Missouri Governor Mike Parson holds to the view that it is up to a doctor and his or her patient to make decisions that affect patient health, particularly given COVID-19, for which an experimental vaccine is being forced on the public via mandates in many jurisdictions. Vaccine mandates have become a partisan issue, with the GOP mostly opposing mandates. According to the Kansas City Star, Parson, who is Republican, has just “signed into law a bill that bars pharmacists from questioning doctors” who prescribe ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.
Note how the Kansas City Star article references the two “controversial drugs,” but makes no mention of controversial vaccines.
Reuters published an article in 2021 that included a warning by lawyers that “the vaccine is so new that there’s virtually no definitive research on injury causation to cite.”
The article continued:
Indeed, the overwhelming majority of all litigants under what’s known as the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program have NOT succeeded.
Reports are now copious and mounting about sudden deaths associated with the vaccine, and vaccine injuries. In November 2021, the European Parliament released a German study “examining the autopsies of people who died shortly after vaccination.” The study suggested that “50% of these deaths were caused by the vaccine, which is also believed to be behind an unprecedented accumulation of lymphocytes found in the hearts, kidneys, livers and spleens of the deceased.”
According to the Daily Mail, doctors are trying to determine why so many healthy young people are suddenly dying in Australia. Young people are now urged to have their hearts checked to avoid Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (SADS). Although the article offers no reason for the sudden deaths, Australia imposed upon its citizens some of the most restrictive COVID rules in the world. Those who tested positive were sometimes required to be quarantined at facilities. By November 2021, over 10,000 Australians had filed coronavirus vaccine injury claims.
The American Council on Science and Health is now advising the obvious: “it’s good to be skeptical of scientists and the politicians who listen to them”; yet this didn’t seem so obvious at the height of the COVID crisis. The psychological mass coercion by governments, medical establishments and media was astounding, and questions were discouraged. Many are now denying that any “forced” experimental vaccination took place, while others are calling it “an American tradition.” Take, for instance, the New York Times article “Vaccine Mandates are an American Tradition,” which presents an argument that everyone already knows, but omits the most important aspect of subject at hand: the nature of the mRNA vaccine. It an experimental, gene transfer and expression vaccine which was developed hastily. The public was actually the test subjects. Note: the COVID vaccines were described in Clinical Trials.gov as an experiment to “Study to Describe the Safety, Tolerability, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of RNA Vaccine Candidates Against COVID-19 in Healthy Individuals.” In other words, scientists studying the vaccine did not know about the “Safety, Tolerability, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of RNA Vaccine Candidates Against COVID-19,” so they had to study it on the public.
Actual Study Start Date :
April 29, 2020
Estimated Primary Completion Date :
February 8, 2024
Estimated Study Completion Date :
February 8, 2024
It was never a secret that these mRNA vaccines were experimental. Mass fear took precedence over research, and all possible reasoned approaches. Mass immunity was never properly weighed, nor were other alternative treatments, including ivermectin and hydroxychoroquine. Citizens were forced to take part in an experiment with immense possible impact upon their personal health, or face severe punishment and/or marginalization. Not every jurisdiction went along to get along: Florida fought mandates tooth and nail.
There is no denying that COVID was a potentially serious illness that killed many. It does no good to downplay this, but many scientists warned that herd immunity (much like the flu) was an intelligent option to weigh, considering the low death rates, particularly among the most vulnerable.
The National Institute of Health surprisingly published a report by Dr. Russell L. Blaylock — a retired neurosurgeon and current clinical assistant professor of neurosurgery at the University of Mississippi Medical Center, as well as a visiting professor in the biology department at Belhaven College. In an article entitled “Covid Update–What is the Truth?,” Dr. Blayback began with a stunning rebuke of trusted authorities:
The COVID-19 pandemic is one of the most manipulated infectious disease events in history, characterized by official lies in an unending stream lead by government bureaucracies, medical associations, medical boards, the media, and international agencies.[3,6,57] We have witnessed a long list of unprecedented intrusions into medical practice, including attacks on medical experts, destruction of medical careers among doctors refusing to participate in killing their patients and a massive regimentation of health care, led by non-qualified individuals with enormous wealth, power and influence.
Although governments and many institutions are asserting that no one was held down for forced vaccinations, they are manipulating the discourse, and refusing to admit the coercion and duress forced upon citizens who faced devastating job loss and marginalization for “not following the science.” Restrictions continue, with more vaccines on the way.
Dr. Paul Alexander, former Trump administration official at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services during the COVID-19 pandemic, became a victim of media bashing. The mainstream media has been doing a hatchet job on him in efforts to ruin his reputation and protect Big Pharma and globalist government.
Dr. Alexander stated
You must understand that most people (those I write about below) were and are scared about retribution and their research grants etc. They still are. Most if not all are. Their jobs, salary, grants, and to be honest, safety, guides their decisions. Few people are brave enough to stand up. Yet there are many who are run after the money and advancement.
He also issued a grave warning to parents:
I again warn. I am warning parents to be very careful with their healthy children. Their children. Stop and step back as to these vaccines. Your children bring near zero risk. They do not need these vaccines. Period. No one, no Fauci, no Walensky, no Francis Collins, no Albert Bourla et al. have prosecuted the case as to why your healthy zero risk child needs a vaccine that is proven ineffective and harmful. Your response should be NO! Under no condition! And be willing to defend that hill! There is no liability protection for your child if harmed by these vaccines.
Anyone should be at least wondering why is it that so many talented doctors and researchers have been willing to sacrifice their entire careers to warn about an experiment. And why the heavy-handedness by governments.
Physician and biochemist Dr. Robert Malone also stated unequivocally that alternate COVID treatments were suppressed to promote the vaccines.
ACT for America founder Brigitte Gabriel told her COVID story and the case of an upstart pharmacist on an anti-ivermectin frenzy HERE.
Amid information overload, one thing is obvious, or at least should be: questions need to be asked, questions that might include the fact that Omicron affected both the vaxxed and unvaxxed, amid continued government restrictions. Also, why were people not informed by media regularly that the vaccine was an experiment, one forced upon citizens trying to hold on to their jobs and freedoms?
Under Missouri’s new law, patients, responsible doctors and pharmacists will now be protected, and able make their private medical choices freely.
“New Missouri law protects doctors, bars pharmacists from questioning controversial drugs,” by Kacen Bayless, Kansas City Star, June 8, 2022:
Missouri Gov. Mike Parson on Tuesday signed into law a bill that bars pharmacists from questioning doctors who prescribe the controversial off-label drugs ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.
The measure, which passed in the General Assembly last month, was attached to a bill that exempts military employees and contractors participating in a federal training program from licensing requirements if they hold licensing in another state. Parson’s office announced his signing of the legislation along with six other bills Tuesday.
The new law, which goes into effect in August, prevents state medical licensing boards from punishing or taking away the medical licenses of doctors who “lawfully” prescribe the two drugs. And it prevents pharmacists from contacting a doctor or patient “to dispute the efficacy of ivermectin tablets or hydroxychloroquine sulfate tablets for human use” unless the doctor or patient asks about the drugs’ effectiveness.
Sen. Rick Brattin, a Harrisonville Republican who is running running for Missouri’s 4th District in Congress, previously told The Star he added the language regarding ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine after he spoke with doctors who worried they would lose their medical licenses for prescribing the drugs. Brattin, who said he previously bought ivermectin for COVID-19 but has never taken it, described the drug as “politicized.”….
Fighting the W DC “White Coats” corruptocrats.
Crimes against humanity have committed.
This has been an enormous victory, long delayed, but a vital move towards defeating this medical behemoth that stands between a doctor and his patient.
Pharmacists were a well paid member in the opioid crisis in which untold numbers of people were killed, developed addictions and simply destroyed their lives and that of those around them. Where were the pharmacists in reviewing the actions of the medical scams being perpetrated against the hapless victims of this opioid fraud in which the Pharmacy industry was a vital member? I will tell you they were there at the end of the supply chain, acting as the street distributors of those poisons, feeding the corrosive fire of the opioid plague that devastated the lives of all involve. And there was profit, of course, a great deal of profit. Every pill dispensed was profitable to the manufacturer, the prescriber, and the distributor of this societal tragedy.
Yet, now they have seen fit to block the dispensing of a harmless set of compounds, well studied, used by billions of people and for decades, drugs prescribed by physicians who have the training and knowledge far greater than that of the most learned pharmacist. Additionally, as these pharmacists play doctor in denying prescriptions while holding no medical license, they have been further emboldened to act as doctors with the ready administration of a drug that actually is an experimental compound, which is seen to be harmful to many who receive it, some dying hours after administration, sometimes being hospitalized immediately after the injection due to anaphylaxis, and some of these not living long enough to be hospitalized. Between the dispensing of a well known safe drug, and the administration of an experimentally dangerous drug, they chose to act as the apothecary police, but only with regards to the former, even as they only had feedback of the dangers from the latter, and that feedback often too well timed to be easily dismissed by even the smallest spoon in the pharmacy drawer.
There is certainly a long list of criminals involved in this medical fraud that has been cast as an intentional plague perpetrated against the public, but easily among the perpetrators are those who acted to withhold legally prescribed treatments from the ill, and in this, the pharmacists responsible for denial of treatment is easily not at the bottom of this list. As Dr. McCullough noted, we know who is involved, we are taking names, there will be nowhere to hide, and eventually, you will answer for the lives you destroyed.
Of course, this bill only prevents them from continuing to perpetrate their crimes, but there will be a recompense in which judgement will be pursued, and I, for one, hope to see a vicious reckoning for the crimes of all involved, and particularly the local pharmacist, whose ready access and reliable judgement had once been a most sacred connection between the treatment and the treated, a relationship that has been badly abused and too badly betrayed to ignore the harms it has caused.
Good for MO!! Now let’s hope other states follow suit!! Ivermectin and HCQ are safe and relatively inexpensive drugs that have proven effective on treating some patients with COVID-19.
Essentially the drugs have huge upside potential with very minimal risks. At best, it was/is bad judgement on policy makers to drmonize these drugs. At worst, there were/are ulterior motives in demonizing these treatments.
Obvuously HCQ and Ivermectin aren’t going to be right for everyone. I think this is experiential common sense. As it is am effective treatment for many and significant steps were taken to restrict its availability, it is very safe to say many have died who wouldn’t have had these treatments been actively encouraged.
I know some people who had COVID-19 and benefited from Ivermectin. They had to go around the medical profession to get it!!