US President Barack Obama has told associates that he intends to veto the French proposal for a UN Security Council resolution mandating the creation of a Palestinian state and an Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank within two years, Channel 10 is reporting on Friday.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Yes, OBAMA intends to milk concessions out of Netanyahu with this CHEAP threat, some would call it BLACKMAIL, but that may lead to charges of bigotry or racism. Call it what it is. The threat of a UN mandated ‘Palestine’ , outside of the written and verbal agreements that codify such an arrangement as a result only of negotiations between the two parties, just may leave The UN and it’s Security Council vulnerable. There just perhaps maybe a way to bring charges against The UN as a terrorist protection racket; not only using it’s auspices to protect and defend them but also to bring their numbers up as there way of working towards a terrorist supporting super majority which could find a way to eject ISRAEL from it’s UN membership.
I would ask none other than Ms. Nitsana Darshan Leitner, whether there could be a way of a legal action against The UN for promoting racism and genocide.
My second point is that the whole threat of a P. State is a bogey man scare tactic. Such a move by The UN would almost certainly result at the end of the day in a ‘greater ISRAEL’.
I expect the three dimensional chess match between Bibi and phoney to continue at pace. If Netanyahu plays his cards just right, He has proven himself, by pissing off, just about everyone on earth and remain in office with a landslide victory with a gauntlet of assassins on every periphery , to best the amateur presently occupying the White House.
Prediction: OK outcome with time.
Don’t underestimate Obama’s malice
That’s twice in the last week. I have noted it on Israpundit both times.
Ted, this information totally contradicts the crap that Debka floated. Assuming it is true, you should use it as a lesson in avoiding sources that are little more than rumor mills.
Arnold Harris
Mount Horeb WI
My analysis is that the report is probably true. If he does not veto the proposal he loses all leverage over Bibi. He would also hurt Hillary and the Dems in the 2016 election.
This being said he will leverage Bibi that if Bibi does things that he does not approve of he will after the Iran negotiations are ended come up with his own plan for a PA state to be passed in UN security council. This could be forwarded by France or someone else and the US simply then will not veto.