The ADL beats the drums of war (and so does AIPAC)

I know that Israelis are in favour of the US striking Assad along with McCain, Graham, Boehner, Cantor and others in the US, but what about Israpundit’s informed readers. My preference is for the US to stay out of it.  Israel is better off having as neighbour, an Iranian backed Syria than a melange of Islamists headed by the MB in tandem with Erdogan.  The US and the EU is more likely to support Israel if we are confronted with the former rather than the latter.  Ted Belman

AIPAC to mount major lobbying blitz for Obama’s Syria strike plan

EU sides with Russia’s Putin, urges against US ‘military solution’ in Syria

Syrian War Suck-Up The ADL Ignores It’s Mission (Again) To Beat The War Drums For Obama

By Jeff Dunetz

If the IRS really wanted to go after charitable organizations that are blatantly political they would go after the ADL, but then that will never happen because the ADL is a huge supporter of progressive politics and President Obama. But ever since Abe Foxman has taken over the group has abandoned its mission to fight anti-Semitism and all forms of bigotry, and is using its donated tax-free funds to concentrate on a political agenda.

Today they released a statement supporting Obama’s ramp up to war in Syria:

Barry Curtiss-Lusher, ADL National Chair and Abraham H. Foxman, ADL National Director, issued the following statement:

    We welcome President Obama’s demonstration of U.S. leadership in responding to the use of chemical weapons in Syria. In recent days, President Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry have forcefully made the case for United States action against the Syrian regime in the wake of its use of chemical weapons against its own citizens.

The president clearly and unequivocally identified the significant national security interests of the United States and moral imperative underlying his decision to use military force against Syria. We support the president’s decision.

Congress should act swiftly to add its voice to hold President Bashar al-Assad accountable for the wanton slaughter of his own citizens.

Any nation that violates international norms and obligations which threaten the peace and security of the world must face the consequences of those dangerous acts. 

This is not even close to the first time the ADL as strayed from its mission to support the progressive agenda with money donors’ believed was being used for a different purpose. Below are some examples:

  • Supported Partial Birth and other forms of Abortion. In 2008urging both parties to adopt a pro-choice stance in their presidential platforms. I wonder if Abe Foxman realizes that not all Jews support the ADL’s pro-choice position. 
  • Before Chuck Hagel was appointed to Defense Secretary position they strongly opposed his selection. Once Obama named Hagel they tamed their words considerably.
  • Advocates for Gay Marriage. Remember in NY#9 when many Orthodox Jews voted against the Democrat because he voted for the New York State Gay Marriage Bill? Well Abe Foxman’s ADL couldn’t care less.
  • Issued a “White Paper” promoting the progressive’s negative PR spin about the Tea Party movement. They said the Tea Party was part of the “New Rage in America”
  • Refused to recognize the anti-Semitism present within Occupy Wall Street, until Andrew Breitbart’s BigGovernment.com embarrassed them into making a statement.

The ADL has become nothing but a tool for the progressive movement. If you wish to donate to the progressive movement allow me to suggest you donate to Organizing for Action–they do it better.  If you want to donate to a Jewish Organization allow me to suggest you don’t donate to  the ADL, there are hundreds of Jewish Organizations dealing with Jewish, or other worthy charitable work, unlike the ADL those groups don’t waste their time and your donations being political wannabes.

September 5, 2013 | 58 Comments »

Leave a Reply

8 Comments / 58 Comments

  1. @ yamit82:

    “But [BHO] or his “brain trust” must know that if the Mullahs get the Big One, this will set off a M-E arms race that will make the Cold War arms race look like a fond memory. . . . Turks, Egyptians, Emiratis, etc”

    “Ideology over reality and common sense???”

    Apparently.

    That and an industrial-strength dose of compulsive myopia.

    They’re “hooked on a feeling” — and their preoccupation with it is keeping them from doing the very things that might bring it to fruition.

    They want a world free of nukes

    — but letting Tehran complete its run thru the nuclear goalposts is FAR more likely to douse the non-proliferation dream than to fulfill it.

    They are bringing about the very things they most fear.

  2. mar55 Said:

    Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Turkey want Assad defeated.

    Obama wants the job done for the GCC but he prefers if Israel does it so that he does not have to risk his image and electorate and impeachment for entering into a war. I beleive it was the original intention for the jihdis to do the job and when that was not enough for US/Nato to do enough, as in libya, to support the jihadis in getting the job done. However, US and Nato military action is politically limited. If Obama gets the votes we will probably see token planes from turkey and saudi also in the “action” and that it will primarily to give support to the jihadis on the ground and nothing to do with chemistry.

  3. Vinnie Said:

    In any event, an attack on Iran would probably result in a Hezbollah assault on Israel, which would in turn give Israel the excuse to finish them off once and for all…

    It is best for Israel that Irans proxies are weakened first to mitigate blowback from a future Iran attack and keep casualties lower. Nothing could be better than shiite and sunni jihadis killing each other first. The longer they kill each other in syria and lebanon the better for israel. Anyone fighting against hezbullah is doing israel a favor. Now that hezbullah is splitting its forces between syria and lebanon this is a good thing for Israel. More hezbullah in syria is good because they can fight the foreign jihadis there and the lebanese can christians and sunnis can have a weaker foe in lebanon. Opportunity exists.