The ‘Jordan option’ and the failure of the Israeli right

By Hassan A. Barari, JORDAN TIMES

Implicit in the call for the implementation of the “Jordan option” is the failure of Israel’s leaders to transcend domestic constraints and overcome internal impediments to peace.

The seeming collapse of the peace process has led many analysts to ponder what role Jordan can play in the West Bank.

Should Amman intervene, and if so, under what conditions?

Such questions tend to tie Jordan’s moves in the region to the changing dynamics of the Palestinian political arena.

For some, the failure of Israelis and Palestinians to come to some understanding means, inter alia, direct Jordanian involvement in the West Bank. But this view shows a lack of appreciation of how Jordan’s strategic thinking has evolved over the years.

Indeed, projecting Jordan as a fence sitter, waiting to step in should the Palestinians fail in their state-building endeavour fails to capture the complexity of the issue.

Today, Begin Centre in Jerusalem hosts a conference titled “The Jordan Option: The Ultimate Alternate Solution”. This alternate solution calls for Jordan to be the Palestinian state and Israel, to the Jordan River, to be a state for the Jews.

This proposed scenario, which will never materialise, is fraught with danger for all American allies in the region.

Jordan has been a beacon of stability and played a prominent and positive role in peacemaking. All along, Jordan’s stability and resilience benefited all neighbouring countries, Israel included.

Therefore, those who advocate changing Jordan into a Palestinian state are indeed playing with fire and have no understanding of the dynamic of war and peace in this part of the world.
This call is a recipe for a regional turmoil that would jeopardise the existence of Israel itself.

The conference and those who participate in it do not respect the fact that Jordan and Israel signed a peace agreement in 1994.

The Israeli right — not to mention the so-called Jordan Opposition Coalition (which has no presence in Jordan) — has yet to internalise that peace with Jordan entails mutual respect.
The crux of the matter is the inability of the Israeli right to defend the course of action it has caused since Begin assumed power in 1977.

Its obsession with establishing settlements has distracted it from the demographic developments in the area stretching from the Mediterranean to the River Jordan.

As Israel moved to the right over the last two decades, it has become extremely difficult to spot leaders who fit the bill of leadership.

Obviously, Rabin was the last Israeli who was willing to overcome internal opposition to make peace.

In short, the failure of the Israeli right to address the demographic crisis caused by the perpetuation of the occupation and the mushrooming of settlements has led some of them to look for a scapegoat.

The “Jordan option” in the version proposed by the conference is an act of war rather than a call for a solution.

hassbarari@gmail.com

October 18, 2017 | 4 Comments »

Leave a Reply

4 Comments / 4 Comments

  1. Nice ideas all, but the bible tells us that this is not to be. It’s time for us to accept that and get on with the business of staying alive.

  2. Peace for Israel it this point only can come from winning the conflict. Destroying the terrorist organizations and not leaving Judea & Samaria. In fact strengthening Israel’s hand there. So realistically at the present Israel can strive for stability and strengthening its position compared to our enemies.

    Peace can only come in the long run when the concept of Pal State West of the Jordan is only something in the history books.

  3. I am of the opinion that the various peoples in the region must first define what is that each believes is “peace”.. The horrors we have endured since Oslo cannot possibly be… peace. Dancing like scorpions into “negotiations” before that the “peace” envelope we envision is set, is nonsensical, at best,

  4. This guy is so obviously on the kinglet’s payroll, a Jordan shill. He says nothing of any note.

    Rabin didn’t make peace, He made Terror, in large doses, by bringing back, from safe obscurity thousands of miles away, 10,000 bloodthirsty terrorists, headed by the monster Arafat,that they’s spent much blood and treasure to chase out of the Middle East. Trapped in Beirut, the Americans forced their release. Rabin and co-conspirators, gave them status, respectability (lasted a week) territory he had no authority to give, weapons, money and more. In return, we got thousands of murders, and tens of thousands of wounded, with multi-billions worth of material damage, plus the horror of thousand of families completely eliminated, scarred or ruined for ever.

    There is hardly anyone in Israel who doesn’t have a family member murdered by terrorists, all begun by Rabin, Peres, Beilin and other traitors, who in any NORMAL country would have been strung up to the nearest lamppost. Instead, they’ve been eulogised, promoted, revered, even to the 4,000,000 the State paid for Peres birthday party… A curse on them.