There are lots of reasons to question the FDA’s greenlighting Pfizer’s vaccine

See also, FDA Approves Pfizer Vaccine Even Though Multiple Safety Studies Won’t Be Completed For Years published by AM GREATNESS.

By Terry Paulding, AM THINKER

According to VAERS, 3,079 people have died after receiving the Pfizer vaccine, and nearly 3,900 have suffered a permanent disability. Many more thousands have been hospitalized with post-vaccination side effects. Think about that and then think about this “approval” of the vaccine as being “safe.” While I realize nothing is perfect, my only conclusion is that it was a political approval. The vaccine has killed and disabled an awful lot of otherwise healthy people, which doesn’t seem to me to warrant the green light it’s been given.

Previous experimental vaccines have been pulled for far fewer dangerous side effects. Normal vaccine approval is a 5-to-10-year process. We’ve accelerated the timeline because of the pandemic. Was that wise?

While I’m not a medical person or a researcher, I am guilty of exercising logic whenever I can. We still have no clear evidence that the Pfizer jab (or any of the others, for that matter) is safe in the long run. Previous attempts at a vaccine for swine flu, for instance, were halted after causing Guillan Barre syndrome in recipients. It’s an awful disease, causing total paralysis in some. Note that it is one of the serious side effects of this vaccine, along with clotting disorders and heart disorders. All can have life-long deleterious effects.

Then, there’s the way the vaccine pushers are willfully ignoring the fact that the Delta variant infects the vaccinated and, if you read the story of the vaccinated chickens that ran on American Thinker yesterday, you’ll understand that the vaccine itself may be causing virus’s rapid transformation. The idea that a vaccine can cause a virus to mutate, and that the mutations may be worse than the original, is inescapable. I’ve written before about antibody-dependent enhancement. There are many warnings, but the government refuses to listen to any of them.

Because the bloviating class has spread so much misinformation about treatments, to keep up the relentless push to get everyone jabbed (the emergency use authorization is only okayed if there is no viable treatment), many doctors have been afraid to prescribe available treatments, or believe they have been disallowed to prescribe them. I know I had to hunt for a doctor willing to treat me in case I get COVID, and I have heard from readers whose doctors flat-out stated that they were “unable” to prescribe Ivermectin. If that’s the case, by the way, America’s Frontline Doctors will help.

Hey Dems: What Price Your Deep StatePals Now?Way back in January, I wrote an article here titled Munchausen by (government) proxy. I felt that we were on the wrong track—and that was before we started our mass vaccination drive. Munchausen is a mental illness diagnosis, where the caregiver convinces someone that he or she is ill, then takes control over their life.

I personally think I called it correctly—and if you look at places like Australia, where totalitarian lockdowns have become commonplace, it’s hard to call that anything but a mental illness sapping those in charge of all common sense. There’s a secondary mental health condition called Stockholm Syndrome. It’s where someone, generally someone taken hostage, starts to identify with the captors. An emotional bond forms. Seeing the abject fear and dependence on government and the willingness to give up basic rights, among many people, I think this applies as well.

It’s disturbing to see our cities rush to ban unvaccinated people from living their lives. The relentless pressure to get the jab will be even more fierce. For those of us unwilling to be guinea pigs, life could get even more difficult.

One thing I want to note, before ending. Despite the continual barrage of scare porn from the government and the press, if you want to see what the reality is with COVID infections and deaths, check this site. It’s kept up to date. You might be shocked at how few people are dying from COVID right now.

August 24, 2021 | 1 Comment »

Leave a Reply

1 Comment / 1 Comment

  1. It is much much worse than the author suggests. These drugs are gene therapy products that are charaded as vaccines. The distinction is vitally important. The EUA testing associated with a routine, traditional attenuated or inactivated vaccines have a set of testing guidelines that are very limited and distinctly separate from gene therapy products. As Dr. Malone notes, Pfeizer labeled their shot as a gene therapy product but the FDA allowed them to first be authorized and then approved meeting only traditional vaccine guidelines:

    It is very clear that the native spike protein as expressed by the virus is toxic, it does open the blood brain barrier, it does cause vascular endothelial disruption to the cells that line the inside of your blood vessels, and the assertion that the spike that was engineered by the vaccines was safe is false, because at the time they did that engineering they were not aware of the toxicity and they disregarded it. What the engineering was done for was to increase the [immune stimulation]. The rule with product development, it follows the French judicial system – you are guilty til proven innocent. In the case of pharmacology products and the toxicology of those, the onus is upon the developers to demonstrate safety. They have not done that. In the case of these engineered spike proteins, the studies that would be required to demonstrate the product is fully safe and effective and particularly the nature of the spike protein, those were not done – there were a lot of short cuts.
    …
    In this case as demonstrated by the Pfiezer common technology document, what we call the IND, or the submission offered to justify proceeding into humans, it’s clear to see that Pfiezer was able to cobble together data that was not even directly related to the active drug, the final mRNA formulation. They were allowed to substitute other data that they had laying around on the bench in lieu of that and not perform the full toxicology, biodistribution, duration studies that would normally be required in animals. So that part was skipped. And then in terms of safety and particularly in terms of long term safety, the norm is that you have at least a year of at least 3k subjects have been exposed to the product voluntarily to assess any long-term safety issues like auto-immune diseases. Instead, what they did is they rushed this into humans and then they have been attempting to collect those data under the EUA but they haven’t done it in any systematic way. The have relied upon the self-reporting systems that we are familiar with now called VAERS, VSafe and other systems that are well known to grossly underestimate adverse events.
    …
    FDA has considerable latitiude…they have bypassed many of the norms typically used, always use in my experience. Another key thing they elected to do is treat these products as traditional vaccines. Prior to this push, both Pfiezer and Moderna clearly documented in their SEC filings that these were considered to be gene therapy products.. For some reason the gene therapy checklist was waived and they were only asked to perform in a very superficial way as would be used with traditional vaccines but they are not traditional vaccines.

    From inteview with Dr. Malone released this past weekend. Please listen to the entire interview below:
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/hiTLkIyJMOap/