The Unvaccinated: An Inconvenient Control Group in a Sinister Social Experiment

By William Sullivan, AM THINKER

Back when the experts didn’t know if the new vaccines would even be “effective at preventing symptomatic COVID-19 infections,” the government, media, corporations, and public health intelligentsia still relentlessly pushed the stuff on Americans while proclaiming that they were 90-percent effective, and Dr. Anthony Fauci openly presumed that we’d “really need for 75-to-85-percent of the population to get vaccinated to achieve herd immunity.”

All of that information can be found in a single article from December of 2020.  Today, we’ve hit Dr. Fauci’s once-supposed sweet spot for vaccination rates (among adults, at least), thanks to a propaganda campaign that neglected to publicize any potential risks while promoting benefits which have proven to be impossible to attain.

There was never any proven evidence that the vaccines were effective in staving off COVID infections.  Yet we now know what was unknown then, even as they pushed for four-in-five Americans’ becoming vaccinated, and that is that the vaccines are not at all effective at preventing symptomatic COVID-19 infections.

That’s right.  Get the vaccine, or don’t get the vaccine, and you can still get symptomatic infections while presenting the risk of infection to others.

How likely you are to go to the hospital and/or die from infection is still greatly dependent upon your age and health preconditions.  If you’re older or happen to be unhealthy, you’re more likely to die from COVID infection, even if vaccinated.  If you’re younger and healthy, you are extremely unlikely to experience hospitalization or death, vaccinated or not.

These are all undeniable facts.  And so, just like that, we’ve come full-circle to where we began, when Dr. David Katz told us all in the New York Times on March 20, 2020 (before it had become clear that the media was conspiring to hide any opinions or evidence contrary to public health status quo), that the very best we could do is to protect the elderly and those predisposed to harm from infection while the rest of us went about our lives by gaining herd immunity in a natural way — i.e., letting young and healthy people, who are not harmed by COVID infection nearly to the same extent as the at-risk demographics, live their lives and acquire immunity.

It worked for Sweden.  Current observations suggest that it’s worked for Florida.  Nonetheless, the government, media, corporations, and public health officials aren’t interesting in honestly informing the public of risks and benefits, or letting individuals make informed decisions.  No, they’re interested in promoting the cudgel of federal government power to demand that the one-in-five who’ve yet to get the vaccine become vaccinated in order to end the pandemic.

Let’s take a moment to appraise two very simple facts.

First, the vast majority of those who are yet to be vaccinated are young and healthy people, and who very often would have been at little risk of harm from COVID in the first place.

Second, since four-in-five American adults are “fully-vaccinated,” the believability of the story about outbreaks of COVID stemming only from the one-in-five who are unvaccinated is waning fast, even among the most gullible of Fauci’s flock.

There is a distinct danger in the government’s allowing the continued existence of that disobedient one-in-five who’ve bucked the state-approved guidance.  They stand as evidence, you see, of the government health intelligentsia’s fallibility.

Imagine, if you will, a hypothetical scenario in the not-so-distant future.  It’s January, 2022.  Hospitals are overwhelmed, despite substantial adult rates of vaccination of 80-percent or so.  But strangely, hospitalizations are notably among the vaccinated, not the young and healthy unvaccinated who chose, based upon their logical appraisal of personal risk, to not get a new vaccine which was rushed to market and which the government seemed all-too-eager to force into their bodies.

In fact, imagine that we could easily determine that a large number of the unvaccinated are not hospitalized at all, and that most of the hospitalized are, in fact, older and unhealthier vaccinated people who were more predisposed to harm from COVID anyway.

What would that mean?  Would it mean that vaccination didn’t make people as safe as they were promised by the government, the media, corporations, or the public health intelligentsia?

At the very least, it would mean that.  And right now, we should not be stupid enough to imagine that what is taking place is anything less than damage control by our political tormentors who are desperate to hide the evidence of their lies to the American people.  If the Biden administration can get nearer to 95-percent of Americans to be vaccinated at any cost, even at the cost of an executive edict which contradicts every foundational principle that the Constitution exists to protect, it is worth it for them.

The “unvaccinated” are now the target of the government because they represent an uncontrolled minority that can be blamed for the ills of society, sure.  But most importantly, there is now a desperate push to vaccinate this last one-fifth of American adults.  The unvaccinated are an inconvenient control group to set against the variable of the vaccinated population — especially since any honest appraisal of this social experiment we’ve undertaken this past year would clearly undermine the government’s hypothesis that was once presented about the vaccines’ efficacy.
November 15, 2021 | 4 Comments »

Leave a Reply

4 Comments / 4 Comments

  1. This is a bit devastating to the high efficacy and hoped longevity of the booster program. A very interesting tweek to iMOH airport study on booster-only data back in Dec. This current study, conducted in part by Dr. Levi, looked at all age groups with current Green Pass definitions of vaccinated and unvaccinated over 3months to

    provide a more realistic assessment of the relative efficacy of the
    booster against COVID-19 infections and more generally evaluate the effectiveness of the current Green Pass policy in preventing infections

    They found an initial benefit among the unvaccinated in August(-146% efficacy), followed by 71% efficacy in September, and then falling back to 62% efficacy in October. All of this was found despite a built-in bias against unvaccinated that could not be teased out(ie, the unvaccinated were tested 2x as much as unvaccinated). These real world epidemiological findings strongly question the successful use of the Green Pass policy in its stated use of stopping the spread of disease, as it does not require the ‘vaccinated’ to be tested based on their vaccine status, even though they are similarly carrying disease as they freely go about society.
    Here is the Study abstract summary:

    The paper describes an analysis based on data published on November 1, 2021, by the Israeli Ministry of Health (MOH) on its control dashboard about returning Israelis through the national airport. The data include the respective numbers of Vaccinated and Unvaccinated individuals and the number of positive COVID-19 cases identified in each group. These reflect the modified definitions of Vaccinated and Unvaccinated status after the Pfizer booster vaccination campaign in Israel (August-October). In particular, to maintain a Vaccinated status and specifically the “Green Pass”, individuals who received the initial 2 doses more than 6 months ago were required to receive the booster vaccine.
    Israel national airport is a unique setting, where the Vaccinated and Unvaccinated individuals all have to test, which allows a more objective assessment of both the booster and Green Pass efficacy in preventing infections. The analysis suggests that the positivity rate (number of cases divided by number of tests) among the Vaccinated cohort throughout August-October is only 1.54-fold smaller than the one among the Unvaccinated cohort (about 35% relative protection). More specifically, compared to the Unvaccinated group, the Vaccinated group has a significantly higher positivity rate during the month of August, then in September it shows a 3.45-fold smaller positivity rate (71% relative protection), and this protection decreases to 2.66-fold (62% protection) during October. The analysis suggests that the relative protection of the booster shot against infection is likely to be significantly smaller than the initial estimates of 10-11-fold (over 90%) reported by the MOH, probably around 60% at best. This also implies that the absolute number of infected individuals in the Vaccinated group is likely to be at least as high as in the Unvaccinated, raising serious concerns that the new Green Pass is inefficient in preventing infection spread, and could expose high risk individuals to risk.

    It should be noted that the portion of the vaccinated who received the booster increases in each month from 51%(Aug) to 75%(Sept) to 79%(Oct) even as the effectiveness goes from -146% to 71% to 62%, respectively. Hence, the real world benefit of the booster seems not be providing the proclaimed benefit of >90% that was cited based on its use only 13days of data in the previous iMOH airport study… They should revisit that booster study with a wider window of review, similar to this 3month study, ASAP…

  2. This is staggering…”a plague of fallen athletes” continues:

    Breaking news: 500% increase in deaths – SCD/SUD of FIFA players in 2021

    Not 24 athletes, not 30, nor 75 – Since December, 183 professional athletes and coaches have suddenly collapsed!

    108 of them died!

    The Israeli “Real-Time News” reports.
    bit.ly/3Cla38S Image
    ????? ??? ???
    https://bit.ly/3Cla38S
    According to the research literature, the phenomenon of athlete breakdown for reasons unrelated to injury is rare.

    So what is causing the sudden epidemic?

    The “Real-Time News” research presents the list of athletes who were injured and/or died. Image
    Analyzing the list we found:
    • Most athletes are males (only 15 females)
    • Vast majority are 17-40 years. Only 21 are older (5 aged 42-45, six aged 46-49, 7 aged 51-54, and 3 others aged 60-64).
    * 23 are teenagers, aged 12-17, 16 died.

    • In over 80 of the cases, such as football stars Sergio Aguero and Christian Eriksen, the athletes collapsed *while* playing, racing or training, or immediately after.

    • In most cases, it has been reported that the cause of the collapse is heart-related, including myocarditis, pericarditis, heart attacks, or cardiac arrest.
    • The second cause reported is clotting events.
    We emphasize that the list we have is even longer, but for the sake of caution, dozens of cases were removed from it in which we did not have full details so that only the cases that were reported in detail remained.
    In addition, cases were removed from the list in which evidence of previous risk factors was mentioned, such as a heart defect.
    To get a better picture of the data compared to previous years, we only looked at data relating to deaths among athletes registered with FIFA,
    and compared the data regarding the number of SCD/SUD deaths among these athletes in previous years, to the number of cases in 2021.
    To find out how many deaths actually occurred during the last two decades among FIFA players (2001-2020), we used Wikipedia – “List of association footballers who died while playing”.
    List of association footballers who died while playing – Wikipedia
    https://bit.ly/3HnZFkG
    To know how many cases occurred in 2021, we used the list collected by us in “Real-Time News” (which includes the cases noted in Wikipedia for 2021).
    Dr. Josh Getzko, a senior lecturer in the Department of Sociology and Anthropology and the Institute of Criminology at the Hebrew University, analyzed the data.
    According to FIFA data, in 2000 there were 242,000 athletes registered in the association, and in 2006 there were 265,000 athletes registered. Assuming FIFA has not changed significantly in twenty years, can expect about 5 deaths a year”.
    According to Wikipedia, in 2001-2020 there was an average of 4.2 deaths per year attributed to SCD or SUD, the vast majority being SCD. In contrast, in 2021, according to our list, there were 21 cases of SCD/SUD among FIFA players
    In other words, instead of 4 SCD/SUD deaths per year (according to Wikipedia data), or 5 cases per year (calculated according to the BMJ) during 2001-2020, 21 players have died so far this year.

    That is, about 5 times more than the annual average! Image
    This figure is found to be statistically significant. In fact, there is no other year since 2001 where the difference between the number of observed cases of SCD/SUD and the expected number is statistically significant.
    In 2021 it is highly statistically significant and only likely to happen by chance about 2 in 1,000 times.
    Link to the list of athletes who have been injured and/or died since December 2020

    https://twitter.com/YaffaRaz/status/1460311509213536265
    Full article here:
    https://www.rtnews.co.il/?view=article&id=49&catid=22

  3. The worst thing that can be done in the middle of an epidemic is a mass vaccination when there are other therapies such as the antiparasitics HCQ and Ivermectin.

  4. The unvaccinated are an inconvenient control group to set against the variable of the vaccinated population

    Exactly so.

    The inconvenient truth is that such controls always provide inconvenient insight to reality. This is why the EUA studies vaccinated their controls to hide any potential of such inconvenient insights being seen in comparing the vaccine and placebo cohorts. Controls are vitally important, and without them, we are left blind to reality.