By Mordechai Sones, FRONTLINE DOCTORS
Microstructure Technology Professor Dr. Hervé Seligmann, previously with the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) Faculty of Medicine Emerging Infectious and Tropical Diseases Research Unit, examined fertility in countries that have massively vaccinated against COVID-19 compared to those that have not, and concludes that women’s fertility decreases the more women are vaccinated.
According to the data presented by Shimabukuro et al (2021), of the 127 women who were vaccinated in the first 20 weeks, 82% resulted in miscarriage.
The article by Shimabukuro et al. 2021 presents preliminary safety results of coronavirus 2019 mRNA vaccines used in pregnant women from the V-Safe Registry. These findings are of particular importance, as pregnant women were excluded from the phase III trials assessing mRNA vaccines.
In table 4, the authors report a rate of spontaneous abortions <20 weeks (SA) of 12.5% (104 abortions/827 completed pregnancies). However, this rate should be based on the number of women who were at risk of an SA due to vaccine receipt and should exclude the 700 women who were vaccinated in their third-trimester (104/127 = 82%). They acknowledge this rate will likely decrease as the pregnancies of women who were vaccinated <20 weeks complete but believe the rate will be higher than 12.5%. However, given the importance of these findings they feel it important to report these rates accurately. Additionally, the authors indicate that the rate of SAs in the published literature is between 10% and 26%. However, the upper cited rate includes clinically-unrecognized pregnancies, which does not reflect the clinically-recognized pregnancies of this cohort and should be removed.
In the first graph one can see a decrease in fertility the more a country vaccinates, with 3 countries clear outliers, Israel, Mongolia, and Seychelles:
In the second graph, the data are corrected according to the wealth of the countries (poorer countries have higher fertility). After the correction, Seychelles and Mongolia return to the norm, and only Israel continues to enjoy relatively high fertility despite the high percentage of vaccinated women:
Although Dr. Seligmann does not explain the reason for the Israeli anomaly, Nakim Organization Director Haim Yativ says the abnormality in Israel can be explained by the fact that Israel is Pfizer’s laboratory state, and that it must have been given a high percentage of placebo recipients to test the vaccine results against them as a control group.
In the third graph, Dr. Seligmann compares the fertility data of 2019 with 2021. From the graph one can see the declining trend in fertility the more women get vaccinated. At the same time it can be seen that on average in 2021 fertility was higher than in 2019, possibly explained by COVID-19 lockdowns and/or other social factors related to the situation:
In conclusion, Dr. Seligman estimates that fertility damage should soon appear to be even more severe due to the effect of vaccines on men and pregnancy.
“Comparisons between countries show lower fertility associated with female vaccination,” he writes. “This is in line with suspicions of greater adverse pregnancy risks in women vaccinated during the first pregnancy trimester. It is possible that male vaccination effects independent of female vaccination effects would be detectable if fertility was estimated by pregnancy numbers, not numbers of births, over a longer period, as male fertility affects more directly pregnancy frequencies and more indirectly pregnancy outcomes. Data analyzed reflect almost exclusively vaccine effects during pregnancy. Soon, effects of vaccination on the period before conception, including on men, should appear and strengthen the decrease in fertility observed at this point.”
To read his study, click here.
Haim Yativ notes that the births do not guarantee the health of the babies born to vaccinated parents, and that reports of genetic defects in various places have not been investigated but rather ignored.
He also notes that at this stage it is not possible to draw conclusions about harm to male fertility, and that “we will have to wait 9 months from the time the vaccination campaign began in various countries, but already at this stage we can refer to the many warnings by experts of sterilization and/or genetic damage to their future offspring.”
“Effects of vaccination on fertility will likely increase as effects on preconception periods, men included, will become more common, beyond effects of vaccination during pregnancy,” Yativ concludes.
Reader
October 14, 2021 at 5:10 am [posted the 4th time]
@peloni
I am not assuming anything.
I said IF.
Of course, I don’t know about the % of placebos but I figure that the doctor who wrote the article might have some knowledge of it.
His idea that since Israel is a “test” country, and when you conduct experiments with drugs, etc., there is always a placebo group, seems sound to me.
Also, this might explain why Israel paid so much more per dose than some countries.
They can’t announce this officially.
First of all, there is a very comprehensive contract with Pfizer about sharing the data and keeping it secret from everybody else.
Second, imagine the scandal that would ensue after such an announcement.
I’ve already seen comments on the Internet that “The Joos are getting placebos but the rest of us get the real thing”.
Like I said, I am convinced that this is a eugenics program (among other things) and the right people all get placebos, and the ones at the very top get all the banned cures they wish.
They probably have a computerized rating system which determines who gets what.
@peloni
I am not assuming anything.
I said IF.
Of course, I don’t know about the placebos but I figure that the doctor who wrote the article might have some knowledge of it.
His idea that since Israel is a “test” country, and when you conduct experiments with drugs, etc., there is always a placebo group, seems sound to me.
Also, this could be an explanation of why Israel paid so much more per dose than some countries.
They can’t announce this officially.
First of all, there is a very comprehensive contract with Pfizer about sharing the data and keeping it secret from everybody else.
Second, imagine the scandal that would ensue after such an announcement.
I’ve already seen comments on the Internet that “The Joos are getting placebos but the rest of us get the real thing”.
Like I said, I am convinced that this a eugenics program (among other things) and the right people all get placebos, and the ones at the very top also get all the banned cures they wish to have.
They probably have a computerized rating system which determines who gets what.
@Reader
The problem here is that you are assuming this “high quantity of placebos” actually exists in any number, much less high numbers. Correct me if I am wrong here.
I have never heard that Israel has been supplied a number of placebos, outside of idle chatter on the web, but nothing officially. Am I incorrect on this? Serious question. If this is just speculation, making such assumptions are poorly suited for as a basis of sound arguments. This is the opposite of good scientific inquiry. It is, of course, something to think about and consider as possible, but you can’t just assume this is true and use it as a basis of a conclusion to support a theory. By doing so, you are simply investigating a theory and assuming it is true and claiming the assumption as your proof. Your assumption could be correct, but you can’t just assume that you are. Unless I am unaware of something of which you and Dr. Yativ have better knowledge. Hope this is clear.
@peloni
To me it doesn’t.
If Israel was supplied a high quantity of placebos (let’s say 50%, of course, we don’t know the actual %), then its birth rate among the “vaccinated” women would be much higher than in those countries who weren’t supplied the placebos or were supplied them at a much lower rate.
This would happen if among the “vaccinated” Israeli women a large % would, in fact, remain unvaccinated due to receiving placebos.
Israel must have this information for each person because it sends it to be studied by Pfizer.
The question is does someone (or something – like a computer program) decide who gets a placebo or is it done at random?
Personally, I am convinced that every country gets a % of placebos which go to the “better” sectors of society.
These studies cannot predict the future, though.
It is possible that fertility of the 2nd generation (those born to the vaccinated mothers) will be even lower, and the 3rd generation (grandchildren) will be sterile:
An experiment on hamsters fed GMO soy:
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/genetically-modified-soy_b_544575
https://gmwatch.org/en/news/archive/2014/15447-russians-raise-funds-for-first-ever-independent-international-research
If the above is true for this “vaccine”, the final question will be who is going to bury the last generation on Earth.
The study of one year olds in Rhode Island showed that children born after the vaccination campaign started are cognitively and intellectually impaired (I can’t find the link).
Retrospective studies are useful to a point to describe glaringly obvious trends, but, as has been noted before, these can not identify or eliminate all forms of bias so additional work on this must be pursued. Routinely such glaring concerns would result in a consideration of pausing the use of the responsible drug, but that will never happen here.
The results of this study by Dr. Seligman are very disturbing, though not terribly surprising given what we have seen in a prospective trial and the concentration of the spike in the ovaries first noted in the Japanese study(https://www.pmda.go.jp/drugs/2021/P20210212001/672212000_30300AMX00231_I100_1.pdf) that Dr. Bridle discussed in late May. It will require a closer look with prospective trial work that we should have already had prior to allowing, much less forcing, women of child bearing age to be vaccinated, not to speak of pregnant women.
This seems to me to be a circular argument where Yativ assumes a data corruption specific to Israel, via a high rate of placebos, to explain the anomaly in the Israeli data – if someone sees this as a rational argument I would appreciate a better understanding of the argument.
The anomaly is glaring, however, as Israel alone seems impervious to this effect. There must be an explanation, and Nakim’s suggestion could explain it, but we can’t assume that it does by assuming a placebo effect that we can’t substantiate.
But it is due to something. Perhaps the increased birthrate among the unvaccinated would explain this resistance to fertility reduction at least in some measure. Recall that the heredi population has been resistant to being vaccinated. Something to consider.
The issue of male fertility will now have an active input into these matters going forward and this should be investigated as well. With Israel’s recent 3rd jab program expanding to other nations, it should be noted that sperm take 3months to regenerate from scratch, assuming the process is not permanently harmed, if it is harmed at all. So with the relative distance in time, it will be interesting to compare the conception rate between June-July with the rate over past years as well as that for August-Sept against the rate of conception over past years. There has been gobs and gobs of data that is ignored and assumed inconsequential as we continue to not know what we don’t want to know. This should end. We need to know these answers even. Sooner would have been much better than later, but it is later and later would be much better than never.