By Ted Belman
In response to this query by Prof Paul Eidelberg,
I would deeply appreciate your thoughts about the invasion of migrants into the USA?
What can be done to diminish this enormous NATION-DESTROYING problem?
I replied:
My first thought was that the upcoming invasion bore many similarities to the attempted invasion of Israel by Gazans. Israel responded with a policy of zero tolerance.
The US isn’t exactly similarly threatened but threatened it is. If she allows anyone to enter, millions will follow. Like Trump says, if you don’t have a border, you don’t have a country.
There are a few problems:
1. they must be stopped with all riot control measures at Trump’s disposal including troops. One of the problems is that the migrants will keep trying every day and night.
2. The second problem is that the migrants, with the aid of the globalists, will remain encamped on the border and many more will join them. Before you know it, there will be 100,000 people there.
3. The migrants will be encouraged to start violence including the use of fire, projectiles of all kinds and shooting of firearms.
At 20 miles a day it will take 100 days to arrive. But the betting is that they will arrive before the midterms, ably assisted of course.
Will such a display play into the hands of the Democrats or the Republicans?
Maybe they also think that Islam will restore some vigor and self-confidence to European society, which the elites know has lost al self-confidence and self-respect, and all belief in any sort of religion or moral code. In other words, many members of the European elites may suffer from “self-hatred,” and believe that by phasing out their own civilization they are performing a “mitzvah.” Certainly the elites are behaving like they have a death wish.
Maybe. But the Islamic migrants don’t show any tendency to accept the values of the European elite. In fact, their values are usually the opposite of the professed values of the European elites. In addition, the Islamists show no interest in promoting the power of the European elites. In fact, they undermine that poor with their terrorism, n0-go areas, etc. Maybe these elite types just want to keep the oil flowing, and to keep exporting European products to “Eurasia,” which is very profitable to European countries. And the migrations do allow the European industrialists to import cheap labor for their factories, without having to close them down and relocate their factories in the Third World, which is what American industrialists do. That kind of “outsourcing” and “globalization” is unpopular with voters, even though Macron now openly supports it. Some of the European elites seem to have concluded that their own culture and history are despicable in any case, so why not encourage the Islamization of European society? Perhaps they have decided that the Muslims are not clever enough to destroy the world, the way European nationalists (like Hitler and Stalin) were, and the contemporary nationalists like Putin probably still are.
@ adamdalgliesh:
Hi, Adam
“The probable main motivation for this is to provide EU businesses with workers”
Europe actually has plenty of potential workers; and with automation, they should require fewer and fewer. There are special interest groups, however, such as the Koch brothers, whose agenda is to provide industry with CHEAP workers. That is certainly one motivation for backing the collapse of borders.
I believe that cheap labor is only a short-term agenda, though. The ultimate goal seems to be the DESTRUCTION of society, and its replacement with an oligarchy of the elite. Migrations and other dislocations have a tremendous social effect, in that they uproot families from their tribal roots and individuals from their families. The oligarchy then replaces the family as the authority structure.
Incredible. Should certainly be organized into an article. The probable main motivation for this is to provide EU businesses with workers, becuase the EU ‘s native people’s have not provided a sufficient labor force because of declining birth rates. Reminds me of Lenin’s remark that capitalists would sell him the guns he would use to overthrow them.
Dear Ted,
Please go ahead and publish as you see fit. I have regrettably no time to dress this up. Suffice to say that every word can be backed up.
The global compact by the UN, agreed to by member governments, to be signed December 10th 2018 in Morocco, can be found at the following link:
https://refugeesmigrants.un.org/sites/default/files/180711_final_draft_0.pdf
The UN report on Replacement Migration based on 1999 research and eventually published in 2001 can be found in bits and pieces and must be added back to one piece on:
http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/migration/
The long series of agreements between the Arab World and the EC, later the EU , within the framework of the Euro-Arab Dialogue institution, a EU sponsored body with thousands of employees are well documented in Bat Ye’ors Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis. Fairleigh Dickinson Univ. Press, Madison NJ, 2005.
Regarding the planned flooding of 50 million refugees into the West, there are a series of Youtube interviews with Avi Lipkin, dated about 2012. While Lipkin’s forecasts have not always borne out, this one actually has. And it was not based on his projection, but on his wife Rachel’s monitoring of newscasts in the Arab world in 2011 predicting what was to follow.
As for activities of the NGOs, it is common knowledge they are for two thirds government funded, Soros’ immense financial engagement notwithstanding. In that respect, NGO is an oxymoron.
The involvement of NGOs in the migration business is well documented. From chartering ships, to providing migratory route maps in Arabic, to running support offices along the routes, to doling out mobile phones and pocket money, the examples are too numerous to list here.
This does not even include the actual stoking of the so-called Arab Spring, designed to unleash a mass migration in tandem with the bombing of Libya and the provision of arms to rebels throughout the Middle East. A good example is the work conducted by the Hanns Seidel Stiftung, a German NGO that prepared activists for the overthrow of the Mubarak regime. This took place all over the Middle East, with potential new leaders invited to participate in workshops not only in Germany, but also in Washington.
The so-called Spring revolutions far from being spontaneous, were well planned, and scheduled to coincide with a migration prepared, committed to and wished for by official policy, since decades before.
@ Hugo Schmidt-Fischer:
I want to publish this as an article. Is it OK to go or do you want to dress it up a bit?
If you think this is spontaneous, think again.
You may want to study the treatise “Replacement Migration: Is it a Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations?” It is only meant as a rhetoric question, the answer according to the UN is a resounding yes, and the migratory streams, everything you are witnessing today it is all detailed in that little piece of work. Go find it, if Google hasn’t suppressed it yet. I still keep a copy, just in case.
This was written in 1999, and issued around 2000 courtesy of the office of Mr. Joseph Chamie, Director, Population Division, United Nations, New York 10017, USA.
Truth is, the forerunners of the EU were already working hard on generating mass migrations starting with the late 1970s oil shock. The former EC (European Community) thereupon constituted the Euro-Arab Dialogue. It later culminated in the Barcelona Declaration of 1995 and the subsequent creation of the Union for the Mediterranean which cemented the earlier 1980s agreements to allow Arab mass migration into Europe.
Sometime in 2011, Internet outlets began picking up on reports from the so-called Arab World that Obama was planning upheavals that would result in over 50 million mass immigrants to the West. For a while it sounded crazy. But Obama supplied the upheavals, and NGOs, essentially, funded by governments, got working. In Europe, it is well on the right path.
More is heading your way. In what is called the ‘GLOBAL COMPACT FOR SAFE, ORDERLY AND REGULAR MIGRATION’, an ‘INTERGOVERNMENTALLY NEGOTIATED AND AGREED OUTCOME’. For short, the UN Global Compact on Migration.
Accordingly, ‘Heads of State and Government and High Representatives’, are scheduled to meet in Morocco on 10 and 11 December 2018. They will reaffirm the New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants.
CAUTION! We may not in future, be able to discuss such issues in public.
According to article 17, the Compact must ‘Eliminate all forms of discrimination and promote evidence-based public discourse to shape perceptions of migration’. Evidence based… take this to mean that public discourse must fit to certain criteria, determined by …whom one must ask. Paragraph c) goes into more detail.
c) Promote independent, objective and quality reporting of media outlets, including internet- based information, including by sensitizing and educating media professionals on migration-related issues and terminology, investing in ethical reporting standards and advertising, and stopping allocation of public funding or material support to media outlets that systematically promote intolerance, xenophobia, racism and other forms of discrimination towards migrants, in full respect for the freedom of the media.
Got that? Governments are called to stop placing ads in newspapers and publications that do not conform to the official policy of migration. That means no job ads for positions, no publications of tenders, no public announcements by the States on media outlets that do not adhere to the general policy.
We are talking about 25% – 40% of a newspaper’s income. In the age of declining subscribers and Internet, this means a death sentence to any newspaper that will not toe the line.