Leave a Reply

22 Comments / 22 Comments

  1. @ jobardu:
    Jobardu, you said,

    “Michael S is living in the past.”

    What was the intent of this off-the-wall comment? Nothing that you said after it made any sense.

  2. @ jobardu:
    True.
    BUT.
    Where do the Republicans get the money for their political campaigns?
    From the unemployed rural white nationalists?

    The “Wall Street Democrats” threatened the Democratic party several months ago with switching their support to the Republicans unless the Democrats start behaving (I don’t remeber what the grievance was there).

    The brothers Koch, the great libertarians, financed the Tea Party movement.

  3. One day and one Id to vote/person.
    Not more, not less!
    How many countries have three months to vote? ABSURD!

  4. @ Reader:
    Michael S is living in the past. At present, the super-rich are supporting the Democratic globalists and collectivists. They eschew individual rights and support group rights, with them controlling the groups. Their ideology is the devil’s spawn of post-modernism– the various and sundry “Critical “x*x. Theories” (where x*x stands for combinations of race, gender, Islam, Hispanic, Asian etc) which are complex circular argument where the various complainants are right and America and its enlightenment culture are wrong.

    It has sown its poison plants over the past half-century and is now reaping its harvest of American society, property, children money, and power. It can’t be stopped, only defeated.

  7. @ Ted Belman:
    When the politicians are bought and sold by the big corporations (legally, with the permission of the Supreme Court), you can have all the voting integrity in the world but the government will do the will of those who own it (HINT: it is NOT “the people”).

  8. @ Edgar G.:
    I mean that the government, both Democrats and Republicans are financed by the VERY RICH, and I suspect that in many cases the same people finance both parties to get the results they want.

    That comment that I copied and pasted tries to explain how this works in his opinion – that they work in concert – consciously or not – to promote the interests of their financial sponsors but not of the people who vote for them.

    It is largely a fake fight with each party ultimately promoting the same interests.

    There is an old interview with Warren Buffet where he says “Class struggle exists, and we, the rich people, won it.”

  9. @ Reader:
    I believe that the main battle is over voting integrity. One citizen one vote.. No votes count if after the election day. No machines.
    With those basics, the vote can swing to the left and to the right.

  10. @ Reader:
    I just don’t understand this comment. Do you actually mean that the 2 sides “warring” agains tone another are as if in a glass topped box where their masters, the”powers-that-be” as you call them, look down on them and just smile. What’s good about that..?

    What is really needed is something which will bind the two sides together and THEN make war on “the powers-that-be”… Now THAT’S the thing to want to have happen.

    ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????.

  11. @ Reader:
    An addition to my comment:
    The fight about the results of the elections benefits both parties (Democrats and Republicans) and their sponsors because it splits the people into two warring factions fighting against each other instead of against the powers-that-be (my opinion).

  12. This is a comment from a different website which explains how the system really functions (HINT: as a ONE 2-headed party):

    BaronVonAmericano

    It is a matter of fact, established through decades of FEC filings, that the rich fund both parties.

    Indeed, not only do they make up the majority of funding, but because they are often bundled, high-dollar donors’ opinions are directly available to those running for office, where as a million $5 donations speak with no coordinated voice.

    Given this irrefutable condition, what is the argument against the idea that this concentrated money doesn’t work the two parties together?

    Indeed, any argument against must assume that very rich people, unlike unions, voting rights organizers, and every other common-interest constituency, never organize among themselves. Out of some innate goodness of rich people, they don’t coordinate. Indeed, it would be so outrageous to think that rich people would be so rude as to lobby for their common interests that to even suggest this is conspiracy theory to some.

    That’s a weak argument against. And contrary to most information we have available.

    Predominant among that information is the fact that the super-rich pretty much always get what they want, while the public NEVER gets what it wants if it really threatens the rich in any substantive way (there’s a 2014 Princeton study that verifies this).

    So I would submit that, using the two parties together, the super rich have a gas pedal with Republicans, where they push the most unreasonable policies, and a brake with the Democrats, who will always ensure that “leftwing” pressure is just short of enough influence to actually legislate anything significant, or block major giveaways to the rich.

    In short, Republicans chart our future while Democrats are the valve to relieve any pressure against that Republican agenda. Just note how what is Republican idiocy at any given time becomes bipartisan wisdom just a few years later.

    Deregulating, incarcerating, and benefits-slashing under Reagan and Bush became bipartisan under Clinton, who backed the crime bill, deregulated Wall Street, and transformed welfare for the worse.

    The misguided “war on terror” that was mocked by every Democrat under George W. Bush became the centerpiece of bipartisan consensus under Obama.

    The right-wing Heritage Foundation plan for healthcare (federal subsidies to crappy private insurance) became a socialist’s dream under Obama — too far to the left for any Republicans. (Clever move of the Overton Window there.)

    If donors are working together to create a total vision for this nation, it becomes much easier to understand why Democrats appear to lack any spine. Indeed, one starts to understand that Democrats have a very stiff spine, which is used to hold back the people and normalize Republican outcomes.

  13. @ REBEL:
    What is the other thing that can be done? Revolution? It aint going to happen. People are asleep. The neurotoxins like fluoride have fried everyone’s brains.

  16. This is ridiculous. The only way it could be overturned is through the supreme court. The supreme court already refused to hear these cases. It would take a miracle for anything to change.

  18. @ Ted Belman:
    HI, Ted

    “it will go to the Supreme Court who will hear the cases because the people have spoken. Everybody will be swept away in the avalanche…”

    It’s still too close to Purim, for statements like that.

    I don’t have a crystal ball; but here’s my very skeptical assessment:

    1. The vicious Democrats will double down on their unconstitutional takeover — stripping away as many of our rights as possible, so we can never legally put them out of power.

    2. Joe Biden will not last long. Either his minders will allow his wife to take over (like Mrs. Woodrow Wilson; but not likely), the 25th Amendment will be invoked, installing willing puppet Kamala Harris, or perhaps Biden will die, his corpse will be preserved like Vladimir Lenin’s, and he will contine to rule from the mauseleum; or perhaps

    3. the Pelosi and AOC factions will break out into open warfare, and I have no idea what happens then.

    4. I plan to take a nap, leaving the whole matter in Hasem’s capable hands.

  20. @ Ted Belman:
    Sounds right… Right now, looking at how things are shaping up (so to speak), the US is utterly messed up. I’ve always believed that the states hold the real power in the US, and it’s time for them to flex their muscles. In many respects they have the means to rebutt the Feds effectively. This, as you say, is where the people have a real voice…

  21. @ Michael S:
    What I see happening is that the swing states will pass legislation decertifying the vote for Biden.. Key officials who were party to the fraud will be recalled or forced to resign. Somebody will challenge what the legislators are doing and it will go to the Supreme Court who will hear the cases because the people have spoken. Everybody will be swept away in the avalanche of evidence that finally gets a hearing. And if the Court doesn’t do it, the army will.

    140 million people have listened to 2 hour video already.

  22. “IT WILL RESULT IN THE COUNTRY FLIPPING ITSELF”

    I haven’t watched the video yet; but I would like to know how, exactly, the country is expected to “flip” itself. At the moment, the American people seem to have no say in “the country” — which consists of corrupt mega-corporations, corrupt government officials, corrupt law enforcement, corrupt judges, corrupt media, etc. The only thing I can think of is mass demonstrations, ala Martin Luther King; but that could be tricky with mass lockdowns and censorship.