Obama may have to prove his eligibility yet

New Hampshire wakes up to Obama’s alleged Social Security fraud …
Hearing Friday as state lawmakers also probe president’s eligibility

By Bob Unruh, © 2011 WND

A hearing, with the apparent support of two state lawmakers, is scheduled before the New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission to hear a complaint filed by Orly Taitz that alleges Barack Obama has used fraudulent documents and a fraudulent Social Security number.
The hearing is scheduled Friday at 2 p.m. in Room 307 of the New Hampshire Legislative Office Building, and Taitz is encouraging the public to be present.

The state holds the first presidential primary Jan. 10, 2012.

On her website, Taitz said state Rep. Harry Accornero had said he was joining in her complaint, and she expects Rep. Larry Rappoport also to be in attendance. The lawmakers could not be reached immediately for comment.

“Let’s hope the elections board of New Hampshire will have the decency to refuse [to allow] Obama to appear on the ballot due to undeniable evidence of him using a stolen [Connecticut Social Security Number] … and due to the fact that he is using a computer generated forgery instead of a valid birth certificate,” Taitz wrote.

She noted that the election code in the state contains a statement that requires a candidate to swear to his qualification to be president pursuant to Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 of the United States Constitution, which states, “No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of president.”

Taitz has been involved in a long list of high-profile cases over the past few years that have challenged Obama’s eligibility under the Constitution’s requirement that the president be a natural-born citizen. Some believe that means a birth in the United States, and they doubt the validity of the image of a Hawaiian Certificate of Live Birth that Obama released in April.

Others say natural-born means both parents must be citizens at the time of the birth. Under that standard, Obama could not qualify, because his father was a student in the U.S. but not a citizen.

The complaint alleges that Obama is ineligible because “he never provided any documentary evidence of his natural born status.”

Further, “The most staggering evidence is Mr. Obama’s lack of a valid Social Security number and his use of a fraudulently obtained Social Security number from the state of Connecticut, a state where he never resided, which was never assigned to Obama, according to E-Verify,” the complaint states.

It alleges not only is the Obama birth documentation a modern printout, there are numerous experts who attest it is fraudulent.

“Taitz received an affidavit from scanning machines expert Douglas Vogt. … It shows further evidence of forgery, such as different types of ink used. Some of the document shows as gray scale scanning, some as black and white scanning, some color. It shows different types of letters and kerning … numerous other parameters lead to the same conclusion, that the document in question is not a copy of a 1961 type written document, but a computer generated forgery, created by cutting and pasting bits and pieces from different documents and filling in the blanks with computer graphics,” the document explains.

“Obama does not have an valid identification papers, which are necessary to be a candidate on the ballot, running for the U.S. presidency, based upon New Hampshire elections law 655-17 and on Article 1, section 2 of the U.S. Constitution,” Taitz wrote.

“This case shows an unprecedented level of corruption and lawlessness in the federal government and in the government of Hawaii, which allowed Obama to get on the ballot in 2008. … Petitioner demands removal of Obama from the ballot in the state of New Hampshire in the Democrat party primary and demands immediate criminal prosecution of Obama and his accomplices for elections fraud, common law fraud and uttering of forged documents.”

Meanwhile, Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County in Arizona has assigned a special cold case team to investigate the possibility that Obama could use fraudulent documents to apply for the Arizona ballot next year.

He’s said the investigators have accumulated thousands of pages of evidence and his report likely will come early in 2012.

November 17, 2011 | 12 Comments »

Leave a Reply

12 Comments / 12 Comments

  1. Furthermore, the family of the supposed Doctor who signed President OSama’s birth certificate said their father never mentioned delivering the President. In those days, interracial births were VERY rare. There is no question that President OSama is hiding a lot of secrets.

    Let’s not mention OSama’s ties to Bill Ayer’s a die hard Marxist revolutionary, his mysterious trip to Pakistan, and his entire upbringing and inculcation in Moslem countries.

    This is the strangest President in the history of United States and he has been working feverishly to subvert America from within. What is hard to believe is that the CIA, who must have deep files on this subversive, has kept quiet all this time.

  2. You remain confused Sol. Not that we care that much but grow up fellow.
    15 trillion or unpayable debts debtors should carefully review their posings guy.
    Bottom line,
    If that is the best the US can come up with to be president, well… sorry for you.
    And if that one wins by a ….slide, I doubt it would be l a n d the first four letters.

  3. What is surprising is that more people aren’t upset over having an illegitimate President like BO. There are many issues which are irrefutably evident in the American law that prove BO fails to meet the proper qualifications which means he is illegal in his position as President. In the Jewish Scriptures in the book of Isaiah it says ‘God’s ways are not man’s ways’ and in Daniel and Proverbs ‘God is the one Who sets up rulers and brings them down.’ As evident as BO’s illegitimacy is, ultimately God put BO in office and some might say God is using BO to judge the USA for its sin of homosexuality and turning away from Israel, for if God doesn’t judge the USA for its sin of homosexuality than God must apologize to Sodom and Gomorrah. And we all know God would never apologize for punishing sin.

  4. The irrefutable evidence is the fact that Obama has no valid Social Security Administration-issued social security number of his own. He has used not just one SS# of another, but multiple SS#s (over 20 by some reports documented in court documents). Only one instance of using a false SS# is a felony – so this crime arises to the level of involving a high crime and is an impeachable offense. Also, his own fake birth certificate implicates him (Barack’s Kenyan father was a British subject at the time of Barack’s birth). The US Supreme Court established that a natural born citizen was irrefutably born to US citizen parents plural. (1875 Minor v. Happersett) Our current Supreme Court would have to acknowledge this precedent were the Obama validity question to come before them. John McCain was validated by the US Senate using the two parent citizen standard.

  5. Another effort that will paint Obama’s opponents as cockamamie buffoons. He’s President, he’s legitimate, he’s gonna be tough to beat. If you want to run around like a chicken with your head cut off – he’ll win by a landslide.

  6. Obama’s presidency has shown the American media and public to be accepting
    of almost anything. Constitutional or unconstitutional, legal or illegal. Once
    a respected world power, we are now a country, for large part governed by
    deceit. Legislation passed by coercion, at times unseen. Courts that assume
    legislative powers. Executive that is gaining dictatorial power. Financial
    bookkeeping that is illegal in the private sector. Obama’s presidency poses
    the question “what came first the chicken or the egg” could he have become president in a uncorrupted political atmosphere? Regretfully, his vetting occurred during the Bush administration. History may demand how it was, or was not done. But with revisionist history, it could well just be FORGOTTEN.

  7. Where on earth do you people come from? Seriously, you “birthers” are insane. Actually a more apt term may be troofers.See if any of the following attributes apply to any of you. “Troofers” hold over-valued ideas about powerful others’ roles in causation and effect of events, to the exclusion of almost every other point of view which contradicts them. Everything is evil – there is invariably an assumption of malign intent. They reach far beyond the everyday – they are invariably over the top. They evidence indiscriminate distrust – of the government, of other allegedly powerful groups. Every official explanation is a lie – “That’s what they want us to believe” and theorists do not believe evidence-based consensus. Heroic strivings to seek out evidence – in the absence of positive objective proof. They are self-insulating and therefore very resistant to change, and are sealed off from impartial examination of the evidence, and they arise even before the full facts are known. Inverse thinkers tended towards emotional reasoning, they tended to possess an external locus of evaluation/control, and to be victims of post-hoc (inverted) cause/effect reasoning. Ad hominem insult levels were very high where these were in evidence. Self-aggrandizement of members and lack of reality-testing of points of view

  8. You are exactly right – Obamawasnever vetted. What a bunch of BS. As always obots always try refute the fact without adressing the issue in general . They must be scared!

  9. I wonder why you people always raise your tones and seed questions about the values or credibility of those that have genuine concerns about the true status of Mr. Soetoro Obama?
    The Social Security records much as many other records remain in limbo. Including but not limited to schooling records, his removal from the IBA, Illinois Bar. etc.
    Unless and if WE THE PEOPLE receive that information vetted by the FBI and other credible organizations, the shadow of doubt will remain. Or increase. Come clean Mr. Obama.

  10. We have been talking about this nonsense for years and still no impeachment. Apparently the Republicans and the Democrats have simply given up on this quest. I guess its time to move on.

  11. Obama has NEVER been vetted, and has refused to sign the oath claiming eligibility to hold the Presidency, even though that oath is legally required to take office. Until a few years ago, the Demo party and other congressmen routinely referred to Obama’s African birth as did the Obamas. At Occidental College, Obama received an affirmative action scholarship reserved for foreign-born students. Obama has produced two purported birth certificates. The first was not a birth certificate at all. The second one has been well-documented as a fraud, having been assembled recently using Photoshop. In addition, it is known that Obama has used several SSN’s that don’t belong to him. While it is true that Obama’s bigotry and hatred of America are well-established, it is also established that he has no right to hold the Presidency or even run for it.

  12. Orly Taitz is a wack-a-doo and to continue with this nonsense is to erode the credibility of your wonderful blog, Ted. Barak Hussein Obama has been fully vetted, first as a Illinois State Senator, next as a US Senator and finally as the President.To continue with this absurdity as to his citizenship deflects and distracts from his actual ineptitudes and incompetencies. Most of us agree that another 4 years of BHO will be disastrous for our nation (I am a Jon Huntsman supporter)but attempting to discredit him by questioning his citizenship is adolescent and could actually help him. So please, I implore you- NO more Orly Taitz and her coven of cads and cows. Let’s beat Obama the old fashioned way by voting early and often…