Peloni: The claim that Iran is not seeking nuclear weapons is the result of a pro-Iranian bias which is and continues to characterize Tulsi Gabbard’s perspective. I and many others warned about this fact before Gabbard was placed into the sensitive position she holds today, and this warning was first validated by her choice of the pro-Iran Daniel Davis to fill one of the most sensitive positions on her staff, and it has now been re-validated by Gabbard’s absurd statement before Congress, which ignores the capability of Iran having the means of being within a week’s effort of having a number of nuclear devices. The deep disconnect which exists between this fact and Gabbard’s position is, in fact, not one of naivete, but one of supporting the nearly achieved outcome of Iran’s nuclear ambitions. The pro-Iran element in Washington simply received an upgrade with Gabbard’s nomination. Recalling that Personnel is Policy, we should concentrate on the reality that the sooner Gabbard’s position is vacated, the safer the US and the world will become.
Tulsi Gabbard is wrong and she should challenge the IC’s assessment – it is politicized and it’s based on Iran using our Signals Intercept capabilities as a public relations platform.
The intel is based on Signals Intercept of an Iranians reading a script saying they are not… pic.twitter.com/tvwcBrCVUE
— Michael P Pregent (@MPPregent) March 25, 2025
Text:
Tulsi Gabbard is wrong and she should challenge the IC’s assessment – it is politicized and it’s based on Iran using our Signals Intercept capabilities as a public relations platform.
The intel is based on Signals Intercept of an Iranians reading a script saying they are not pursuing a nuclear weapon.
She said the same thing in 2015 when we engaged her when I was Executive Director of Veterans Against the Deal.
“The intelligence community says Iran is not pursuing a nuclear weapon” This is h
r position – the IC is pro-JCPOA – it has been since 2015.
Coming back to the subject of this article, I have few doubts about the intelligence of the IC, but serious doubts about the intelligence they show us. Thinking of the way the CIA or the Shin Bet have been intelligently informing us would make anyone count his beads.
@radiok@comcast.net
I rescued your very important comment.
First, it’s Daniel Davis as Deputy, now she thinks Iran isn’t pursuing nukes? As a military friend of mine told me, she’s not qualified for this position and never will be. In fact, she’s dangerous to the health of the Republic and our people.
Read Trevor Loudon’s chapter on her in his book, WHITE HOUSE REDS.
She has worked to ease US pressure on the world’s largest sponsor of terror, The Islamic Republic of Iran. Hoping to break the sanctions on Iran, the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), Jared Huffman (D-CA), Ro Khanna (D-CA), Gabbard and 13 other leftist lawmakers, sent a letter to the State Department regarding the dire human impact of the US sanctions on Iran.
In a 2019 CBSN interview, Tulsi criticized Trump’s tough stance on Iran and stated that as president she would re-instate the “Iran Deal” and ease the sanctions.
Along with 18 leftist members of congress, Tulsi urged the Trump administration to achieve a final peace settlement with North Korea. Several far-left organizations endorsed the roadmap for same. Senator Bernie Sanders expressed peace talks with North Korea and the United States. Gabbard was backed in this effort by Christine Ahn, one of the closest collaborators with Pak Chol who is part of the North Korean intelligence apparatus. Ahn is one of Tulsi’s biggest fans.
Tulsi is always in sync with socialists. And like Senator Bernie Sanders, she is continually promoting peace, but the kind of peace that ensures an absence of resistance to world Marxist-Leninist domination.
Radicals such as Gabbard, Bernie Sanders and the DSA continually argue for softer lines on China, North Korea, Russia and Iran.