ tessa:
Both Lin Wood and Dr Lauri Roth have made reference to it.
Others have as well.
Joe S Said:
It is also an epithet used to smear a legitimate claim.
@ Ted Belman:
Ted Belman – Please tell us, what is your evidence that these are “owned or leased by the Clinton Foundation?” Lots of people are saying this, but so far none have provided any verifiable evidence. If it’s true, then there should be some evidence. Otherwise, it’s just more fake news.
Another “news” article citing non-identifiable “sources.” We can get this type of non-sourced gossip from the main stream media. So sad we don’t have real journalists anymore.
@ Michael S:
“conspiracy theory” is just a more civilized way of telling someone that they are full of sh*t.
Let’s focus on the forest, not the trees.
I just posted an article, Human Tafficking by the Numbers which claims that sex trafficking in 2017 was a $100 Billion industry. Part of that industry is centered on pedophilia.
You will notice that I posted a number of articles which explore the issue including one that attacks QAnon.
I totally accept this condemnation. Even so I wonder how much truth there is in their theory. A $100 B industry is no small potatoes.
@ Joe S:
I have good reason not to trust anyone using the term “conspiracy theory”
@ Bear Klein: You have done your homework here. I think it is extremely unlikely that the owners are linked to a pedofile ring that includes the Clintons, or that child victims of pedophilia were found on the ship, or that it was carrying weapons of mass destruction. On the other hand, the fact that so many companies from several different countries were involved in the ownership and management of the ship does suggest to me that the actual owner was trying to conceal his identity. However , that waas probably for tax-evssion purposes, not anything more sinister than that. Unfortunately, involving many different companies and even banks in government filings by corporations and investors has become all to common in recent years. But the motives for this complicated paperwork are are financial, not sexual or military.
It is also true that intelligence agencies have at times concealed their ownership or controlling interest in certain transportation corporations, usually to facilitate the shipment of weapons to pro-American guerrila fighters in remote parts of the world, such as Laos. However, I do not see any reason to think that this particular container ship was being used for any sort of secret or sinister purpose, or that the ship’s blocking the canal was anything but an accident.
THe accident does reveal that the U.S. and Europe’s reliance on goods produced in distant non-Western countries, including China, creates a dangerous “supply chain” problem. This has already resulted in periodic shortages of some consumer products, such as toilet paper. Some economists believe that this supply-chain problem could get worse as the U.S. comes out of lockdown.
@ Joe S: I agree.
@ Joe S: True.
The fact that this article is dated April 1 should tell us all we need to know about its factual authenticity
@ Ted Belman:
Your information is faulty. Here is the ownership. You are using dubious sources and creative fiction writers among them it appears.
@ Ted Belman:
Just another baseless conspiracy theory
https://factcheck.afp.com/suez-ship-baselessly-linked-qanon-conspiracy-theory-about-clintons
A hallucinatory antisemite who has never heard of the Abraham Accords.
The author is a hallucinatory antisemite who believes Israel smuggles weapons of mass destruction to generic Muslims in order to start wars. As for the bit about prices? You see that on Amazon, routinely, for used books that are placed individually with descriptions and prices set by or for individual sellers. The same book will be 99 cents plus $3.99 shipping and then you will see it for $10,000 plus $3.99 shipping. Looks like some kind of software error to me. I knew a guy who kept getting threatening bills demanding $0.00 from the power company culminating in a turnoff notice until he sent them a check for $0.00 and he got a nice thank you note.
Excuse me? The Mossad? And, any particular Muslims or will just any do?
@ Bear Klein:
If you go a tittle deeper you will see two names. Evergreen and Ever Given. And I believe they are owned or leased by the Clinton Foundation.
The article posted does not even get the name of the ship correct. What else in it is not correct or is it all made up fiction.