T. Belman. Dr Harvey Risch asked me to advocate for the use of hydroxychloroquine to the Israeli government. Try as I might, I couldn’t get anyone to read the supporting material that Risch supplied me with.
There has been little accountability for the lies of the COVID pandemic.
Clearly the disease originated at the Wuhan Virology Lab. The mRNA vaccines were not nearly as effective as touted (if they worked at all), and possibly unsafe.
Another glaring dishonesty, exposed by doctors like Meryl Nass, relates to the use of hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID.
Whether or not hydroxychloroquine is effective against COVID, government authorities thwarted doctors from honestly attempting to find out, and interfered with doctor-patient relationships to do so. Agencies conspired to undermine and discredit doctors like Dr. Meryl Nass, discouraging alternative therapies possessing strong safety records while hard-selling experimental and relatively untested mRNA vaccines.
In the case of Dr. Nass, a nationwide pattern of censorship against physicians who supported hydroxychloroquine was reflected when the State of Maine Board of Licensure in Medicine suspended her medical license and referred her for a psychiatric evaluation. The Board slandered the good doctor by claiming her provision of care constituted “an immediate jeopardy to the health and physical safety of the public” and even suggested she might be using drugs:
The information received by the Board demonstrates that Dr. Nass is or may be unable to practice medicine with reasonable skill and safety to her patients by reason of mental illness, alcohol intemperance, excessive use of drugs, narcotics, or as a result of a mental or physical condition interfering with the competent practice of medicine.
Dr. Nass was not doing anything extreme in her patient care: she was targeted because she spoke up forcefully against the mRNA vaccine narrative. She got in the way of efforts by politicians and pharmaceutical companies to ensure maximum jab compliance.
The immediate insistence by authorities that Covid skipped species in an open air market flew in the face of common sense—that it may have come from a lab studying that very virus with gain-of-function methodology, using bats carrying that virus, in the city where that virus then broke out. Similarly, the rush to dismiss hydroxychloroquine as a potentially effective therapy could not have been known without study (much like early dismissals of natural immunity). Banning its use made no sense.
As a person who had taken hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for many years for Lyme Disease, the slandering of the drug (and doctors who prescribed it) was rather stunning to me. I knew the risks of the drug were minor. Yet Dr. Anthony Fauci and others very aggressively opposed trying to save lives with this drug before mRNA vaccines were available, using illogical and extremist justifications.
Dr. Nass stood up boldly and early. At her website and in her newsletters, she has competently established that:
– studies purporting to discredit HCQ employed excessive doses and were designed by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
– the government limited HCQ use by reducing supplies to pharmacies.
– the government used the reduced supplies to suggest doctors who prescribed HCQ for Covid patients were depriving patients from using HCQ for traditional purposes.
– government propaganda fabricated and elevated dangers of the drug, and the FDA and CDC limited its use using false claims.
– trials were unreasonably limited to already-sickened patients.
– conflicts of interest existed in hydroxychloroquine studies with pharmaceutical companies who were stakeholders in mRNA vaccines.
– the government pressured state medical licensing boards and pharmacists against providing HCQ.
– Dr. Fauci claimed strong evidence of efficacy was required before HCQ could be endorsed; the opposite of what he proclaimed regarding mRNA vaccines.
All of these and other facts have been meticulously documented by Dr. Nass and other ethical physicians. It appears to be her opposition to the Big Pharma COVID narrative, not concern for her patients, that caused this brave patriot to be targeted.
Many have suggested that countries that employed hydroxychloroquine against COVID experienced better health outcomes than wealthy nations that imposed lockdowns and coerced vaxxing:
Death rates in countries that rely on hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for the treatment of Covid-19 appear to be dramatically lower than death rates in countries that discourage the use of the drug. A new study claims that the death rate in the countries that used HCQ early on was 79% lower than in countries where the drug was not used. ….a pill costing a few cents saves lives, while the mountain of money spent on lockdown in the rich part of the world has failed to do so.
Other studies claimed the stuff actually worked very well:
HCQ was found to be consistently effective against COVID-19 when provided early in the outpatient setting. It was also found to be overall effective in inpatient studies. No unbiased study found worse outcomes with HCQ use. No mortality or serious safety adverse events were found. HCQ is consistently effective against COVID-19 when provided early in the outpatient setting, it is overall effective against COVID-19, it has not produced worsening of disease and it is safe.
This is the polar opposite of claims by the usual suspects The Lancet, WHO, CDC, and FDA who in unison pushed experimental jabs to the exclusion of alternative interventions. Many patients distrusted the so-called science of these proven liars (remember when Fauci said COVID vaccines were “just like measles”?), and sought alternative scientific voices for guidance.
Dr. Meryl Nass has stood up to the Orwellian stranglehold narrative, just as she has continued to defy the Maine licensing board whose case against her continues to deteriorate like an Alvin Bragg indictment. Americans should take their spoon of modern experimental medicine with a generous pinch of salt. Are doctors permitted to suggest mRNA vaccines are not warranted for young children, or will that too be targeted as verboten?
Doctors like Meryl Nass are the salty hope of free-thinking physicians and patients alike. Her case in Maine continues, and must be watched closely. So too should the now-discredited talking heads who have spewed a litany of lies about the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine and mRNA vaccines.
John Klar hosts the Small Farm Republic Substack and podcast from his Vermont farm. His new book is Small Farm Republic: Why Conservatives Must Embrace Local Agriculture, Reject Climate Alarmism, and Lead an Environmental Revival.
Felix: “And my central point if you were Jewish and the leading American, Trump, says Israel murdered one million Americans” What pure nonsense.
@Felix
Actually, it is far more than simple conjecture. You may well describe it as circumstantial evidence, but a smoking gun is circumstantial evidence indicating that a weapon was fired, and there are many felons stewing in prison only due to a jury finding them guilty based on far less evidence than stands implicating the Chinese in developing this virus. Indeed, circumstantial evidence is the basis for obtaining the majority of all criminal convictions, even when using the standard of ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’.
Does reasonable doubt exist in regards to the Chinese involvement in developing the virus? The Chinese were working on developing a SARS Cov2 like virus and behaved quite guilty when an outbreak took place only a few feet from where the Chinese gain of function research was being conducted? If you believe this, then nearly every prison should likely be emptied for convicting innocent men of crimes which were only proven by circumstantial proof. Indeed, you literally have to suspend common sense and all rational deduction to believe the lab leak scenario is not at minimum a valid consideration.
@Felix
Forgive me if you object to my comments, but I believe they are entirely relevant, and they do not prevent ‘the Texan lady’, whose name is Honeybee, from making her own response.
Peloni
“Who in Mother Hubbard’s cupboard cares about how the Chinese feel that they are being implicated in doing what they did? The evidence clearly points…”
But conjecture is not proof.
Either
The Chinese create a virus in a lab
Let it escape
Or worse release it deliberately
And deny everything
Causing millions to die terrible deaths
The above and more are in the mix I am hearing.
What if these charges against China are wrong?
Peloni Why should you have to step in since it was the Texan lady who intervened against me and I asked her to back up. Of course you are free to comment but it seems a strange way of proceeding.
@Felix
This conversation does seem very redundant.
The evidence of the lab leak is very strong. First there is the fact that for the virus to have been created in nature would be in line with the someone drawing a royal flush all day without any form of a precursor which would lead to the development of this Frankenstein virus, and there is no such related precursor. Second, the research which was being pursued at the Wuhan lab was being conducted on coronaviruses, and it involved the insertion of a furrin cleaveage site into the Spike protein as decribed in the DARPA proposal which they refused to fund, but which Fauci did fund. Third is the coverup exercised by China’s friends in Washington – Fauci, Farrar, Collins, Anderson, etc – simply to avoid any conversation implicating the China flu having been created in the Chinese labs, despite the fact that many of them believed that the Chinese lab was in fact the source of the virus as detailed in their emails. In addition to all of this remains the fact that China coincidentally also bought a massive level of PCR tests some nine months before the virus mysteriously supposedly flew out of the pangulin-bat cross. Recall further that China also had a serious breach of some form take place at the Wuhan lab back in Sept 2019, which caused it to be shuttered for at least a week during which time the ventilation system was upgraded and the Wuhan international airport was also curiously closed.
In additon to all of this is the fact that China is known to have had viruses escape their labs in the past. The research being done was described in the grant proposals as being intended to be carried out in a cave, which is far less secure than even the BSL Level 2 lab in Wuhan, when the research should have been conducted in a BSL level 4 lab, if it were to be pursued at all, which it shouldn’t have. The US funded much of the gain of function research, supplied the scientists, and gained access to China’s labs as a result of the two nations working in such tangents with eachother.
To believe the virus was not man made in a lab, all you have to do is believe the Chinese when they say that the evidence they provided their scientists to prove that the virus was not developed in their labs was in fact authentic, undoctored and complete.
Who in Mother Hubbard’s cupboard cares about how the Chinese feel that they are being implicated in doing what they did? The evidence clearly points to China based on not only the incredulous scientific impossibility that it wasn’t them, but also based on their reaction to the virus and their attempts to keep it secret, the attempts of their allies in the Washington to lie about their own suspicions that the Chinese were responsible, and the fact that the Chinese were purposefully cooking a virus which, if not SARS Cov2, would have been an impressive knockoff of it. How they feel about being implicated is quite irrelevant to the question of whether they did it or not.
Honeybee then YOU produce the evidence of the lab leak
On the other hand more and more evidence it was Zoonotic centred in the market
And my central point if you were Jewish and the leading American, Trump, says Israel murdered one million Americans
How would you feel?
Felix “There is no evidence that COVID-19 was lab-created” You can’t really believe this statement.
Ted Felix uses insults in order to hide his errors.
What about the insults that have rained down on Chinese scientists?
What about the lies?
There is no evidence that COVID-19 was lab created
There is massive evidence it is zoonotic
In short many of you sure know how to lie, slander, insult following the pattern of Trump with Biden not far behind.
@Felix
The misinformation actually came from the trials put together by Jeremy Farar of the Welcome Trust and his friends Fachi and Collins, in the NIAID and NIH, receptively, and it came at the cost of many lives. They treated deathly ill patients, some of them US veterans, with a dose which is 6X the maximum dosage of HCQ. Farar was something of an expert in the use of HCQ, having worked with it extensively over the previous decade, so the fact that the dosage prescribed was well in excess of the maximum dose range could hardly be a surprise to him. All they demonstrated of course is that if you give a bunch of sick old men toxic dosages, they could and would die as a result of such malfeasance.
Add to this the Surgisphere scandal, and the insurrection by Trump’s own HHS to circumvent his efforts to make this drug, which actually was safe and effective, available to the entire US. This was not just malfeasance, not just insurrection, it was murder on a massive scale, for which not a single person has faced a single charge or the slightest repercussion for their role in any one of these actions.
@Felix
Why must all your comments contain an insult.
You and that article are so wrong. The article makes no mention of the details of the trials.
Promoters of Hydroxy made it clear that it is an early treatment solution and must be taken in the first week and in the right dosage and with Zinc.
None of that is mentioned in the article.
FELIX-
Dr.Zelenko used it very successfully on hundres of his patiens and was one of the first to advocate it. He composed “The Zelenko Protocal”, which detailed exactly what medications to be used, when, for how long and in what quantities. He guaranteed a cure, and quoted that ALL his patients treated as he described survived.
He was victimised, financially, abs personally, and accused of violating ethica etc, was driven away from his Hassidic Community.
Those tests, are positively faked . Such a simple cheap cure needing no huge research expenses, and dead in the water, would have cost the Big Pharmas untold billions. You know how they react ant come between them and money.They destroy them.
Dr. Nass deserves every honour that can be bestowed.
Contrary to what Peloni says above HCQ is of no.use whatsoever in treating COVID-19.It was studied to the nth degree as the disease broke in 2020. Why does Peloni and Ted persist in misinformation of readers?
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435621003620
The W DC “White Coats” have engaged in activities that caused the death of thousands if not hundreds of thousands left without any therapy for early covid disease. This is consistent with crimes against humanity.
Meryl Nass is one of the unsung heroes of this war of medical experimentation launched against the people of the world. I have been reading her comments since she first exposed the fraud surrounding the HCQ trials in late spring 2020, when she exposed the clinical use of toxic doses of HCQ to undermine the well founded use of HCQ, even while Trump was courageously advocating for it. The people who died during those euthanizing trials were but the first victims of that criminal act, and the fact that no criminal investigation into those deaths followed (thank you for this too Bill Barr), foretold the tragedy which was made inevitable as a result. Indeed, millions died simply from a lack of access to sound, cheap medicines the value of which, required a staged murder of severely sick people.
Dr. Nass continues to be a light of reason and honest scientific inquiry which constantly battles the established worship of ‘science’ as if it were a fixed and immutable empty pagan idol. To destroy the reputations of doctors such as Dr. Nass and safe medicines such as HCQ, the entire practice of medical ethics and medical inquiry has been re-envisioned to create a cult of medical certainty around a provably toxic injection. I never thought I would see the things which I have witnessed over the past few years, but of them all, this perversion of honest inquiry has certainly been the most damaging and is still to this day being used to preserve the edicts of the medical bureaucrats against the general public.