Even followers of Islam considered the Temple Mount to be the location of the Jewish Holy Temples, but in 1967, Moshe Dayan gave control over it to the Muslim Wakf. Op-ed.
Ben Gvir on the Temple MountPublic relations
Israel’s National Security Minister, Itamar Ben Gvir’s visited the Temple Mount, Judaism’s holiest spot where the first and second Holy Temples stood. Many countries worldwide have quickly raced to a microphone to condemn the Jewish State for the horrible crime of a Jew walking across the faith’s holiest site. He did not pray, of course, as only Muslims are permitted to pray atop the Mount. Despite the international condemnation of a Jew walking through his faith’s holiest site, the real inciter of the condemnation was Moshe Dayan.
The Christian Gospels, which pre-date Islam, believe the Mount was the location of the Temples to the “Big Guy upstairs” For example, in Mark 12:40 and Luke 20:47, J.C. accused the Temple authorities of thieving. He names poor widows as their victims, providing evidence of this. Mark 12:42 and Luke 21:2. Wrote that Dove sellers were selling doves sacrificed by the poor who could not afford grander sacrifice. According to Mark 11:16, J.C put an embargo on people carrying any merchandise through the Temple gates—a sanction that would have disrupted all commerce. In the Gospel of John 2:15-16, he refers to the Jerusalem Temple as “my Father’s house.” The Christian faith believes that J.C. is the Son of God, which means they consider the Temple Mount a Holy place.
One concept of how First Temple looked
Even followers of Islam considered the Temple Mount to be the location of the Jewish Holy Temples. At least, that’s what they claimed before 1947, when the Jewish nation was allowed to have sovereignty over their eternal homeland. They doubled down in 1967 after the Six-Day war, when Israel removed the Jordanian occupation and took over Judaism’s holiest spot.
There are many examples in the Quran and other Muslim scripture saying the Jewish Temple stood on top of the temple mount. There is even a more modern example. The Official 1925 Supreme MoslemBen Gvir’sCouncil (Wakf) Guide Book To Al-?aram Al-Sarif (Temple Mount) recognized the presence of the Jewish Temples atop the Mount. Below is paragraph two, which appears on page four, which says, “It’s [the Temple Mount] identity with the site of Solomon’s Temple is beyond dispute.” After Israel declared independence in i948, the Waqf removed all references to King Solomon’s Temple from its guidebooks, whose location at the site it had previously said was “beyond dispute
Al Haram Al Sharif guide
The three Abrahamic faiths, the majority of faiths in almost every country in the western world, believe the Beit Hamikdash (the Jewish Temple) was atop the Mount. They are going against their own faiths to condemn the Jewish State of Israel and Itamar Ben Gvir’s stroll across the site of the Holy Temple.
It wasn’t really his fault. It was the fault of the man who many believe is the hero of the Six-Day-War, Moshe Dayan.
Jerusalem became the capital city of the Jewish nation in the time of King David. David conquered it and made it the seat of his monarchy in approximately 1000 BCE. After the Romans conquered the city in 70 CE, the Jewish people mourned the loss of the city and the site of the Holy Temple in the city for the next nineteen hundred years.
After Israel’s War of Independence in 1948, the Jewish State controlled the newer half of the Holy City while Jordan occupied the older part of Jerusalem. But on the third day of the Six-Day War, Israeli forces reunified their capital.
Finally, after almost two millennia, the Jewish people controlled the Temple Mount. They could pray at the home of the holiest site of all of Judaism. Where the two Temples stood and where Abraham almost sacrificed his son Isaac.
Well—they held the top of the Temple mount until Moshe Dayan took it upon himself to cede control of the location of the holy Temples back to the Muslim Waqf under the supervision of Jordan, one of the countries that attacked Israel the week before.
Made Defense Minister just before the start of the June 1967 War, Israel’s quick victory made Dayan an international hero. But if it were not for the progressive hubris of the man considered to be the hero of the Six-Day War, the Temple Mount would not be as divisive of an issue between Israel and her neighbors as it is today.
Jews had been denied access to the Old City of Jerusalem since Jordan gained control of the “Old City” during the 1948 War of Independence.
It’s hard to explain the joy and reverence as Jews approached the Temple mount for the first time. It wasn’t a military celebration or only an Israeli celebration. The entire Jewish people were unified. Jews across the world cried tears of joy upon hearing the news. It should be noted that despite what commentators and the mainstream media will tell you, the Kotel (the Wailing Wall) is not the holiest site in Judaism—it is the retaining wall for the most sacred site in Judaism, the Temple Mount. The Kotel is the closest place to the holiest spot where Jews can pray.
According to accounts, Moshe Dayan did not believe Israel should try to unify Jerusalem. He was worried that entering the Old City would result in a house-to-house battle which might be costly and might cause damage to the holy sites of other faiths, and “that will bring the whole world crashing down upon our heads.” He also considered it unimportant and said to Commander Uzi Dayan, “who needs that Vatican.”
Future Prime Minister Menachem Begin convinced then-Prime Minister Levi Eshkol to overrule Dayan. The recapture of the Old City was much easier than Dayan warned, and returning the Temple Mount to Israel created incredible joy, not just for Israelis but for the entire Jewish people, whether they lived in Israel or the diaspora. The whole Jewish nation was united in happiness.
When Israel gained possession of the Temple compound during the Six-Day War, Prime Minister Levi Eshkol wanted to create a multi-faith council to run the Temple Mount. The Muslim Mosque would not have been touched, but all faiths would be allowed up on top of the Mount, and it would “belong” to all three Abrahamic religions.
Dayan didn’t like that idea. He thought the Temple Mount should remain in Muslim possession. In his biography, Dayan stated that he was worried that Jews would try to rebuild the Beit Hamikdash (the Jewish Temple), which was the last thing he wanted.
But there was no way a third Temple could be built. Well… it couldn’t be built then. By Jewish tradition, a third Temple can’t be built until the Moshiach (Messiah) comes. And when that time comes, it won’t matter.
But Dayan thought he knew better than the Prime Minister, Rabbinical tradition, and the people of Israel.
Dayan took it upon himself to grant control of the Temple Mount back to the Muslims because he wanted to ensure there wouldn’t be a third Temple. And there was nothing that Prime Minister Eshkol could do about it. After all, this Moshe Dayan was a hero.
Historically King David purchased the site 30 centuries ago. As was written in Chapter 21 of the first book of Chronicles, “And David said to Ornan, “Give me the place of the threshing-floor, so that I may build thereon an altar to the Lord; give it to me for the full price.”
Since that day, the Jewish people have lost possession of the Temple Mount three times. Only once was the site given away voluntarily. That was when Moshe Dayan gave it away 56 years ago.
Moshe Dayan is still considered a hero. But he should go down in history as the man who gave away the Temple Mount and gave the world opportunity to make the Temple Mount an issue. He turned the Temple mount into a place for riots, another way to delegitimize the Jewish State. Dayan prevented the entire Jewish nation from praying at their holiest site, which once hosted the Shechinah, the divine presence of God. The most sacred site in Judaism is off-limits. That is what Jews call a shanda (a shame).
Thanks to Moshe Dayan. Itamar Ben Gvir’s visit to the Temple Mount sparked internal condemnation.
Jeff Dunetz is editor/publisher of the blog “The Lid.” The political columnist for The Jewish Star, and co-host of the weekly radio show, Host of The Lid Radio show on SHR Media, and is a Leader At Large of Herut NA-the Unapologetic Zionists!
@ Sebastien Zorn
Thank you for the detailed presentation of this moment of history.
But if it’s not a mistake, then what?
The main thing : this does not remove the blame from subsequent generations of politicians.
“Ambassador Gilad Erdan noted that Minister of National Security Itamar Ben-Gvir entered through the only non-Muslim entrance to the Temple Mount, at one of the limited designated times for Jewish admittance and made no attempt to pray.”
https://www.jns.org/israels-un-envoy-mocks-meeting-over-ben-gvirs-uneventful-temple-mount-visit/
“It is, in retrospect, an astonishing moment of religious restraint. The Jewish people had just returned to its holiest site, from which it had been denied access for centuries, only to effectively yield sovereignty at its moment of triumph. Shortly after the war, Dayan met with officials of the Muslim Wakf, who governed the holy site, and formally returned the Mount to their control. While Israeli soldiers would determine security and stand at the gates, the Wakf would determine who prayed at the site, an arrangement that would effectively bar non-Muslim prayer. The Temple Mount was no longer in Gur’s hands.
An unplanned victory ended in a spontaneous concession. No cabinet meeting authorized Dayan’s move. The defense minister simply took advantage of his popularity within the Israeli public to manage Israel’s most sensitive religious problem—an arrangement that has persisted ever since.
In ceding the right of Jews to pray on the Mount, Dayan’s intention was to minimize bloodshed and prevent the Palestinian-Israeli conflict from becoming a holy war. He was supported by most of Israel’s religious establishment, which was keen on preventing Jews from trespassing on the Holy of Holies—the area of the ancient Temple which only the high priest was permitted to enter, and then only on Yom Kippur, and whose precise location was no longer known.”
https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2017/06/israel-paratroopers-temple-mount-1967/529365/
But it is a Holy War and there is no getting around that, Hudnas aside. That’s why as I believe Golda Meir said, the Arabs/Muslims won’t accept a Jewish state the size of a postage stamp.
Dayan was a secular socialist.
The argument about minimizing bloodshed after Israel routed the combined Arab armies and the Pals were in flight was sheer idiocy. I’ve read elsewhere that the fool actually begged them to stay.
Should have stuck to winning battles. Great general. Lousy politician.
“I don’t want the Temple Mount”
By GERSHON BASKIN Published: JULY 26, 2017 22:03
“Building the third Temple would be the destruction of modern Jewry and would, I believe, lead directly to the end of the modern State of Israel.”
https://www.jpost.com/opinion/i-dont-want-the-temple-mount-500852
I’m sure Dayan felt the same.
AS1818 Wasn’t a mistake. It was ideological.
“Dayan’s most significant act on the Temple Mount, which sparked controversy over the years and was widely criticized, was to forbid Jewish prayer and worship there, unlike the arrangements that emerged at the Machpelah Cave in Hebron where there is also a functioning mosque.7 Dayan decided to leave the mount and its management in the hands of the Muslim Wakf, while at the same time insisting that Jews would be able to visit it (but not pray at it!) without restriction. Dayan thought, and years later even committed the thought to writing, that since for Muslims the mount is a “Muslim prayer mosque” while for Jews it is no more than “a historical site of commemoration of the past…one should not hinder the Arabs from behaving there as they now do.”8 The Israeli defense minister believed that Islam must be allowed to express its religious sovereignty – as opposed to national sovereignty – over the mount; that the Arab-Israeli conflict must be kept on the territorial-national level; and that the potential for a conflict between the Jewish religion and the Muslim religion must be removed. In granting Jews the right to visit the mount, Dayan sought to placate the Jewish demands for worship and sovereignty there. In giving religious sovereignty over the mount to the Muslims, he believed he was defusing the site as a center of Palestinian nationalism.9”
https://jcpa.org/al-aksa-is-in-danger-libel/al-aksa-is-in-danger-libel-temple-mount/
Dayan is a human being, and it is natural for human beings to make mistakes.
Mistakes are made by people and they also need to correct them .
How many Premiers have been replaced!
How many ministers have changed since!
How many years has Netanyahu been PM?
I’m sure he didn’t even think about taking control of the Temple Mount.
The other Premiers and ministers did not initiate either.
And current ministers are silent about this.
How convenient it is to blame everything on the late Dayan !
Status Quo simply means the existing state of affairs
For example;
In December only 40 people shot in Chicago
This is a change in status quo which is >50 people per month
UN should protest this, too.
Why are we committed to status quo?
What is holly about the status quo?
In Nazi occupied Europe it was status quo for Jews to be sent to the gas chambers.
Just imagine the United Nations condemning Ben Gvir’s for breaking status quo and not going to the gas chamber?
And then the Prime Minister of Israel assures the world that there has not been any changes to the status quo. Ben Gvir’s, merely took a bathroom break on his way to Auschwitz. And this has been done by other parliamentarians before him, so it is not a change to the status quo.