Netanyahu: “an historic mistake”

Following is an excerpt from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s remarks at the start of the weekly Cabinet meeting today (Sunday, 24 November 2013):

    “What was achieved last night in Geneva is not an historic agreement; it is an historic mistake. Today the world has become a much more dangerous place because the most dangerous regime in the world has taken a significant step toward attaining the most dangerous weapon in the world. For the first time, the world’s leading powers have agreed to uranium enrichment in Iran while ignoring the UN Security Council decisions that they themselves led. Sanctions that required many years to put in place contain the best chance for a peaceful solution. These sanctions have been given up in exchange for cosmetic Iranian concessions that can be cancelled in weeks. This agreement and what it means endanger many countries including, of course, Israel. Israel is not bound by this agreement. The Iranian regime is committed to the destruction of Israel and Israel has the right and the obligation to defend itself, by itself, against any threat. As Prime Minister of Israel, I would like to make it clear: Israel will not allow Iran to develop a military nuclear capability.”
November 24, 2013 | 203 Comments »

Leave a Reply

3 Comments / 203 Comments

  1. yamit82 Said:

    “agnus dei qui tolis peccata mundi” Is an alien concept in Judaism, it’s a Pagan one.

    It is however, one of the great passages of Mozart’s “Requium Mass”.

  3. @ dweller:
    “agnus dei qui tolis peccata mundi” Is an alien concept in Judaism, it’s a Pagan one.

    “This will be an eternal statute for you – you will fast and not do any m’lachah on the 10th day of the 7th month, because on that day He will provide forgiveness for you, to purge you of all your sins: before Adonai will you be purged!” (Vayikra 16:29-30)

    Always wondered how the christians ignored this Key verse and why youska for Jews was necessary.

    If as dweller admitted that he believes it was a [god] who fathered his “messiah” how is it that he ascribes no divinity to him? Adam was not fathered and had no mommy, he was a created being ( not quite an angel and not quite human.)
    @ dweller:

    yeshu was a sinner!!

    The prescribed penalty for violating shabbat was death by stoning: Numbers 15:32-36 –
    An episode is recorded in the Gospel of Matthew, which describes how yeshu felt about observing Shabbat.

    Matthew 12:1-7(KJV) – (1) At that time Jesus went on the sabbath day through the corn; and his disciples were an hungred, and began to pluck the ears of corn and
    to eat. (2) But when the Pharisees saw it, they said unto him, Behold, thy disciples do that which is not lawful to do upon the sabbath day. (3) But he said unto them,
    Have ye not read what David did, when he was an hungered, and they that were with him; (4) How he entered into the house of God, and did eat the shewbread, which
    was not lawful for him to eat, neither for them which were with him, but only for the priests? (5) Or have ye not read in the law, how that on the sabbath days the
    priests in the temple profane the sabbath, and are blameless? (6) But I say unto you, That in this place is one greater than the temple. (7) But if ye had known what
    this meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice, ye would not have condemned the guiltless. [See also Mark 2:23-26.]

    Aside from the factual errors in this passage, (8) it appears that, by letting his disciples pick grain on shabbat, a blatant violation of Torah law, yeshu
    disagreed with the Torah on the rules that pertain to observing shabbat

    Instead of heeding the Rabbinic authorities and correcting his disciples’ behavior (as he himself taught should be done [Matthew 23:3]),yeshu attempts to justify their actions and challenges the authority of the Rabbis. The flaw in his rationale is that it presupposes the fact that, under ordinary circumstances, there is no justification for picking grain on Shabbat. Hunger can have two extremes – ordinary hunger and starvation. If the disciples were starving, the account is meaning-
    less since Rabbinic law permits life- saving activities on shabbat. If the disciples were just plain hungry, such as before their next meal, the activity is not permissible, just as the laws concerning adultery may not be violated when one is “hungry” for sex.

    Conclusion: yeshu violated the prohibition on changing Torah Law! Was a major sinner and worthy of death by stoning.

    The above shows total ignorance of Judaism and Jewish law by the authors of the Gospels lending credibility to claims that the narratives are a fiction and that the authors could not have been Jewish.