T. Belman. The legal principal is illegally obtained evidence is not admissible in a Court of law.
Israel’s newly ordered commission of inquiry could damage a lot of high-profile careers and foreign relations, and the man with all of the answers is ex-police chief Roni Alsheich
By Anshel Pfeffer, HAARETZ Feb 7/22
On Monday morning in Jerusalem District Court, lawyers representing the defendants in Benjamin Netanyahu’s corruption case demanded that the judges suspend the hearings. This came after the latest in a series of bombshell reports in the Calcalist business daily that the police had used NSO’s Pegasus spyware in multiple cases – including against figures close to Netanyahu, among them key witnesses at the trial.
For now, the judges have accepted the prosecution’s claim that they are not aware of any illegal surveillance being used against witnesses and decided to continue with the trial. However, this is just one of the cans of worms that have been opened by the reports into the use of Pegasus against Israeli civilians.
Any defense lawyer currently involved in a criminal case will now be looking very closely at the evidence against their client, hoping to find proof that it was obtained using the Pegasus spyware that allows users to access data, and much more, on hacked cellphones. We’re about to see a slew of cases in which they demand their clients be exonerated because of this.
Also Monday morning, Public Security Minister Omer Bar-Lev announced the formation of a commission of inquiry into the police use of Pegasus after both he and Israel Police commissioner Kobi Shabtai had called for an external investigation into the matter. This was a major about-face from earlier statements when the series of Calcalist reports began two weeks ago, when both men denied any wrongdoing.
But where should such an investigation even start?
That depends on who you’re listening to in the Israeli media. Netanyahu’s proxies are focused on only one thing: that the police acted illegally in their “witch hunt” of the former prime minister, and therefore all of the evidence needs to be thrown out and the charges against Netanyahu dismissed.<
And then there’s the other side – Netanyahu’s critics – who are accusing him of being the original source of corruption within the police. They point to a specific event that took place six years ago, just a few minutes’ walk from the courthouse in Jerusalem.<
Then-Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and then-Police chief Roni Alsheich at a ceremony in Kfar Sava in 2017.Credit: Gil Eliahu
On December 3, 2015, Shin Bet security service deputy chief Roni Alsheich was appointed new police commissioner at the national police headquarters in northeastern Jerusalem. Officially, it’s the public security minister who appoints the commissioner. However, Alsheich had been the idea of Netanyahu, who as prime minister is also directly in charge of the Shin Bet.
Netanyahu was the main speaker at the appointment ceremony: “I believe you will do a great job in … cybertechnology, which is becoming an important aspect in every action of the state and every action against the state,” the then-premier told him. “There is the need for reform that takes into account all these factors. … I expect, Roni, that you will use these technologies … also for policing, also for the daily protection of civilians and for law enforcement.”e.”
Alsheich is the man who brought in “weapons-grade” surveillance technology from the intelligence community to the moribund police force. With Netanyahu’s blessing.
Netanyahu is also the pioneer of “Pegasus diplomacy,” using the cyberoffense tool developed by the NSO Group as a sweetener for all manner of diplomatic and security agreements with foreign leaders – ranging from Brazil’s Jair Bolsonaro to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. Pegasus has been used by many governments worldwide to track political rivals, activists and journalists. Will the new commission of inquiry investigate any of these dealings? It’s highly unlikely.
The Bennett-Lapid government may want to blame Netanyahu for any wrongdoing. However, unlike him, the leaders he did business with are still in power, and the government has no desire to harm relations with them.
Any investigation will almost certainly be limited to the domestic use of Pegasus. Not all domestic use, though, because Pegasus and similar technologies were being used by the Shin Bet and other parts of the Israeli intelligence community long before they reached the police – against Palestinian targets and other perceived enemies of Israel. None of this is likely to be investigated.
And even if the investigation focuses only on the police use of spyware against Israeli targets, it’s not just Alsheich and Netanyahu who stand to be implicated (in Netanyahu’s case, he can perhaps also gain if this affects the permissibility of evidence in his case).
Members of this current government also have ties with the NSO Group, starting with Prime Minister Naftali Bennett: 18 months ago, when he was defense minister, he tried to get the government to use NSO to track potential carriers and spreaders of COVID-19. Furthermore, Bennett’s close ally, Interior Minister Ayelet Shaked, is a close personal friend of NSO’s former president, Shiri Dolev.
NSO’s executives are aware of all this and are presumably not above using the knowledge they have to defend themselves, and if necessary bring others down with them.
The same is true of Alsheich, the man who used Pegasus both in the Shin Bet and the police, and has so far remained silent. He knows more than anyone how it was used, who gave the orders, who the targets were and who saw the materials. And he has forgotten nothing.
This investigation has the potential to rock Israel’s political class, the law enforcement establishment, the intelligence community and Israel’s foreign relations. As a result, it is unlikely to go very far.
@Peloni pretty much agree with your comment. There will be very likely an independent State Inquiry into the matter. This will not be carried out by the government nor police. It will be an independent investigation and is very important for Israel.
So much for the idea that “the judges have accepted the prosecution’s claim that they are not aware of any illegal surveillance being used against witnesses and decided to continue with the trial.”
The Tyranny of Bureaucratists conducted an illegal coup on the Prime Minister. This is quite disturbing. There can be no expectation of justice for any citizen of a nation in which there is no expectation of justice for every member of that nation. As with Trump, this becomes even more pivotal when the use of unjust legal measures supported by unjustified surveillance measures are employed to conduct espionage against the legally elected premiere of the state. They used to call such activities treason.
Ted, you are correct in the USA and you tell me (in Canada) illegally obtained evidence is not admissible as evidence in court. In Israel I believe that is not as clear cut and exceptions I believe are made. Certainly in security cases.
This certainly is a bombshell situation which is rocking Israel.
Clearly a society does not want the police using means of investigation that are meant for national security or crimes to spy on politicians or citizens without reasonable suspicion of crime. A warrant certainly should be necessary to do such spying on politicians or citizens.