T. Belman. Just as I forecast,Trump and Putin have cut a deal. Russia is now responsible to rein in Turkey and to protect the Kurds. Exactly what Putin has agreed to with respect to Iran, will soon be evident. Trump is now focused on pushing back Iran in Iraq.
Esper made no reference to negative Turkish or Syrian military steps or the situation of the Kurds. Washington has evidently shunted those problems over to the new reigning power in eastern Syria, i.e. Moscow.
The Putin-Erdogan meeting takes place at the end of the five-day ceasefire negotiated between the US and Turkey for Kurdish forces to retreat from an agreed security zone along the Syrian-Turkish border.
DEBKAfile’s military sources report that Tabqa air base, taken over by Russian forces on the heels of the Syrian army, is large enough to accommodate Russian bombers and air cargoes. Located near the largest Syrian dam on the River Euphrates and 40km from Raqqa, it offers Moscow complete control of eastern Syria including the Kurdish regions of the northeast and the Syrian-Iraqi border, excepting only the large US garrison at al Tanf which sits athwart the intersection of the Syrian, Iraqi and Jordanian borders.
The radical realignment of strength in these regions was almost certainly coordinated between Washington and Moscow, like the other military steps emanating from the Turkish incursion of Syria against the Kurds.
Having appealed to Moscow and Damascus to halt the Turkish intrusion into their lands, Syria’s Kurdish leaders understand that responsibility for their fate has passed from Washington to Moscow. Their bitter complaints of betrayal and abandonment by America, and appeals for aid from Israel, are therefore aimed at raising popular sympathy in the West, knowing that Moscow is their only realistic address for claiming support.
Putin therefore finds himself in a similar situation to that of President Donald Trump at the outset of the Turkish operation (on Oct. 9). He must evade the charges leveled against the Trump administration of abandoning the Kurds of Syria to a genocidal Turkish army, after their gallant fight against the Islamist State, an enemy shared by the US and Russia.
The Russian leader will therefore need to confront Erdogan’s demand to occupy a “security zone” in northern Syria, to which Washington acceded, and lean hard on the Turkish president to start pulling all his troops out of the Syria and ending his military venture there. Kurdish forces have meanwhile complied with the US-Turkish truce stipulation and begun withdrawing from the besieged border town of Ras al-Ayn with their wounded civilians and fighters. This as a signal of their willingness for compromise, so long as one of the two big powers offers them military protection.
Moscow’s expanded military and air force control over northern and eastern Syria, following the US pullback, calls for an extension of the Israeli-Russian military cooperation deal that limits Israel’s air strikes against Iran to the north and the west. Addenda to these understandings will need to be negotiated.
Therefore it may be assumed that Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu will soon be flying to Sochi discuss coordinating with Putin and his defense chiefs in which parts of eastern Syria the Israeli Air Force is allowed to hammer Iranian and its allied forces and which are barred.
@ Bear Klein:
Bear,
I appreciate your insight, and often look forward to your posts. When you start talking about “good”, “bad” and “morality”, however, please give me a break. War is an amoral exercise, generally perpetrated by immoral people with ulterior motives — on BOTH side. War has often been compared with chess, a game I used to play with keen interest. People who seem ever concerned about “peace”, are like chess players who insist that the board positions always stay the same, and no pieces are taken. In other words, they make for dreadfully boring chess players.
Donald Trump made an interesting gambit in Syria, in pulling back some pieces. The other players (Turkey, Syria, Russia, Iran, the various Kurdish factions and others) have made counter-moves. This happens in chess, and it happens in war. There is no reason here, to wring one’s hands. The main players are Trump and Putin. The others are kibitzers.
God bless and keep you and yours, God bless Israel, and God bless America!
@ Bear Klein:
I guess one man’s “population transfer” is another man’s “ethnic cleansing”. What will you call it when the palestinian arabs are incentivised to move to Jordan?
If you are a brave Kurd who fights along side of the US to get rid of terrorists it does not pay because in the end the US betrays you and allows Islamic Terrorists aligned with Turkey to attack you. The US POTUS says you can not pay us so we are leaving. Trump is all about the money and some of these soldiers are being sent so the US can claim the oil fields in eastern Syria.
Article Continues at http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/270401
@ Raphael:
Ethnic Cleansing and murder of an ally who lost 11,000 fighters is something to cheer? Really you think that is a good thing.
A population transfer of Kurds out of NW Syria, and up to two million Arab refugees out of Turkey and into the vacated region, might unwittingly set a useful precedent in a peace plan between Israel and the palestinians.
I’m with Ted on this. I think Trump has a plan that will be a win-win for everybody, except possibly Iran, which may find that these developments hinder their expansion.
Consider:
1. The U.S. extricates itself from Syria, which was doing us little good. Saves money, and saves lives.
2. We turn the NW Syria mess over to Russia. They are already there, supporting Assad, anyway. Let them deal with Turkey and the other factions. If they can broker peace…good, if not, at least we’re out of there, and Russia is further enmeshed.
3. The Kurds of NW Syria were never our responsibility. Yes, we supported them against ISIS, but they were to a large extent rogue. In any case, we facilitated their evacuation. There will be no bloodbath.
4. Our pulling back to Iraq still leaves us close enough to react if necessary, and bolsters our forces in Iraq, which is a smart strategic move, securing the oil, and raising the ante for Iranian aggression.
5. Israel has a working relationship with Russia, who understands Israel’s issues with Iranian bases in Syria. Russia would be just as happy to have Iran out, since they are a destabilizing influence.
6. With the prospect of gaining back part of his country, not to mention the Turkish incursion, Assad’s attention is turned northward, away from Israel.
7. If a safe zone is established in Syria, a large number of Syrian refugees can be repatriated, from Turkey to Syria…a good thing for both countries, one would think.
8. What about the ISIS prisoners, formerly in Kurdish, (SDF), custody? It would be a great surprise if the doors were opened and they all walked. Nobody wants that to happen. There will be an orderly transfer of custody.
For all of these reasons, and more, the U.S. redeployment, from Syria to Iraq, is a good move. By taking the initiative, Trump was able to control the chain of events . Those who objected to his move, in knee-jerk fashion, can now do little besides wonder at Trump’s ability to think outside of the box.
@ Ted Belman:Does this change anything or prove anything?
Certainly not to the Kurds! They feel betrayed then not too many actually care.
@ Bear Klein:
A couple of days ago Trump said he would be happy if anyone else stepped forward to defend the Kurds.
Deal??? Really?? Sounds like Russia stepped into the void left by the US retreat and abandonment of the Kurds.
full article at https://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/The-US-once-stopped-ethnic-cleansing-now-it-excuses-it-in-Syria-Analysis-605263