Several of the U.S.’s top climatologists and at least two Nobel Prize winning physicists are among some 30,000 U.S. scientists to have signed a petition saying that “the human-caused global warming hypothesis is without scientific validity.”
The “Global Warming Petition Project” has 31,487 signers and is growing. The petition “strongly rejects as unproven the hypothesis of man-made global warming or climate change.” Four NASA astronauts and more than 9,000 PhDs also signed the petition.
The petition reads:
“There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.”
The petition also urges the U.S. government
“to reject the global warming agreement that was written in Kyoto, Japan in December, 1997, and any other similar proposals. The proposed limits would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind.”
The project’s website states:
“These scientists are instead convinced that the human-caused global warming hypothesis is without scientific validity and that government action on the basis of this hypothesis would unnecessarily and counterproductively damage both human prosperity and the natural environment of the Earth.”
The project’s website also notes:
“In PhD scientist signers alone, the project already includes 15-times more scientists than are seriously involved in the United Nations IPCC process. The very large number of petition signers demonstrates that, if there is a consensus among American scientists, it is in opposition to the human-caused global warming hypothesis rather than in favor of it.”
New signatures are being collected here.
Climate Change is a plot to transfer wealth from the West to industrializing third world countries, in particular China. Now, you may ask, why would Western Leftists be crazy enough to want to de-industrialize their own countries?
Answer. It’s an eschatalogical religion. Marxism is a spinoff of Hegelianism which says the spirit of History is a god who manifests in the history of different countries at different times. The goal is a kind of union with Brahma, or the equivalent.
If you watch this video I posted a couple of time already, you will understand.
Scene from:
“Jonah Who Will Be 25 in the Year 2000” (1976)
https://youtu.be/N8fhqHyRj6M
By the way, I just saw the new “Spider Man.” Entertaining. And funny. That’s new. But, as usual, full of liberal propaganda. The villain and his family represent the white workers and African-Americans who now support Trump. The hero’s side-kick is from some other third world immigrant background, at issue in the immigration debate but avoiding the question of Islam, so I would guess, Indian or some nearby nationality.
Only commissars have a right to judge these things. That’s why Obama appointed Van Jones as the “Green Czar” right?
“Became a Communist in the aftermath of the 1992 “Rodney King riots” in Los Angeles
Founded the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights in 1996
Was active in the anti-Iraq War demonstrations organized by International ANSWER
Suspected that the Bush administration “may indeed have deliberately allowed 9/11 to happen, perhaps as a pretext for war”
Served as a board member of the Rainforest Action Network and Free Press
In March 2009, President Barack Obama named Jones to be his so-called “green jobs czar.”
Has been a senior fellow with the Center for American Progress…”
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=2406
Yeah, but how would they know? They’re only scientists.
More reason that POTUS Trump was right in pulling the country out of the Paris Accords.
Some NASA scientists lean right, and some left. They ALL stand together for higher government funding.
NASA is just another government bureaucracy, albeit one in zero-g.
It needs to be ABOLISHED.
Remember that NASA astronette who drove non-stop from TX to FL, wearing a diaper so as to deal with the inevitable call of nature, in order to confront (and possibly violently attack) the mistress of some other astronaut?
Then some other drunken-astronaut flew (in a USAF jet, I’m sure) from Houston over to Cocoa Beach in order to appear in court to vouch for ‘one of the best and brightest’.
Of course the political judge released her to into his trustworthy, government bureaucrat hands. That despite her being an obvious flight risk.
Had some ghetto gal from West Palm Beach been arrested for a crime of passion, she’d have been left to rot in jail, unable to raise the $500,000 bail a FL judge would have imposed.