JNS
“US taxpayer dollars should never go to a corrupt entity that undermines Israel, one of our greatest allies and closest friends,” Representative Chip Roy says.
Republicans in Congress are responding to the resumption of US foreign aid to the United Nations Relief and Work Agency for Palestine Refugees by the Biden administration earlier this year by introducing a set of bills aimed at preventing taxpayer funds from being sent to the agency unless certain requirements are met.
The legislation was introduced in the House of Representatives on Tuesday by Representative Chip Roy and co-sponsored by 28 Republican members of Congress, and in the Senate by Senator Jim Risch, ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, on the same day with 12 Republican co-sponsors.
According to a news release on Tuesday, “The UNRWA Accountability and Transparency Act” would require that prior to providing the aid to the agency, the US State Department should certify that no UNRWA employee is a member of a terrorist organization such as Hamas or Hezbollah, does not promote terrorist activity or propagate anti-American, anti-Israel or antisemitic rhetoric; that no UNRWA infrastructure or resource is being used by a terrorist organization; that it is subjected to a comprehensive financial audit and implements a system to ensure that the funds are not diverted to a terrorist organization; that no UNRWA school or facility uses textbooks or other educational materials that spread anti-American, anti-Israel or antisemitic rhetoric; that no recipient of UNRWA funds is a member or affiliate of a terrorist organization; and that UNRWA has no affiliation with financial institutions that the United States deems or believes to be complicit in financing terrorism.
Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations Gilad Erdan has spoken about the problems with UNRWA and has urged the Biden administration not to restore its funding, which was eliminated during the administration of former President Donald Trump.
“Israel strongly opposes renewing funding for UNRWA, an antisemitic agency that incites against Israel and uses a twisted definition of who is a ‘refugee,'” Erdan tweeted. “Rather than solving the conflict, UNRWA perpetuates it. Any return to funding it must be contingent on essential reforms.”
The release cited examples of UNRWA’s entanglement with terrorist organizations, such as the April 2017 resignation of an UNRWA teacher and chairman of the UNRWA Employees Union in Gaza amid allegations that he had been elected to a leadership position in Hamas and the October 2017 report of Hamas tunnels under UNRWA schools in the Gaza Strip.
“US taxpayer dollars should never go to a corrupt entity that undermines, Israel, one of our greatest allies and closest friends,” Roy said in the release. “UNRWA has a long track record of using educational materials that promote antisemitism, violence and terrorism while maintaining ties to the terrorist organization Hamas. Because of this, UNRWA is an obstacle to peace whose flawed mandate perpetuates the Palestinian ‘refugee crisis’ by using a nonsensical definition of a refugee.
Risch explained that “when UNRWA was created, its specific purpose was to provide relief for refugees of the 1948 Arab-Israeli conflict. More than 70 years later, the organization has employed individuals affiliated with Hamas, a US designated foreign terrorist organization and its schools have been used to promote antisemitism and store Hamas weapons.
“It is unacceptable that US taxpayer dollars are being used to fund this agency, which is why I’ve introduced legislation to cease US contributions to UNRWA unless the administration can certify without a doubt that the agency has no affiliation with US designation FTOs and does not support antisemitic rhetoric.”
Reprinted with permission from JNS.org.
It is telling that the only member of the govt who is cited to support a continued ban on funding UNWRA is the UN ambsador. It is, good, of course that such a statement was made, but it is more unfortunate that louder voices, such at the FM were not added to this statement. It would be too much to expect from the America First policy that Lapid has championed, but it could have an effect. In this present moment, Israel’s allies in the US could be employed to support this bill by vulnerable Democrats. The Dems need to have only a 5 defections in the House while only requiring a single defection in the Senate to provide the passage of this bill. But then again, that would place pressure upon the White House to act to support Israel’s interests and that would be too much to expect while Israel’s govt is pursuing their America First policy. So, as the Rep will use this moment for whatever political posturing they can, it holds no hope of success, in spite of the close margins of power in the congress, so long as Israel will not employ their influence to succeed in this tug-a-war power struggle to support a US law that clearly has implications upon Israel, but where the US and Israeli govt are given the image to be on the same side.