“Land for Peace” is dead. It’s time to try ‘Peace for Peace’. A genuine, sincere peace agreement shouldn’t require the surrender of Israel’s heartland to a band of armed terrorists.
David Rubin, former Shiloh Mayor, INN
With U.S. President Barack Obama’s visit to Israel planned for this month, speculation is building as to the main focus that he will be bringing to his meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. While pundits on both sides of the ocean are expecting the two leaders to put a positive public spin on their meeting and relationship, the fact is that the tension and disagreements of the past four years are not easily forgotten, not by them and not by their advisors.
It has been reported that Obama is planning to pressure Netanyahu against launching a preemptive attack on Iran’s nuclear weapons program, and that may be so, but other reports have begun to emerge that Obama’s expected push to renew the sluggish peace process will be even more intense. While the brunt of this pressure will likely be exerted on Netanyahu in private, it will undoubtedly be based once again on the “land for peace” formula, under which Israel is expected to eventually vacate all or most of Judea and Samaria (the ‘West Bank’) and the eastern half of Jerusalem to create a Palestinian state.
It has long been the mantra of the primary peace process promoters that Israel, a country roughly resembling in size the small state of New Jersey, would need to surrender these areas to bring Israel the elusive peace that it has always sought, even long before its reestablishment as a sovereign nation in 1948. However, after over thirty years of Middle East peace summits and conferences, with millions of dollars wasted on these efforts, resulting in over 1,600 Israeli lives lost in terrorist attacks just in the past twenty years, with thousands of others wounded, perhaps its time to try something new?
The sad fact is that the peace process has always failed and will continue to fail until we do an abrupt restart and begin to base any future peace process on biblical principles, historical justice, and common sense. Toward this end, I have proposed a new peace plan, which is called Peace for Peace, which does away with the failed land for peace formula and the hopelessly stalled negotiations and offers a unilateral path to peace between Israel and its primarily Arab Muslim neighbors, who it should be clear by now have never abandoned “the stages plan”, of using peace negotiations and the land for peace formula to chip away at Israel’s concrete assets piece by piece, thereby weakening the Jewish State’s resistance. This is an Arab strategy that we have until now foolishly accepted as legitimate, but Peace for Peace changes the rules of the game and stops unrealistically arousing the appetite of the Palestinian wolf. At its core are four key principles:
1. The entire land of Israel is the eternal sovereign inheritance of the Jewish people and no other sovereign nation or quasi-governmental authority can exist within the borders in Israel’s possession, which at this time consists of the territory from the Mediterranean Sea to the Jordan River.
2. Israel extends its hand in unconditional peace and cooperation, peace for peace, to all of its neighbors, including those Arabs who live within its borders in Judea and Samaria (the ‘West Bank’).
3. A path to loyal citizenship in the State of Israel will be offered for all non-citizens of Israel currently living within its borders, including Judea and Samaria. Such a path will include an extensive two-year course in Zionist, Jewish history, culminating in a required oath of loyalty to the Jewish State of Israel, with hand on the Tanach, the Bible of Israel and followed by a 2-3 year commitment of national service to Israel, as performed by all other citizens.
4. Those who refuse this path of citizenship will be offered a stipend to be resettled in one of the neighboring countries. The option of subsidized transfer will be on the table for one year. After that point, only a small number of non-citizens will be allowed to remain, based on Israel’s needs.
As has been revealed in recent demographic studies, Israel need not fear such a scenario. The demographic delusions of Israeli Knesset member Tzippi Livni, who incessantly harps on the demographic threat to Israel that would be caused by the annexation of Judea and Samaria, need not be heeded. As reported extensively by demographic researchers, such as Yoram Ettinger, Israel’s growth in Judea and Samaria is now outpacing the Arab growth. In fact, it is the only part of the world in which the demographic struggle opposite the Muslim world is being won.
The time has come for Israel’s politicians to learn from past failures and to adopt this new approach to peace – a peace based on biblical principles, historical justice, and common sense.
A featured speaker throughout North America, Europe, and in Israel, David Rubin is a frequent guest commentator on national and international radio and television programs and a regular OpEd contributor on Israel National News and the Jerusalem Post.
I agree with Yidvocate. The extortion commenced with a massacre in 1920 Here is what it looked like in 1947 just before the Partition Resolution: http://domino.un.org/pdfs/AAC21JA12.pdf
@ Bernard Ross</
"Nothing so concentrates a mind,like the thought of an execution." Samuel Johnson
Not so FAST. The hoax that represents the 5Mi Palestinians needs to be addressed on legal levels all over the Western world. Then will see what needs or can be done. We may be for a surprise.
“The time has come” for Israel to forget about everyone else, who only think of themselves, and do what they want. All the torturous solutions are only geared to giving the shnorers something. The shnorers who robbed and killed the jews for 2000 years. The shnorers never have, and never will, think about the Jews. if israel did not have to worry about what the shnorers think the solution could occur within a couple of weeks with trucks to the adjacent borders, setting up receiving camps in buffer zones on the other sides of the borders, then withdrawing. The problem is then literally outside of Israel and its solution would have to take place among everyone but Israel. They would have better treatment than the jews cleansed from arab lands because they would have transportation and be met by the UNRWA welcoming committees. They could be compensated for lost property at the same rate that the Jews of europe and arab nations were compensated. That is if Jews wish to not accept the usual double standards.
why should this be? It is purely there to appease the same internationals who want to rob Israel anyway. This is pie in the sky. Give some temporary residency, deport all who have been involved against the state of Israel,the jews of arab nations who were cleansed were given nothing so why should the Jews always be expected to give. Jordan was created on 80% of the mandate territory. Like gaza and the PA west bank it is JEW FREE. Why expect the Jews to do differently. Jews west of Jordan, arabs east of Jordan river.
There will be no peace that can rely on anything but Israeli strength and the Israeli military. In that case why opt for “peace” when the status quo is better. If the arabs were worried about losing more territory and being deported they would be rushing for peace. Jews were run out in spite of the Geneva conventions, nothing was said by the world, so why shouldn’t Israel accept the established precedent and do the same. It is a matter only of the fortitude to resist sanctions. It is doable logistically and no one other than the usual suspects would go to war against Israel to help the pals.
You give us peace, we give you peace. You give us war, we give you war.
What could be more simple and straightforward, logical and fair?
I give you peace and you give me your land? That’s not peace, that’s extortion. If anything, it is Israel the stronger party that would be on the extorting end, not the weaker party. How perverse that Israel has played the extortion game, as the extortionee no less, for so long.