The NGO funding debate. “Just the facts, maam”

NGO MONITOR

FAQs on Foreign Government Funding for NGOs

The Israeli public, media, government and Knesset (legislature) are conducting an intense debate on massive foreign government funding for highly political non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Important concerns regarding the manipulation of Israeli democracy by foreign governments through NGO funding, and the role of these groups in political advocacy and warfare, triggered this debate.

Prof. Gerald Steinberg, president of NGO Monitor, was quoted in The New York Times (below) and JTA, and appeared on BBC Radio World News and IBA News to discuss these issues. Today’s Jerusalem Post editorial also referenced NGO Monitor’s research on foreign government funding to NGOs.
 
To provide further clarity in this debate – which has become polarized and often distorted by misleading claims – NGO Monitor has prepared a background sheet of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ). We have also compiled a detailed chart of NGOs that receive both direct and indirect funding from foreign governments, and translations of the proposed bills.

 

The questions addressed in this report include:

  • Can an NGO receive sizable portions of its budget from governments and still qualify as a “non-governmental” organization?
  • How do these NGOs contribute to political campaigning and advocacy outside of Israel?
  • Why do foreign governments provide large sums to Israeli political advocacy NGOs?
  • Is it true that much of this European government funding for political NGOs in Israel is not transparent, in violation of basic democratic norms?
  • What can be done to offset the influence of foreign-government funded NGOs in Israel, their lack of democratic accountability, and their role in political warfare?
  • Has Israel already banned all government funding for political NGOs?

alum office 

Israeli Government Backs Limits on Financing for Nonprofit Groups

 

By ETHAN BRONNER

November 13, 2011

 

JERUSALEM – A committee of Israeli cabinet ministers voted Sunday to back two bills aimed at curtailing the support of left-wing nonprofit groups from foreign governments.

 

The 11-to-5 vote threw the support of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government behind the bills, which human rights groups have denounced as violations of free expression and an effort by the government to silence its critics.

 

Officials and legal experts said that the bills would probably be altered before reaching Parliament and could ultimately be struck down by the Supreme Court.

 

One bill would limit to about $5,000 a year the amount that a foreign government, government-supported foundation or group of governments like the European Union could give to Israeli groups considered “political.” The other bill would impose a heavy tax on such contributions.

 

The bills were largely aimed at groups that focus on Palestinian rights, civil liberties and other causes advocated by the Israeli left, many of which rely on European government support.

 

An official in Mr. Netanyahu’s office said the prime minister backed efforts to limit foreign government donations to the groups because they amounted, in his view, to interference in Israeli politics. But he wanted the bills amended so their impact would be narrowed.

 

Lawyers said defining which groups were political ones was a task that would not pass legal scrutiny.

 

Sari Bashi, director of Gisha, an Israeli group devoted to promoting free movement for Palestinians in Gaza that would be affected by the new bills, said that “while it seems likely that some of the most antidemocratic aspects of the bills will be softened, that actually could make the situation worse, because it would define political speech in such a way as to silence some but not others and possibly allow the bills to become law.”

 

Gisha gets half its annual budget in contributions from European governments and foreign foundations that rely partly on government support.

 

The measures would be less likely to affect right-wing groups, whose foreign donations come mostly from private groups and individuals.

 

Three prominent ministers from Mr. Netanyahu’s Likud party, Dan Meridor, Benny Begin and Michael Eitan, opposed the bills in Sunday’s ministerial committee vote. They raised a procedural appeal, which means the bills must return to the government for reconsideration before reaching Parliament.

 

The issue of foreign government backing for Israeli groups associated with the left has been a deeply contentious one here since a United Nations report two years ago accused Israel of war crimes in its invasion of Gaza in late 2008.

 

That report, by a committee chaired by Richard Goldstone, a South African jurist, was said in Israel to have received a great deal of help from local nonprofit groups that live largely on foreign government donations.

 

Many Israelis believe such groups are helping the country’s enemies in a campaign to delegitimize Israel. Human rights advocates here counter that bills such as the two that were backed on Sunday are doing far more damage.

 

Last February, Parliament passed a law requiring Israeli groups to report quarterly on which foreign governments were donating to them. A group that campaigned for that law, NGO Monitor, said its concern was that European governments were supporting political activities in Israel without accountability.

 

Gerald Steinberg, the group’s president, said, however, that he opposed the two new bills under consideration. He added that he suspected they would not survive.

 

“This is mostly domestic politics,” he said, noting that the public is upset over foreign government support for the left here and that Mr. Netanyahu’s right-wing Likud party was locking horns with Yisrael Beiteinu, the nationalist party of Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, to harness that anger.

 

“My gut is that Netanyahu will realize that this does damage to Israel’s image and feeds tension with the Europeans,” Mr. Steinberg said. “Transparency is the main issue.”

 

He said that European governments spend more per year on left-wing Israeli and pro-Palestinian groups than their total contributions to nonprofit human rights groups in other countries in the Middle East.

 

“We estimate that together, this amounts to between $75 and $100 million from European governments to Israeli and Palestinian groups annually, far exceeding funding for human rights and democracy organizations in the rest of the region,” he said.

 

In addition to Gisha, about 15 other Israeli groups rely heavily on European aid, including Breaking the Silence, which focuses on abuses by Israeli troops, and Physicians for Human Rights, Israel.

 

Ms. Bashi, of Gisha, who is an American-trained lawyer, said she was not comforted by the idea of leaving the bills to Supreme Court scrutiny because Parliament was looking into ways to control and intimidate the justices.

 

Consideration of a bill to give a parliamentary committee the power to vet high court nominees was postponed on Sunday by Mr. Netanyahu.

 

November 15, 2011 | 3 Comments »

Leave a Reply

3 Comments / 3 Comments

  1. “My gut is that Netanyahu will realize that this does damage to Israel’s image and feeds tension with the Europeans,” Mr. Steinberg said. “Transparency is the main issue.”

    Isn’t this tension being fed by Europe for insinuating itself into Israeli domestic politics through NGO funding? Here once again Israel is being condemned for simply responding to the aggression of others against her. As far as the liberals are concerned, Israel is only good when it allows itself to be the world’s punching bag.

  2. I am pleased to see Israel starting to beef itself up against the NGO fifth column in its midst. A big war seems imminent, and these are sensible measures.

    I am also glad to see the good cooperation Israel has with Kenya, Tanzania, Ethiopia and South Sudan. These countries are strategically important to Israel, and the two parties share MANY interests in common. Perhaps Israpundit will post an article on this, which I can comment on. Some reasons this Israeli-African cooperation is important to Israel:

    1. Kenya and Tanzania can provide Israel with bases on the Indian Ocean (accessing Iran and all points south and east), without the bottlenecks and obvious political and security hindrances involved in transiting Suez and/or the Straits of Tiran. The fact that Israel is supplying Kenya with swift boats and drones, implies that the Kenyans are supplying bases. This is very good for Israel.

    2. It is in Israel’s interest to help South Sudan to get established, to protect itself from its Sharia Law neighbor to the north, and to provide alternate access to world markets through Kenya. North Sudan is Israel’s enemy. It is also the “Cush” mentioned in Ezekiel 38.

    3. Somalia is also Israel’s enemy, as well as the whole world’s. Pirates from Somalia and the autonomous district of Puntland have had a severe and expensive impact on shipping throughout the Indian Ocean, and provide a safe haven for Al Qaeda operatives. Both Ethiopia and Kenya have committed troops in the recent past, to try to keep those lawless regions in check; and in doing so they are in a strategic partnership with Israel.

    4. Kenya, Tanzania, Ethiopia, South Sudan and Israel are at war, de facto, with an Islamist coalition of Al Qaeda, North Sudan, Somalia, Gaza, Sinai and others. (“Puntland”, by the way, may be the “Put” of Ezekiel 38). The embassy bombing in Kenya affected Kenyans as much as Israelis; and Israel is one of the chief countries bearing the burden of South Sudanese and Ethiopian refugees. They cannot disentangle one another from each other’s problems, so they might as well cooperate.

    5. It’s been Israeli foreign policy, since Medinat Israel’s founding, to make alliances with the countries ON THE OTHER SIDE OF their enemies. In the past, this has meant allying with countries such as Turkey and Iran. Now Turkey and Iran have become Israel’s enemies, and may very soon become Israel’s immediate neighbors; so Israel has to look farther afield for friends. Greece and Cyprus have lined up with Israel (though not in the UN, those squeaky rats!), and India has been cooperative in some matters. This new African cooperation completes the picture.