Nazis Were Given ‘Safe Haven’ in U.S., Report Says

By ERIC LICHTBLAU, NYT

WASHINGTON — A secret history of the United States government’s Nazi-hunting operation concludes that American intelligence officials created a “safe haven” in the United States for Nazis and their collaborators after World War II, and it details decades of clashes, often hidden, with other nations over war criminals here and abroad.

The 600-page report, which the Justice Department has tried to keep secret for four years, provides new evidence about more than two dozen of the most notorious Nazi cases of the last three decades.

It describes the government’s posthumous pursuit of Dr. Josef Mengele, the so-called Angel of Death at Auschwitz, part of whose scalp was kept in a Justice Department official’s drawer; the vigilante killing of a former Waffen SS soldier in New Jersey; and the government’s mistaken identification of the Treblinka concentration camp guard known as Ivan the Terrible.

The report catalogs both the successes and failures of the band of lawyers, historians and investigators at the Justice Department’s Office of Special Investigations, which was created in 1979 to deport Nazis.

Perhaps the report’s most damning disclosures come in assessing the Central Intelligence Agency’s involvement with Nazi émigrés. Scholars and previous government reports had acknowledged the C.I.A.’s use of Nazis for postwar intelligence purposes. But this report goes further in documenting the level of American complicity and deception in such operations.

The Justice Department report, describing what it calls “the government’s collaboration with persecutors,” says that O.S.I investigators learned that some of the Nazis “were indeed knowingly granted entry” to the United States, even though government officials were aware of their pasts. “America, which prided itself on being a safe haven for the persecuted, became — in some small measure — a safe haven for persecutors as well,” it said.

The report also documents divisions within the government over the effort and the legal pitfalls in relying on testimony from Holocaust survivors that was decades old. The report also concluded that the number of Nazis who made it into the United States was almost certainly much smaller than 10,000, the figure widely cited by government officials.

The Justice Department has resisted making the report public since 2006. Under the threat of a lawsuit, it turned over a heavily redacted version last month to a private research group, the National Security Archive, but even then many of the most legally and diplomatically sensitive portions were omitted. A complete version was obtained by The New York Times.

The Justice Department said the report, the product of six years of work, was never formally completed and did not represent its official findings. It cited “numerous factual errors and omissions,” but declined to say what they were.

More than 300 Nazi persecutors have been deported, stripped of citizenship or blocked from entering the United States since the creation of the O.S.I., which was merged with another unit this year.

In chronicling the cases of Nazis who were aided by American intelligence officials, the report cites help that C.I.A. officials provided in 1954 to Otto Von Bolschwing, an associate of Adolf Eichmann who had helped develop the initial plans “to purge Germany of the Jews” and who later worked for the C.I.A. in the United States. In a chain of memos, C.I.A. officials debated what to do if Von Bolschwing were confronted about his past — whether to deny any Nazi affiliation or “explain it away on the basis of extenuating circumstances,” the report said.

The Justice Department, after learning of Von Bolschwing’s Nazi ties, sought to deport him in 1981. He died that year at age 72.

The report also examines the case of Arthur L. Rudolph, a Nazi scientist who ran the Mittelwerk munitions factory. He was brought to the United States in 1945 for his rocket-making expertise under Operation Paperclip, an American program that recruited scientists who had worked in Nazi Germany. (Rudolph has been honored by NASA and is credited as the father of the Saturn V rocket.)

The report cites a 1949 memo from the Justice Department’s No. 2 official urging immigration officers to let Rudolph back in the country after a stay in Mexico, saying that a failure to do so “would be to the detriment of the national interest.”

Justice Department investigators later found evidence that Rudolph was much more actively involved in exploiting slave laborers at Mittelwerk than he or American intelligence officials had acknowledged, the report says.

Some intelligence officials objected when the Justice Department sought to deport him in 1983, but the O.S.I. considered the deportation of someone of Rudolph’s prominence as an affirmation of “the depth of the government’s commitment to the Nazi prosecution program,” according to internal memos.

The Justice Department itself sometimes concealed what American officials knew about Nazis in this country, the report found.

In 1980, prosecutors filed a motion that “misstated the facts” in asserting that checks of C.I.A. and F.B.I. records revealed no information on the Nazi past of Tscherim Soobzokov, a former Waffen SS soldier. In fact, the report said, the Justice Department “knew that Soobzokov had advised the C.I.A. of his SS connection after he arrived in the United States.”

(After the case was dismissed, radical Jewish groups urged violence against Mr. Soobzokov, and he was killed in 1985 by a bomb at his home in Paterson, N.J. )

The secrecy surrounding the Justice Department’s handling of the report could pose a political dilemma for President Obama because of his pledge to run the most transparent administration in history. Mr. Obama chose the Justice Department to coordinate the opening of government records.

The Nazi-hunting report was the brainchild of Mark Richard, a senior Justice Department lawyer. In 1999, he persuaded Attorney General Janet Reno to begin a detailed look at what he saw as a critical piece of history, and he assigned a career prosecutor, Judith Feigin, to the job. After Mr. Richard edited the final version in 2006, he urged senior officials to make it public but was rebuffed, colleagues said.

When Mr. Richard became ill with cancer, he told a gathering of friends and family that the report’s publication was one of three things he hoped to see before he died, the colleagues said. He died in June 2009, and Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. spoke at his funeral.

“I spoke to him the week before he died, and he was still trying to get it released,” Ms. Feigin said. “It broke his heart.”

After Mr. Richard’s death, David Sobel, a Washington lawyer, and the National Security Archive sued for the report’s release under the Freedom of Information Act.

The Justice Department initially fought the lawsuit, but finally gave Mr. Sobel a partial copy — with more than 1,000 passages and references deleted based on exemptions for privacy and internal deliberations.

Laura Sweeney, a Justice Department spokeswoman, said the department is committed to transparency, and that redactions are made by experienced lawyers.

The full report disclosed that the Justice Department found “a smoking gun” in 1997 establishing with “definitive proof” that Switzerland had bought gold from the Nazis that had been taken from Jewish victims of the Holocaust. But these references are deleted, as are disputes between the Justice and State Departments over Switzerland’s culpability in the months leading up to a major report on the issue.

Another section describes as “a hideous failure” a series of meetings in 2000 that United States officials held with Latvian officials to pressure them to pursue suspected Nazis. That passage is also deleted.

So too are references to macabre but little-known bits of history, including how a director of the O.S.I. kept a piece of scalp that was thought to belong to Dr. Mengele in his desk in hopes that it would help establish whether he was dead.

The chapter on Dr. Mengele, one of the most notorious Nazis to escape prosecution, details the O.S.I.’s elaborate efforts in the mid-1980s to determine whether he had fled to the United States and might still be alive.

It describes how investigators used letters and diaries apparently written by Dr. Mengele in the 1970s, along with German dental records and Munich phone books, to follow his trail.

After the development of DNA tests, the piece of scalp, which had been turned over by the Brazilian authorities, proved to be a critical piece of evidence in establishing that Dr. Mengele had fled to Brazil and had died there in about 1979 without ever entering the United States, the report said. The edited report deletes references to Dr. Mengele’s scalp on privacy grounds.

Even documents that have long been available to the public are omitted, including court decisions, Congressional testimony and front-page newspaper articles from the 1970s.

A chapter on the O.S.I.’s most publicized failure — the case against John Demjanjuk, a retired American autoworker who was mistakenly identified as Treblinka’s Ivan the Terrible — deletes dozens of details, including part of a 1993 ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit that raised ethics accusations against Justice Department officials.

That section also omits a passage disclosing that Latvian émigrés sympathetic to Mr. Demjanjuk secretly arranged for the O.S.I.’s trash to be delivered to them each day from 1985 to 1987. The émigrés rifled through the garbage to find classified documents that could help Mr. Demjanjuk, who is currently standing trial in Munich on separate war crimes charges.

Ms. Feigin said she was baffled by the Justice Department’s attempt to keep a central part of its history secret for so long. “It’s an amazing story,” she said, “that needs to be told.”

April 10, 2012 | 8 Comments »

Leave a Reply

8 Comments / 8 Comments

  1. @ Al Eisenberg:
    Martin Bormann was always rumored to have escaped the dragnet and settled peacefully in Paraguay. He helped the Nazi sympathizer leader of Peru Albert Strossener rid the country of Jews via a series of little publicized pogroms in the late 60s.

    There is no rumor about it.

    He died in Paraguay.

    His body was removed and re-planted in Berlin later on to hide the conspiracy;
    but the skeleton was found with non-German Paraguayan clay embedded in the bones.

    (Video which shows the evidence)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ct0HcvpIPeo

    Bormann’s skull had red clay, which is found in Paraguay, NOT Berlin.

    What is clear is that the USA and Russia went after Nazi technocrats.

    South Americans, who had less to offer the Nazis, got stuck with military thugs, which to some Souith American dictators, such as Strassner, was what they wanted.

    Peron was disappointed. He wanted engineers more than interrogators.

    Peron fell for the promises of Ronald Richer who promised to deliver what would later be called cold fusion technology to the Argentines.

    For one week, the whole world wondered if Argentina had beaten the USA to fusion.

  2. Martin Bormann was always rumored to have escaped the dragnet and settled peacefully in Paraguay. He helped the Nazi sympathizer leader of Peru Albert Strossener rid the country of Jews via a series of little publicized pogroms in the late 60s.

  3. The Jewish nation is engaged in a serious war of survival on the soil of its ancient homeland. For my part, I would concentrate Israel’s national efforts taking back every square kilometer of that homeland, plus large, mostly empty and strategically-important territories such as the Sinai peninsula and part of the deserts of far northwestern Saudi Arabia.

    All this, in my judgement, is more significant than chasing around 85-90 year-old geezers from eastern Europe who worked for the Nazis in World War II, typically in minor flunky capacity. The war against Hitler and his gang ended 67 years ago. The present war do sustain and expand the State of Israel will go on for centuries.

    The only real vengeance that the Jewish nation can exact from the assorted Jew-haters is to give them ulcers watching the growth of Israel and the Jewish nation into the significant center of power of the Middle East.

    Arnold Harris
    Mount Horeb WI

  4. @ CuriousAmerican:

    Funny, but I think the comment that is the source of this quote has disappeared. But I did not post it originally.

    If I may comment, a Jewish group that kills former mass murderers of Jews isn’t anything like terrorism. It is strictly an act of revenge, outside the law and prosecutable as murder and maybe organized crime, but not terrorism. Terrorism is a carefully defined legal and moral term that applies to those groups who subvert civil society with violence to meet political ends. This does not qualify.

  5. @ Paul:

    (After the case was dismissed, radical Jewish groups urged violence against Mr. Soobzokov, and he was killed in 1985 by a bomb at his home in Paterson, N.J. )

    Apparently, the PLO is not the only group capable of terrorism.

    I am not saying this was MORALLY WRONG; but it was legally terrorism.

    They probably know who did the bombing and let them get away with it just as they let Mr. Soobzokov.

  6. @ ArnoldHarris:

    ArnoldHarris says:

    April 10, 2012 at 7:45 pm

    The USA admitted some German Nazi scientists to this country because their usefulness here was in the national interest for development of what would become our space rocketry programs. No other explanation was ever forthcoming, and the issue is self-explanatory. If I were running the government of the State of Israel, I would admit to that country anybody whose presence could be shown to be vital or even useful in the interests of the Jewish state and the Jewish nation, irrespective of who they were and no matter what they had done to earn their notoriety. Once again, the issue here is self-explanatory.

    An honest man.

    Oddly enough, South American countries got blamed for hiding Nazis.

    They did hide a few, but not as many as you think. Their reason was that they also thought the Germans would help their technology. But we Americans and the Soviets got the pick of the litter. The South Americans thought they were getting technical geniuses but only got Nazi paper pushers.

    We Americans got Von Braun , Brazil got Dr. Mengele, and Argentina Eichmann.

    Same motives for all three countries, but Mengele and Eichmann were not going to improve anyone’s technology. Von Braun, also a war criminal, could at least build a rocket.

  7. The USA admitted some German Nazi scientists to this country because their usefulness here was in the national interest for development of what would become our space rocketry programs. No other explanation was ever forthcoming, and the issue is self-explanatory. If I were running the government of the State of Israel, I would admit to that country anybody whose presence could be shown to be vital or even useful in the interests of the Jewish state and the Jewish nation, irrespective of who they were and no matter what they had done to earn their notoriety. Once again, the issue here is self-explanatory.

    As for small-fry such as Demjanjuk, there were at the time numerous official cracks someone such as him could slip through. In any case, facts bore out that his contention that he was not the “Ivan the terrible” they were looking for, even though one could argue that his employment as a guard at one of the Nazi death camps in Poland meant that he probably could be tagged “Ivan the not so nice”.

    I heard a story somewhere that “Gestapo” Mueller, who, according to eye-witnesses in Hitler’s Berlin bunker, was last seen alive on April 29, 1945, was not killed during the breakout of the surviving Nazi secretaries, aides, etc, from the Berlin fuehrerbunker, but wound up in the hands of the Soviet secret police, where he was put to work doing what experienced secret state police officials do. That would not surprise me in the least if it were proven to be true. Russian governments — from the centuries of the tsars, through the 70+ years of communism, and now into the Putin era, always have been more practical and ruthless than their western counterparts. There are times when we in the west should learn and put to use some of their tricks.

    Arnold Harris
    Mount Horeb WI

  8. It would also be interesting to learn about any connections between these post war US safe havens and Nazi sympathizers before the war. Nazis were active in the US promoting their political party long before WWII and their were many sympathizers here in the US.